Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 07 November 2024
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic New Therapeutic Strategies Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria View all 14 articles

Editorial: New therapeutic strategies against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria

  • 1Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • 2Department of Microbiology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, India

Multidrug resistance in bacterial pathogens poses a threat to human health, and the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections seriously affects population welfare. The emergence of carbapenem resistance is a major concern, especially for intensive care units (ICUs) and other at high-risk wards, that has led to serious consequences (Tamma et al., 2021). Detailed studies identifying the mechanisms leading to carbapenem resistance in bacteria may help overcome and manage this Research Topic (Mascellino et al., 2024).

CRE often carry multiple resistance genes that are able to propagate through both vertical and horizontal routes (Rumbo et al., 2011). These resistance elements limit treatment options and some patients require a longer duration of therapy requiring intensive care with increased toxicities if compared to patients infected with carbapenem-susceptible strains. Therefore, new alternative approaches are needed to combat the spread of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria among populations and to treat patients infected with life-threatening carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (Oliva et al., 2021; Tompkins and van Duin, 2021). The development of new classes of antibiotics could be a solution. However the director of World Health Organization (WHO) Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said verbatim that “Since mid-2017, only 13 new antibiotics have been authorized, with just two representing a new chemical class and considered innovative.”

Molecular studies play an important role in understanding the mechanisms underlying bacterial resistance. For example, mobile colistin resistance genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) and their variants have been identified in gram-negative bacteria which pose a new threat to the treatment of clinical infections. A new method using a multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay was developed to detect mobile colistin resistance genes. This method has high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility (Gong et al.).

A previous study examined the in vitro drug susceptibilities of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases in Poland. Cefiderocol, eravacycline, tigecycline, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and aztreonam were found to be the most effective antibiotics, demonstrating CAZ/AVI plus aztreonam 100% in vitro sensitivity with the tested strains. Owing to the safety of both drugs and their cost-effectiveness, this therapy should be the first-line treatment for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections (Słabisz et al.).

Ginkgolic acid, derived from Ginko biloba extracts, was identified as a potent inhibitor against KPC-2 and found to have no toxic effects. The evolution of resistance genes has limited the clinical application of carbapenems. Therefore, the synergistic effect of ginkgolic acid and carbapenems, especially meropenem, could be interesting and valid in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, potentiating the killing effect of carbapenems on KPC-2-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae. Generally, plant extracts exhibit good efficacy against microorganisms, specifically by altering the functional groups of KPC-2 (Song et al.).

From a study conducted in Portugal, extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a growing concern because of its resistance to most common antibiotics, including carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones. Only one case of non-susceptibility to colistin has been previously reported. Isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam in 71.5 and 77.5% of tested isolates, respectively. When a combination therapy is used, ceftazidime-avibactam plus colistin is preferred, which leads to a lower mortality rate in patients with PA infections (Mendes Pedro et al.).

A network meta-analysis from South Arabia included data from over 25 clinical trials and 5,034 individuals to investigate the antibiotic resistance trends and treatment outcomes of gram-negative infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii turned out to be more resistant than Enterobacterales.

In China, resistance of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii was evaluated by comparing strains isolated in ICUs with those isolated from non-ICUs over a period of 10 years. Sensitivity rates to amikacin, carbapenems, and piperacillin/tazobactam were relatively high compared to high resistance rates to fluoroquinolones. The isolates from ICUs showed greater resistance than the non-ICUs strains (Shi and Xie).

The combination of antibiotics leads to more activity, especially the association between β-lactams and inhibitors of β-lactamases, such as avibactam. In a study performed in Belgium, the authors validated Gradient Diffusion Strips (GDS) focusing on an aztreonam–avibactam gradient. A double-disc synergy test (DDST) was used as a screening tool for the synergistic detection of aztreonam and avibactam. Aztreonam used in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam is considered an effective therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Verschelden et al.).

A recent italian study evaluated the effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for the treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae complex and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in 10 patients. The successful and safe use of imipenem/relebactam, a newly available and promising treatment option, for the treatment of KPC-Klebsiella pneumoniae or difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated infections, has been reported. This preliminary clinical experience with imipenem/relebactam is a very attractive option compared to other combinations, especially in Italy, where the prevalence of difficult-to-treat resistant organisms is a significant concern (Leanza et al.).

Risk factors for CRE colonization also increase the possibility of subsequent infections in patients with hematological diseases. These findings suggest that septic shock increases mortality in CRE-infected hematological patients. Clinicians should try to prevent the early onset of infection and take measures to reduce mortality rates in these patients. From this research, it emerged that mortality risk factors are higher in patients with hematological diseases (Wang et al.).

Controlled trials are crucial for studying antimicrobial routes and administration methods. In Taiwan, continuous meropenem infusion is reportedly much better for microorganism eradication than traditional intermittent bolus strategies. This does not allow for bacterial death but specifically contributes bacterial eradication (Ai et al.).

