Global perspective of ecological risk of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities

Yang, Bing; Wu, Lin; Feng, Wanju; Lin, Qi

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1468592

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol., 09 October 2024

Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1468592

This article is part of the Research Topic Anthropogenic Effects on the Microbial Communities of Terrestrial Ecosystems View all 29 articles

Global perspective of ecological risk of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities

Bing Yang^*

Lin Wu

Wanju Feng

Qi Lin

Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, Chengdu, China

Introduction: The impacts of plastic pollution on soil ecosystems have emerged as a significant global environmental concern. The progress in understanding how plastic pollution affects soil microbial communities and ecological functions is essential for addressing this issue effectively.

Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the literature from the Web of Science Core Collection database to offer valuable insights into the dynamics and trends in this field.

Results: To date, the effects of plastic residues on soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass, respiration rate, community diversity and functions have been examined, whereas the effects of plastic pollution on soil microbes are still controversial.

Discussion: To include a comprehensive examination of the combined effects of plastic residue properties (Type, element composition, size and age), soil properties (soil texture, pH) at environmentally relevant concentrations with various exposure durations under field conditions in future studies is crucial for a holistic understanding of the impact of plastic pollution on soil ecosystems. Risk assessment of plastic pollution, particularly for nanoplasctics, from the perspective of soil food web and ecosystem multifunctioning is also needed. By addressing critical knowledge gaps, scholars can play a pivotal role in developing strategies to mitigate the ecological risks posed by plastic pollution on soil microorganisms.

1 Introduction

The significance of soil microbial communities extends beyond their involvement in essential biogeochemical cycles (Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014), as they also play a crucial role in shaping the well-being of plants, animals, and humans (Romdhane et al., 2022). Prior research has suggested that a decline in microbial diversity and the simplification of soil community composition are likely to have detrimental effects on the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to provide vital services such as climate regulation, soil fertility, and food and fiber production (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2016; Wagg et al., 2014). The significance of microorganisms in ecosystem functioning has led to increased global interest in the impacts of anthropogenic activities on soil microbial responses (Banerjee et al., 2018; Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014). Previous research has highlighted soil physicochemical properties, including soil water content and organic carbon availability (Drenovsky et al., 2004) and pH (Bahram et al., 2018; Fierer and Jackson, 2006), as key determinants of soil microbial community.

Plastic materials are widely used in the industrial engineering, agriculture and medical industry and other fields due to their high versatility, stability, light weight, and low production costs (Fuller and Gautam, 2016; Ya et al., 2021). However, limitations of recycling technology and long durability result in plastic accumulation in natural environment, especially soil (Boots et al., 2019; Ya et al., 2021). Under long-term photo-oxidative, thermal, ozone-induced, mechanic-chemical, catalytic and biological processes, plastic debris can be decomposed into micro-plastics (Thompson et al., 2004), referring to plastic debris with a size less than 5 mm, are an emerging contaminant of soil (Boots et al., 2019; de Souza Machado et al., 2018a; Ding L. et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2020; Li H. Z. et al., 2021; Wang Q. et al., 2021; Yang B. et al., 2022). Previous studies have demonstrated that micro-plastics entre soils through multiple pathways (Guo et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2020; Yang B. et al., 2022), such as compost and sewage sludge application (Corradini et al., 2019; Schell et al., 2022; van den Berg et al., 2020; Weithmann et al., 2018; Yang M. et al., 2021; Yang J. et al., 2021; Zhang J. et al., 2023; Zhang L. et al., 2020), residual plastic mulching (Huang et al., 2020; Khalid et al., 2023; Qi R. et al., 2020; Qi et al., 2018; Steinmetz et al., 2022; Zhou B. et al., 2020) and micro-plastic seed film-coating (Accinelli et al., 2019), atmospheric fallout (Allen et al., 2019; Bergmann et al., 2019; Brahney et al., 2020; Corradini et al., 2019; Nizzetto et al., 2016; Scheurer and Bigalke, 2018), wastewater irrigation (He et al., 2018; Perez-Reveron et al., 2022), wind erosion (Bullard et al., 2021; Rezaei et al., 2022; Rezaei et al., 2019), and tire wear (Ding J. et al., 2022).

Plastic pollution has emerged as a critical environmental issue with far-reaching impacts on soil ecosystems, particularly on microbial communities that play essential roles in nutrient cycling and soil health. Recent studies have demonstrated that microplastics can alter the physical and chemical properties of soil (Boots et al., 2019; de Souza Machado et al., 2018b; Feng et al., 2022; Lozano et al., 2021a; Qi Y. et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020), leading to changes in microbial diversity, abundance, and function. Additionally, microplastics can serve as vectors for harmful chemicals and pathogens, thereby influencing microbial community structure and resilience. Studies have reported that micro-plastics and/or nano-plastics can be carriers for other soil pollutants (Rillig et al., 2019a; Zhang S. et al., 2020), absorbing and transporting harmful organic pollutants (Huffer et al., 2019; Li et al., 2016; Zhang B. et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021), antibiotics (Li et al., 2018; Zhu D. et al., 2022; Zhu F. et al., 2022), heavy metals (Abbasi et al., 2020; Zhang B. et al., 2020), xenobiotics (Hummel et al., 2021) and act as a vector for bacterial disease (Beloe et al., 2022). Furthermore, the degradation of plastics introduces a variety of chemical compounds into the soil, which can be metabolized by certain microbes, leading to shifts in community composition. In addition, micro-plastics provide additional habitats for many microbial communities in the environment (Li et al., 2023; Rüthi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023; Yang Y. et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu D. et al., 2022; Zhu F. et al., 2022). Finally, micro-plastics affect plant (Rillig et al., 2019b), which in turn mediate soil microbial community through alterations of rhizodoposition as well as litter quality and quantity. In the last decades, the impacts of plastic contamination on soil microbial community have been extensively studied (Rillig et al., 2019a). The development trends indicate an increasing concern over the long-term ecological consequences of plastic pollution, with research focusing on understanding the mechanisms of microbial adaptation and the potential for bioremediation. Addressing these impacts is crucial for preserving soil health and ensuring sustainable agricultural practices, highlighting the need for ongoing research and policy interventions. However, to our knowledge, no report has revealed the status and development trends of impacts of plastic pollution on soil microbial community using data mining yet.

