Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1448950
This article is part of the Research Topic Soil Microbial Communities to Promote Suppressiveness against Soil-Borne Pathogens and Diseases View all 3 articles

Synergistic co-evolution of rhizosphere bacteria in response to acidification amelioration strategies: impacts on the alleviation of tobacco wilt and underlying mechanisms

Provisionally accepted
Bian Hong Zhang Bian Hong Zhang 1Li-Na Tang Li-Na Tang 2*Ri Kun Li Ri Kun Li 3*Rui-Xin Pan Rui-Xin Pan 1*Lin-Dong You Lin-Dong You 1*Xiao-Yan Chen Xiao-Yan Chen 1*Kai-Wen Yang Kai-Wen Yang 1*Wenxiong Lin Wenxiong Lin 1*Jin-Wen Huang Jin-Wen Huang 1*
  • 1 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2 Tobacco Science Research Institute of Fujian Tobacco Monopoly Bureau, FuZhou, China
  • 3 Shicheng County Tobacco Company of Jiangxi Province, GanZhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Soil acidification represents a severe threat to tobacco cultivation regions in South China, exacerbating bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. The comprehension of the underlying mechanisms that facilitate the restoration of rhizosphere microbial communities in "healthy soils" is imperative for ecologically managing tobacco bacterial wilt. This study focuses on acidified tobacco soils that have been subjected to continuous cultivation for 20 years. The experimental treatments included lime (L), biochar (B), and a combination of lime and biochar (L+B), in addition to a control group (CK). Utilizing rhizosphere biology and niche theory, we assessed disease suppression effects, changes in soil properties, and the co-evolution of the rhizosphere bacterial community. Each treatment significantly reduced tobacco bacterial wilt by 16.67% to 20.14% compared to the control group (CK) (P < 0.05) and increased yield by 7.86% to 27.46% (P < 0.05). The biochar treatment (B) proved to be the most effective, followed by the lime-biochar combination (L+B). The key factors controlling wilt were identified through random forest regression analysis as an increase in soil pH and exchangeable bases, along with a decrease in exchangeable acidity. However, lime treatment alone led to an increase in soil bulk density and a decrease in available nutrients, whereas both biochar and lime-biochar treatments significantly improved these parameters (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the abundance of Ralstonia and wilt incidence. Nonetheless, all treatments significantly expanded the ecological niche breadth and average variation degree (AVD), enhanced positive interactions and cohesion within the community, and intensified negative interactions involving Ralstonia. The utilization of lime-biochar mixtures is highly recommended for tobacco production due to its potential ecological and economic benefits. This study offers valuable insights for disease control strategies and presents a novel perspective for research on Solanaceous crops.

    Keywords: Bacterial wilt, Acidification amelioration, Tobacco, Rrhizosphere bacteria, Synergistic co-evolution

    Received: 14 Jun 2024; Accepted: 18 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Tang, Li, Pan, You, Chen, Yang, Lin and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Li-Na Tang, Tobacco Science Research Institute of Fujian Tobacco Monopoly Bureau, FuZhou, China
    Ri Kun Li, Shicheng County Tobacco Company of Jiangxi Province, GanZhou, China
    Rui-Xin Pan, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Lin-Dong You, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Xiao-Yan Chen, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Kai-Wen Yang, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Wenxiong Lin, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Jin-Wen Huang, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, School of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.