Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 04 April 2023
Sec. Biology of Archaea
This article is part of the Research Topic New Insights into the Genetic Mechanisms of Thermophilic Archaea View all 7 articles

Editorial: New insights into the genetic mechanisms of thermophilic archaea

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
  • 2Biochemistry and Industrial Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Archaea were recognized as the third domain of cellular life, besides Bacteria and Eukarya, by Carl Woese and George Fox in 1977 (Woese and Fox, 1977). Since then, it has been widely proved that archaea share common features with bacteria in many metabolic aspects, whereas their machineries of DNA transactions resemble those of the eukaryotic counterpart. Indeed, archaeal enzymes and regulatory proteins that constitute the DNA transactions machineries are usually simpler eukaryotic-like versions (Greci and Bell, 2020; Koonin et al., 2020). Taking advantages of the in vitro stability of their proteins/enzymes as well as of the design of powerful genetic manipulation tools, thermophilic archaea have established as simpler prokaryotic model systems to explore the complexity of eukaryotic genetic mechanisms.

Most archaeal species encode one or more copies of archaeal histone, which wraps DNA in a similar manner as the histone octamer in eukaryotes (Levin et al., 2018). Indeed, the genomic DNA is kept as a highly compacted structure, yet accessible to the molecular machines functioning in DNA transactions. For instance, the helical polymerization of the nucleosome-like structures may be critical for regulation of gene expression in all histone-encoding archaea. Proofs of this come from a study by Sanders et al., in which mutations were introduced into the histones of Thermococcus kodakarensis to block the formation of tightly packed chromatin structures and then the changes in gene expression were quantified. The altered chromatin landscape and the resultant global transcriptome changes revealed the regulatory importance of higher-order histone-based chromatin architectures in archaeal gene expression. It also should be noted that most species of creanarchaea encode Cren7 instead of archaeal histone, which compacts DNA through bending and bridging (Zhang et al., 2020). In Sulfolobus, Cren7 undergoes extensive methylations at multiple lysine residues to various extents (Guo et al., 2008), the function of which remains unclear. Ding et al. showed that, unlike for Sis7d, methylation significantly influences the DNA binding, supercoiling, and bridging capacities of Cren7 from Sulfolobus islandicus. The conservation of the methylation sites among Cren7 homologs suggested the adoption of a potential eukaryotic-like epigenetic mechanism involved in the chromosomal regulation in crenarchaea.

All living organisms have evolved a variety of DNA repair mechanisms to maintain their genome integrity in response to endogenous and external sources of DNA damage agents. Hyperthermophilic archaea (HA), thriving in high-temperature environments, must face the severe challenge of the accelerated rates of deamination of base in DNA. Lin et al. provided a clear review of the molecular mechanisms involved in the repair of hypoxanthine in DNA, which is operated by DNA glycosylases and endonucleases from HA, and proposed future research directions. Abasic sites are the most abundant DNA lesions in archaeal cells, the replication of which requires specialized DNA polymerases. Feng et al. found that the sequential actions of two polymerases (i.e., Dpo4 and Dpo2 from S. islandicus) efficiently promote the bypass of abasic sites. Dpo4 starts the translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and stalls at +1 to +3 site downstream the lesion, at which Dpo2 efficiently catalyzes further DNA synthesis past the lesion. Archaea also employs the restriction–modification (R-M) system to protect against invading DNA, such as that of viral origin. Thermococcus kodakarensis encodes two putative R-M systems (i.e., TkoI and TkoII) that are large multifunctional proteins exerting both methyltransferase and endonuclease activities. Zatopek et al. demonstrated that T. kodakarensis strains deleted with either or both R-M enzymes grew more slowly but displayed significantly increased competency compared to the parent strain. The recognition sequences for the methyltransferase and endonuclease in TkoI and TkoII were also identified.

Molecular mechanisms of the biological conflicts and self vs. non-self recognition in archaea remain poorly understood. By phylogenomic analysis, Makarova et al. identified a hypervariable gene module widespread among Thermococcales, named VARTIG (VARiable Thermococcales IG). The modules consist of an upstream gene encoding a large protein containing several immunoglobulin (Ig) domains and combinations of downstream genes, some of which also contain Ig domains, and showing an overall organization similar to the organization of Polymorphic Toxin Systems (PTS). The functions of VARTIG remain unclear but the identified features of this system imply its potential roles in the inter-microbial conflicts, innate immunity, and self vs. non-self discrimination.

All the articles in this topic provide new insights into the genetic mechanisms of thermophilic archaea and may help us to understand DNA transactions in eukaryotes. The perspectives and hypotheses raised by the authors also provide valuable clues to the mystery of evolution of the three domains of life.

Author contributions

ZZ and SF wrote and edited the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the editorial and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Greci, M. D., and Bell, S. D. (2020). Archaeal DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 65–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, L., Feng, Y. G., Zhang, Z. F., Yao, H. W., Luo, Y. M., Wang, J. F., et al. (2008). Biochemical and structural characterization of Cren7, a novel chromatin protein conserved among Crenarchaea. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 1129–1137. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koonin, E. V., Krupovic, M., Ishino, S., and Ishino, Y. (2020). The replication machinery of LUCA: common origin of DNA replication and transcription. BMC Biol. 18. 61. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00800-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levin, P. A., Henneman, B., van Emmerik, C., van Ingen, H., and Dame, R. T. (2018). Structure and function of archaeal histones. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Woese, C. R., and Fox, G. E. (1977). Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5088–5090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Zhan, Z., Wang, B., Chen, Y., Chen, X., Wan, C., et al. (2020). Archaeal chromatin proteins Cren7 and Sul7d compact DNA by bending and bridging. mBio 11, e00804-00820. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00804-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: thermophilic archaea, archaeal virus, chromosome organization, DNA replication, DNA repair, DNA recombination, RNA transcription

Citation: Zhang Z and Fusco S (2023) Editorial: New insights into the genetic mechanisms of thermophilic archaea. Front. Microbiol. 14:1185784. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1185784

Received: 14 March 2023; Accepted: 23 March 2023;
Published: 04 April 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Chuanlun Zhang, Southern University of Science and Technology, China

Copyright © 2023 Zhang and Fusco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhenfeng Zhang, zhangzf@im.ac.cn; Salvatore Fusco, salvatore.fusco@univr.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.