Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1483626

Effects of rosemary extract and its residue on production, immune performance and gut microbiota in geese

Provisionally accepted
Yuzhi Huang Yuzhi Huang 1Lanmeng Xu Lanmeng Xu 1*Hang He Hang He 2*Lijuan Peng Lijuan Peng 1*Qinfeng Liao Qinfeng Liao 2*Kun Wan Kun Wan 1*Simeng Qin Simeng Qin 1*Lijing Cao Lijing Cao 3*Jie Zhang Jie Zhang 1*
  • 1 College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 2 College of Animal Science and Technology, Chongqing Three Gorges Vocational College, Chongqing, China
  • 3 Chongqing Rongchang District Vocational Education Center, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    To explore the effects of rosemary extract (RE) and its residue (RR) on the production, immune performance, and gut microbiota of geese, we treat 28-day-old Sichuan white geese (n = 180) with three diets: 1) basal diet (control), 2) basal diet supplemented with 0.02% RE, and 3) basal diet supplemented with 15% RR for 42 days. On day 70, compared with control treatment, the final body weight, average daily gain and lysozyme levels in the RE treatment increased significantly (p < 0.05). In the RE and RR treatments, there was a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase, globulin, and high-density lipoprotein levels compared to the control treatment, and there was also a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (p < 0.05). Moreover, for both RE and RR treatments, semi-eviscerated, eviscerated weights and calcium apparent digestibility increased significantly, along with a decrease in the duodenal index (p < 0.05). Compared with RE treatment, those in the RR treatment had significantly higher duodenal and jejunum relative lengths, aspartate aminotransferase, uric acid, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels, and decreased chest depth, chest angle, neck length, semi-eviscerated and eviscerated weights, crude protein digestibility, and levels of globulin, triglyceride, and lysozyme (p < 0.05). There were no differences in gut microbiota α or β diversities among treatments (p > 0.05). Compared to the control treatment, the relative abundance of Turicibacter significantly increased in the RR and RE treatments, and the relative abundance of Sporobacter, Alistipes and Barnesiella significantly increased in the RR treatment (p < 0.05). Rikenellaceae, Succinivibrionaceae, and Aeromonadales were enriched in the RR treatment, and Lachnospiraceae, Turicibacteraceae, Fusobacteriaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae were enriched in the RE treatment. While we demonstrate the RR diet to be less effective than the RE diet, it did improve production and the gut microbiota of geese to a certain extent.

    Keywords: rosemary extract, rosemary extract residue, Production performance, Immune performance, Gut Microbiota, Geese

    Received: 20 Aug 2024; Accepted: 16 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Huang, Xu, He, Peng, Liao, Wan, Qin, Cao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Lanmeng Xu, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
    Hang He, College of Animal Science and Technology, Chongqing Three Gorges Vocational College, Chongqing, China
    Lijuan Peng, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
    Qinfeng Liao, College of Animal Science and Technology, Chongqing Three Gorges Vocational College, Chongqing, China
    Kun Wan, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
    Simeng Qin, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
    Lijing Cao, Chongqing Rongchang District Vocational Education Center, Chongqing, China
    Jie Zhang, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.