Multi-virulence of Campylobacter jejuni carried by chicken meat in Brazil

Campylobacter jejuni is the most frequent cause of bacterial gastroenteritis; therefore, the characteristics of its epidemiology must be continuously investigated to support possible mitigating measures. This is particularly important when evaluating representative strains from the world's leading chicken meat exporter, Brazil. We evaluated a panel of 14 virulence genes in 359 strains of C. jejuni isolated from chilled broiler carcasses in Brazil. The genes were classified into five virulence categories (B: biofilm/motility; SS: secretion/cytotoxicity system; CI: invasion/colonization; GB: Guillain-Barré; and AE: adaptation to stress). The percentage of strains with stress adaptation genes (86.07%) indicates the ability to survive in unfavorable environments; in addition, the strains showed a risk of causing infections in humans due to the frequency of the hcp gene (97.77%). Genes related to Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) in 77.44% of strains are an additional concern, which must be monitored. The gene panel showed the presence of 124 virulence profiles. Individual analyses by carcass, slaughter establishment, and municipalities in which they were located showed high index variabilities (I.Var.) of 0.82, 0.87, and 0.78, respectively. Georeferencing indicated the state of Paraná as a hotspot for virulent strains. Higher levels of isolation and multi-virulence were identified in the summer, which is hot and humid in Brazil. Together, our results showed that the studied strains are a potential danger to public health and that there is an urgent need for their surveillance and the adoption of control measures, especially in the state of Paraná.

1. Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most frequent causes of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, being the most prevalent agent in countries with structured surveillance systems (CDC, 2019; EFSA, 2020). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is underreporting of human infections and the identification of contaminated food. These problems, added to the multiplicity of reservoirs, transmission routes, and geographical and seasonal distribution, make it difficult to fully understand its epidemiology (Kaakoush et al., 2015).

This microorganism is considered fastidious, has a high potential to form biofilms, easily acquires the viable non-cultivable form under conditions of extreme stress, and has a variety of virulence factors. These genetic determinants guarantee not only efficiency in the infectious processes in the human host but also survival in hostile environments. They are fundamental to the characterization of different strains (Ungureanu et al., 2019).

Some genes have been recognized for their importance in the genus Campylobacter, including flaA and luxS involved in the formation of biofilms, cdtABC and hcp related to secretion systems, cadF, ciaB, and pldA related to invasion and colonization, dnaJ, htrA, and cbrA involved in adaptation to environmental stress, and neuA and cstII related to the induction of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (Amon et al., 2012; Bolton, 2015; Melo et al., 2017; Serichantalergs et al., 2020).

Given this, conducting epidemiological analysis becomes a difficult and, at the same time, fundamental task in adopting intervention measures for its control and prevention (Llarena et al., 2017). These analyses are particularly relevant in the poultry industry since the consumption of chicken meat contaminated with Campylobacter is one of the main sources of infection for humans, and Brazil is the world's largest exporter of this food (Omurtag et al., 2013; ABPA, 2023). This study aimed to determine the virulent genetic potential and genotypic spread of C. jejuni isolated from broiler carcasses destined for internal and external trade. In this study, it was possible to develop an index for the classification of virulent and multi-virulent strains, aiming to assist further epidemiological studies of the species.

2. Methodology

2.1. Collection, isolation, and identification of C. jejuni

Overall, 359 strains of C. jejuni isolated from 114 refrigerated chicken carcasses, slaughtered in establishments registered with the Federal Inspection Service by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA), were analyzed. The carcasses were analyzed from October 2017 to July 2018 to meet the Exploratory Program for the Research and Estimation of the Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., the same ones used for the official verification of the Salmonella spp. Control and Monitoring Program, determined by IN n° 20 of 21 October 2016 (MAPA, 2016). The collections of carcasses were carried out in establishments located in the states of Paraná (A), Santa Catarina (B), and Rio Grande do Sul (C), distributed across 43 municipalities (Rodrigues et al., 2021).

The strains were isolated and identified as C. jejuni in official MAPA laboratories using the methodology proposed by ISO 10272-1: 2017 (ISO, 2017) and mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF^®) for the identification of the genus and species, respectively. Additional information, such as establishment and place and date of isolation, was received together with the cryopreserved strains and deposited in the culture bank of the Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Federal University of Uberlândia (LEPIMOL-FAMEV-UFU).

