Giulia Fantoni1,2*
Giuseppe Boccadifuoco1
Federica Verdirosa1
Eleonora Molesti1
Alessandro Manenti1
Emanuele Montomoli1,3- 1VisMederi S.r.l., Siena, Italy
- 2Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- 3Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
The increase in antimicrobial-resistant bacterial strains has highlighted the need for a new vaccine strategy. The primary goal of a candidate vaccine is to prevent disease, by inducing a persistent immunologic memory, through the activation of pathogen-specific immune response. Antibody titer is the main parameter used to assess the immunogenicity of bacterial vaccine candidates and it is the most widely used as a correlate of protection. On the other hand, the antibody titer alone cannot provide complete information on all the activity mediated by antibodies which can only be assessed by functional assays, like the serum bactericidal assay and the opsonophagocytosis assay. However, due to the involvement of many biological factors, these assays are difficult to standardize. Some improvements have been achieved in recent years, but further optimizations are needed to minimize inter- and intra-laboratories variability and to allow the applicability of these functional assays for the vaccine immunogenicity assessment on a larger scale.
1 Introduction
After the emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus on infectious diseases is shifting to another global public health threat caused by the rise of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacterial strains. At the beginning of the 20th century, bacterial diseases were the highest cause of mortality and morbidity. The 1940–1980 period was characterized by a continuous discovery of new antibiotics, the so-called “miracle drugs,” which increased life expectancy and was perceived by society as a milestone achievement in microbiological research (Baquero, 2021). From the mid-1980s, the focus of the pharmaceutical industry shifted to other drug development, and the discovery of new antibiotics was remarkably reduced. Therefore, since the emergence of antibiotic resistance was no longer compensated by new anti-microbial drug discoveries, bacteria became again a global threat to modern health care, raising concerns of national and international public health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) (Baquero, 2021). For this reason, during the last few years, vaccines have become a valuable alternative to prevent pandemics caused by AMR bacteria, for which currently available treatments are no longer or less effective. Vaccines can mitigate directly and indirectly the antimicrobial resistance consequences. Vaccines can prevent diseases by the elicitation of the immune response, reducing antimicrobial drug consumption, and the development of resistance. This is particularly important considering community and healthcare-associated infections with multidrug-resistant pathogens. Additionally, the use of viral vaccines reduces the need for antibiotic treatments, that may occur in case of secondary bacterial infections (Rosini et al., 2020). However, bacteria are much more complex organisms than viruses and represent a more difficult target for vaccine development, today only a limited number of vaccines are licensed and applied against bacterial infections. Despite these difficulties, the WHO encourages the development of new therapies and vaccines targeting AMR bacteria strains (Tacconelli et al., 2018). However, for bacterial vaccine advancement, appropriate assays for immunogenicity assessment are needed. Progress in antigen discovery must go along with the set-up of robust and reliable methods of evaluation performed during the strict approval process.
2 Which aspects are investigated to evaluate vaccine immunogenicity?
Vaccination aims to induce an immune response able to control exposure to an infectious agent and clear or prevent the infection. Ideally, a candidate vaccine should induce the adaptive immune response, represented by both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. The antigen presentation followed by vaccine administration, induces the selection of antigen-specific B-and T-cells in separate ways (Figure 1) (Kapingidza et al., 2020). The B-cell receptor (BCR) allows direct interaction with the antigen, without T-cell involvement. The humoral immunity is based on the capacity of the B-cells to secrete antibodies. Antibodies have two functional domains, called the antigen-binding fragment F(ab’)2 and the crystallizable fragment (Fc) which are responsible for the specificity and functionality, respectively. The basic function of the F(ab’)2 fragment is the binding of antigenic epitopes via complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) (Mix et al., 2006). The Fc domain passes through structural variations identified as five isotypes (IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE) which are responsible for distinct innate immune effector functions (Kapingidza et al., 2020). Antibodies variety is generated during Ag-dependent B-cell maturation in peripheral lymphatic tissues by isotype class switching and somatic hypermutation (Mix et al., 2006). The Fc fragment mediates several antibody functions, such as receptor-mediated phagocytosis, cytotoxicity, the release of inflammatory mediators, the transport through the mucosa, and complement activation (Figure 1) (Mix et al., 2006; Jiskoot et al., 2019). It follows that a strong antibody–antigen affinity and specificity may generate greater potency and efficacy against bacterial infections (Goulet and Atkins, 2020). The antibody-mediated neutralization represents one of the simplest mechanisms involved in protection against bacteria. The F(ab’)2 domains bind the specific pathogen antigen, inhibiting the host-cell invasion or bacterial toxin effect. Moreover, antibodies hold back pathogen pathogenesis, with the inhibition of microbial virulence factors like biofilm formation (Lu et al., 2018).
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the generation of the basic immune response induced by vaccination, the main functions mediated by antibodies against bacterial infection, and the related serological test. Antigen presentation, followed by vaccine administration, induces the selection of antigen-specific B- and T-cells. The dendritic cells (DCs) process the antigens and present them via MHC class I or MHC class II, promoting differentiation into cytotoxic T-cells (CD8+) and helper T cells (CD4+), respectively. Cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) mediate the lysis of autologous infected cells, while helper T-cells stimulate other immune cells, like the B-cells, through cytokine secretion. B-cells can directly interact with the vaccine antigens and produce antibodies, which mediate several functions necessary to overcome bacterial infections. The main functionality of antibodies includes neutralization of pathogens and toxins, complement activation which leads to bacterial lysis through the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC), and, finally, opsonophagocytosis mediating the elimination of bacteria by phagocytic cells. Antibody level is estimated through antibody-binding assays (ELISA), while functionality is assessed using the toxin neutralization test, the serum bactericidal assay (SBA), and the opsonophagocytosis assay (OPA). This figure was created using BioRender.com.
The complement activation represents one of the most crucial functions mediated by antibodies. The complement system consists of a complex of almost 50 plasma and surface proteins and is part of the innate immune system which cooperates with antibodies for the rapid elimination of invading bacteria. In general, the complement activation induces three different enzymatic cascades called, the classical, mannan-binding lectin (MBL) and alternative pathways. The classical complement pathway is triggered by the antibody’s interaction with the bacterial surface antigens. The C1 complex interacts with the Fc region of pentameric IgM or IgG complex and leads to the formation of the C3 convertase enzyme which transforms C3 into C3a and C3b. A high concentration of C3b switches the substrate from C3 convertase to C5 convertase, which catalyzes the cleavage and the release of C5a and C5b. The association of the C5b with C6, C7, and C8 allows the binding and then the polymerization of C9, generating the membrane attack complex (MAC) (Heesterbeek et al., 2018). The MAC is a ring-structured pore that can directly kill Gram-negative bacteria without the involvement of immune cells through osmolysis (Xie et al., 2020). The gram-positive bacteria are less susceptible to this mechanism for the presence of the peptidoglycan outer layer. In this case, the killing action is led by the strong chemoattractant C5a which recruits phagocytes in the infection site, and by the C3b opsonized particles that enhance the phagocytosis. The C3-derived products are also responsible for a long-term immune response, stimulating the adaptive immune response through the antigen presentation to B-cells and antigen-presenting cells (APC) placed in the lymphoid organs (Heesterbeek et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2018). Then, the MBL pathway is triggered by surface-specific recognition of molecules like collectins and ficolins uniquely present in bacteria and fungi. These molecules in complex with the MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs) lead to the formation of C3 convertase. Lastly, in the alternative pathway, the factor B and D proteins also play a role in the amplification loop of C3b molecules. It is also considered that in the third recognition path, factors B and D can react with spontaneous hydrolyzed C3 (C3H2O) to obtain C3 convertase (Heesterbeek et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2018). In general, all three pathways lead to the formation of C3 and C5 convertase which catalyze the formation of the C3a and C5a. The C3a and C5a are anaphylatoxins and leukocyte chemoattractants, that bind their specific receptor (C3aR, C5aR1, and C5aR2) on immune cells to stimulate and modulate the inflammatory response. Although anaphylatoxins play an important role in protection against certain infections, dysregulation has been associated with several diseases related to inflammatory disorders, like allergy, autoimmunity, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer (Nandakumar et al., 2010; Ghosh and Rana, 2023). Consequently, the C5a and C3a elicitation can be taken into consideration to evaluate the possibility of allergic reactions and hypersensitivity, during vaccine immunogenicity evaluation (Nicaise-Roland et al., 2022).