The subfield of scientometrics known as bibliometric analysis employs computer technology and statistical methods to quantitatively assess the current state of research, areas of high interest, and emerging trends within a particular research domain (Li J. et al., 2021; Zhang and Chen, 2020). Furthermore, bibliometric analysis has gained widespread recognition as a valuable tool for guiding novice researchers (Fu et al., 2010), offering valuable insights into the development and evolutionary patterns of disciplines, collaborative efforts, and prospective directions. Since the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database provides comprehensive coverage of the most important and influential research results from all over the world (Zhang and Chen, 2020), we do a bibliometric collection based on the SCI-E database in the “Web of Science Core Collection.” Considering the unique advantages and drawbacks of bibliometric analysis tools, such as Bibexcel, Bibliometrix (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017), BiblioMaps (Grauwin and Sperano, 2018), CiteSpace (Chen, 2006), CitNetExplore (Thor et al., 2016), SciMAT (Cobo et al., 2012), Sci2 Tool (Börner, 2011), VOSviewer (van Eck and Waltman, 2010), we utilized three commonly used bibliometric analysis software simultaneously.

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Performance, critical knowledge gaps, and development directions of studying plastic-soil-microorganism interaction through bibliometric analysis, and to offer insights and suggestions for the future development of this field.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Data collection

A comprehensive literature search on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database¹ on January 1, 2024. The search formula was defined as follows: ((TS = (microplastic* or nanoplasctic*)) AND TS = (soil microbial community or soil bacterial community or soil fungal community)) AND LA = (English), and the type of documents is set to “articles “OR “review” (Supplementary Figure S1). A total of 452 English peer-reviewed publications were retrieved with selected information (including title, keywords, abstract, introduction, author information, journals, citation, and institutional affiliation).

2.2 Data analysis

In the present study, three analytical software tools were simultaneously used. Firstly, the overview, consisting the main information, annual scientific production, sources, authors, affiliations, countries, most globally cited documents, most frequent words, word dynamics, clustering by coupling were analyzed using the Bibliometrix, which contains the more extensive set of techniques and are suitable for practitioners through Biblioshiny (Moral-Muñoz et al., 2020). Additionally, the visualization of co-authorship networks and the co-occurrence networks of keywords were implemented using VOSviewer version 1.6.18 (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands). The collaborative relationship between authors sharing more than two publications was determined by co-authorship analysis using VOSviewer. Finally, keyword clustering network analysis, co-citation reference analysis and the burst analysis were performed using the CiteSpace version 6.2. R6 (a keyword clustering map was generated using the log-likelihood ratio algorithm (LLS) after eliminating relevant subject words).

3 Results

3.1 Publication outputs

As shown in Figure 1, the annual number of articles on potential ecological risks of plastic contaminate showed an overall upward trend during 2011–2023. From 2011 to 2017, fewer papers were published, whereas the growth rate of published papers has accelerated since 2018, and the number of papers published in 2023 has risen to 193. Further analysis showed that the cumulative publications experienced an exponential growth ( $y = 0.2509 e^{0.5521 x}, R^{2} = 0.9619$ ) during 2011–2023 (Figure 1). It shows that studying on ecological risks of plastic containment on soil microorganisms has gradually increased and received more and more attention in recent years.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Distribution of annual and cumulative scientific publications addressing potential impacts of plastics pollution on soil microbial communities gained from the Web of Science (WoS) core collection from 2011to 2023.

3.2 Countries/regions and institutions

From the country level, China ranked the first productive country on the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities, with 322 papers published, accounting for 71.24% of the total publications. This was followed by Germany and the United States, with 46 and 42 publications, respectively. Further examination showed that the publications of the Germany, Poland, United States, Mexico, and Switzerland has exploded recently (Figure 2A). Among which, the strongest burst intensity was found in Germany, with a burst intensity of 2.18 and a burst period of 2018–2019, whereas the longest lasting burst time was found in Poland, with a period spanning from 2011 to 2020. From the institutional level (Table 1), Chinese Academy of Sciences has the highest number of publications, with 67 articles, ranking the first. This was followed by University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, with 25 papers. During 2016–2021, the Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences experienced a surge in publications, with a burst intensity of 1.75, and the longest burst time, whereas the Tsinghua University has a relatively late burst time in comparison with other institutions, from 2021 to 2022 (Figure 2B).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Top five countries (A), top ten institutions (B) and top ten authors (C) with strongest burst.

Table 1

Table 1. Top 15 most productive institutions of studying the ecological risks of plastics pollution on soil microbial community.

Additionally, there were strong close cooperation across some countries (Figure 3A) and institutions (Figure 3B). China is the most willing to cooperate with other countries. Notably, China and the United States have the closest cooperative relationship. Chinese Academy of Sciences has the strongest willingness to cooperate with other institutions, whereas the closest cooperative relationship was observed between Free University of Berlin and Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research. The collaborations between China Agricultural University and Bangor University were also frequently.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Collaboration network between countries (A), core institutions (B), and core authors (C). In the maps, the size of the circle represents of the number of documents, and the thickness of the lines depicts the strength of the association. In general, the larger the nodes, the stronger the collaboration between country, institution, and authors.

