AUTHOR=Di Marco Federico , Spitaleri Andrea , Battaglia Simone , Batignani Virginia , Cabibbe Andrea Maurizio , Cirillo Daniela Maria TITLE=Advantages of long- and short-reads sequencing for the hybrid investigation of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome JOURNAL=Frontiers in Microbiology VOLUME=14 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1104456 DOI=10.3389/fmicb.2023.1104456 ISSN=1664-302X ABSTRACT=Introduction

In the fight to limit the global spread of antibiotic resistance, computational challenges associated with sequencing technology can impact the accuracy of downstream analysis, including drug resistance identification, transmission, and genome resolution. About 10% of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) genome is constituted by the PE/PPE family, a GC-rich repetitive genome region. Although sequencing using short read technology is widely used, it is well recognized its limit in the PE/PPE regions due to the unambiguously mapping process onto the reference genome. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of short-reads (SRS), long-reads (LRS) and hybrid-reads (HYBR) based analysis over different common investigative tasks: genome coverage estimation, variant calling and cluster analysis, drug resistance detection and de novo assembly.

Methods

For the study 13 model MTB clinical isolates were sequenced with both SRS and LRS. HYBR were produced correcting the long reads with the short reads. The fastq from the three approaches were then processed using a customized version of MTBseq for genome coverage estimation and variant calling and using two different assemblers for de novo assembly evaluation.

Results

Estimation of genome coverage performances showed lower 8X breadth coverage for SRS respect to LRS and HYBR: considering the PE/PPE genes, SRS showed low results for the PE_PGRS family, while obtained acceptable coverage in PE and PPE genes; LRS and HYBR reached optimal coverages in PE/PPE genes. For variant calling HYBR showed the highest resolution, detecting the highest percentage of uniquely identified mutations compared to LRS and SRS. All three approaches agreed on the identification of two major clusters, with HYBR identifying an higher number of SNPs between the two clusters. Comparing the quality of the assemblies, HYBR and LRS obtained better results than SRS.

Discussion

In conclusion, depending on the aim of the investigation, both SRS and LRS present complementary advantages and limitations implying that for a full resolution of MTB genomes, where all the mentioned analyses and both technologies are needed, the use of the HYBR approach represents a valid option and a well-rounded strategy.