Concerning the ability of the immune response to face bacterial infections, cell-mediated immunity also plays an important role. The T-cells are unable to interact with antigens directly, but depend on the APC, like dendritic cells (DC) or macrophages, to process antigens and present through the MHC class I or MHC class II, enhancing the differentiation to cytotoxic T-cells (CD8+) and T helper cells (CD4+), respectively (Salerno-Gonçalves and Sztein, 2006). Cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) mediate the lysis of autologous cells infected by intracellular pathogens, and T-helper cells stimulate other immune cells through the secretion of cytokines and by cell-to-cell interactions. Based on the profile of the secreted cytokines, the T-cells are classified as T helper 1 (Th1) or T helper 2 (Th2) (Jiskoot et al., 2019). Th1 response stimulates the cellular-based immune response, while Th2 response leads to the humoral immune response. The Th1-cells produce cytokines, such as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNF-α), which potentiate the effector function of phagocytes and increase inflammation (Jiskoot et al., 2019). On the other hand, Th2 cells developed under the influence of IL-4 signaling, produce another set of cytokines that support B-cells proliferation and differentiation (Jiskoot et al., 2019). For this reason, Th2 cells have been associated with increased humoral responses. However, the cytokines produced by Th2 cells have been linked to IgE production; consequently, the elicitation of memory Th2 cells has become an important focus in the design of novel candidate vaccines, to evaluate and mitigate allergic reactions (Jiskoot et al., 2019). Therefore, a vaccine candidate that has a balanced Th1/Th2 response can be considered optimal (Salerno-Gonçalves and Sztein, 2006). However, current advances in the understanding of intracellular bacterial infection revealed that the immune response is more complex than the Th1/Th2 dichotomy and recognizes the role of T-helper 17 cells (Th17) in antimicrobial host defense. The Th17 is a subset of pro-inflammatory T-helper cells defined by their production of interleukin 17 (IL-17). IL-17 exhibits proinflammatory effects and is known to mediate the immunomodulation of DC, recruitment of neutrophils, and promoting the CTL and Th1 response, which is crucial against intracellular bacteria (Li et al., 2018). Therefore, the Th17/IL-17 elicitation represents an important parameter to evaluate vaccines for intracellular bacteria. The Natural Killer (NK) cells are another separate lymphocyte lineage that shows both cytotoxicity and cytokine-producing effector roles. A further function of the antibodies is the enhancement of the cytotoxic destruction of the bacterial cells through the so-called antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), mediated by NK cells. The NK cells, activated by the binding with the Fc portion of the antibody, release perforin and granzyme which lead to the death of infected or tumor cells (Vivier et al., 2008). The elicitation of efficient T-cells and the generation of memory T-cells represent another challenge in vaccine development. Indeed, modern vaccines may not efficiently elicit long-term T-cell immunity due to the short persistence of the antigens. To improve this aspect, DNA-based vaccines, viral vectors, prime-boost regimes, and adjuvant combinations, have been proposed (Corrado and Pearce, 2022). In this context, the most used techniques for the evaluation of the cell-mediated immunity response are the Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay (ELISpot) and flow cytometry applied to intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) (Salerno-Gonçalves and Sztein, 2006).
The last important function triggered by antibodies is the enhancement of opsonophagocytosis. These antibody-coated pathogens are labeled for phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages (Figure 1). In the case of antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, the Fc receptor recognizes the antibodies binding the bacterial surface and starts intracellular signaling which leads to the actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and the formation of the phagosome (Pidwill et al., 2021). Moreover, the Fc receptor recognition activates signaling of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs), which lead to the antigen presentation to the T-cells, and in some cases activates the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIMs) for the retention of the whole pathogen antigens to be transferred to B-cells and induce also a humoral immunity (Lu et al., 2018).
3 Available bacterial vaccines
The primary goal of a candidate vaccine is to prevent disease by inducing a persistent immunologic memory through the activation of pathogen-specific immune response. In particular, long-term protection involves memory cell activation that rapidly triggers a secondary immune response. Memory B-cells are responsible for the secretion of high-affinity functional antibodies, while memory T-cells are capable of rapid expansion and cytotoxic properties (Corrado and Pearce, 2022). Vaccine boosters aim to increase the quality, quantity, and persistence of the immune response inducing a secondary response (Montero et al., 2024). However, this depends on the vaccine formulation and the target pathogen. The presence of adjuvants in the formulation can induce an early activation of innate immunity which then turns into higher antibody and cellular responses to the vaccine antigens (Del Giudice et al., 2018). In general, adjuvants are useful for those vaccines formulated with purer components, like purified recombinant antigens, which represent a safer option but also show lower immunogenicity, in contrast to other types of vaccines (Del Giudice et al., 2018). In the case of the hepatitis B vaccine, the presence of adjuvant systems has been associated with positive regulation of genes associated with IFN-γ-related responses and the innate cell compartment (De Mot et al., 2020). The complexity of bacteria makes them more challenging targets for vaccine development compared to viruses (Osterloh, 2022). However, they naturally contain various immunostimulatory components that can be exploited as in-built adjuvanticity (Del Giudice et al., 2018).