3.3 Authors

A total of 23 authors published at least five articles during the examined period (Table 2). Specifically, professor Davey L. Jones from Bangor University was the most productive author in terms of published articles. He published 13 papers with 881 citations, followed by professor Geissen Violette from Wageningen University & Research and professor Yao Huaiying from Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, respectively. Both the afore-mentioned two authors published nine articles, whereas the citations were 1,027 and 242, respectively. The other authors published no less than five articles were Huadong Zang and Jie Zhou from China Agricultural University, Yaying Li from Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yongxiang Yu from Wuhan Institute of Technology, Robert W. Brown and David R. Chadwick from Bangor University, Xuetao Guo and Zhuozhi Ouyang from Northwest A&F University, Yanhua Chen, Xuexia Wang, and Zuoyuan Zou from Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Tida Ge from Ningbo University, Yongming Luo from Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Esperanza Huerta Lwanga from Wageningen University & Research, Yong Sik Ok from Korea University, Hongwen Sun from Nankai University, as well as Jing Wang, Jun Wang, Hui Wei and Jiaen Zhang from South China Agricultural University (Table 2). Burst analysis showed that the publication number of Anika Lehmann has increased explosively during 2018–2019, with the first publication in 2018, and the publication number of Yongming Luo, Peter Christie, Ying Teng showed a steady increase during 2016–2019 (Figure 2C).

Table 2

Table 2. Top authors with least five publications related to ecological risks of plastics pollution on soil microbial community.

As presented in co-author network, several author groups work together closely and have significant links to other groups, including the clustering of an important collaborative team with Davey L. Jones and Geissen Violette as the core (Figure 3C). Davey L. Jones established extensive collaborations with other authors, as evidenced by the highest number of linkages. Among which, the closest partnership was found to that between him and Huadong Zang. Besides, there are scientific groups with significant scientific outputs but limited levels of cooperation with other groups among the most influential authors in this field. For instance, the collaborative team with Huaiying Yao as the core, which is at the edge of the entire network map, is less collaborative in intensity than those located near the center of the map.

3.4 Journals

During 2011–2023, the leading journal that published the most articles was Journal of Hazardous Materials, followed by Science of the Total Environment and Environmental Pollution, with a total of 76 and 30 publications, respectively (Table 3; Figure 4A). In addition, the Chemosphere, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Applied Soil Ecology, Environment International, Environmental Research, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, and Frontiers in Environmental Science were also important sources. Further analysis indicated that there was a notable shift in journals during the examined period. The earlier studies mainly published on Science Advances and International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, whereas the latest studies were published on Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Ecological Indicators, and Environmental Engineering Research (Figure 4B). Burst analysis revealed that Journal of Polymers and the Environment experienced the strongest emergence, followed by Marine Environmental Research, with a bursting strength of 6.64 (Figure 4C).

Table 3

Table 3. Top 25 influential journals with the number of published papers, Impact factor, and the position of the journal in its category.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) timeline of journal publications (B), the top 20 cited journals with the strongest burst citations (C), and citation clusters (D). In the clustering and timeline view map, each circle and its corresponding label constitute a node. The size of the circle corresponds to the frequency of the keywords, the color of the sphere indicates the average year of publication, as indicated by the color gradient in the lower right corner. Blue signifies journals with earlier publications, with Advances and International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation showing an early average publication time. Conversely, yellow denotes journals with more recent publications, with Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Ecological Indicators, and Environmental Engineering Research representing relatively new entries in the field. In the citation clustering diagram, each color block represents a cluster group, with the cluster number being inversely proportional to the cluster size.

3.5 Highly cited references and co-cited references

The co-cited publications were clustered into 14 categories (Figure 4D), namely #0 soil respiration, #1 nitrogen cycling, #2 plastic degradation, #3 soil contamination, #4 biomarkers, #5 horticulture, #6 gut microbiota, #7 phytotoxicity, #8 denitrification, #9 soil degradation, #10 micro-plastic remediation, #11 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, #12 LDPE, and #13 microbiology. The most cited paper was a research article titled “Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance,” which has been cited 205 times until January 1, 2024, based on the WoS database (Table 4). This study investigated the effects of six different microplastics (polyester fibers, polyamide beads, and four fragment types: polyethylene, polyester terephthalate, polypropylene, and polystyrene frag) on a broad suite of proxies for soil health and performance of spring onion (Allium fistulosum), and suggested that the pervasive micro-plastic contamination in soil May impact plant performance and further threat agroecosystems and terrestrial biodiversity As illustrated in the Figures 5A,B, the cluster-based co-citation network was found to be a well-structured and a sufficiently credible network (Q = 0.8771, S = 0.9818).

Table 4

Table 4. Top 20 most cited papers.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Co-occurrence keyword cluster network visualization of the author keywords using VOSviewer software (A), and the top ten keywords with the strongest citation bursts maps using CiteSpace (B). The minimum co-occurrence frequency of keywords was 3. To be clearer, only the most abundant keywords were shown in the co-occurrence network. Specifically, out of 1,110 keywords (1,004 after removing duplicates), a total of 103 keywords were selected to create a visual map. Each circle in the map represents a node, with the circle’s size indicating the frequency of that keyword. The thickness of the circle’s line represents the strength of the relationship between the keywords. The nodes are color-coded based on different research directions, determined using a clustering algorithm that calculates the similarity between keywords. Similar keywords are grouped together, and the specific cluster names can be summarized separately. The colors of each cluster describe each topic. The red cluster shows the highest interest in soil bacterial community, while the yellow cluster focuses on micro-plastic pollution. The green cluster highlights research on the soil microbial community, while the blue cluster emphasizes soil-related studies. In the top ten keywords with the strongest citation bursts, the blue line represents a time interval, while the red line highlights periods in which a particular keyword experienced a burst of activity or increased attention. The starting year and duration reflect the starting time and duration of the keywords that attracted widespread attention.

