Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1481437
This article is part of the Research Topic Bacillus and Pseudomonas as Plant Friends: Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Interactions View all 6 articles

Pseudomonas oryzihabitans D1-104/3 and P. gessardii C31-106/3 differentially modulate the antioxidative response of duckweed (Lemna minor L.) to salt stress

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Siniša Stanković Institute for Biological Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 2 Center for Biological Control and Plant Growth Promotion, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The common duckweed (L. minor) is a model organism for investigation of plant physiology, especially stress-related responses. Its two physiological characteristics are of special interest: 1) salt-stressed duckweeds may accumulate starch, a precursor for biofuel; 2) duckweeds are associated with various beneficial (plant-growth promoting, PGP) bacterial strains. In this paper, we analyzed the role of two bacterial strains: Pseudomonas oryzihabitans D1-104/3 and P. gessardii C31-106/3 in regulation of duckweed's growth and antioxidative responses to salt (10 and 100 mM NaCl) and hypothesized that they alleviate salt-induced oxidative stress. Methods: Fresh and dry weight, frond number, photosynthetic pigments, malonedialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ascorbic acid (AsA), proline, total polyphenol (TPC) and starch content, as well as antioxidant capacity and antioxidant enzymatic activity were measured after 14 days. Fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize bacterial presence on duckweeds. Results: fluorescence microscope revealed that Pseudomonas bacteria colonized all duckweed surfaces. The doubling time of duckweeds inoculated with P. gessardii C31-106/3 was significantly longer. Additionally, at 0 and 10 mM NaCl, this strain decreased chlorosis in duckweeds. Moreover, P. gessardii C31-106/3 increased dry-to-fresh-weight ratio, proline, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid content at 100 mM, as well as AsA content in plants in NaCl-free medium, while P. oryzihabitans D1-104/3 increased AsA at 100 mM NaCl. Both bacterial strains decreased lipid peroxidation, while P. gessardii C31-106/3 increased and P. oryzihabitans D1-104/3 decreased H2O2 content at 100 mM and 0 mM NaCl, respectively. Bacteria significantly increased TPC and antioxidant capacity at 100 mM NaCl, particularly P. oryzihabitans D1-104/3. After 14 days, the SOD and POX activities were at the same level in all samples. At 100 mM NaCl, CAT activity was increased in all plants. Discussion: The results of this study show that two Pseudomonas strains had markedly different effects on duckweed: while P. oryzihabitans D1-104/3 supported growth, P. gessardii C31-106/3 prioritized salt stress tolerance in duckweeds.

    Keywords: antioxidant, Bacteria, duckweed, plant-growth promotion, stress, tolerance

    Received: 15 Aug 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Poprzen, Antonić -Reljin, Uzelac, Milovančević, Paunović, Trifunović-Momčilov, Marković, Raspor, Nikolić, Stanković and Radulović. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Olga Radulović, Siniša Stanković Institute for Biological Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.