Zhe Lyu1*
Amelia-Elena Rotaru2
Mark Pimentel3
Cui-Jing Zhang4
Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann5,6
James G. Ferry7*- 1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
- 2Nordic Center for Earth Evolution (NORDCEE), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- 3Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 4Archaeal Biology Center, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
- 5Archaea Physiology & Biotechnology Group, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
- 6Arkeon GmbH, Tulln a.d. Donau, Austria
- 7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Cross-boundary significance of methanogens - the methane moment and beyond
Introduction
As previously outlined in our editorial preface (Lyu et al.), methanogens are anaerobic methane-producing archaea that colonize almost every corner of the earth. This ubiquitous distribution is coupled with their enormous diversity, outsized contributions to global methane emissions, active interactions with surrounding microbiomes, and potential roles in the health and disease of humans, animals, and plants. Consequently, it is our collective view that methanogens are of cross-boundary significance, a primary motivation for us to establish this exciting Research Topic.
In conclusion, we are very fortunate to have been able to edit and publish 18 manuscripts from 122 authors. Here, our editorial team presents an epilog for a bird's-eye view of these manuscripts. Because this Research Topic is dedicated to William “Barny” Whitman, our epilog ends with a special commentary about him, contributed by James G. Ferry.
Emeritus Professors Whitman and Ferry have both advanced methanogen research in their own remarkable ways, and we invite scientists around the world to stand on their and other giants' shoulders to continue pushing boundaries in studying this powerful group of archaea. Together, we shall create a collective momentum that helps to carry humanity through the methane moment and beyond.
Summary of the Research Topic
Studies from this Research Topic reinforce that methanogens occupy diverse niches across the globe. Broadly, these methanogens can be classified as environmental or host-associated. Using culture-independent and/or culture-based approaches, our authors have found environmental methanogens, both established and new species, in habitats often deemed challenging for many other life forms. These include a saline and alkaline soda lake in Russia (Khomyakova et al.), sulfate-rich marine sediments in the USA (Coon et al.), heavily polluted landfill sites in India (Prakash et al.), an alkaline terrestrial mud volcano in Russia (Khomyakova et al.), coal beds at moderate (400 m) and high (800–1,200 m) depths in China (Fu et al.) and India (Chawla et al.), and deep (640–1,738 m) underground gas storage facilities in Czech Republic and Slovakia (Hanišáková et al.). Collectively, these findings not only help us better understand the contributions of environmental methanogens to global methane emission and their adaptation strategies in diverse habitats, but offer potential applications of methanogens in solid waste treatment (Prakash et al.), lithium biorecovery from saline waters (Azim et al.), biogas recovery from coal beds (Fu et al.; Chawla et al.), and Power-to-Gas technology (Hanišáková et al.).
Compared to their environmental counterparts, host-associated methanogens are very much understudied, but our authors are beginning to narrow this knowledge gap. First, two comprehensive reviews on rumen (Khairunisa et al.) and mammalian (Volmer et al.) methanogens summarize the current knowledge, highlight the limitations therein, and offer a roadmap to address these limitations. Second, using multi-omics approaches, two experimental studies on rumen (Malik et al.) and porcine (Meene et al.) microbiomes provide rare functional insight of cattle-, buffalo-, and swine-associated methanogens in the context of diet treatment and viral infection. Finally, a molecular survey of the microbiomes across 11 multicellular species reveals positive methanogen signatures in 4 species including humans, nematode, and two sponge species (von Hoyningen-Huene et al.). The nematode discovery is of high significance, suggesting that the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans may be adopted to study host-methanogen interactions for the health and diseases of humans and animals.
Regardless of where the methanogens are found, they must eventually be studied by employing laboratory models for a mechanistic understanding of their biology and potential applications. Our authors are also making advances here across multiple scales. At the DNA level, a user-friendly CRISPR/Cas12a toolbox for genome editing is developed for Methanosarcina acetivorans, targeting regions beyond what the popular Cas9 reaches, especially the T-rich sites (Zhu et al.). Advancing to the protein level, the function of a methylthiotransferase shared by both methanogens and methanotrophic archaea is determined to catalyze the methylthiolation of select tRNAs (Boswinkle et al.). In closed batch cultures, a unified basal medium is created for methanogens. When supplemented with differential substrates and gases, it enables growth of three methanogen species operating different methanogenesis pathways (Ngoumelah et al.). Expanding to bioreactors, sophisticated cultivation methods are optimized to achieve fast, high density, and large-scale growth of Methanococcus maripaludis in fed-batch cultivation mode (Palabikyan et al.), bringing it one step closer to feasible biotechnology applications for sustainable biomanufacturing.