3.6 Keywords

A total of 1,110 keywords were identified, and 1,004 keywords were obtained after excluding duplications and words not-related to the target terms of the present study, as well as merging synonymous keywords. Consequently, 103 keywords reached the minimum limit of three occurrences and exposed to final analysis. The top ten frequently occurring keywords were “soil bacterial community,” “biodegradable micro-plastics,” “green gas emissions,” “heavy metals,” “rhizosphere soil,” “microbial diversity,” “nitrogen cycling,” “ecosystem functioning,” “metabolomics,” and “soil quality.” These ten words also have the most connections with the other keywords in the dataset. The clustering analysis of keywords indicate that studies regarding interactions between soil microbial community and plastic contaminant are divided into four major research themes (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S2). The first cluster (red) contains 28 author keywords: soil bacterial community, biodegradable micro-plastics, greenhouse gas emissions, heavy metals, rhizosphere soil, microbial diversity, nitrogen cycling, ecosystem functioning, metabolomics, soil quality, etc. The second cluster (yellow) contains 27 author keywords: soil microbial community, soil enzyme activity, agricultural ecosystems, plastisphere, biodegradable plastics, plastic mulch film, polyethylene micro-plastics, soil aggregation, co-occurrence network, bacterial diversity, etc. The third cluster (green) contains 25 author keywords: soil, plastic pollution, biodegradation, polyethylene, ecological risks, ecotoxicity, fungi, soil property, bacteria, phytotoxicity, etc. The fourth cluster (blue) contains 23 authors’ keywords: micro-plastic pollution, microbes, nano-plastics, soil health, analytical methods, soil physicochemical properties, toxicity, soil biota, terrestrial ecosystem, environmental pollution, etc. Overall, soil bacterial community, micro-plastic pollution, soil microbial community, and soil was the hottest research topics in these four themes, respectively. The time-series keyword co-occurrence network showed that all examined keywords can be divided into 12 clusters, namely #0 microbial community, #1 analytical methods, #2 soil physicochemical property, #3 microbial diversity, #4 soil quality, #5 nutrient cycling, #6 paddy soil, #7 soil microorganisms, #8 nitrogen cycle, #9 degradable micro-plastics, #10 emerging contaminants, and #11 human health. The cluster #0 is microbial community, and its publications are between 2017 and 2022. The “soil microbial community,” “biodegradable micro-plastics,” “soil properties,” “heavy metals,” etc. are included in this cluster. The cluster #1 is analytical methods, and its publications are between 2018 and 2023. This cluster contains 21 words, such as “ecological risks,” “terrestrial ecosystem.” The cluster #2 is soil physicochemical properties. The burst analysis of keywords displayed that “ecological risks” and “soil aggregation” are the keywords with strongest burst during the last five years (Figure 5B). Keywords, such as “ecological risks” and “soil aggregation” have showed burst increase during 2021–2023 (Figure 5B). The cluster #3 is microbial diversity. The cluster #4 is soil quality. The cluster #5 is nutrient cycling. The cluster #6 is paddy soil. The cluster 7 is soil microorganisms. The cluster#8 is N cycle. The cluster #9 is degradable microplastics. The cluster #10 is emerging contaminants, and the cluster #11 is human health. Overall, the studies on soil, plastic pollution, biodegradation, and soil microbial communities are a hot topic in the field of environmental science. The analysis of keyword co-occurrence networks shows that these topics are interconnected and have been the focus of research in recent years. The emergence of keywords related to degradable micro-plastics, emerging contaminants, and human health also indicates a growing interest in understanding the impacts of pollution on the environment and human well-being. This analysis provides valuable insights into the current trends and challenges in environmental science and highlights the need for continued research and innovation in this field (see Figure 6).

Figure 6

Figure 6. The timeline review of keywords. The size of the superimposed balls, indicating the corresponding ball on the annual ring line, is directly proportional to the frequency of keywords. The connection between keywords represents their co-occurrence. In the visualization, purple represents keywords that appeared earlier, while yellow represents those that appeared recently. The overlay color represents the keywords that appeared in a specific year. Within the network, rose-red nodes hold significant centrality as they occupy central positions and act as hubs. Keywords belonging to the same cluster are positioned along the same horizontal line. The occurrence time of each keyword is displayed at the top of the view, with more recent times towards the right. This graphical representation allows us to determine the number of keywords in each cluster, indicating the importance of the clustering field. Additionally, it provides insights into the time span of keywords within each category.

Thematic evolution analysis showed that the studying focus varied greatly during the examined periods (Supplementary Figure S2). The newly interests are the ecological risks and mechanisms of bio-gradable plastic residues on soil microbial community and associated functions in agroecosystem, the combined effects of plastic residues and other emerging pollution on enzymatic activity, soil microbial diversity in plastisphere and rhizosphere, phytotoxicity, soil food webs and soil health as well as the potential effects of biochar on mitigation of plastic pollution (Supplementary Figures S2B–E).

4 Discussion

To provide a better understanding of the current conditions and reveal future research directions of the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities, a bibliometric analysis of the publishing trends, including the countries, institutional collaborations, author collaborations, keywords, and hotspots was performed.

4.1 Implications of performance analysis

The observed steady increase in publications particularly from 2018 to 2023 (Figure 1) and from growing numbers of countries and institutions indicates that the impacts of plastic contamination on soil microorganisms have attracted widespread attention from scholars and have become a globally involved research topic. A likely reason for the tremendous increase in the publications is that the calling for due attention on ecological risks of microplastics in 2016 (Rochman et al., 2016) has received positive response. As evidenced by the findings, China was the most influential and productive country with the highest number of publications and related research institutions (Table 2). This result implies that China has attached a great importance to plastic pollution, and has become the center in the field of ecological impacts of plastic contaminant on soil microorganisms. The total citations and publications of a research institution reflect, to a certain extent, the studying scale and capacity in the field, as well as the close degree of cooperation between domestic and foreign research institutions (Zhang T. et al., 2023). Our findings suggested that the studying on the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities is an interdisciplinary field and formed relatively stable research center.