The samples were prepared according to the direct transfer protocol (Direct Transfer Method) for the plate from the isolated colony in three spots. After application to the plate, the sample was covered with 1 μl of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) solution. Reference strains belonging to LANAGRO-RS were used as controls. The Brucker platform, model Autoflex Speed, was used to identify the isolates. The spectrum bank was the MALDI Biotyper RTC/OC 3.1. The species decision criteria are as follows: equal to or >1.7 for genus and equal to or >2.0 for genus and species. The data acquisition control program was Brucker FlexControl 3.4. Calibration was performed using the Protein Standard I calibrator, with a calibration error tolerance of <200 ppm.

2.2. Virulence panel

After reactivation on Campylobacter Blood-Free Selective Agar (mCCDA) and incubation in a microaerobic atmosphere (5–15% O₂ and 10% CO₂) using a Microaerobac (Probac do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil) at 37°C for 44 ± 4 h, followed by strain confirmation by oxidase, catalase, motility, and typical morphology tests (ISO, 2017), genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, cat no. 0000110703, São Paulo, Brazil), following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Purified DNA (10 ng) was used as a template for all PCR reactions. The PCR conditions and primers used in this study are described in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. PCR conditions, nucleotide sequences, and sizes of amplicons to identify virulence genes in C. jejuni.

Overall, 14 genes were studied and divided into five virulence categories: i) biofilm formation – flaA (motility) and luxS (quorum-sensing mechanism); ii) secretion systems – cdtABC (distensive cytotoxin secretion) and hcp (type VI secretion system); iii) invasion and colonization – cadF (intracellular colonization), ciaB (cell invasion), and pldA (invasion/colonization); iv) adaptation to stress – dnaJ (thermotolerance), htrA (aid in growth under stress), and cbrA (resistance to osmotic shock); and v) induction of Guillain-Barré Syndrome – cstII (GBS) and neuA (GBS).

PCR reactions were performed using the GoTaq^® Green Master Mix kit (Promega, cat no. 0000112705, São Paulo, Brazil), according to the manufacturer's instructions. As positive controls, strains of C. jejuni ATCC 33291, IAL 2383, and NCTC 11351 were used. The amplified products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel, using the TBE 0.5× running buffer (Invitrogen) and, as a molecular weight standard, the 100 bp marker (Invitrogen).

A criterion adapted from the analysis of the antimicrobial multi-resistance index (Biswas et al., 2011) and the five categories described in Table 1 were used to classify the virulence level of the strains. Thus, the strains were classified as virulent (V) when they had at least one gene from each category and multi-virulent (MV) when they had two or more genes from each category.

The variability of the strains within a given group (sample, establishment, municipality, or state) was verified using the analysis of the number of distinct virulence profiles identified. The variability, virulence, and multi-virulence indices were determined by calculating the relative frequency for each group of strains evaluated. The classification for the variability index was adapted (Krumperman, 1983), being low for values <0.5, medium for values between 0.5 and 0.7, and high for values >0.7.

2.3. Statistical analysis

The analysis of the results of the virulence panel was performed based on the number of strains isolated in each analyzed sample, the establishment of origin, the place (city and state), and the seasonal aspects for the percentage description. For comparative analyses, the normality of the data was verified, followed by the application of Fisher's exact test or a Student's t-test to compare two variables and ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis in the comparison of three or more variables. The program used was GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 with a 95% confidence interval.

3. Results

3.1. Genes, virulence profiles, and isolate analysis by sample

A total of 14 genes associated with virulence were studied in all 359 strains of C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses. The evaluation by virulence category found that the concomitant frequency of genes linked to adaptation to stress was significantly higher (86.07%; 309/359) compared to the remaining categories, and those related to secretion were the least frequent (131/359; 36.49%) (Table 2). The majority of the isolates (292/359; 81.34%) had at least eight of the 14 studied genes (p < 0.05, Fisher's test), which portrayed the high percentage of virulent strains (229/359; 72.14%), of which 47.60% (109/229) were classified as multi-virulent. We found a total of 124 virulence profiles, of which five represented 40.1% (144/359) of the strains, with 76 strains belonging to a single multi-virulent profile (cdtA, cdtB, cdtC, luxS, pldA, flaA, dnaJ, cadF, neuA, ciaB, cstII, cbrA, htrA, and hcp). This fact determined the low variability index (I.Var. = 0.35) considering the 359 strains.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Frequency of virulence genes in C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses in Brazil between October 2017 and July 2018.

