Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Virology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1501061
This article is part of the Research Topic Molecular Pathogenesis of Enteroviruses: Insights into Viral-Host Interactions, Pathogenic Mechanisms, and Microbiome Dynamics View all 4 articles

The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA epigenetic modification modulates the amplification of Coxsackievirus B1 in human pancreatic beta cells

Provisionally accepted
Maressa Fernandes Bonfim Maressa Fernandes Bonfim 1*Camille Aitchedji Camille Aitchedji 1*Flore Van Goethem Flore Van Goethem 1*Lionel Sauvage Lionel Sauvage 1Thibault Poinsot Thibault Poinsot 1*Emilie Calonne Emilie Calonne 2*Rachel Deplus Rachel Deplus 2*François Fuks François Fuks 2*Decio Laks Eizirik Decio Laks Eizirik 1*Anne Op de Beeck Anne Op de Beeck 1*
  • 1 ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
  • 2 ULB Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Brussels, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by a prolonged autoimmune attack resulting in the massive loss of insulin-producing beta cells. The initiation and progression of T1D depends on a complex interaction between genetic, immunological and environmental factors. Epidemiological, experimental and clinical evidence suggest a link between viral infections, particularly Coxsackievirus type B (CVB), and T1D development. Specifically, infections by the CVB serotype 1 (CVB1) contribute to the triggering of autoimmunity against beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals, and prolonged and probably non-lytic infections by CVB are associated with the development of T1D.However, the molecular mechanisms underlying CVB1 replication and establishing persistent infections in human pancreatic beta cells remain poorly understood. Here we show that the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA epigenetic modification machinery regulates CVB1 amplification in the human beta cells. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting m6A writers and erasers, we observed that downregulation of m6A writers increases CVB1 amplification, while the downregulation of m6A erasers decreases it. Notably, the inhibition of Fat Mass and Obesity-associated protein (FTO), a key m6A eraser, reduced by 95% the production of infectious CVB1 in both human insulin-producing EndoC-βH1 cells and in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived islets. The FTO inhibitor reduced CVB1 expression within 6 hours post-infection, suggesting a direct regulation of the CVB1 genome by m6A modification. Furthermore, in the absence of viral replication, FTO inhibition also decreased the translation of the incoming CVB1 genome, indicating that m6A plays a critical role in the initial stages of viral RNA translation. In addition, modulation of the m6A machinery affected the type I interferon response after poly-IC transfection, a mimic of RNA virus replication, but did not affect the cellular antiviral response in CVB1-infected cells. Altogether, these observations suggest that m6A directly affects CVB1 production.Our study provides the first evidence that the m6A epigenetic modification machinery controls CVB amplification in human pancreatic beta cells. This suggests that the m6A machinery is a potential target to control CVB infection in T1D and raises the possibility of an epigenetic control in the establishment of persistent CVB infections observed in the pancreas in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

    Keywords: M6A, coxsackievirus, pancreatic beta cell, type 1 diabetes, Epigenetic regulation

    Received: 24 Sep 2024; Accepted: 29 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bonfim, Aitchedji, Van Goethem, Sauvage, Poinsot, Calonne, Deplus, Fuks, Eizirik and Op de Beeck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Maressa Fernandes Bonfim, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
    Camille Aitchedji, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
    Flore Van Goethem, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
    Thibault Poinsot, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
    Emilie Calonne, ULB Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Brussels, Belgium
    Rachel Deplus, ULB Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Brussels, Belgium
    François Fuks, ULB Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Brussels, Belgium
    Decio Laks Eizirik, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium
    Anne Op de Beeck, ULB Center for Diabetes Research (UCDR), Brussels, Belgium

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.