Currently, five main groups of bacterial vaccines are available: whole-cell antigen (WCA), polysaccharide/protein conjugates; recombinant proteins including toxoids; live attenuated vaccines (LAV); and, more recently introduced, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) (Table 1) (Jiskoot et al., 2019). The WCA vaccine is based on the administration of inactivated bacteria (heating, irradiation, or chemical) and predominantly induces the activation of the B-cells assisted by T-helper cells for the antibodies production. For this reason, WCA immunization is efficiently used for vaccination against extracellular bacteria, like Vibrio cholerae (Dukoral and Shanchol) (Song et al., 2021; Osterloh, 2022). However, antibodies may lack effectiveness against intracellular pathogens, due to the difficulties in reaching the target. An efficient defense against intracellular bacteria requires the activation of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells, mediated by the MHC class I pathway, and Th1/Th17 response. The polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are based on bacterial capsular polysaccharides conjugated with a carrier protein. The polysaccharides alone cannot be processed and displayed on MHC molecules like proteins, consequently, it activates an immune response T-cell independent. The polysaccharide conjugation with a protein carrier enhances the engagement of CD4+ T-helper cells through the interaction with the MHC class II of B-cells which leads to higher affinity and class-switched antibodies (Rappuoli, 2018). Examples of bacterial polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are vaccines against H. influenzae type b (PedvaxHIB, ActHIB, HibTITER, proHIBiT), pneumococci (Prevnar (PVC7), Pneumovax 23(PPV)), meningococci (Menactra, Menveo, MenQuadfi) (Thisyakorn et al., 2014; Mbaeyi et al., 2020; Slack et al., 2020). The toxoid vaccines (DTaP) are composed of inactivated exotoxins released by bacteria like Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Clostridium tetani, Bordetella pertussis, induce the activation of B cells and antibody production with the cooperation of T-helper cells (Domenech De Cellès et al., 2019; Osterloh, 2022). Differently, the LAVs are based on microorganisms that have lost pathogenicity but maintain the capacity for transient intracellular replication, they can activate the cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells through the interaction with MHC class I of infected cells, reaching an efficient defense against intracellular bacteria (Osterloh, 2022). Examples of such attenuated vaccines are Mycobacterium tuberculosis (BCG), Salmonella typhi (Vivotif), and Vibrio cholerae (Vaxchora) (Fraser et al., 2007; Roy et al., 2014; Mosley et al., 2017). The OMVs carry many bacterial antigens preserving the features of the bacterial membrane, that when transferred into the cytosol of target cells have the potential to elicit T-cell responses, including cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell responses (Osterloh, 2022). The four licensed vaccines based on OMVs are all directed against N. meningitidis serogroup B bacteria (Bexsero/4CMenB, VA- MENGOC-BC, MenBVac, MeNZB) (Castilla et al., 2023).
Table 1. Five main types of available bacterial vaccines with related induced immunity response (Osterloh, 2022), an example of available vaccines, assay for immunogenicity evaluation and efficacy.
As a consequence of emerging AMR bacteria, the development of novel vaccine candidates against these bacterial targets is strongly encouraged by the public health authorities and a list of bacterial priority pathogens is available and updated by WHO. Vaccine strategy requires the inclusion of multiple serotypes, different adjuvants, and the continuous discovery of immunogenic epitopes. Bacteria possess a variety of antigens whose immunogenic potential is often unknown, and it is unclear which antigen can elicit a protective and long-lasting immune response (Poolman, 2020). There are several limitations to new bacterial vaccine development: the lack of a known correlate or surrogate of protection, the need for appropriate animal models, and the improvement in certain vaccine formulations that can increase the efficacy in high-risk groups such as infants and elders. Furthermore, intracellular bacteria represent a more challenging target for vaccine development, as the protection requires the activation of the cell-mediated immune response, besides the antibody production (North, 2020). Vaccine development is a process that requires multiple steps and needs to take into consideration multiple aspects besides the antigen discovery. The first aspect is the epidemiological impact determined by the disease, the existence of alternatives to treat the disease, and the cost/benefit associated. Fundamental is the involvement of research groups and institutions that can be aware of the stage of the scientific knowledge of the selected disease and can identify gaps in vaccine development. Lastly, significant is the existence of laboratories capable of carrying out the process from pre-clinical to phase III clinical studies in compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and others that meet Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for the production of the vaccines. After considering all these aspects, on average it takes 10 to 15 years to introduce a new vaccine to the market. The development of a vaccine is pyramidal, for every success there are many failures, where most failures occur in the preclinical and phase I stages of clinical studies (Pollard and Bijker, 2021). Traditional strategies for bacterial vaccine development aimed to induce a strong humoral response, prioritizing the use of antibody-binding assays to evaluate immunogenicity. However, binding assays, like ELISA, can only measure the level of antibodies in the serum of the patient, which may not necessarily reflect the degree of protection. Likely, the failure of some bacterial vaccines led to a broader view including the evaluation of multiple aspects of the immune response. For anti-viral vaccines, immunogenicity can be assessed through non-functional and functional assays (Trombetta et al., 2014). For example, the neutralization assay has been applied to evaluate neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. The fast approval of the COVID-19 vaccines was partly related to the reliability of these serological assays (Manenti et al., 2022). In this case, the availability of well-established functional assays, recognized by regulatory agencies, made the immunogenicity evaluation more straightforward. However, in the case of bacterial vaccines, functional assays involve critical biological components, such as live bacteria and differentiated immune cells, which are more difficult to standardize in comparison to the antibody-binding counterparts (Feavers and Walker, 2010). Further advancement in functional assays that evaluate the bactericidal and opsonization ability of the antibodies could help the development and approval of new candidate vaccines.
4 Immunologic correlates of vaccine-induced protection against bacteria
Immunogenicity is assessed at all clinical stages of the vaccine approval journey. Considering the complexity of the immune response, it is difficult to determine what are the specific immunological factors triggered against a specific pathogen. The correlate of protection (CoP) is defined as a laboratory marker of immune response, that correlates with the protection from infection, disease, or other defined endpoints (Plotkin, 2008). Considering the redundancy of the immune system, more than one vaccine-induced response can be a CoP (Plotkin, 2020). The establishment of a correlate of protection is fundamental for vaccine development strategies, as it should meet certain criteria to be accepted by regulatory agencies. The absolute CoP is a defined threshold considered for vaccine efficacy, while the relative CoP is an indicative level where the efficacy may occasionally fail. When more than one immune function is involved in protection is defined as co-correlate (Plotkin, 2020). In general, the majority of vaccines induce protection through a synergic action of antibodies and cellular immunity, which may prevent the pathogen’s diffusion through multiple mechanisms. The in-vitro evaluation of functional antibodies is the key to better characterize the features of the elicited humoral responses against bacterial pathogens (Boero et al., 2023). Serological assays able to measure the antibody’s functionality may be critical for vaccine licensure, however, there is the need for further optimizations and standardization to overcome the key barriers to the discovery of pathogen-specific CoP. Consequently, the principal CoP for bacterial infection is still represented by the antibodies measured by ELISA and there is not a defined threshold for protection for many diseases (Ipsen, 1946; Herrera et al., 2022). Usually, the toxin neutralization assay is employed to predict the protection against toxin-producing bacteria. However, in the case of anthrax bacillus and pertussis, a better correlation can occur with the assessment of specific IgG antibody levels against the toxins. Protection against pertussis also involves the cellular response elicitation (Plotkin, 2020). CoPs for enteric vaccines include antibody responses but also undefined responses in the intestine (Holmgren et al., 2017). In the case of Shigella spp., protection involves bactericidal and opsonophagocytic response and intestinal IgG and IgA antibodies against the O antigen (Holmgren et al., 2017). For pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have been established a protective cut-off value of IgG antibodies for all serotypes but protection involve also the antibodies’ opsonophagocytic ability evaluated through opsonophagocytosis assay (OPA) (Oosterhuis-Kafeja et al., 2007). For meningococcal vaccines, clinical efficacy trials are not feasible due to the low incidence of Invasive Meningococcal Disease (IMD). In 1969, Goldschneider et al. reported that the presence of serum bactericidal antibodies is predictive of protection from the disease and today the serum bactericidal assay (SBA) is considered the surrogate of protection (Goldschneider and Artenstein, n.d.). However, functional assays are more complex than antibody-binding assays; they require multiple biological factors that are not well or easy to standardize. It is also commonly agreed that traditional SBA and OPA assays can be labor-intensive, time-consuming, and require specialized equipment and well-trained personnel. Moreover, the need for international standards is a limiting factor for functional test qualification and validation restricting their employment for vaccine efficacy assessment (Toh et al., 2021).