Last but not least, we must pursue unified principles that govern the biology of methanogens. Equally important is to update existing principles as necessary. Our authors set excellent examples on both fronts. Emeritus Professor Conrad, another giant in our field, theorizes that regardless of the ecological niches and the microbiome composition therein, the rate limiting microbes for ecosystem methane production are often methanogens instead of the primary fermenters, because methanogens exhibit unusually high apparent activation energy (Ea). Given that the higher the Ea the faster a metabolism becomes when temperatures rise, this theory predicts that methanogenesis will increase more rapidly than most other metabolisms as the atmosphere warms, thus contributing more to global warming. In another example, Professor Mukhopadhyay reminds us of a common misconception that “pseudomerein” or “pseudopeptidoglycan” instead of peptidoglycan occur in archaea, specifically the Methanobacteria and Methanopyri. The short answer is that these “pseudo” cell wall polymers are indeed a specific type of peptidoglycan, which should simply be named archaeal peptidoglycan in contrast to the bacterial types. This shall renew the interest of developing archaeal-specific antibiotics for human and animal use, as existing peptidoglycan-targeted drugs are only effective on bacteria.
Dedication to Prof. Whitman by Prof. Ferry
It is particularly fitting that this volume is dedicated to the career of William “Barny” Whitman who has made exceptional and lasting contributions to the field of methanogenesis both in research and service. Barny's research has produced milestone advances in physiological and ecological understanding achieved by integrating genetics, molecular biology, and biochemistry. His early discovery of nickel in cofactor F430 of methylcoenzyme M reductase (Whitman and Wolfe, 1980; Ellefson et al., 1982), and subsequent biochemical characterization of the enzyme (Whitman and Wolfe, 1983, 1987), launched a path taken by him and other investigators leading to current understanding of this key enzyme essential to all methanogenic pathways (Lyu et al., 2018, 2020; Shao et al., 2022). His biochemical contributions extend much further including anabolic and catabolic understanding of Methanococci. Equally significant, he developed genetic approaches for Methanoccoci that greatly accelerated a broad understanding and initiated a broader application of genetics in methanogen research. Barny's willingness to share expertise and collaborate has furthered an understanding of Methanococci that cannot be overstated. Collectively, Barny along with his trainees and collaborators have contributed ~120 publications in archaeal research focusing on methanogens.
Barny is also recognized for his major contributions to the broader field of microbiology including both the domain Bacteria and Archaea. Of note is his highly cited article entitled “Prokaryotes: The unseen majority” (Whitman et al., 1998) that raised awareness of microbiology to the broader scientific community, his integrated approach researching the marine roseobacteria and soil bacteria (Singleton et al., 2001; Furlong et al., 2002; Upchurch et al., 2008; Reisch et al., 2011; Bullock et al., 2017; Wirth et al., 2020), and his leadership in the newly established SeqCode (Hedlund et al., 2022) as a nomenclatural code for uncultivated prokaryotes.
Barny has given tirelessly to service benefiting methanogen research and the broader microbial field. For the past three decades, he has been the main driving force clarifying the taxonomy of methanogens (Keswani et al., 1996; Liu and Whitman, 2008; Prakash et al., 2023; Cui et al., 2024). It would be remiss to not recognize his wider contributions as supervising editor of Bergey's Manual and editor of Archaea. With the exceptional width and depth, it is challenging to summarize Professor Whitman's accomplishments in a single sentence except to recognize that the strength of the methanogen field would be glaringly less without his contributions. Indeed, the same applies to the wider field of prokaryotic biology.
Author contributions
ZL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. A-ER: Writing – review & editing. MP: Writing – review & editing. C-JZ: Writing – review & editing. SK-MRR: Writing – review & editing. JF: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ZL is supported by USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 7005333 as well as seed funds provided by the North Carolina State University. A-ER is supported by the NovoNordisk Foundation grant NNF21OC0067353, the Danish Research Council grant DFF 1026-00159, and the European Research Council ERC-CoG grant 101045149. C-JZ is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 42007217). Research in the group of SK-MRR at the Universtität Wien is supported by the Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FFG) grant 888509, project FlaeXMethan.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to our 122 authors and 34 reviewers who have made this Research Topic possible. We thank Dr. Oskar Modin who edited one of the manuscripts. We also appreciate the journal's Specialty Chief Editor Dr. Chuanlun Zhang and staff for their support throughout the whole process.
