The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbial Symbioses
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series in the Wildlife Gut Microbiome and Its Implication for Conservation Biology, Volume III View all 9 articles
Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests
Provisionally accepted- 1 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 2 Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 3 Helmholtz Center München, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Neuherberg, Bavaria, Germany
- 4 Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
The global decline in biodiversity and insect populations highlights the urgent need to conserve ecosystem functions, such as plant pollination by solitary bees. Human activities, particularly agricultural intensification, pose significant threats to these essential services. Changes in land use alter resource and nest site availability, pesticide exposure and other factors impacting the richness, diversity, and health of solitary bee species. In this study, we investigated yet another facet currently less well investigated in such context: Microbial communities associated with wild bees play crucial roles in larval development, metabolism, immunity and overall bee health. However, drivers and dynamics of healthy microbiome in solitary bees are still poorly understood, especially regarding the direct and indirect effects of land use on the diversity and composition of these microbial communities. We examined bacterial communities in the offspring and nest materials of the Megachilid trap-nesting solitary bee O. bicornis along a gradient of land use intensification by 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Given that landscape composition, climatic conditions, and food resources are known to influence microbial compositions in solitary bee species, we hypothesized that land use changes alters resources available for food and nest material collection and thereby affecting microbiomes in offspring and nest environments. We anticipated reduced microbial diversity and altered composition with increased land use intensification, which is known to decrease number and diversity of resources, including the pool of floral and soil bacteria in surrounding environments. As expected, we observed significant shifts in the bacterial composition and diversity of bees and their nests across varying degrees of land use intensity, differing in management types and the availability of flowers. Shannon diversity of bacteria in nest materials (larval pollen provision, soil nest enclosure) and larval guts decreased with increasing land use intensity.However, pupae microbiome remained unaffected, indicating a reorganization of the microbiome during metamorphosis, which is not significantly influenced by land use and available resources. Our findings provide new insights into the factors shaping environmental transmission and changes in solitary bee microbiomes. This understanding is crucial for comprehending impacts of intensive land use on wild bee health and developing strategies to mitigate these effects.
Keywords: Solitary bee microbiome, metabarcoding, Pollination, Biodiversity Exploratories, grasslands, Osmia bicornis
Received: 17 Oct 2024; Accepted: 09 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Peters, Leonhardt, Schloter and Keller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Alexander Keller, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, 80539, Bavaria, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.