Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1322207

Inhibiting Methanogenesis by Targeting Thermodynamics and Enzymatic Reactions in Mixed Cultures of Rumen Microbes In Vitro

Provisionally accepted
Kairi Tanaka Kairi Tanaka 1,2Scott Collins Scott Collins 3Kathryn Polkoff Kathryn Polkoff 3Vivek Fellner Vivek Fellner 1*
  • 1 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 3 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Inhibiting methane (CH4) represents an opportunity to improve the sustainability, productivity, and profitability of ruminants. Ruminal methanogenesis can be mitigated via two primary strategies: (1) alternative electron acceptors and (2) enzymatic inhibition. The former utilizes thermodynamic favorability of reactions like nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonia (NH3) while the latter targets specific enzymes using structural analogues of CH4 such as bromochloromethane (BCM). In this study, we investigated the effects of four additives and their combinations on CH4 concentration in mixed cultures of rumen microbes. Sodium nitrate (NaNO3), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), and 3-nitro-1-propionate (3NPA) were included as thermodynamic inhibitors, and BCM was included as a kinetic inhibitor. The effect of additives included at three levels was evaluated in Experiment 1 and 2. The highest level of each additive was used to determine the combined effect of NaNO3 + Na2SO4 (NS), NS + 3NPA (NSP), and NSP + BCM (NSPB) in Experiments 3 and 4. Basal diets consisted of alfalfa hay and a concentrate mix formulated to obtain three forage to concentrate ratios: 70:30 (HF), 50:50 (MF), and 30:70 (LF), respectively. Experimental treatments were placed in culture bottles and incubated at 39°C for 6, 12, or 24h. Measurements included CH4, H2, pH, NH3-N, and short chain fatty acids, as well as amplicon sequencing using two (universal and archaea-specific) primer sets for the 16S rRNA V4-V5 regions and another for the fungal ITS2 region. Addition of NaNO3 decreased (p<0.001) CH4 and butyrate and increased (p<0.03 and 0.005, respectively) acetate and propionate. Cultures receiving NaNO3 had an enrichment of microorganisms capable of nitrate and nitrite reduction. Na2SO4 did not decrease (p>0.10) CH4. 3NPA inhibited CH4 but to a lesser extent. Irrespective of level of inclusion, BCM inhibited (p<0.001) methanogenesis, decreased (p<0.002) total short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and acetate and increased (p<0.001) H2 and propionate. The relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter was decreased in the presence of BCM, both alone and in the NSPB treatment. Here, we provide a proof of concept that the combination of an electron acceptor and a methane analogue may be exploited to improve microbial efficiency via methanogenesis inhibition.

    Keywords: Methane mitigation, Rumen microbiome, Anaerobic fermentation, methanogenesis, Thermodynamics, enzymatic reactions

    Received: 16 Oct 2023; Accepted: 17 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Tanaka, Collins, Polkoff and Fellner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Vivek Fellner, Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695-7621, North Carolina, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.