5 Current serological assays used for the evaluation of bacterial vaccine immunogenicity
The evaluation of immunological response is a critical aspect of vaccine development, and it is required by all regulatory agencies for vaccine licensure. In the case of bacterial vaccines, the immunogenicity is evaluated through antibody-binding assay, SBA, and OPA assays which have been discussed more in detail in the sections below.
5.1 Antibody-binding assay
In the case of bacterial vaccines, the antibody titer is the major parameter evaluated for assessing the immunogenicity (Osterloh, 2022). The Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) represents the most widely serological assay used for the quantification and identification of specific antibody responses. Antibody concentration, evaluated by ELISA assay, is considered a reliable correlate of protection for most bacterial vaccines (Plotkin, 2020). Similarly, the flow cytometry tool can be used to assess antibody binding to whole pathogens rather than to specific antigens. In addition, the multiplex technologies can allow the simultaneous identification and quantification of the antibody’s binding to a substantial number of antigens related to several bacteria serotypes. For example, the Luminex platform takes advantage of the xMAP® microsphere technology, where beads are internally dyed with two or three spectrally distinct fluorochromes and covalently coupled with different capture molecules (Dunbar, 2023). These specific combinations allow distinct analysis of multiplex data and the simultaneous assessment of the antibody responses to multiple antigens. This is particularly useful in the case of polyvalent vaccines like the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV), which has broad coverage and individual serological immunoassay would be extremely time-consuming and laborious (Dunbar, 2023). However, concerning PVC vaccines, the ELISA remains the gold standard for the detection of capsule-specific IgG antibodies (LaFon and Nahm, 2018). Although, antibodies against pneumococcal polysaccharide are the primary mediators of bacterial opsonization and killing, other antibodies lacking functional activity are present in the serum. Indeed, first-generation ELISA tended to overestimate antibody levels due to the presence of non-functional antibodies. At the same time, for third-generation ELISA the specificity has been improved via pre-absorption with both pneumococcal cell wall and 22F polysaccharide to remove non-protective antibodies (Wernette et al., 2003; LaFon and Nahm, 2018). Despite the improvements, it occurred that IgG antibodies did not reflect the level of protective immunity and OPA data confirmed that these antibodies were non-functional. For this reason, toxin neutralization assay, SBA and OPA, can provide information on the functional activity of the antibodies against the bacteria (Figure 1) (Feavers and Walker, 2010).
5.2 The serum bactericidal assay
The Serum Bactericidal Assay (SBA) aims to measure the capability of pathogen-specific antibodies present in the serum to activate the complement classical pathway, trigger the MAC formation, and consequently kill the target organism (Feavers and Walker, 2010). In general, the assay involves live bacteria, usually grown until the mid-exponential phase, incubated with serially diluted sera, and an exogenous source of complement (Figure 2) (Feavers and Walker, 2010). The complement, bacteria, and their interaction, are the main biological factors difficult to standardize. On the other hand, the SBA makes it possible to evaluate the antibody’s capacity to effectively neutralize the bacteria present in the reaction. This is a significant advantage compared to the use of binding-assays which can only estimate the specific antibodies concentration but not their functional capacity. In the classical or conventional version of the SBA (C-SBA), after the incubation time, the reaction mix is plated in solid agar plates and incubated overnight (Figure 2A). In this case, bacterial survival is evaluated through the count of the Colony Forming Units (CFU). The readout is expressed as the reciprocal titer of the serum which kills ≥50% of the bacteria when compared to the negative control (Borrow et al., 2020). Bacteria can be naturally susceptible or resistant to complement-mediated killing, even in the absence of antibodies. If the bacteria are too sensitive or resistant to complement action, the SBA assay is not applicable (Toh et al., 2021). Theoretically, the complement source of choice should be from the same host species, as the assay should mimic the real immune response during the infection (Feavers and Walker, 2010). For this reason, the SBA assay used to evaluate the bactericidal activity against human host pathogens should involve human serum as a complement source. However, in the case of Neisseria meningitidis, the human complement from healthy donors can have intrinsic bactericidal activity against meningococci and the procurement of large amounts of those lots with normal hemolytic activity represents a problem (Borrow et al., 2020; Findlow et al., 2022). Consequently, the human complement source must be validated in advance for each isolate to avoid interference with the assay result. The potential solution is the use of a complement source different from the host species. The rabbit complement is the most widely used as it was found to be a reliable and suitable source of complement for SBA (rSBA). However, while the rSBA has been used for the evaluation of MenACWY vaccines, in the case of the MenB vaccine only human complement (hSBA) is appropriate due to the higher SBA titer obtained with rabbit complement (Plotkin, 2008). In the case of encapsulated bacteria, like Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and N. meningitidis type A and C (men A, C), the SBA is considered the co-CoP together with the ELISA assay (Hib: ELISA Long term: ≥ 1.0 g/mL, Short term: ≥ 0.15 g/mL, SBA ≥ 4 titer; men A, C: rSBA ≥8 titer or hSBA ≥4 titer) (Plotkin, 2010). On the other hand, the assay standardization has been successfully carried out only for Men A and C serogroups, using baby rabbit sera as a complement source. No standardization for Men B, W135, and Y has been established up to now. However, Borrow et al. evaluated and optimized parameters for interlaboratory reproducibility of the assay (Borrow et al., 2005). For MenB vaccine evaluation the hSBA titer ≥1:4 is considered the threshold for protective immunity against IMD (Borrow et al., 2020). No formal method has been established due to discrepant results between laboratories, which have been reconducted to the different epidemiology of prevalent strains, making the choice of a “universal” reference strain difficult. This is particularly true in the case of protein-based vaccines, where the antigens included in the vaccine formulation may not be expressed by all the different wild-type strains. For example, for MenB vaccines only strain-specific protein-based vaccines were developed to avoid the possibility of autoimmunity. As the protein antigens sequence and expression can vary among the same serotype, the vaccine coverage against circulating strains is difficult to establish (Donnelly et al., 2010). The bactericidal activity of the immunized serum samples, evaluated through SBA, increases with the number of antigens expressed by the strains and their affinity to vaccine antigens (Donnelly et al., 2010; Vogel et al., 2013). Consequently, the choice of the strains to be tested should consider this aspect for the immunogenicity assessment, especially to avoid very large and pointless efficacy trials (Donnelly et al., 2010). To evaluate the strain coverage of the multicomponent protein-based vaccine against MenB (4CMenB (Bexsero)) the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) has been developed. The MATS is a sandwich ELISA that uses polyclonal rabbit antibodies raised against the three antigens included in the vaccine (factor-H-binding protein, neisserial heparin-binding antigen, and neisserial adhesin A) applied to bacterial lysates (Vogel et al., 2013). The authors find out that MATS relative potency could be used as a valid parameter to predict the killing in a large panel of strains (Donnelly et al., 2010; Vogel et al., 2013). For the same purpose, the MEASURE assay has been developed to predict the bactericidal response induced by the Bivalent rLP2086 (Trumenba) vaccine, composed of two variants of the factor H binding protein (fHbp) (McNeil et al., 2018). This assay, based on flow cytometry, can be used to evaluate the surface expression of a large collection of MenB isolates, using an anti-fHbp cross-reactive antibody. In this way, it becomes possible to predict the vaccine-induced strain susceptibility in SBA (McNeil et al., 2018). The complications in standardizing SBA for meningococcus Groups B, W135, and Y are the same as those encountered for other bacterial species. On the other hand, the evidence that vaccine-elicited functional antibodies can represent a valid serological CoP encouraged the development of SBA assay for multiple bacterial strains (Plotkin, 2010). The enumeration of the CFU as readout of the C-SBA influences several assay parameters, including the assay volume, the number of bacteria, the number of replicates, and the duration of the experiment. Consequently, the conventional SBA is considered labor-intensive, with a high inter-operator and inter-laboratories variability (Borrow et al., 2006). Even if the introduction of automated colony counting represented an improvement, the conventional assay still is not applicable to test a large number of serum samples (Necchi et al., 2017; Heuser et al., 2023). The need for an alternative high throughput SBA is derived from the awareness that antibody functionality is an important parameter to consider during vaccine efficacy assessment.