Profiles including genes linked to the biofilm formation/motility category were the least identified (60.5%; 75/124), and those associated with secretion systems (95.2%; 118/124) and adaptation to stress (96.0%; 119/124) were the most prevalent. A total of 16 clusters (A1 to A16) of virulence categories were identified, with A16 comprising 57 profiles (46%), of which 14 were classified as multi-virulent (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Virulence profiles classified according to the categories of studied genes in C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses in Brazil between October 2017 and July 2018.

The 359 strains used in our study came from the analysis of 114 carcasses, of which one to ten distinct colonies of C. jejuni were isolated per sample (Md = 3). Samples in which we obtained isolates from three or more colonies (59/114; 51.75%) were grouped according to the number of isolates to determine the variability index (I.Var.), whose value identified did not differ between groups (p = 0.4841). The elevated I.Var. average found (0.82) justified the individual analysis of each strain throughout the study. The I.Var. identified within each group differed significantly (p < 0.05), and this value was >0.75 for all samples (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Variability index of C. jejuni per sample according to the number of isolated colonies. The error bar indicates the standard deviation, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 by the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Our study included the analysis of 46 slaughterhouses under federal supervision in 43 municipalities. We obtained a variation of one to 22 isolates in each location, and those establishments that presented three or more strains (36/46; 78.3%) were used to determine the general and individual I.Var. scores. In the interpretation of virulence and multi-virulence indices, all establishments were considered.

The average I.Var. score of all establishments was 0.87, with the majority of them (28/36; 77.78%) showing values above 0.7 (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Variability index of virulence profiles of C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses by slaughterhouse.

The distribution of establishments according to the classification of virulence and multi-virulence is described in Table 5. In general, and according to our expectations, the number of virulent strains per establishment and between establishments was significantly higher than that of multi-virulent strains (Student's t-test, p < 0.001). The significant majority of establishments (21/46; 45.7%) had 70–100% of the strains classified as virulent, and two had the same percentage range of multi-virulent strains, both located in state A. Percentages < 40% of virulent and multi-virulent strains were identified in 11/46 (23.9%) and 33/46 (71.8%) of the establishments, respectively.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Frequency distribution of virulent and multi-virulent strains by establishment.

3.2. Analysis of isolates by state, municipality, and seasonality

The characteristics of C. jejuni were analyzed according to their states of origin: A, B, and C. State A had the lowest number of isolates (81/359; 22.6%) and profiles (42/124; 33.9%) compared to the other two states (p < 0.05), whose numbers were similar (Table 6).

TABLE 6

Table 6. Variability indices, strain frequencies, and virulence profiles identified in C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses in Brazil.

Despite presenting more isolates, state C had the lowest relative frequency (Fisher's test, p < 0.05) of strains classified as virulent and multi-virulent compared to states A and B, as well as multi-virulent profiles (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Relative frequency of virulent and multi-virulent strains by state. V: Virulence; M: Multi-virulence; P: profiles; S: strains; States: A, B, and C; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 - One way ANOVA and Fisher's test.

The construction of the heat graph led to the identification of more evident hot zones in state A. Genes linked to biofilm formation were the least frequent but predominant in all states in December and most common in state A. The highest concentration of virulent and multi-virulent strains was also more expressive in state A, especially in November and December. Thus, state A presents itself as the main hotspot in terms of potential for the maintenance of virulent and multi-virulent strains of C. jejuni compared to the other states. The other genetic categories (SS, IC, and SA) showed a similar frequency in the three states (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Heat graph based on the extreme colors from green to red, which indicates the relative frequency of each virulence category studied according to the state and months of isolation of C. jejuni. BF, Biofilm formation group (frequency of one or more genes); SS, Secretion system (frequency of one or more genes); IC, Invasion/Colonization (frequency of one or more genes); SA, Stress adaptation (frequency of one or more genes); GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome (frequency of one or more genes); V, index of virulent strains; MV, index of multi-virulent strains; X, absence of isolates (GraphPad Prism 8.0.1).

