Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Systems Microbiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1481112

Microbial characteristics of bile in gallstone patients: A comprehensive analysis of 9,939 cases

Provisionally accepted
Xin Zheng Xin Zheng 1Yunjun Yan Yunjun Yan 2Xin Li Xin Li 3Mimin Liu Mimin Liu 4Xiaoyue Zhao Xiaoyue Zhao 3Jing He Jing He 3Xuewei Zhuang Xuewei Zhuang 1*
  • 1 Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 2 Jinan Dian Medical Laboratory CO., LTD., Jinan, China
  • 3 Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 4 Jinan Dian Medical Laboratory CO., LTD., Jinan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The exact triggers of gallstone formation remain incompletely understood, but research indicates that microbial infection is a significant factor and can interfere with treatment. There is no consensus on the bile microbial culture profiles in previous studies, and determining the microbial profile could aid in targeted prevention and treatment. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the differences in microbial communities cultured from bile specimens of patients with gallstones. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and bile microbial status of 9,939 gallstone patients and explored factors related to recurrence. Results showed a higher proportion of females among patients, with the age group of 60-74 years being the most prevalent. The most common type of gallstone was solitary gallbladder stones. A total of 76 microbes were cultured from 5,153 patients, with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis being the most frequently identified. Significant differences in microbial diversity and positive detection rates were observed across different age groups, types of gallstones, and recurrence status. Positive frequencies of E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and K. pneumoniae varied significantly by age group and gallstone type. The microbial diversity in the recurrence group was significantly lower compared to the non-recurrence group. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the group with single microbial species compared to those with no microbes or multiple microbes. For the recurrence group, there were significant differences in the frequencies of seven microbes (Aeromonas hydrophila, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Enterococcus faecium, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) before and after recurrence, with these microbes appearing in a higher number of patients after recurrence. Regression analysis identified patient age, stone size, diabetes, venous thrombosis, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, coronary heart disease, and the number of microbial species as important predictors of recurrence. A random forest model constructed using these variables demonstrated good performance and high predictive ability (ROC-AUC=0.862). These findings provide important references for the prevention and individualized treatment of gallstones.

    Keywords: gallstone, Bile, Microbes, Clinical Characteristics, Recurrence In this study, respiratory diseases included bronchitis, Bronchiectasis, Bronchial cyst

    Received: 26 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zheng, Yan, Li, Liu, Zhao, He and Zhuang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xuewei Zhuang, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.