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the main steps for the Conventional SBA (A) and Luminescence-based SBA (B). The assay reaction mix is the same for the two versions of the SBA assay, composed of the serially diluted serum samples from the immunized patients, an exogenous source of complement, and bacteria. After the incubation, in the case of the C-SBA (A), the reaction mix of each well is plated on agar and incubated overnight. The day after the colony counting of each plate is performed. The readout is the colony forming unit (CFU) value for each of the sera dilution points, which is proportional to the number of surviving bacteria. In the case of L-SBA (B), the BacTiter GlowTM reagent is added to the assay plate, after the incubation, and the luminescence value is recorded within 5 min using a luminometer. The read-out is the luminescence value for each sera dilution point, which is proportional to the number of survival bacteria. The L-SBA is a high throughput method that allows the test of 88 sera samples in single per operator in 1 day, in contrast to the C-SBA with only 22 sera samples in single per operator in 1,5 days (Aruta et al., 2021). This figure was created using BioRender.com.
The Luminescence-SBA (L-SBA) applies to the same principles of the C-SBA but evaluates the antibody bactericidal activity by quantifying the ATP level as a correlate of bacterial survival (Figure 2B) (Necchi et al., 2017). In L-SBA the level of luminescence detected is directly proportional to the number of bacteria present in the assay wells, which is inversely proportional to the level of functional antibodies present in the serum (Mancini et al., 2022). Therefore, serum bactericidal titer obtained by the luminescence readout method strongly correlates with the data obtained by the conventional agar plate-based assay (Necchi et al., 2017). The L-SBA allows us to avoid the major disadvantages of the conventional SBA and can be used as a high throughput functional assay for vaccines’ immunogenicity evaluation. Shimanovich and co-authors have demonstrated that the SBA is a potential CoP for Shigella since it can evaluate the bactericidal activity elicited by vaccination, associated with a reduction of shigellosis in humans (Shimanovich et al., 2017). The equivalence of the results obtained with the L-SBA compared to the CFU-based method have been demonstrated for several pathogens, including Citrobacter freundii, Salmonella serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis, Shigella flexneri serotypes 2a and 3a, Shigella sonnei, Neisseria meningitidis (Aruta et al., 2021). The same team has also demonstrated the applicability of a High-Throughput L-SBA for 9 bacterial species: S. sonnei, S. flexneri 1b, S. flexneri 2a, S. flexneri 3a, S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis, S. paratyphi A, and C. freundii along with a further optimization using 384-wells-plate format instead the 96-wells one (Aruta et al., 2021). Another version of the conventional SBA is represented by the use the Resazurin (R-SBA), a metabolic indicator that gives a fluorescence readout when is irreversibly reduced to resorufin by living bacteria. Stazzoni and co-authors developed this method for screening monoclonal antibodies against Neisseria gonorrhea and compared it to L-SBA and C-SBA (Stazzoni et al., 2023). The same fluorescent readout has been applied to develop a high-throughput version of SBA for meningococcal strains which maintains a good agreement with the conventional assay results (Mak et al., 2011).
5.3 The opsonophagocytosis assay
The immune response elicited by vaccination involves different mechanisms of action. Depending on which bacterial infection occurs, functional antibodies mediate the clearance of the pathogens by complement activation and cellular phagocytosis. The activation of the complement classical pathway and MAC formation is evaluated by SBA assay, described in chapter 5.2. Cellular phagocytosis is mediated by the opsonization of the bacteria with antibodies and the C3b derived from complement activation (Feavers and Walker, 2010). The presence of opsonophagocytic activity is evaluated by the Opsonophagocytosis assay (OPA). Generally, OPA assay requires serially diluted sera incubated together with bacteria, complement, and phagocytic cells (Figure 3) (Boero et al., 2023). Depending on the phagocytic differentiation stage of the cells used in the assay, it is possible to evaluate the neutralizing activity or only the internalization of the bacteria. The use of non-differentiated cells in the assay, like HL-60 monocytes, indicates antibody-mediated uptake of bacteria. Flow cytometry-based OPA with non-differentiated cells can be used to evaluate the adherence/internalization using fluorescent whole bacteria or fluorescent beads coated with the antigens of interest (Boero et al., 2023). On the other hand, the most established OPA is the opsonophagocytic killing assay (OPKA) which requires the use of specialized cells, like differentiated HL-60 macrophages, and evaluate the killing efficiency (Boero et al., 2023). As for the SBA assay, the complement source needs to be previously tested for its intrinsic killing activity, in the absence of specific antibodies, and chosen based on the possible interference with the bacteria used in the assay (Feavers and Walker, 2010). Different cell lines can be used in the OPA, however, the HL-60 human leukemic cell line differentiated into activated neutrophils is the most frequently used and optimized as a phagocytic population because of their strong phagocytic activity. The conventional OPA assay evaluates the phagocytosis via CFU counting readout by plating the reaction mix in a solid agar plate after the incubation time. The IC50 is calculated by plotting the CFU count against serum concentration and it is considered a measure of antibody opsonizing capacity (Feavers and Walker, 2010). As for the SBA, the CFU-based method has several disadvantages: it is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and not suitable for the evaluation of a large number of samples (Necchi et al., 2017). The flow cytometry-based OPA can overcome some disadvantages related to plating and counting the CFU but cannot distinguish the adherence from the internalization of the bacteria (Fabbrini et al., 2012). Then, the development of multiplexed OPA (MOPA) allowed the test of up to four different serotypes in the same assay plate, taking advantage of the use of different antibiotics to select resistant strains (Kim et al., 2003). Furthermore, the automated colony counting tool allowed the acceleration of the process (Heuser et al., 2023). The MOPA is particularly useful in the case of a polyvalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) clinical test, which would require performing an OPA assay against several serotypes (Romero-Steiner et al., 2006; Song et al., 2013). ELISA antibody levels at 0.35 mcg/ml remain an overall cut-off for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) (Oosterhuis-Kafeja et al., 2007). For the OPA assay, the protective titer varied from 1/4 for type 1 to 1/769 for type 7F (Holmgren et al., 2017; Toh et al., 2021). In general, the OPA assay has been used to evaluate the presence of opsonizing antibodies for different bacterial vaccines, but it is currently recognized as a co-CoP only for PCV. The OPA has become an important method to evaluate the immunogenicity in PVC vaccine trials particularly for adults and the elderly, who may be susceptible to pneumococcal infections despite “adequate” or normal IgG antibody levels (LaFon and Nahm, 2018). For this reason, a standardized protocol for multiplexed opsonophagocytic killing assay for antibodies against S. pneumoniae is available and updated periodically (Nahm and Burton, 2014). A fluorescent version of the OPA (fOPA) based on flow