Recognizing collaborative networks in research across various countries, institutions, and authors is crucial (Zhou et al., 2018) as it aids in identifying the foremost and most innovative countries, institutions, and authors in this domain (Yu and Chen, 2021). Networking among countries and institutions helps to provide directions for further research (Wahyuningrum et al., 2023). Furthermore, evaluating the mode and extent of collaboration can elucidate the collaborative relationships at different stages (Lin, 2024). The impact assessment and mitigation of plastic contaminants are believed to be a multifaceted and comprehensive research topic, necessitating wide collaboration for future research. Although cooperative relationships between some countries, such as between China and the United States, were observed, the breadth and intensity of cooperation between institutions are not ideal. Clearly, this situation will hinder the development of the research field in the long run. Enhancing academic collaboration and exchange with other nations leads to mutually beneficial outcomes (Geng et al., 2022). Although authors with similar backgrounds in terms of nationality and institution tend to collaborate more frequently and easily (Zhang T. et al., 2023), cross-background, cross-institutional, and cross-national collaboration should be prioritized. Interdisciplinary collaboration is particularly are beneficial for the mutual learning among different teams and contribute to the rapid advancement and diverse development of ecological risks assessment and mitigation of plastic contamination. Therefore, we strongly recommend that research institutions in various countries carry out extensive cooperation and communication to jointly promote the development of mitigation strategies.

The assessment of research impact and researcher interest in scientometric literature heavily relies on citation metrics (Bagdi et al., 2023). Traditional citation metrics often emphasize established researchers and prominent journals, potentially overlooking emerging scholars and interdisciplinary research. In contrast, altmetrics can highlight impactful work that resonates with the public, policymakers, and practitioners, thereby democratizing the recognition process. Moreover, altmetrics enable real-time tracking of research influence, providing immediate feedback to researchers regarding how their work is being received and utilized. This feedback can encourage more dynamic and responsive research practices, enabling scholars to adjust their focus and dissemination strategies based on ongoing engagement and feedback from a broader audience. Additionally, the adoption of altmetrics can catalyze the development of new tools and platforms for research dissemination and collaboration. By leveraging social media, academic networks, and digital repositories, researchers can enhance the visibility and accessibility of their work, fostering greater collaboration and innovation across disciplines. Furthermore, the integration of altmetrics into research assessment can promote greater transparency and inclusivity in recognizing scholarly contributions. By embracing a more diverse array of metrics, the academic community can better capture the multifaceted nature of scholarly influence and contribution, ultimately advancing the goals of knowledge dissemination and societal advancement.

4.2 Critical knowledge gaps

Identifying critical knowledge gaps in the studying of the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microorganisms is crucial for advancing our understanding and implementing effective strategies. Overall, the effects of plastic residues on soil microbes varied significantly across polymer type, particle shape, size, elemental composition and concentration, exposure duration, soil properties, land-use type and target object (Bucci et al., 2020; Qiu Y. et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022; Li H. Q. et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2023; Liu M. et al., 2024; Jia et al., 2024). Microplastics increased soil microbial biomass, substantially reduced soil bacterial diversity (as measured by the Shannon index) and altered the microbial community composition, with their impact on soil bacteria being more pronounced than on soil fungi (Liu M. et al., 2024). Our analysis indicates that due to limited empirical data, the effects of micro(nano)plastics on soil microbes have not been fully characterized.

A critical knowledge gaps is that the findings from laboratory experiments need to be further validated under field conditions. Firstly, while numerous studies have documented the presence and physical effects of micro(nano)plastics in soil environments, their toxic effects on microbial health and function have not been fully explored. For instance, studies have shown that microplastics can alter soil physical properties, such as bulk density, soil aggregation stability and soil moisture (Zhang B. et al., 2020; Qiu Y. et al., 2022), soil pH (Song et al., 2024), soil organic carbon content (Zhao et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2022) as well as nutrient availability (Yang M. et al., 2021; Yang J. et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2020), potentially impacting microbial activity and diversity (Rillig et al., 2019b; Hanif et al., 2024). However, direct assessments of toxicity, such as changes in microbial cell viability, metabolic activity, and gene expression induced by micro(nano)plastic exposure, are still limited. Experimental studies on the biochemical and physiological responses of soil microbes to micro(nano)plastics are essential. For instance, it is crucial to determine whether micro(nano)plastics induce oxidative stress, disrupt cell membranes, or interfere with essential metabolic processes in soil microbes (Zhu et al., 2018). Furthermore, most existing studies on the impacts of micro(nano)plastics on soil microbial community have used a certain type of virgin polymer. In contrast, under field conditions, soil microbial communities are often exposed to a mixture of different micro(nano)plastics, covering a range of degradation gradients. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how the concentration, particle size, shape, and chemical composition of micro(nano)plastics affect their toxicity. Such studies can reveal the mechanisms underlying microbial stress induced by micro(nano)plastic and help determine which specific microbial groups are particularly susceptible to these pollutants (Qi Y. et al., 2020). In addition, most existing studies use concentrations higher than those found in real environmental conditions (Shen et al., 2019; Wang W. et al., 2021; Wang L. et al., 2021). Furthermore, most studies involve a single soil type, whereas the responses of soil microbial communities to micro(nano)plastics vary greatly under field conditions, influenced by the diversity of microbial taxa, the heterogeneity of soil types, and intensive anthropogenic activities. It is well known that different soil types exhibit distinct differences in physicochemical properties, microbial diversity, and functional gene abundance (Li H. Z. et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2024a). Soil microbial communities exhibit selective response to plastic residues. Different microbial species and functional groups show varying degrees of sensitivity to micro(nano)plastic pollution. For instance, some bacteria May possess metabolic pathways that enable them to degrade certain types of microplastics, whereas others May be inhibited or killed by the same contaminants (Rochman et al., 2016). This variability in microbial responses makes it more complex to generalize the ecological impacts of micro(nano)plastics in different soil ecosystems. Moreover, soil characteristics, such as texture, soil water content, organic matter content and pH, can modulate the effects of micro(nano)plastics on microbial communities. For instance, soils with high organic matter content May adsorb micro(nano)plastics, reducing their bioavailability and toxicity to microbes (Salam et al., 2023). Conversely, sandy soils with low organic content cannot buffer these impacts as effectively, leading to greater microbial stress. Understanding the interactions between soil properties and micro(nano)plastics is crucial for predicting the ecological outcomes of microplastic pollution in different environmental contexts. Given this complexity, comprehensive studies involving a wide range of microbial taxa and different soil types are needed. Such studies should aim to identify patterns and drivers of microbial response to micro(nano)plastics, helping elucidate factors determining susceptibility and resilience. By incorporating microbiological, soil science, and environmental chemistry approaches, future studies can comprehensively understand the ecotoxicological effects of micro(nano)plastics on soil ecosystems (de Souza Machado et al., 2018a).