Even with a significant number of profiles that contemplate only one strain in the three states, no state had a high I.Var. due to the large number of strains being grouped into a few profiles (Table 6). In state C, the variability below 0.7 is due to the existence of two profiles comprising 16 and 18 strains. In state B, the lower value is linked to a profile that includes 37 multi-virulent strains, and in state A, to a multi-virulent profile with 25 strains.

The georeferencing of the strains made it possible to determine the specific regions within each state where there is greater densification in terms of the number of isolates (Figure 4A). High relative frequencies of virulent (Figure 4B) and multi-virulent (Figure 4C) strains were evident in the geocoded hot tags.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Heat maps. Distribution of the number of C. jejuni isolates (A), relative frequency of virulent (B), and multi-virulent (C) strains from chicken carcasses in southern Brazil (Microsoft Office – Excel 365, 2016).

In state A, the distribution of the number of isolated strains showed a more dispersed characteristic, but the greatest densification came from the north, northwest, and west regions. Paradoxically, this high dispersion masks its high rates of virulence and multi-virulence, especially in the central and metropolitan regions (Figure 4).

States B and C had a high and significant number of isolates, with a more convergent disposition. In Santa Catarina, the predominance was evident in the western, plateau, and southern regions. In Rio Grande do Sul, the strains were found exclusively in the northwest, northeast, and central-east regions of the state. Virulence characteristics are evident in both states, but the hot zones referring to the multi-virulence index are restricted only to the west and south of SC (Figure 4).

There was a variation of one to 23 isolates per city, with a median of eight isolates. To determine the I.Var. and the distribution of virulence profiles according to the classification of V and MV, the selected municipalities were those that presented three or more isolates, which corresponded to 79.1% (34/43) of the total, with seven in state A, 16 in state B, and 11 in state C. The average I.Var. identified in the municipalities was 0.78 and considered high. The significant number of cities with I.Var. >0.7 (23/34; 70.6%) determined the high mean value identified (Fisher's test, p < 0.05). The number of cities/states with virulent strains did not fluctuate significantly, regardless of the percentage range of virulent strains. However, a significant minority of cities (4/34; 11.8%) had 40% or fewer of their virulent strains. Controversially, cities with 0–40% of the multi-virulent strains were predominant (24/34; 70.6%) in our study. This high number is because 100% of the municipalities in state C fall within this range (Table 7).

TABLE 7

Table 7. Distribution of cities according to the percentage value of virulent and multi-virulent strains of C. jejuni isolated in municipalities located in three Brazilian states (A, B, and C).

The I.Var. and the virulence and multi-virulence characteristics were evaluated for the 359 strains, considering the months from October to December 2017 and January and March to July 2018.

High I.Var. are directly related to low rates of multi-virulence due to the odds ratio (Table 7). Our study showed that we had the lowest rates of multi-virulence in the months from January to July 2018, with a decreasing characteristic over time. This determined the high genetic variability between the strains due to the diversity of virulence profiles. In the months from October to December 2017, there was greater balance and equivalence in these indexes (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Indexes of variability and multi-virulence of C. jejuni over time of isolation. The dashed line (—) separates low and medium indexes from values of high genetic variability.

In general, the months considered hot and humid (October to December) in the southern hemisphere determine the highest number of isolates associated with high rates of virulence and multi-virulence, indicating the seasonal characteristic of C. jejuni (Table 8).

TABLE 8

Table 8. Frequency of virulence and multi-virulence of strains and profiles by seasonality.

4. Discussion

Brazil, the world's largest exporter of chicken meat, encourages further research on Campylobacter, the main food-borne pathogen found in chicken meat, to acquire in-depth knowledge of the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of the strains present in the country.