cytometry analysis has been developed to evaluate the functional antibodies against Group B Streptococcus. The method takes advantage of the use of bacteria labeled with pHrodo™, which is a dye that emits bright fluorescence signals in the presence of acid conditions, like the phagolysosome compartments. In this way, the fluorescence signal is proportional to the level of the bacteria internalized by the HL-60 differentiated cells. The advantage over another type of flow cytometry-based OPA is the ability to measure only internalized bacteria excluding those that are only in adherence to the cells (Fabbrini et al., 2012). Concerning Shigella spp., no immunological correlates have been established and conventional OPKA assays have been used to evaluate the killing of opsonized bacteria with serum from vaccinated patients (Shimanovich et al., 2017; Mancini et al., 2023). The OPA assay has been also used to assess the opsonization ability of the antibody induced by a live attenuated vaccine against non-typhoidal Salmonella (Nasrin et al., 2021). The OPA has also been used to evaluate the immunogenicity of the novel 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag) and the 10-Valent Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Bioconjugate Vaccine (VAC52416) (Inoue et al., 2018; Fierro et al., 2023). For MenB vaccines, the OPA assay has been performed to assess protection in patients with primary terminal complement deficiency, whereas the complement-antibody mediated killing (SBA assay) cannot be assessed (Toh et al., 2021).
Figure 3. Graphical representation of the main steps for the opsonophagocytosis assays (OPA). The assay reaction mix is composed of complement, bacteria, phagocytic cells, and serially diluted serum samples from the immunized patients. After the incubation time, the reaction mix is plated and incubated overnight. The day after the colony counting of each plate is performed. The readout is the colony formation unit (CFU) value for each sera dilution point, which is proportional to the number of survival bacteria. This figure was created using BioRender.com.
6 Discussion and conclusion
In recent years, the field of vaccinology has achieved significant advances. These innovations have indirectly led to the improvement of serological assays to assess the efficacy of vaccines and to better understand the mechanisms behind protective immunity. The immunogenicity is evaluated during all the steps performed during the approval process of a novel vaccine candidate, starting from the pre-clinical until the phase III clinical studies. The primary goal of a candidate vaccine is the prevention of the disease by inducing a persistent immunologic memory and the antibodies play a fundamental role. Antibodies prevent infection by enhancing different mechanisms, such as pathogens and toxin neutralization, complement activation, and cellular phagocytosis. Currently, the ELISA assay is the most widely used assay to measure the antibody concentration. However, the binding assay cannot evaluate the functionality of the antibodies. SBA and OPA are the most commonly used assays for the assessment of neutralizing and opsonophagocytic antibodies. However, all the conventional versions of these assays are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and not applicable to a large number of samples. For these reasons, high throughput versions of these assays have been proposed to overcome some of the drawbacks. Luminescence-SBA has been demonstrated as a good alternative to the CFU-based method for several pathogens, however, it is not yet considered the gold standard like conventional SBA for meningococcal strains. The availability of biological standards or pathogen-specific positive controls will be also critical to assess vaccine-induced immune responses, promote standardization, minimize inter and intra-laboratory variability, and support comparability between vaccine candidates. Despite numerous improvements, further optimizations and development are needed to reduce assay variability and increase the applicability. The final goal is the employment of functional assays as part of the vaccine immunogenicity assessment process for all bacterial species, especially considering the need for new vaccines against AMR bacteria that represent the future worldwide challenge.
Author contributions
GF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GB: Writing – review & editing. FV: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. ElM: Writing – review & editing. AM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EmM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
GF, GB, FV, ElM, AM, and EmM were employed by VisMederi S.r.l.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Aruta, M. G., Carducci, M., Micoli, F., Necchi, F., and Rossi, O. (2021). Increasing the high throughput of a luminescence-based serum bactericidal assay (L-SBA). Biotech 10:19. doi: 10.3390/biotech10030019
Baquero, F. (2021). Threats of antibiotic resistance: an obliged reappraisal. Int. Microbiol. 24, 499–506. doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00184-y
Boero, E., Vezzani, G., Micoli, F., Pizza, M., and Rossi, O. (2023). Functional assays to evaluate antibody-mediated responses against Shigella: a review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1171213. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1171213
Borrow, R., Aaberge, I. S., Santos, G. F., Eudey, T. L., Oster, P., Glennie, A., et al. (2005). Interlaboratory standardization of the measurement of serum bactericidal activity by using human complement against meningococcal serogroup B, strain 44/76-SL, before and after vaccination with the Norwegian MenBvac outer membrane vesicle vaccine. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 12, 970–976. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.8.970-976.2005
Borrow, R., Carlone, G. M., Rosenstein, N., Blake, M., Feavers, I., Martin, D., et al. (2006). Neisseria meningitidis group B correlates of protection and assay standardization—international meeting report Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 16–17 march 2005. Vaccine 24, 5093–5107. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.091
Borrow, R., Taha, M. K., Giuliani, M. M., Pizza, M., Banzhoff, A., and Bekkat-Berkani, R. (2020). Methods to evaluate serogroup B meningococcal vaccines: from predictions to real-world evidence. J. Infect. 81, 862–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.034
Castilla, J., García Cenoz, M., Abad, R., Sánchez-Cambronero, L., Lorusso, N., Izquierdo, C., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of a meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 427–438. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206433
Corrado, M., and Pearce, E. L. (2022). Targeting memory T cell metabolism to improve immunity. J. Clin. Invest. 132:e148546. doi: 10.1172/JCI148546
De Mot, L., Bechtold, V., Bol, V., Callegaro, A., Coccia, M., Essaghir, A., et al. (2020). Transcriptional profiles of adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines display variable interindividual homogeneity but a shared core signature. Sci. Transl. Med. 12:eaay8618. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8618
Del Giudice, G., Rappuoli, R., and Didierlaurent, A. M. (2018). Correlates of adjuvanticity: a review on adjuvants in licensed vaccines. Semin. Immunol. 39, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2018.05.001
Domenech De Cellès, M., Rohani, P., and King, A. A. (2019). Duration of immunity and effectiveness of diphtheria-tetanus–acellular pertussis vaccines in children. JAMA Pediatr. 173:588. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0711
Donnelly, J., Medini, D., Boccadifuoco, G., Biolchi, A., Ward, J., Frasch, C., et al. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative assessment of meningococcal antigens to evaluate the potential strain coverage of protein-based vaccines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 19490–19495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013758107
Dunbar, S. A. (2023). Multiplexed suspension array immunoassays for detection of antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1296665. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1296665
Fabbrini, M., Sammicheli, C., Margarit, I., Maione, D., Grandi, G., Giuliani, M. M., et al. (2012). A new flow-cytometry-based opsonophagocytosis assay for the rapid measurement of functional antibody levels against group B Streptococcus. J. Immunol. Methods 378, 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.01.011
Feavers, I., and Walker, B.. Functional antibody assays. In: G. Davies , editor. Vaccine adjuvants. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; (2010) p. 199–211. (Methods in Molecular Biology; vol. 626), Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-60761-585-9_14.