The long-term ecological impacts of microplastics on soil microbial communities are another critical knowledge gap. Most existing studies concentrate on short-term effects. Short-term laboratory experiments, while valuable for initial insights, cannot reflect the dynamic interactions and cumulative effects that occur over a long period in natural environments. For instance, a recent study reported that short-term exposure to pollutants significantly affected soil bacterial functions, while long-term exposure did not exert significant impact on soil bacterial functions (Wu Z. et al., 2024). In contrast, long-term studies under field condition are essential to capture seasonal variations, microbial succession, and the gradual accumulation of microplastics in soils, providing a more comprehensive picture of their ecological impacts (Liu et al., 2023). Plastic accumulation and persistence in soil can last for many decades (Temporiti et al., 2022). Short-term studies hinder our ability to generalize findings and assess the chronic effects of microplastic pollution on soil health and functionality (Rochman et al., 2016). Over time, the microplastics gradually fragment and degrade into smaller particles, including nanoplastics, which can alter their toxicity and bioavailability (Ya et al., 2021; Wu J. Y. et al., 2024). Long-term field studies can reveal these processes, showing how the aging and weathering of microplastics affect their interactions with soil microbes. Furthermore, such studies can help determine the adaptability or resistance potential of microbes to micro(nano)plastic pollution, enhancing a deeper understanding of ecosystem resilience. The complexity and variability of soil ecosystems also require long-term monitoring and field studies to understand the comprehensive impact of micro(nano)plastics on soil microbial communities. By evaluating the long-term and synergistic impacts of micro(nano)plastics, scholars can better predict their ecological consequences and provide information for risk assessments and remediation efforts. This knowledge is crucial for developing sustainable agricultural practices and environmental management strategies, protecting soil health and ensuring the continued provision of important ecosystem services.

In addition, it is noteworthy noting that microplastics and/or nanoplastics can absorb other pollutants, including heavy metals. Microplastics rarely exist alone; they interact with heavy metals, pesticides (Fu et al., 2024; Wu C. et al., 2024), and organic pollutants (Ya et al., 2023), which May exacerbate their toxic effects on soil microbial communities. Therefore, it is a necessity to explore the potential interactions between microplastics and other soil pollutants, such as heavy metals (Meng et al., 2023; Li et al., 2024; Song et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2024) and pesticides (Fu et al., 2024), which May enhance or diminish their ecological impacts on soil ecosystem. Besides, the toxicity caused by plastic additives as well as the indirect effects on soil properties, such as soil water content (Qiu Y. et al., 2022) and soil organic carbon (Zhao et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2022; Salam et al., 2023), and plant performance (Qi et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2019; Zhang L. et al., 2022) during plastic degradation, would also have a significant impact on soil microbial community (Boots et al., 2019; de Souza Machado et al., 2019). To deepen our understanding of the specific effects and underlying mechanisms, of plastic debris on soil microbes and/or microbial communities. It is necessary to include more types of polymers, shapes, particle sizes, degradation stages and concentrations of plastic debris into consideration. For instance, nanoplastics, May have unique impacts that require further investigation. Meanwhile, despite microplastics being recognized as a pervasive pollutant in soil ecosystems, our understanding of their specific interactions with soil microbial communities at a molecular and cellular level is still relatively unclear. Current studies mainly focus on the presence and quantification of microplastics in soils, which leaves a significant knowledge gap in understanding how these particles influence microbial physiology and metabolism. For instance, although it is known that microplastics can serve as vectors for chemical pollutants and pathogens, the exact mechanisms of interaction between these pollutants and microbial cell membranes, intracellular processes, and genetic material are poorly understood (Rillig et al., 2019b). Advanced molecular techniques, such as metagenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, are urgently needed to dissect these complex interactions. These approaches can reveal changes in microbial gene expression, shifts in metabolic pathways, and changes in community composition induced by microplastic exposure (Tiwari et al., 2022). Furthermore, studying the physical interactions between microplastics and microbial cells, such as adhesion, biofilm formation, and particle ingestion, is crucial for understanding the broader ecological implications (Qiu X. et al., 2022). Without a detailed understanding from molecular and cellular perspectives, our ability to predict the ecological consequences of micro(nano)plastics in soils will be severely limited. Besides, a comprehensive understanding the ecological risks of micro(nano)plastics, particularly for nonbiodegradable nanoplastics the perspective of soil food web is also needed (Wei et al., 2022). Exploring the potential impacts of nanoplastics on soil microorganisms and their roles in soil nutrient cycling could provide valuable insights into the overall ecological consequences of nanoplastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems. Studying the interactions between nanoplastics and soil biota at the molecular level May reveal novel mechanisms underlying the persistence and bioaccumulation of nanoplastics in soil environments. This deeper understanding is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies to safeguard soil health and ecosystem resilience. Finally, soil, soil microbes and plants are closely related and interact constantly, and thus it is advisable to unravel the general response patterns of ecosystems to plastic pollution in the view of plant–soil-microbial systems (Jia et al., 2024).

