Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1409559

Assessing the influence of diverse Phosphorus Sources on Bacterial communities and the Abundance of Phosphorus Cycle Genes in Acidic Paddy Soils

Provisionally accepted
BONGOUA-DEVISME AFFI JEANNE BONGOUA-DEVISME AFFI JEANNE 1*KOUAKOU S. ahya KOUAKOU S. ahya 1KOUADIO K. Hippolyte KOUADIO K. Hippolyte 1BAHAN F. LEMONOU MICHAEL BAHAN F. LEMONOU MICHAEL 2
  • 1 Félix Houphouët-Boigny University, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
  • 2 Centre National de Recherche Agronomique, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The impact of chemical fertilizers on soil microbial communities is well acknowledged.This study assesses the influence of various phosphorus sources on soil bacterial composition, abundance, and Phosphorus Cycle Gene Abundance. Three phosphorus sources (natural phosphate rock, triple super phosphate (TSP), and chemical fertilizer NPK) were field tested following two rice cultivation cycles. Soil samples were subsequently collected and analyzed for bacterial groups and phosphorus cycle genes. Results indicated that the bacterial community composition remained consistent, comprising five main phyla: Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Halobacterota, and Chloroflexia, regardless of fertilizer type. NPK fertilizer significantly reduced the relative abundance of Chloroflexia by 19% and Firmicutes by 16.4%, while increasing Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria by 27.5% and 58.8%, respectively. TSP fertilizer increased Actinobacteria by 27.1% and Halobacterota by 24.8%, but reduced Chloroflexia by 8.6%, Firmicutes by 12.6%, and Proteobacteria by 0.6%. Phosphate rock application resulted in reductions of Chloroflexia by 27.1%, Halobacterota by 22.9%, and Firmicutes by 6.2%, alongside increases in Actinobacteria by 46.6% and Proteobacteria by 23.8%. Combined application of TSP, NPK, and phosphate rock led to increases in Proteobacteria (24-40%) and Actinobacteria (13-39%), and decreases in Chloroflexia (5.2-22%) and Firmicutes (6-12.3%) compared to the control (T0). While the different phosphorus sources did not alter the composition of phosphorus cycle genes, they did modulate their abundance. NPK fertilizer did not significantly affect ppK genes (57-59%) but reduced gcd (100% to 69%), 3-phytase (74% to 34%), appA (91% to 63%), and phoD (83% to 67%). Phosphate rock reduced appA and gcd by 27% and 15%, respectively, while increasing 3-phytase by 19%.TSP decreased ppK and phoD by 42% and 40%, respectively, and gcd and appA by 34% and 56%, respectively. Combined fertilizers reduced appA (49% to 34%), 3-phytase (10% to 0%), and gcd (27% to 6%), while increasing ppK (72% to 100%). Among tested phosphorus sources, natural phosphate rock was best, causing moderate changes in bacterial composition and phosphorus genes, supporting balanced soil microbial activity. These findings highlight the complex interactions between fertilizers and soil microbial communities, underscoring the need for tailored fertilization strategies to maintain soil health and optimize agricultural productivity.

    Keywords: NPK fertilizers, TSP, Natural phosphate rock, bacteria phylum, chemical fertilizer

    Received: 30 Mar 2024; Accepted: 22 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 AFFI JEANNE, ahya, Hippolyte and LEMONOU MICHAEL. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: BONGOUA-DEVISME AFFI JEANNE, Félix Houphouët-Boigny University, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.