The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1492270
Effects of antibiotic growth promoter and its natural alternative on poultry cecum ecosystem: an integrated analysis of gut microbiota and host expression
Provisionally accepted- 1 Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
- 2 dsm-firmenich, Animal Nutrition and Health R & D Center, Tulln, Austria
- 3 dsm-firmenich, Science & Research, Delft, Netherlands
- 4 Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
Background In-feed antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been a cornerstone in the livestock industry due to their role in enhancing growth and feed efficiency. However, concerns over antibiotic resistance have driven a shift away from AGPs toward natural alternatives. Despite the widespread use, the exact mechanisms of AGPs and alternatives are not fully understood.This necessitates holistic studies that investigate microbiota dynamics, host responses, and the interactions between these elements in the context of AGPs and alternative feed additives.In this study, we conducted a multifaceted investigation of how Bacitracin, a common AGP, and a natural alternative impact both cecum microbiota and host expression in chickens. In addition to univariate and static differential abundance and expression analyses, we employed multivariate and time-course analyses to study this problem. To reveal host-microbe interactions, we assessed their overall correspondence and identified treatment-specific pairs of species and host expressed genes that showed significant correlations over time.Our analysis revealed that factors such as developmental age substantially impacted the cecum ecosystem more than feed additives. While feed additives significantly altered microbial compositions in the later stages, they did not significantly affect overall host gene expression. The differential expression indicated that with AGP administration, host transmembrane transporters and metallopeptidase activities were upregulated around day 21. Together with the modulated kininogen binding and phenylpyruvate tautomerase activity over time, this likely contributes to the growth-promoting effects of AGPs. The difference in responses between AGP and PFA supplementation suggests that these additives operate through distinct mechanisms.We investigated the impact of a common AGP and its natural alternative on poultry cecum ecosystem through an integrated analysis of both the microbiota and host responses. We found that AGP appears to enhance host nutrient utilization and modulate immune responses.
Keywords: Antibiotic growth promoter (AGP), Phytogenic feed additive (PFA), Poultry, Cecum, gut microbiome, host expression, host-microbe interaction
Received: 06 Sep 2024; Accepted: 05 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Peng, Ghanbari, May and Abeel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chengyao Peng, Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Thomas Abeel, Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.