The fourth critical knowledge gap is to better understand how changes in microbial communities resulted from plastic contaminants affect soil ecosystems and their functions. Due to the complex interactions between plastic residues, soil and soil microorganisms, and the mechanism of the effect of micro(nano)plastics on soil microorganisms is not clear at present (Zhou Y. et al., 2020; Qi et al., 2024). Plastic pollution is expected to induce shifts in soil microbial community composition and its mediated ecological processes through pH (Song et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024), soil moisture (Qiu Y. et al., 2022), soil organic matter content (Zhao et al., 2021; Salam et al., 2023; Iqbal et al., 2024a). The shifts in community structure can further change microbial function (Huang et al., 2019; Fei et al., 2020; Li H. Z. et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2024a; Dong et al., 2024b; Liu et al., 2024a), microbial interactions (Hu et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022a; Zhou et al., 2024) as well as the complex interplay of microbial processes in the soil environment (Zhang et al., 2024). It is still unclear how changes in microbial communities caused by plastic contaminants affect soil ecosystems and their functions. Therefore, investigating the influence of plastic residues on essential soil processes like nutrient cycling is crucial for assessing broader ecological consequences (Shi et al., 2022b; Zhu D. et al., 2022; Zhu F. et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2024a). Furthermore, recent studies have examined the effects of micro(nano)plastics on greenhouse gasses (Gao et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022; Rauscher et al., 2023; Iqbal et al., 2024b; Su et al., 2024; Sunil et al., 2024) and climate change (Shen et al., 2020), whereas the causal relationship between micro(nano)plastics and climate change needs further exploration (Chia et al., 2023). Finally, studying the spread of plastic-associated contaminants through the food web is essential for understanding the broader ecological impacts of soil plastic pollution. Studies have shown that plastic pollution significantly affects plant health (Khalid et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2024; Qi et al., 2018) and higher trophic levels (Gao et al., 2024; Guo et al., 2024; Kwak et al., 2024), whereas complex interactions exist between plants, soil microorganisms and animals need further investigation. Investigating the combined pollution of micro(nano) plastics and other contaminants on soil microbial functional groups and functional genes is currently a key research focus (Ya et al., 2021), with potential to advance the field in the coming years.

Furthermore, there are few studies addressing the interactions between micro(nano)plastics and soil microbial communities under environmental stresses, such as drought (Liu et al., 2024b; Lozano et al., 2021a; Lozano et al., 2024), elevated CO₂ (Xu et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2023), and nitrogen deposition (Zhang S. et al., 2023). Therefore, investigating the effects of these environmental stressors on the interactions between micro(nano)plastics and soil microbial communities is crucial for understanding the potential risks associated with plastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems. Investigating how drought conditions affect the behavior and fate of micro(nano)plastics in soil, as well as their effects on microbial community structure and function, can provide valuable insights into the resilience of soil ecosystems in the face of climate change challenges. Moreover, exploring the combined effects of elevated CO₂ and nitrogen deposition on the interactions between micro(nano)plastics and soil microbial communities can provide a comprehensive understanding of how multiple stressors May exacerbate the ecological consequences of plastic contamination in soil environments. By unraveling the intricate relationships between environmental stressors and micro(nano)plastics in soil systems, we can better assess the long-term impacts on soil health, plant growth, and ecosystem function. In conclusion, integrating studies on the interactions between micro(nano)plastics and soil microbial communities under various environmental stressors are essential for advancing our knowledge of the ecological impacts of plastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems. Future research efforts should focus on elucidating the mechanisms of these interactions, identifying potential mitigation strategies, and developing sustainable management practices to protect soil biodiversity and ecosystem resilience in the face of global environmental changes.

Finally, identifying soil microbes with potential to degrade microplastic and/or nanoplastics and developing sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics that reduce negative impacts on soil microorganisms, is also a critical knowledge gap. This requires interdisciplinary collaborations between microbiologists, environmental scientists, and material engineers. By harnessing the power of biotechnology and nanotechnology, innovative solutions can be developed for the degradation of microplastics and nanoplastics in soil ecosystems. Understanding the molecular interactions between soil microbes and plastic pollutants is crucial for designing customized biodegradation strategies. Furthermore, the development of environmentally friendly bioplastics derived from renewable resources can provide sustainable alternatives to traditional plastics, reducing the accumulation of harmful residues in the soil environments. In addition to technological advancements, educational initiatives and public awareness campaigns play a pivotal role in promoting responsible plastic use and waste management practices.

4.3 Hotspots and frontiers

Keywords, the most significant phrases in a particular field of study (Ye et al., 2020), serve as crucial markers for understanding patterns and trends in research that aid in comprehending shifts in focal points and development trends over time (Bagdi et al., 2023). Examining the joint presence of keywords is an effective approach to pinpointing research focal points in a specific field of study (Gao et al., 2020; Ranjbari et al., 2021). Moreover, performing cluster analyses on keyword is advantageous for attaining a comprehensive insight into past and present research concerns and identifying future research prospects (Wahyuningrum et al., 2023). The cluster analysis of the most frequently associated keywords spotlights soil bacterial communities, micro-plastic pollution, soil microbial communities, and soil as the most prevalent research subjects. Additionally, conducting a burst analysis on key terms aids in mapping out the progression of research highlights over time, and anticipating forthcoming research directions (Chen et al., 2014). The burst analysis of keywords supports that “ecological risks” and “soil aggregation” are the latest and most important studying topics of the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microorganisms.

The ecological risks of plastic pollution on soil microbial community and associated ecosystem functioning are a complex issue. To date the underlying mechanisms responsible for the impacts of microplastics on soil microbial communities has been relatively less explored (Huang et al., 2024), and thus further research is needed. Understanding the ecological risks of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities and associated ecosystem function, studies with unambiguous objectives, scientifically rigorous experiment design, appropriate sampling and analyzing techniques, as well as statistical method are needed. Meanwhile, a multidisciplinary approach combining ecological, microbiological, and environmental science is required.