Fierro, C. A., Sarnecki, M., Doua, J., Spiessens, B., Go, O., Davies, T. A., et al. (2023). Safety, Reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and dose selection of 10-valent Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli bioconjugate vaccine (VAC52416) in adults aged 60–85 years in a randomized, multicenter, interventional, first-in-human, phase 1/2a study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 10:ofad417. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad417
Findlow, J., Lucidarme, J., Taha, M. K., Burman, C., and Balmer, P. (2022). Correlates of protection for meningococcal surface protein vaccines: lessons from the past. Expert Rev. Vaccines 21, 739–751. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1940144
Fraser, A., Paul, M., Goldberg, E., Acosta, C. J., and Leibovici, L. (2007). Typhoid fever vaccines: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Vaccine 25, 7848–7857. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.027
Ghosh, M., and Rana, S. (2023). The anaphylatoxin C5a: structure, function, signaling, physiology, disease, and therapeutics. Int. Immunopharmacol. 118:110081. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110081
Goldschneider, B., and Artenstein, M. S.. Human immunity to the meningococcus I. The role of humoralantibodies.
Goulet, D. R., and Atkins, W. M. (2020). Considerations for the Design of Antibody-Based Therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci. 109, 74–103. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.05.031
Heesterbeek, D. A. C., Angelier, M. L., Harrison, R. A., and Rooijakkers, S. H. M. (2018). Complement and bacterial infections: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic applications. J. Innate Immun. 10, 455–464. doi: 10.1159/000491439
Herrera, C. M, Schmitt, J. S., Chowdhry, E. I., and Riddle, M. S. (2022). From Kiyoshi Shiga to Present-Day Shigella Vaccines: A Historical Narrative Review. Vaccines. 10:645. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050645
Heuser, E., Becker, K., and Idelevich, E. A. (2023). Evaluation of an automated system for the counting of microbial colonies. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e00673–e00623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00673-23
Holmgren, J., Parashar, U. D., Plotkin, S., Louis, J., Ng, S. P., Desauziers, E., et al. (2017). Correlates of protection for enteric vaccines. Vaccine 35, 3355–3363. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.005
Inoue, M., Yonemura, T., Baber, J., Shoji, Y., Aizawa, M., Cooper, D., et al. (2018). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a novel 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag) in healthy Japanese adults. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 7, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1496764
Ipsen, J. (1946). Circulating antitoxin at the onset of diphtheria in 425 patients. J. Immunol. 54, 325–347. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.54.4.325
Jiskoot, W., Kersten, G. F. A., Mastrobattista, E., and Slütter, B. (2019). “Vaccines” in Pharmaceutical biotechnology. eds. D. J. A. Crommelin, R. D. Sindelar, and B. Meibohm (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 281–304.
Kapingidza, A. B., Kowal, K., and Chruszcz, M.. Antigen–antibody complexes. In: U. Hoeger and J. R. Harris, editors. Vertebrate and invertebrate respiratory proteins, lipoproteins and other body fluid proteins. Cham: Springer International Publishing; (2020). p. 465–497. (Subcellular Biochemistry; vol. 94).
Kim, K. H., Yu, J., and Nahm, M. H. (2003). Efficiency of a pneumococcal Opsonophagocytic killing assay improved by multiplexing and by coloring colonies. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 10, 616–621. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.10.4.616-621.2003
LaFon, D. C., and Nahm, M. H. (2018). Measuring immune responses to pneumococcal vaccines. J. Immunol. Methods 461, 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.08.002
Li, Y., Wei, C., Xu, H., Jia, J., Wei, Z., Guo, R., et al. (2018). The Immunoregulation of Th17 in host against intracellular bacterial infection. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2018/6587296
Lu, L. L., Suscovich, T. J., Fortune, S. M., and Alter, G. (2018). Beyond binding: antibody effector functions in infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 46–61. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.106
Mak, P. A., Santos, G. F., Masterman, K. A., Janes, J., Wacknov, B., Vienken, K., et al. (2011). Development of an automated, high-throughput bactericidal assay that measures cellular respiration as a survival readout for Neisseria meningitidis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18, 1252–1260. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05028-11
Mancini, F., Alfini, R., Caradonna, V., Monaci, V., Carducci, M., Gasperini, G., et al. (2023). Exploring the role of GMMA components in the immunogenicity of a 4-valent vaccine against Shigella. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:2742. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032742
Mancini, F., Micoli, F., and Rossi, O. (2022). Setup and characterization of a high-throughput luminescence-based serum bactericidal assay (L-SBA) to determine functionality of human sera against Shigella flexneri. Biotech 11:29. doi: 10.3390/biotech11030029
Manenti, A., Gianchecchi, E., Dapporto, F., Leonardi, M., Cantaloni, P., Fattorini, F., et al. (2022). Evaluation and correlation between SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing and binding antibodies in convalescent and vaccinated subjects. J. Immunol. Methods 500:113197. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.113197
Mbaeyi, S. A., Bozio, C. H., Duffy, J., Rubin, L. G., Hariri, S., Stephens, D. S., et al. (2020). Meningococcal vaccination: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices, United States, 2020. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 69, 1–41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6909a1
McNeil, L. K., Donald, R. G. K., Gribenko, A., French, R., Lambert, N., Harris, S. L., et al. (2018). Predicting the susceptibility of meningococcal serogroup B isolates to bactericidal antibodies elicited by bivalent rLP2086, a novel prophylactic vaccine. MBio 9, e00036–e00018. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00036-18
Mix, E., Goertsches, R., and Zett, U. K. (2006). Immunoglobulins—basic considerations. J. Neurol. 253, v9–v17. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-5002-2
Montero, D. A., Vidal, R. M., Velasco, J., Carreño, L. J., Torres, J. P., Benachi O, M. A., et al. (2024). Two centuries of vaccination: historical and conceptual approach and future perspectives. Front. Public Health 11:1326154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1326154
Mosley, J. F., Smith, L. L., Brantley, P., Locke, D, and Como, M. (2017) Vaxchora: the first FDA-approved Cholera vaccination in the United States. 42:638–640.