In particular, there is probable selection pressure for Campylobacter due to adaptive characteristics to stress conditions that directly or indirectly influence their suitability, specifically in species adapted to the host but widely exposed to hostile environmental conditions, as is the case for C. jejuni (Costa and Iraola, 2019). The significant prevalence of strains that concomitantly present genes associated with adaptation to stress (309/359; 86.07%) (Table 2) suggests the existence of strains capable of survival in several niches. In parallel, this adaptive potential can facilitate its dissemination since there is an intensification of the survival rate under thermal, osmotic, and oxidative stress. Especially for dnaJ, which encodes heat shock proteins, this is particularly important for the survival of Campylobacter in foods that are kept under refrigeration or frozen during marketing, as well as during their preparation if they are undercooked (Baserisalehi and Bahador, 2011).

The high prevalence of the presence of the hcp gene (97.77%) linked to the category of secretion systems indicates the potential to cause more serious infections associated with bloody diarrhea (Kovács et al., 2020), since it is involved in the type VI secretion system (T6SS) that is responsible for carrying toxins into the environment and prokaryotic (Schwarz et al., 2010) or eukaryotic (Jani and Cotter, 2010) cells. The other genes related to the secretion system (cdtABC) had lower and similar frequencies (42–48%) in our study.

In general, the complete presence of the CDT genetic complex indicates the potential for the release of a functional cytotoxin that contributes to virulence, invasion, and cell adhesion and is essential for the release of interleukin-8 (IL-8), which contributes to the inflammatory response of the host mucosa as well as favoring the loss of integrity of the intestinal epithelium and cellular junctions and inducing apoptosis (Hickey et al., 2000).

The significant difference in the prevalence of genes linked to the CDT complex and the hcp gene may be related to the fact that, although they are important secretion systems in the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, both are encoded by independent regions of the genome and are therefore closely related (Asakura et al., 2007; Harrison et al., 2014). Similar to the CDT complex, genes linked to the invasion/colonization category had a concomitant prevalence lower than expected (63.79%) when compared to other studies conducted in Brazil (Melo et al., 2013, 2019). Immune evasion in some strains is an important factor reported in other studies, especially in the initial stages of invasion/colonization, facilitating long-term maintenance in the host through the establishment of chronic infection (Mikonranta et al., 2015; Petrovska et al., 2017).

It is estimated that 25–50% of cases of GBS can be associated with previous campylobacteriosis (Willison et al., 2016). The presence of the neuA and cstII genes demonstrated a significant relationship with the production of lipopolysaccharides (LOS) from the Campylobacter cell wall involved in the development of the syndrome (Melo et al., 2017; Neal-McKinney et al., 2018), and these genes were identified in 88.86% and 77.44% of the strains, respectively, in our study. These values are alarming due to their superiority compared to the findings in the literature (Amon et al., 2012; Melo et al., 2017). However, despite a large number of isolates with the potential risk of developing post-infection neuropathy, the host's immune system (humoral and cellular immunity) is primarily responsible for the development of GBS.

The joint prevalence of genes related to the biofilm formation/motility virulence category was 182/359 (50.7%). The association of both characteristics in our study was due to the physiological involvement identified for the luxS and flaA genes in C. jejuni associated with the complexity of the biofilm formation process that can be reduced by up to 57% in strains that do not share both genetic factors (Plummer, 2012). The high capacity to form biofilms in production environments is quite evident for C. jejuni and involves several intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms (Melo et al., 2017). However, especially for strains that do not share the biofilm/motility category (177/359; 49.3%), the production of biomass can be significantly compromised (Plummer, 2012), which can facilitate the control of these pathogens by the hygiene processes used by industry.

Considering the clusters identified in the 124 profiles, the significance of cluster A16, which includes virulent (57) and multi-virulent (14/57) profiles, is evident (Table 3). This sets up the discussion aimed at the virulence and multi-virulence indices identified from different perspectives.

We observed a similarity in the number of establishments and municipalities that presented more than 70% of their strains classified as virulent (21/46 and 17/43, respectively), of which these strains were multi-virulent in two cities/establishments; these are significant values compared to the lowest interval (Tables 5, 7). In a broader analysis, it became clear that these locations do not include state C in a significant way (Figure 2) but mainly state A (Figure 3), whose strains had a more dispersed origin in the territory but with a convergence of the indices of virulence and multi-virulence to the central and metropolitan regions of the state. It is likely that this state concentrates the largest arsenal of C. jejuni with a higher evolutionary level in comparison to other states involved in the study and is, therefore, the main hotspot for the maintenance of virulent strains since this species tends to acquire a greater number of virulence genes over time (Datta et al., 2003).