Soil aggregation refers to the process by which soil particles bind together to form stable aggregates. These aggregates provide structural stability to the soil, improve water infiltration and retention, and create specific habitats for soil microorganisms. Plastics pollution can negatively impact soil aggregation by physically interfering with the formation and stability of soil aggregates (Qiu Y. et al., 2022). Plastics fragments can also hinder nutrient and water movement through the soil, affecting the availability of essential resources for soil microorganisms. Consequently, the disruption of soil aggregation due to plastic pollution can reduce the habitat quality for soil microbes, impair their functioning, and ultimately affect the overall soil health. Microplastic can affect soil organic matter, soil microbial community, enzymatic activities, and soil aggregation (Blöcker et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2022). However, the impacts of plastic pollution on soil aggregation are still a controversial issue. Some studies found soil aggregation was negatively affected by microplastics (de Souza Machado et al., 2018b; Lozano et al., 2021b; Qiu Y. et al., 2022; Zhang Y. et al., 2022), one study demonstrated no significant effect (Liang et al., 2021), whereas another study reported that soil aggregation was increased by 21.7% (Lozano et al., 2021a). A likely reason for the inconsistency of microplastic pollution on soil aggregation would be related to differences in the aggregate-fraction method and soil organic matter. Furthermore, the interactions between microplastic and microbes is mutual, and the mechanisms driving their interactions is unclear and deserve due attention (de Souza Machado et al., 2018b; Lozano et al., 2021b; Qiu Y. et al., 2022). Finally, soil pH and plants also regulate the responses of soil microbes to plastics (Liu et al., 2023). Therefore, it is advisable to evaluate ecological risks of micro(nano) plastics based on whole ecosystem functions rather than individual function (Jia et al., 2024).

The impacts of plastics pollution on soil microorganisms at a fine-scale are a relatively new area of research that is considered a frontier. Studying the specific effects of plastic pollution on ecological risks and soil aggregation is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of how plastics pollution affects soil microorganisms. This research can lead to the identification of biomarkers, prediction of long-term effects, and the development of effective strategies to mitigate the damage caused by plastics pollution. In summary, understanding the ecological risks and soil aggregation is vital in comprehending the impacts of plastics pollution on soil microorganisms. Addressing these critical areas is essential for maintaining soil health, ecosystem functioning, and ensuring the sustainability of our planet.

4.4 Merits and limitations

This study has several unique merits. Firstly, studies addressing impacts of micro-plastics on soil microbial community were systematically analyzed using bibliometric for the first time to provide comprehensive guidance for scholars in the related research. Additionally, multiple bibliometric tools were used simultaneously to overcome their individual limitations and thus provided detailed and convincing evidence. Finally, bibliometric analysis provides more complete and objective insight into the hotspots and frontiers than traditional reviews.

While bibliometric analysis provides valuable quantitative insights into research trends, productivity, and impact, it is important to acknowledge its limitations in capturing the full depth and context of research content. Bibliometric methods primarily focus on measurable data such as publication counts, citation metrics, and collaboration networks. However, they often fall short in providing a comprehensive understanding of the qualitative aspects of research, such as the nuances of scientific discourse, the context of discoveries, and the broader implications of research findings. Additionally, it cannot provide an in-depth topic content (Paul and Criado, 2020; Wahyuningrum et al., 2023).

5 Conclusion and outlook

5.1 Conclusion

The increasing number of publications highlights the growing interest in the potential impacts of plastic contamination on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, particularly on soil microbial communities. However, studies on the ecological risks of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities are still limited, and the mechanisms underlying these impacts are not yet clear. The leading countries investigating the ecological risks of plastic pollution on soil microorganisms are China, Germany, and the United States. Nevertheless, there is a need to enhance cooperation and communication among different countries and institutions. Davey L. Jones and Geissen Violette are suggested as potential collaborators in this field. Journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Science of the Total Environment, Environmental Pollution, Chemosphere, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Applied Soil Ecology, Environment International, Environmental Research, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, and Frontiers in Environmental Science have played significant roles in exploring the interactions between soil microorganisms and plastics, with the Journal of Hazardous Materials being particularly influential, although improvements in quality and influence are still needed. The most cited paper in this area is “Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance”. The main keywords of studying on the impacts of plastic pollution on soil microbial communities are soil, plastic pollution, biodegradation, and soil microbial communities. The potential hotspots for future research in this field are the ecological risks of biodegradable plastic on soil microbial diversity and functions.

5.2 Future research directions and management recommendations

Since the generalizable pattern of responses of soil microbes to contaminant due to the present of plastic residues remain poorly understood, more long-term field studies including more polymer types, element composition, size and ages in widescale are needed. Furthermore, to evaluate ecological risks of micro(nano) plastics from the perspective of soil food web with advanced multi-omics approaches is necessary. Meanwhile, a detailed content analysis of key publications identified through bibliometric methods to understand the themes, arguments and innovations is also necessary. In-depth case studies of specific research groups, institutions, or projects are expected to uncover the social, economic, and institutional factors influencing research productivity and impact. Engaging with researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders through interviews and surveys to identify emerging research areas and priorities that May not yet be reflected in bibliometric data. Integrating quantitative bibliometric analysis with qualitative data collection and analysis to provide a more comprehensive and actionable understanding of the scientific landscape, thereby informing more effective research funding and policy decisions. In conclusion, establishing robust monitoring protocols to assess the presence and abundance of plastics in various soil types, along with the corresponding changes in microbial communities, is crucial. Collaboration among ecologists, microbiologists, materials scientists, and policymakers is essential to mitigate the environmental consequences of plastic pollution and safeguard the health and resilience of soil ecosystems.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

BY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LW: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. WF: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft. QL: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (no. 2021YFS0295).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1468592/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1. ^ https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search

References

Abbasi, S., Moore, F., Keshavarzi, B., Hopke, P. K., Naidu, R., Rahman, M. M., et al. (2020). PET-microplastics as a vector for heavy metals in a simulated plant rhizosphere zone. Sci. Total Environ. 744:140984. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140984