Nahm, M. H., and Burton, R. L. (2014). Protocol for multiplexed opsonophagocytic killing assay (UAB-MOPA) for antibodies against Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Nandakumar, K. S., Jansson, Å., Xu, B., Rydell, N., Ahooghalandari, P., Hellman, L., et al. (2010). A recombinant vaccine effectively induces C5a-specific neutralizing antibodies and prevents arthritis. PLoS One 5:e13511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013511
Nasrin, S., Fuche, F. J., Sears, K. T., Jones, J. A., Levine, M. M., Simon, R., et al. (2021). Refinement of a live attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Newport vaccine with improved safety. Vaccine 9:57. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010057
Necchi, F., Saul, A., and Rondini, S. (2017). Development of a high-throughput method to evaluate serum bactericidal activity using bacterial ATP measurement as survival readout. PLoS One 12:e0172163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172163
Nicaise-Roland, P., Mehlal, S., Bouz, C., and Chollet-Martin, S. (2022). Biomarqueurs et tests fonctionnels dans l’hypersensibilité immédiate aux vaccins ARNm dirigés contre le SARS-CoV-2. Rev. Fr. Allergol. 62, 624–627. doi: 10.1016/j.reval.2022.03.002
North, J . (2020). Challenges to tackling antimicrobial resistance: economic and policy responses.. Anderson M, Cecchini M, Mossialos E, editors. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108864121/type/book
Oosterhuis-Kafeja, F., Beutels, P., and Van Damme, P. (2007). Immunogenicity, efficacy, safety and effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (1998–2006). Vaccine 25, 2194–2212. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.11.032
Osterloh, A. (2022). Vaccination against bacterial infections: challenges, Progress, and new approaches with a focus on intracellular Bacteria. Vaccine 10:751. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050751
Pidwill, G. R., Gibson, J. F., Cole, J., Renshaw, S. A., and Foster, S. J. (2021). The role of macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus infection. Front. Immunol. 11:620339. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620339
Plotkin, S. A. (2008). Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47, 401–409. doi: 10.1086/589862
Plotkin, S. A. (2010). Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 17, 1055–1065. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00131-10
Plotkin, S. A. (2020). Updates on immunologic correlates of vaccine-induced protection. Vaccine 38, 2250–2257. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.046
Pollard, A. J., and Bijker, E. M. (2021). A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 83–100. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00479-7
Poolman, J. T. (2020). Expanding the role of bacterial vaccines into life-course vaccination strategies and prevention of antimicrobial-resistant infections. NPJ Vaccines 5:84. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-00232-0
Rappuoli, R. (2018). Glycoconjugate vaccines: principles and mechanisms. Sci. Transl. Med. 10:eaat4615. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat4615
Romero-Steiner, S., Frasch, C. E., Carlone, G., Fleck, R. A., Goldblatt, D., and Nahm, M. H. (2006). Use of Opsonophagocytosis for serological evaluation of pneumococcal vaccines. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13, 165–169. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.2.165-169.2006
Rosini, R., Nicchi, S., Pizza, M., and Rappuoli, R. (2020). Vaccines against antimicrobial resistance. Front. Immunol. 11:1048. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01048
Roy, A., Eisenhut, M., Harris, R. J., Rodrigues, L. C., Sridhar, S., Habermann, S., et al. (2014). Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 349:g4643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4643
Salerno-Gonçalves, R., and Sztein, M. B. (2006). Cell-mediated immunity and the challenges for vaccine development. Trends Microbiol. 14, 536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.10.004
Shimanovich, A. A., Buskirk, A. D., Heine, S. J., Blackwelder, W. C., Wahid, R., Kotloff, K. L., et al. (2017). Functional and antigen-specific serum antibody levels as correlates of protection against shigellosis in a controlled human challenge study. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 24:e00412-16. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00412-16
Slack, M., Esposito, S., Haas, H., Mihalyi, A., Nissen, M., Mukherjee, P., et al. (2020). Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in the era of conjugate vaccines: critical factors for successful eradication. Expert Rev. Vaccines 19, 903–917. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1825948
Song, K. R., Lim, J. K., Park, S. E., Saluja, T., Cho, S. I., Wartel, T. A., et al. (2021). Oral cholera vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. Vaccine 9:1482. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121482
Song, J. Y., Moseley, M. A., Burton, R. L., and Nahm, M. H. (2013). Pneumococcal vaccine and opsonic pneumococcal antibody. J. Infect. Chemother. 19, 412–425. doi: 10.1007/s10156-013-0601-1
Stazzoni, S., Troisi, M., Abbiento, V., Sala, C., Andreano, E., and Rappuoli, R. (2023). High-throughput bactericidal assays for monoclonal antibody screening against antimicrobial resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Front. Microbiol. 14:1243427. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1243427
Tacconelli, E., Carrara, E., Savoldi, A., Harbarth, S., Mendelson, M., Monnet, D. L., et al. (2018). Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3
Thisyakorn, U., Chokephaibulkit, K., Kosalaraksa, P., Benjaponpitak, S., Pancharoen, C., and Chuenkitmongkol, S. (2014). Immunogenicity and safety of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine as a booster dose in 12- to 18-month-old children primed with 3 doses of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 10, 1859–1865. doi: 10.4161/hv.28642
Toh, Z. Q., Higgins, R. A., Mazarakis, N., Abbott, E., Nathanielsz, J., Balloch, A., et al. (2021). Evaluating functional immunity following encapsulated bacterial infection and vaccination. Vaccine 9:677. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060677
Trombetta, C., Perini, D., Mather, S., Temperton, N., and Montomoli, E. (2014). Overview of serological techniques for influenza vaccine evaluation: past, present and future. Vaccines 2, 707–734. doi: 10.3390/vaccines2040707
Vivier, E., Tomasello, E., Baratin, M., Walzer, T., and Ugolini, S. (2008). Functions of natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 503–510. doi: 10.1038/ni1582
Vogel, U., Taha, M. K., Vazquez, J. A., Findlow, J., Claus, H., Stefanelli, P., et al. (2013). Predicted strain coverage of a meningococcal multicomponent vaccine (4CMenB) in Europe: a qualitative and quantitative assessment. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 416–425. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70006-9
Wernette, C. M., Frasch, C. E., Madore, D., Carlone, G., Goldblatt, D., Plikaytis, B., et al. (2003). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitation of human antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharides. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 10, 514–519. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.10.4.514-519.2003
Keywords: serum bactericidal assay, luminescent SBA, opsonophagocytosis assay, vaccine, serological assay
Citation: Fantoni G, Boccadifuoco G, Verdirosa F, Molesti E, Manenti A and Montomoli E (2024) Current challenges and improvements in assessing the immunogenicity of bacterial vaccines. Front. Microbiol. 15:1404637. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1404637
Edited by:
Axel Cloeckaert, Institut National de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), FranceReviewed by:
Roberto Adamo, GlaxoSmithKline, ItalyChristopher P. Ptak, The University of Iowa, United States
Juan Manuel Carreño, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
Copyright © 2024 Fantoni, Boccadifuoco, Verdirosa, Molesti, Manenti and Montomoli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giulia Fantoni, R2l1bGlhLkZhbnRvbmlAdmlzbWVkZXJpLmNvbQ==