At the temporal level, it is evident that the quantitative distribution (Table 8), the virulent, and, mainly, the multi-virulent character of the strains (Figure 5) present a seasonal pattern so that we identify the higher rates in the hottest and most humid months of the year (October to December). This behavior was also recorded in a study carried out on C. jejuni isolated from chicken carcasses that showed a higher prevalence and virulence in the summer compared to the winter (Kim et al., 2019). The analysis of the variability indices showed discrepancies in the values found in the general analysis of the data and at the state level (<0.7) with the values obtained by sample, by establishment, and by municipality (>0.7). The high variability between strains isolated from the same sample (I.Var. = 0.82) indicates the existence of different genotypes of C. jejuni coexisting within the same host organism. In fact, this type of adaptation to sub-niches or common niches in the same host is proposed in C. jejuni, where up to 10 different genotypes have already been reported in a single chicken carcass (Colles et al., 2008). This shows that different strains, especially emerging ones (11), with different degrees of complexity and virulence can cohabit with the same host in a commensal manner. In parallel, the similarity in I.Var. found in the strains considering establishments and municipalities (average >0.7) was expected. This is because we had two different establishments present in only three of the 43 investigated cities; for the remainder, the number of strains per municipality and establishment was equivalent. The high variability may be related to the environmental pressure that tends to select different profiles due to the different management and conduct adopted in each establishment and, in general, considering the intrinsic differences of the productive process itself, which involve stages in different degrees of stress that are tolerable or not to the different strains (Kudirkiene et al., 2011).

At the same time, C. jejuni has high genetic plasticity due to its high potential to carry out horizontal gene transfer and recombination since the bacterium is naturally competent for the uptake and transformation of DNA, which favors the diversity of virulence profiles (Burnham and Hendrixson, 2019). Paradoxically, the analysis of I.Var. in the total sampling and its distribution at the state level shows lower values due to the concentration of strains in the same group (total or by state). These lower values occurred due to the existence of a large number of strains grouped in a few profiles classified as virulent and multi-virulent, which represents an evolutionary trend in C. jejuni (Melo et al., 2019). The distribution of I.Var. over time showed an inverse association with the multi-virulence index (odds ratio >1.0) (Table 8). This fact is configured by elevated I.Var. in months with low rates of MV strains. In addition, low variability occurred in the months that include the summer season, which had the highest rates of MV strains. The steep drop in I.Var. associated with the multi-virulence of strains in hot and humid periods of the year is consistent with the significant increases recorded worldwide in enteritis caused by Campylobacter, associated with a surprising increase in the severity of cases (Casey et al., 2017).

5. Conclusion

Considering the complexity of the epidemiology of C. jejuni, our results may contribute to strategies for its control. The gene profile demonstrates that the studied strains have the potential for high adaptation to hostile environmental situations; however, on the other hand, they have a lower frequency of genes linked to biofilm formation, indicating that adequate hygiene processes can be strategic for their control. Finally, the high levels of virulence, especially in summer and in state A, suggest the need to adopt control measures converging with these findings.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PABMP and DAR. Performed the experiments: PABMP, ECAL, ASMB, MdVF, ABGB, and EPM. Analyzed the data: PABMP, RTdM, ALG, and GPM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DAR, PMA, FB, and TFP. Wrote the paper: PABMP and RTdM.

Funding

This work was funded by the CAPES [Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (001)], CNPq, and FAPEMIG.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

ABPA (2023). Relatório Anual 2023, 2023. Available online at: https://abpa-br.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Relatorio-Anual-2023.pdf (accessed February 22, 2023).