The burden of antimicrobial resistance, which is a worldwide problem, should be accurately examined, especially during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in ICUs. Italian researchers underline this Research Topic, which poses therapeutic challenges by providing valuable insights into the epidemiology of hospital infections. In view of the possibility of a future pandemic, this approach may lead to greater infection control (Scaglione et al.).

The combination of amikacin, polymyxin-B, and sulbactam demonstrated in vitro synergy against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. The approach was initially developed for adults and subsequently scaled for children. Pharmacokinetic models for predicting antibiotic exposure in major tissues associated with common infections can be used to deduce antibiotic efficacy at the site of infection. Additional case reports are essential in achieving this aim (Wu et al.).

In conclusion, all solutions implemented to combat multidrug resistance are double-edged swords because the rate of antibiotic resistance of microorganisms keeps up with the rate of drug progress. Bacteria develop additional mechanisms of resistance in parallel with the spread of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, sulbactam/durlobactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam. Bacterial susceptibility rates must be continuously monitored to obtain accurate knowledge of the treatment evolution. However, the question remains as to how long these drugs will be useful (Dan and Tǎlǎpan).

Within this scientific panorama, this Research Topic is very interesting, leading to advanced interpretations and solutions for antimicrobial resistance. To deal with resistant bacteria, new generations of the same antibacterial drugs are made by adding new components to the drug to make it effective, or antibiotics are administered in combination to make the bacteria susceptible to either one of the two (Gaibani et al., 2022). However, strategies for antibiotic combination therapy should consider the potential risk of enhanced toxicity.

The molecular studies of resistance genes play an important role if examining the crucial function of the resistance enzymes, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), carbapenemases (KPC), metallo-β-lactamases (IMP, VIM, NDM etc) or OXA enzymes (OXA_48 and OXA-23) (Shanta et al., 2024).

In summary, the assessment of resistance mechanisms in common pathogens and the implications of treatment strategies constitute the cornerstones of the fight against resistance. Novel diagnostic techniques, including CRISPR-based technologies (Li et al., 2023), next-generation sequencing and whole genome sequencing should be considered, and different solutions, such as phage therapy (Qin et al., 2021), vaccination strategies, N-acethyl-cysteine or the use of conjugated antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as targeted therapies against pathogenic bacteria responsible for infectious diseases, could be evaluated as alternative treatments for antibiotic-resistant infections (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Possible solutions to overcome bacterial carbapenem-resistance. From Mascellino et al. (2024). Source BioRender.com.

Author contributions

MM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AO: Writing – review & editing. SB: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. GC: Supervision, Writing – original draft.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Dr Dania Al Ismail for her support in the figure drafting.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Gaibani, P., Giani, T., Bovo, F., Lombardo, D., Amadesi, S., Lazzarotto, T., et al. (2022). Resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in gram-negative MDR bacilli: molecular mechanisms and susceptibility testing. Antibiotics 11:628. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050628

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. H., Wang, J., Xu, J. P., Wang, J., and Yang, X. (2023). Recent advances in CRISPR-based genome editing technology and its applications in cardiovascular research. Mil. Med. Res. 10:12. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00447-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mascellino, M.T., Biswas, S., and Oliva, A. (2024). Editorial: Enterobacteriaceae antimicroibial agents and resistance: relation with the therapeutic approach volume II. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1356413. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1356413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliva, A., Bianchi, A., Russo, A., Ceccarelli, G., Cancelli, F., Aloj, F., et al. (2021). Effect of N-acetylcysteine administration on 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with septic shock caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii: a retrospective case-control study. Antibiotics 10:271. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030271

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, J., Wu, N., Bao, J., Shi, X., Ou, H., Ye, S., et al. (2021). Heterogeneous Klebsiella pneumoniae co-infections complicate personalized bacteriophage therapy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:608402. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.608402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rumbo, C., Fernández-Moreira, E., Merino, M., Poza, M., Mendez, J. A., Soares, N. C., et al. (2011). Horizontal transfer of the OXA-24 carbapenemase gene via outer membrane vesicles: a new mechanism of dissemination of carbapenem resistance genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 3084–3090. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00929-10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shanta, A. S., Islam, N., Al Asad, M., Akter, K., Habib, M. B., Hossain, M. J., et al. (2024). Resistance and co-resistance of metallo-beta-lactamase genes in diarrheal and urinary-tract pathogens in Bangladesh. Microorganisms 12:1589. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12081589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamma, P. D., Aitken, S. L., Bonomo, R. A., Mathers, A. J., van Duin, D., and Clancy, C. J. (2021). Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin. Infect. Dis. 72, e169–e183. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac268

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tompkins, K., and van Duin, D. (2021). Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 40:2053–68. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04296-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: antibiotic resistance, antibiotics, bacterial pathogen, carbapenem, β-lactamase, carbapenem resistance

Citation: Mascellino MT, Oliva A, Biswas S and Ceccarelli G (2024) Editorial: New therapeutic strategies against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 15:1513900. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513900

Received: 19 October 2024; Accepted: 21 October 2024;
Published: 07 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Rustam Aminov, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2024 Mascellino, Oliva, Biswas and Ceccarelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maria Teresa Mascellino, mariateresa.mascellino@uniroma1.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.