Conflict of interest
SK-MRR is co-founder of Arkeon GmbH. MP is a consultant for Bausch Health, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Salvo Health, and Vivante Health Inc.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bullock, H. A., Luo, H., and Whitman, W. B. (2017). Evolution of dimethylsulfoniopropionate metabolism in marine phytoplankton and bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 8:637. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00637
Cui, H. L., Hou, J., Amoozegar, M. A., Dyall-Smith, M. L., de la Haba, R. R., Minegishi, H., et al. (2024). Proposed minimal standards for description of new taxa of the class Halobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 74:006290. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006290
Ellefson, W. L., Whitman, W. B., and Wolfe, R. S. (1982). Nickel-containing factor F430: chromophore of the methylreductase of Methanobacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3707–3710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.12.3707
Furlong, M. A., Singleton, D. R., Coleman, D. C., and Whitman, W. B. (2002). Molecular and culture-based analyses of prokaryotic communities from an agricultural soil and the burrows and casts of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1265–1279. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1265-1279.2002
Hedlund, B. P., Chuvochina, M., Hugenholtz, P., Konstantinidis, K. T., Murray, A. E., Palmer, M., et al. (2022). SeqCode: a nomenclatural code for prokaryotes described from sequence data. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1702–1708. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01214-9
Keswani, J., Orkand, S., Premachandran, U., Mandelco, L., Franklin, M. J., and Whitman, W. B. (1996). Phylogeny and taxonomy of mesophilic Methanococcus spp. and comparison of rRNA, DNA hybridization, and phenotypic methods. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, 727–735. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-3-727
Liu, Y., and Whitman, W. B. (2008). Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125, 171–189. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.019
Lyu, Z., Chou, C. W., Shi, H., Wang, L., Ghebreab, R., Phillips, D., et al. (2018). Assembly of methyl coenzyme M reductase in the methanogenic Archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis. J. Bacteriol. 200:e00746-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00746-17
Lyu, Z., Shao, N., Chou, C. W., Shi, H., Patel, R., Duin, E. C., et al. (2020). Posttranslational methylation of arginine in methyl coenzyme M reductase has a profound impact on both methanogenesis and growth of Methanococcus maripaludis. J. Bacteriol. 202:e00654-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00654-19
Prakash, O., Dodsworth, J. A., Dong, X., Ferry, J. G., L'Haridon, S., Imachi, H., et al. (2023). Proposed minimal standards for description of methanogenic archaea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 73. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005500
Reisch, C. R., Stoudemayer, M. J., Varaljay, V. A., Amster, I. J., Moran, M. A., and Whitman, W. B. (2011). Novel pathway for assimilation of dimethylsulphoniopropionate widespread in marine bacteria. Nature 473, 208–211. doi: 10.1038/nature10078
Shao, N., Fan, Y., Chou, C. W., Yavari, S., Williams, R. V., Amster, I. J., et al. (2022). Expression of divergent methyl/alkyl coenzyme M reductases from uncultured archaea. Commun. Biol. 5:1113. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04057-6
Singleton, D. R., Furlong, M. A., Rathbun, S. L., and Whitman, W. B. (2001). Quantitative comparisons of 16S rRNA gene sequence libraries from environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4374–4376. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4374-4376.2001
Upchurch, R., Chiu, C.-Y., Everett, K., Dyszynski, G., Coleman, D. C., and Whitman, W. B. (2008). Differences in the composition and diversity of bacterial communities from agricultural and forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1294–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.027
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., and Wiebe, W. J. (1998). Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 6578–6583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578
Whitman, W. B., and Wolfe, R. S. (1980). Presence of nickel in factor F430 from Methanobacterium bryantii. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 92, 1196–1201. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)90413-1
Whitman, W. B., and Wolfe, R. S. (1983). Activation of the methylreductase system from Methanobacterium bryantii by ATP. J. Bacteriol. 154, 640–649. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.2.640-649.1983
Whitman, W. B., and Wolfe, R. S. (1987). Inhibition by corrins of the ATP-dependent activation and CO2 reduction by the methylreductase system in Methanobacterium bryantii. J. Bacteriol. 169, 87–92. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.1.87-92.1987
Keywords: methanogenesis, microbiome, host, environment, agriculture, energy, health, biotechnology
Citation: Lyu Z, Rotaru A-E, Pimentel M, Zhang C-J, Rittmann SK-MR and Ferry JG (2024) Editorial: Cross-boundary significance of methanogens - the methane moment and beyond. Front. Microbiol. 15:1434586. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1434586
Received: 18 May 2024; Accepted: 27 May 2024;
Published: 24 June 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Chuanlun Zhang, Southern University of Science and Technology, China
Copyright © 2024 Lyu, Rotaru, Pimentel, Zhang, Rittmann and Ferry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhe Lyu, zlyu3@ncsu.edu; James G. Ferry, jgf3@psu.edu