Google Scholar

Amon, P., Klein, D., Springer, B., Jelovcan, S., Sofka, D., Hilbert, F., et al. (2012). Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni isolates of various sources for loci associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2, 20–23. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.2.2012.1.4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asakura, M., Samosornsuk, W., Taguchi, M., Kobayashi, K., Misawa, N., Kusumoto, M., et al. (2007). Comparative analysis of cytolethal distending toxin (cdt) genes among Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli and C. fetus strains. Microb Pathog. 42, 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2007.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baserisalehi, M., and Bahador, N. (2011). Chemotactic behavior of Campylobacter spp. in function of different temperatures (37 C and 42 C). Anaerobe. 17, 459–462. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biswas, D., Hannon, S. J., Townsend, H. G., Potter, A., and Allan, B. J. (2011). Genes coding for virulence determinants of Campylobacter jejuni in human clinical and cattle isolates from Alberta, Canada, and their potential role in colonization of poultry. Int Microbiol. 14, 25–32. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolton, D. J. (2015). Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food microbiology. 48, 99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burnham, P. M., and Hendrixson, D. R. (2019). Campylobacter jejuni: collective components promoting a successful enteric lifestyle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 551–565. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0037-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casey, E., Fitzgerald, E., and Lucey, B. (2017). Towards understanding clinical Campylobacter infection and its transmission: time for a different approach?. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 74, 53–64. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2017.1291205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

CDC (2019). Preliminary Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2016–2019 MMWR Morb Mortal. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/reports/prelim-data-intro-2019.html (accessed March 30, 2019).

Google Scholar

Colles, F. M., Dingle, K. E., Cody, A. J., and Maiden, M. C. J. (2008). Comparison of Campylobacter populations in wild geese with those in starlings and free-range poultry on the same farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3583–3590. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02491-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costa, D., and Iraola, G. (2019). Pathogenomics of emerging Campylobacter species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 32, e00072–e00018. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00072-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Datta, S., Niwa, H., and Itoh, K. (2003). Prevalence of 11 pathogenic genes of Campylobacter jejuni by PCR in strains isolated from humans, poultry meat and broiler and bovine faeces. J. Med. Microbiol. 52, 345–348. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05056-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EFSA (2020). Update and Review of Control Options for Campylobacter in Broilers At Primary Production, EFSA Journal. Available online at: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/6090 (accessed March 15, 2020).

Google Scholar

Elvers, K. T., and Park, S. F. (2012). Quorum sensing in Campylobacter jejuni: detection of a luxS encoded signalling molecule. Microbiology. 148, 1475–1481. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-5-1475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hänel, I., Müller, J., Müller, W., and Schulze, F. (2004). Correlation between invasion of Caco-2 eukaryotic cells and colonization ability in the chick gut in Campylobacter jejuni. Vet. Microbiol. 2, 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harrison, J. W., Dung, T. T. N., Siddiqui, F., Korbrisate, S., Bukhari, H., Tra, M. P. V., et al. (2014). Identification of possible virulence marker from Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1026–1029. doi: 10.3201/eid2006.130635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hickey, T. E., McVeigh, A. L., Scott, D. A., Michielutti, R. E., Bixby, A., Carroll, S. A., et al. (2000). Campylobacter jejuni cytolethal distending toxin mediates release of interleukin-8 from intestinal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 68, 6535–6541. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6535-6541.2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ISO (2017). - Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs – Horizontal Method for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. – Part 1: Detection Method (ISO 10272-1, 2006). Available online at: https://www.iso.org/standard/63228.html (accessed May 5, 2020).

Google Scholar

Jani, A. J., and Cotter, P. A. (2010). Type VI secretion: not just for pathogenesis anymore. Cell Host. Microbe. 8, 2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaakoush, N. O., Castaño-Rodríguez, N., Mitchell, H. M., and Man, S. M. (2015). Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., Park, H., Kim, J., Kim, J. H., Jung, J. I., Cho, S., et al. (2019). Comparative analysis of aerotolerance, antibiotic resistance, and virulence gene prevalence in Campylobacter jejuni isolates from retail raw chicken and duck meat in South Korea. Microorganisms. 7, 1–13. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kovács, J. K., Cox, A., Schweitzer, B., Maróti, G., Kovács, T., Fenyvesi, H., et al. (2020). Virulence traits of inpatient Campylobacter jejuni isolates, and a transcriptomic approach to identify potential genes maintaining intracellular survival. Microorganisms. 8, 531. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krumperman, P. H. (1983). Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 165–170. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.165-170.1983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kudirkiene, E., Bunevičien,e, J., Brøndsted, L., Ingmer, H., Olsen, J. E., Malakauskas, M., et al. (2011). Evidence of broiler meat contamination with post-disinfection strains of Campylobacter jejuni from slaughterhouse. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 145, S116–S120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Llarena, A. K., Taboada, E., and Rossi, M. (2017). Whole-genome sequencing in epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1269–1275. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00017-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MAPA (2016). Instrução Normativa n° 20, de 21 de outubro de 2016. Brasil, 2016^a. Available online at: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-animal/controle-depatogenos/arquivos-controle-de-patogenos/SalmonellaIN202016Salmonella.pdf (accessed May 10, 2016).

Google Scholar

Martínez, I., Mateo, E., Churruca, E., Girbau, C., Alonso, R., Fernandez-Astorga, A., et al. (2006). Detection of cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes in Campylobacter jejuni by multiplex PCR. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296, 45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melo, R. T., Grazziotin, A. L., Júnior, E. C. V., Prado, R. R., Mendonça, E. P., Monteiro, G. P., et al. (2019). Evolution of Campylobacter jejuni of poultry origin in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 82, 489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melo, R. T., Mendonça, E. P., Monteiro, G. P., Siqueira, M. C., Pereira, C. B., Peres, P. A. B. M., et al. (2017). Intrinsic and extrinsic aspects on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1332. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melo, R. T., Nalevaiko, P. C., Mendonça, E. P., Borges, L. W., Fonseca, B. B., Beletti, M. E., et al. (2013). Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from chicken meat harbour several virulence factors and represent a potential risk to humans. Food Control. 33, 227–231. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mikonranta, L., Mappes, J., Laakso, J., and Ketola, T. (2015). Within-host evolution decreases virulence in an opportunistic bacterial pathogen. BMC Evol. Biol.15, 165. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0447-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neal-McKinney, J. M., Liu, K. C., Jinneman, K. C., Wu, W. H., and Rice, D. H. (2018). Whole genome sequencing and multiplex qPCR methods to identify Campylobacter jejuni encoding cst-II or cst-III sialyltransferase. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Omurtag, I., Paulsen, P., Hilbert, F., and Smulders, F. J. M. (2013). The risk of transfer of foodborne bacterial hazards in Turkey through the consumption of meat; risk ranking of muscle foods with the potential to transfer Campylobacter spp. Food Secur. 5, 117–127. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0230-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrovska, L., Tang, Y., Jansen van Rensburg, M. J., Cawthraw, S., Nunez, J., and Sheppard, S. K. (2017). Genome reduction for niche association in Campylobacter hepaticus, a cause of spotty liver disease in poultry. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 354. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plummer, P. J. (2012). LuxS and quorum-sensing in Campylobacter. Front. Cellular Infect. Microbiol. 2, 1–22. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues, C. S., Armendaris, P. M., Haddad, C. V. G. C., and Melo, J. P. A. C. B. (2021). Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcasses in slaughterhouses from south of Brazil. Curr. Microbiol. 78, 2242–2250. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02478-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarz, S., Hood, R. D., and Mougous, J. D. (2010). What is type VI secretion doing in all those bugs?. Trends Microbiol. 18, 531–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serichantalergs, O., Wassanarungroj, P., Khemnu, N., Poly, F., Guerry, P., Bodhidatta, L., et al. (2020). Distribution of genes related to Type 6 secretion system and lipooligosaccharide that induced ganglioside mimicry among Campylobacter jejuni isolated from human diarrhea in Thailand. Gut. Pathog. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13099-020-00357-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A., Nisaa, K., Bhattacharyya, S., and Mallick, A. I. (2019). Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of mucosal delivery of recombinant hcp of Campylobacter jejuni Type VI secretion system (T6SS) in chickens. Mol. Immunol. 111, 182–197. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ungureanu, V. A., Stratakos, A. C., Gundogdu, O., Stef, L., Pet, I., Pet, E., et al. (2019). Virulence of a T6SS Campylobacter jejuni chicken isolate from North Romania. BMC Res. Notes. 12, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4201-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willison, H. J., Jacobs, B. C., and Van Doorn, P. A. (2016). Guillain-barre syndrome. The Lancet 388, 717–727. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00339-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, J., Meng, J. H., Zhao, S. H., Singh, R., and Song, W. X. (2006). Adherenceto and invasion of human intestinal epithelial cells by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from retail meat products. J. Food Prot. 69, 768–774. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-69.4.768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar