Comparative Thermophysiology of Marine Synechococcus CRD1 Strains Isolated From Different Thermal Niches in Iron-Depleted Areas

Marine Synechococcus cyanobacteria are ubiquitous in the ocean, a feature likely related to their extensive genetic diversity. Amongst the major lineages, clades I and IV preferentially thrive in temperate and cold, nutrient-rich waters, whilst clades II and III prefer warm, nitrogen or phosphorus-depleted waters. The existence of such cold (I/IV) and warm (II/III) thermotypes is corroborated by physiological characterization of representative strains. A fifth clade, CRD1, was recently shown to dominate the Synechococcus community in iron-depleted areas of the world ocean and to encompass three distinct ecologically significant taxonomic units (ESTUs CRD1A-C) occupying different thermal niches, suggesting that distinct thermotypes could also occur within this clade. Here, using comparative thermophysiology of strains representative of these three CRD1 ESTUs we show that the CRD1A strain MITS9220 is a warm thermotype, the CRD1B strain BIOS-U3-1 a cold temperate thermotype, and the CRD1C strain BIOS-E4-1 a warm temperate stenotherm. Curiously, the CRD1B thermotype lacks traits and/or genomic features typical of cold thermotypes. In contrast, we found specific physiological traits of the CRD1 strains compared to their clade I, II, III, and IV counterparts, including a lower growth rate and photosystem II maximal quantum yield at most temperatures and a higher turnover rate of the D1 protein. Together, our data suggests that the CRD1 clade prioritizes adaptation to low-iron conditions over temperature adaptation, even though the occurrence of several CRD1 thermotypes likely explains why the CRD1 clade as a whole occupies most iron-limited waters.

Introduction

Marine picocyanobacteria contribute to the biogeochemical cycling of various elements, most notably carbon, contributing ∼25% of ocean net primary productivity, of which the Synechococcus genus alone is responsible for about 16% (Flombaum et al., 2013). The large geographic distribution of these organisms, extending from the equator to subpolar waters, is largely attributable to their extensive genetic and functional diversity (Zwirglmaier et al., 2008; Farrant et al., 2016; Doré et al., 2020). Amongst the nearly 20 clades within subcluster (SC) 5.1, the most abundant and diversified Synechococcus lineage in oceanic ecosystems (Dufresne et al., 2008; Scanlan et al., 2009; Ahlgren and Rocap, 2012), only four (clades I, II, III, and IV) were thought to largely dominate in situ. Clades I and IV mainly thrive in temperate and cold, nutrient-rich waters, while clades II and III reside in warm, oligotrophic or mesotrophic areas (Zwirglmaier et al., 2008; Mella-Flores et al., 2011), suggesting the existence of cold (I/IV) and warm (II/III) Synechococcus “thermotypes.” This hypothesis was subsequently confirmed by work demonstrating that strains representative of these different clades exhibit distinct thermal preferenda (Mackey et al., 2013; Pittera et al., 2014; Breton et al., 2020; Six et al., 2021), a feature notably linked to differences in the thermostability of light-harvesting complexes (Pittera et al., 2017), lipid desaturase gene content (Pittera et al., 2018) and the ability of some strains to induce photoprotective light dissipation at colder temperatures using the orange carotenoid protein (OCP; Six et al., 2021). Field studies using global ocean datasets have allowed to refine the respective ecological niches of the different thermotypes, with clade I extending further north than clade IV (Paulsen et al., 2016; Doré et al., 2022) and clades II and III predominating in N- and P-depleted waters, respectively, but also to highlight the importance of a fifth clade within SC 5.1, the CRD1 clade (Farrant et al., 2016; Sohm et al., 2016; Kent et al., 2019). Initially thought to be limited to the Costa Rica dome area (Saito et al., 2005; Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al., 2014), the latter clade was recently found to be a major component of Synechococcus communities in iron (Fe)-depleted areas (Farrant et al., 2016; Sohm et al., 2016; Ahlgren et al., 2020). Furthermore, analysis of the global distribution of these organisms using high-resolution marker genes has highlighted large within-clade microdiversity associated with niche differentiation in marine Synechococcus (Farrant et al., 2016; Larkin and Martiny, 2017; Xia et al., 2019), as also observed in Prochlorococcus (Kashtan et al., 2014; Larkin et al., 2016). Using the petB gene encoding cytochrome b₆, Farrant et al. (2016) showed that most major clades encompassed several Ecologically Significant Taxonomic Units (ESTUs), i.e., genetically related subgroups within clades occupying distinct oceanic niches. This is notably the case for ESTU IIB that occupies a cold thermal niche in sharp contrast with IIA, the dominant ESTU within clade II that occupies warm, mesotrophic, and oligotrophic Fe-replete waters. Similarly, three distinct ESTUs with distinct thermal niches were identified within the CRD1 clade and the co-occurring clade EnvB (a.k.a. CRD2; Ahlgren et al., 2020): (i) CRD1B/EnvBB are found in cold mixed waters in co-occurrence with ESTUs IA, IVA and IVC, (ii) CRD1C/EnvBC dominate in warm, high-nutrient low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions such as the central Pacific Ocean, and (iii) CRD1A/EnvBA are present in both environments and thus span a much wider range of temperatures than CRD1B and C (Farrant et al., 2016). This suggests that these three CRD1 ESTUs could correspond to different thermotypes.

In order to test this hypothesis, we used strains representative of each of the three CRD1 ESTUs to determine the fundamental thermal niches of these organisms as compared to typical cold (clades I and IV) and warm (clades II and III) thermotypes. Furthermore, given the strong influence of temperature on optimal functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus in marine Synechococcus (Pittera et al., 2014, 2017; Guyet et al., 2020), we also examined the effect of temperature acclimation on the photophysiology of CRD1 ESTUs compared to their clade I and IV counterparts and show that CRD1 thermotypes actually differ more strongly in this respect to members of clades I–IV than from each other.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Growth Conditions

The eight Synechococcus spp. strains used in this study were retrieved from the Roscoff Culture Collection (RCC¹), including representative strains of the three known CRD1 ESTUs (CRD1A—C) and one or two of each of the four dominant clades in the field (clades I—IV) used as controls (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1). Cells were grown in 50 mL flasks (Sarstedt, Germany) in PCR-S11 culture medium (Rippka et al., 2000) supplemented with 1 mM sodium nitrate. Cultures were acclimated for at least 2 weeks in temperature-controlled chambers across a range of temperatures dependent on the thermal tolerance of each strain and under a continuous light of 75 μmol photons m^–2 s^–1 (hereafter μE m^–2 s^–1) provided by a white-blue-green LED system (Alpheus, France). For each experiment, cultures were grown in triplicate, inoculated at an initial cell density of ∼3 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1, and samples were harvested daily to measure growth rate and fluorescence parameters as described below.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Characteristics of the Synechococcus strains used in this study.

In order to compare the capacity of strains to repair the D1 subunit of photosystem II (PSII; see “Measurement of PSII Repair Rate” section), cultures grown in 250 ml flasks at 75 μE m^–2 s^–1 were acclimated at 18, 22, and 25°C, temperatures at which all strains were able to grow, were subjected to high light stress (375 μE m^–2 s^–1). Exponentially growing cultures were sampled at T0 and after 15, 30, 60, and 90 min of stress, before shifting cultures back to the initial light conditions and then sampling again after 15, 30, 60 min, and 24 h of recovery (R). While D1 repair measurements were performed at all-time points, cell concentrations were measured by flow cytometry only at T0, T30 min, T90 min, R30 min, and R24 h and liposoluble pigment content was determined only at T0.

Flow Cytometry

Culture aliquots (200 μl) sampled for flow cytometry were fixed using 0.25% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (grade II, Sigma Aldrich, United States) and stored at −80°C until analysis (Marie et al., 1999). Cell concentrations were estimated using a Guava easyCyte flow cytometer (Luminex Corporation, United States) and maximum growth rates (μ_max) were calculated as the slope of the linear regression of ln (cell density) vs. time during the exponential growth phase. Synechococcus cells were identified based on their red (695 nm) and orange (583 nm) fluorescence, proxies for their chlorophyll a and phycoerythrin content, respectively. Fluorescence, forward scatter and side scatter values were normalized to that of standard 0.95 μm beads using Guavasoft software (Luminex Corporation, United States).

Fluorescence Measurements

The maximum PSII quantum yield (F_V/F_M) was estimated using a Pulse Amplitude Modulation fluorimeter (Phyto-PAM II, Walz, Germany) during the exponential growth phase after 10 min dark acclimation followed by addition of 100 μM of the PSII blocker 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU, Sigma-Aldrich, United States; Campbell et al., 1998).

The PSII quantum yield was calculated as:

$F_V/F_M=(F_M-F_0)/F_M$

where F₀ is basal fluorescence, F_M maximal fluorescence level and F_V variable fluorescence (Campbell et al., 1998; Six et al., 2007).

Fluorescence excitation (with emission set at 580 nm) and emission (with excitation set at 530 nm) spectra were generated using a LS-50B spectrofluorometer (Perkin-Elmer, United States) as described in Six et al. (2004). The fluorescence excitation ratio (Exc_{495:550 nm}) was used as a proxy for the PUB:PEB ratio. Phycobilisome (PBS) rod length and the degree of coupling of the PBS to PSII reaction center chlorophylls was then assessed using fluorescence emission spectra by calculating the phycoerythrin (PE, F_max = 565–575 nm) to phycocyanin (PC, F_max = 645–655 nm) ratio as well as the PC to PBS terminal acceptor (TA; F_max = 680 nm) ratio, respectively (Pittera et al., 2017).

Pigment Analyses

Triplicate cultures were harvested during the exponential phase when F_V/F_M was maximum for each temperature condition. Cultures (50 mL) were subjected to centrifugation in the presence of 0.01% (v/v) pluronic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) at 4°C, 14,000 × g for 7 min, using an Eppendorf 5804R (Eppendorf, France). Pellets were resuspended and transferred to 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 4°C, 17,000 × g for 2 min using an Eppendorf 5417R centrifuge (Eppendorf, France). Once the supernatant was removed samples were stored at −80°C until further analysis. Pigment content was subsequently assessed using calibrated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC 1100 Series System, Hewlett Packard, St Palo Alto, CA), as previously described (Six et al., 2005).

Measurement of the Photosystem II Repair Rate

Each culture acclimated to 75 μE m^–2 s^–1 and 18, 22 or 25°C was split into two new 50 mL flasks (Sarstedt Germany) with one used as a control and the other flask supplemented with lincomycin (0.5 mg mL^–1 final concentration, Sigma-Aldrich, United States) in order to inhibit protein synthesis and thus D1 repair (Guyet et al., 2020). Both sub-cultures were then subjected to light stress by exposing cultures to 375 μE m^–2 s^–1 continuous light (at the same temperature), and F_V/F_M measured at different time points as described above. The PSII repair rate for each strain at each temperature was determined from the coefficient differences between the exponential curves fitted over the 90 min time course of F_V/F_M measurements for control and +lincomycin samples. This light stress experiment was replicated on four independent cultures.

Determination of the Realized Environmental Niches of Major Synechococcus Ecologically Significant Taxonomic Units

The realized niches of CRD1 and clades I-IV ESTUs were determined using petB reads extracted from metagenomic data from the Tara Oceans and Tara Polar circle expeditions, the Ocean Sampling Day (OSD; June 21st 2014) campaign, and petB metabarcodes from (i) various oceanographic cruises (CEFAS, BOUM, Micropolar, RRS Discovery cruise 368 and several in the northwestern Pacific Ocean as detailed in Xia et al., 2017), (ii) two individual sampling sites in the Mediterranean Sea (Boussole, Point B) as well as (iii) a bi-monthly sampling at the long-term observatory site SOMLIT (“Service d’Observation en Milieu Littoral”)-Astan located 2.8 miles off Roscoff between July 2009 and December 2011 (Supplementary Table 1).

petB metagenomic recruitment using the Tara and OSD datasets was performed as described previously (Farrant et al., 2016). Synechococcus petB sequences from both metagenomes and metabarcodes were used to define operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity using Mothur v1.34.4 (Schloss et al., 2009) that were then taxonomically assigned using a petB reference database (Farrant et al., 2016). OTUs encompassing more than 3% of the total Synechococcus reads for a given sample were grouped into ESTUs and used to determine the whole temperature range occupied by each of the five major Synechococcus ESTUs.

Comparative Genomics

The Cyanorak v2.1 information system (Garczarek et al., 2021)² was used to compare the phyletic pattern i.e., the presence/absence pattern of each cluster of likely orthologous genes (CLOG) in each strain, for CRD1 strains and their clades I-IV counterparts for a number of selected genes potentially involved in adaptation to low temperature based on previous literature (see section “Results”).

Results

The Fundamental Thermal Niches of CRD1 vs. Clades I–IV Strains

In order to determine the temperature optima and boundary limits of the different CRD1 strains and to compare them to those of typical cold and warm Synechococcus thermotypes, representative strains of each of the three CRD1 ESTUs and strains of clades I, II, III, and IV were grown over a range of temperatures from 6 to 36°C. The growth responses of all strains to temperature followed a typical asymmetric bell-shaped curve over the selected temperature range (Figure 1), with a progressive rise in growth rate (μ) until T_opt (the temperature associated with maximum μ: μ_max) was reached, and a sharp decline above T_opt. BIOS-U3-1 (CRD1-B) was able to grow between 12 and 29°C with a T_opt at 25°C (μ_max = 0.78 ± 0.02 d^–1), a growth pattern most similar to that of the clade IV strain BL107, while the clade I strain MVIR-18-1 was able to grow at much lower temperatures, down to 8°C but could not grow above 25°C (Figure 1A). MITS9220 (CRD1-A) and BIOS-E4-1 (CRD1-C) displayed thermal growth characteristics more similar to the clade II (A15-62 and M16.1) and III (WH8102) strains, representatives of warm thermotypes (Figure 1B). While most strains in this category displayed a minimal growth temperature of 16°C, large variations between strains were observed at the highest thermal boundary limit (T_max). Maximum growth temperature was obtained for M16.1 (II; T_max: 34°C), then A15-62 (II) and WH8102 (III; both with T_max at 32°C), MITS9220 (CRD1-A; T_max: 31°C) and finally for BIOS-E4-1 (CRD1-C; T_max: 30°C). The latter strain also displayed the highest minimal growth temperature (T_min: 18°C) and thus possesses the narrowest temperature range for growth of all the strains studied (12°C vs. 15–18°C). It is also worth noting that CRD1 strains display a lower maximum growth rate and more generally lower growth rates at most temperatures than their clade I, II, III, and IV counterparts.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Fundamental thermal niches of CRD1 vs. clade I, II, III, and IV strains and environmental realized niches of the corresponding ESTUs. (A) CRD1-B strain BIOS-U3-1 vs. cold thermotypes. (B) CRD1-A strain MITS9220 and the CRD1-C strain BIOS-E4-1 vs. warm thermotypes. The insert indicates the strain names and their corresponding ESTU (sensu Farrant et al., 2016) between brackets. Each data point is the average of at least 3 biological replicates. Environmental realized niches are indicated as horizontal boxplots for each ESTU above each graph with the whiskers corresponding to 1.5-fold the interquartile range and outliers being plotted as individual points.

The Environmental Realized Niches of CRD1 vs. Clades I–IV Strains

We then compared the fundamental thermal niches of all studied strains, i.e., the whole temperature range over which they can grow in a laboratory setting in the absence of biotic interactions (e.g., competition or predation), with environmental realized niches (sensu Pearman et al., 2008) of the corresponding ESTUs. For this, we determined the distribution limits of each of these ESTUs along the Tara Oceans and Tara Polar circle transects, 203 samples from OSD2014 and additional oceanographic cruises and individual sampling sites, altogether encompassing 413 samples worldwide covering a wide range of temperature conditions (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 2, and Supplementary Table 1). This made it possible to have much finer estimates of the limits of the thermal niches of the different ESTUs than in the study performed by Farrant et al. (2016), in particular for the cold adapted ESTUs, which were poorly represented in the initial Tara Oceans dataset (Supplementary Figure 2).

This analysis showed that the CRD1B ESTU displayed a reduced thermal tolerance range in the environment (14–24.5°C) compared to the BIOS-U3-1 strain in culture (12–29°C), while the typical cold thermotypes colonized larger thermal niches in situ than their representative strains (Figure 1A). Environmental realized niches indeed ranged from 2.5 to 24°C for ESTU IA (compared to 8–25°C for MVIR-18-1) and from 8.5 to 25°C for ESTU IVA (compared to 12–29°C for BL107). Interestingly, the median temperature of the CRD1B ESTU is 3°C higher than that observed for ESTUs IA and IVA.

As concerns warm thermotypes, CRD1C displayed a fairly narrow thermal tolerance range in situ (22–29.5°C), which, similar to the cold thermotype CRD1B, was even narrower than for its representative strain BIOS-E4-1 (18–30°C; Figure 1B). Comparatively, the CRD1A ESTU was detected across a wider temperature range (14–30.5°C) than the other two CRD1 ESTUs and also slightly larger than the corresponding strain in culture (MITS9220, 16–31°C). Still, the most extended temperature range was observed for ESTU IIA and IIIA (12–32°C) that reached significantly lower temperature limits than the corresponding clade II (16 to 32–34°C) and III (16–32°C) strains. Of note, although both IIA and IIIA ESTUs displayed a similar temperature range, the median temperature of ESTU IIA (25°C) was about 3°C higher than that of ESTU IIIA (22°C) and the maximum median temperature was surprisingly observed for the CRD1C ESTU (26.5°C). In this context, it is also worth mentioning that although clade II strains are clearly both warm thermotypes, M16.1 displays a significantly higher temperature limit for growth than A15-62 and more generally than all other strains. This suggests that ESTU IIA may encompass two distinct ESTUs, but such a high temperature niche (>32°C) where they could be discriminated is exceptional and not available in our dataset (Supplementary Table 1).

Comparative Genomics

In order to assess whether the cold, temperate thermotype BIOS-U3-1 (CRD1B) exhibits similar adaptation mechanisms to those previously described for the cold-adapted clades I and/or IV, we examined a number of clusters of likely orthologous genes (CLOGs) from all Synechococcus genomes belonging to clades I-IV and CRD1 present in the Cyanorak v2.1 information system (Garczarek et al., 2021). First, we looked for the occurrence of two amino-acid substitutions in phycocyanin α- (RpcA) and β-subunits (RpcB), which were shown to differ between cold- (Gly in clades I and IV for RpcA43; Ser in RpcB42) and warm-thermotypes (Ala in clades II and III for RpcA43; Asp in RpcB42), these substitutions being potentially responsible for the differential thermotolerance of this phycobiliprotein between thermotypes (Pittera et al., 2017). In all three CRD1 strains, both sites displayed the warm-type residue (Supplementary Figures 3A,B), suggesting that in contrast to typical cold and warm thermotypes, the molecular flexibility of this phycobiliprotein does not differ between CRD1 thermotypes. We then looked at fatty acid desaturases that are essential for regulating membrane fluidity and thus the activity of integral membrane proteins, including photosynthetic complexes (Mikami and Murata, 2003; Pittera et al., 2018; Breton et al., 2020). All three CRD1 strains surprisingly possess in addition to the core Δ9-desaturase gene desC3, a second Δ9-desaturase, desC4 (Supplementary Table 2), previously thought to be specific to cold-adapted strains as well as the Δ12-desaturase desA3 found in both cold-adapted clades I and IV as well as in clade III, a warm thermotype subjected to much stronger seasonal variability than its (sub) tropical clade II counterparts (Pittera et al., 2018). Furthermore, BIOS-U3-1 also possesses desA2, thought to be specific to warm environments, while this gene is in contrast absent from the other two CRD1 warm-adapted strains. Thus, CRD1 strains exhibit a different desaturase gene set and potentially display a larger capacity to regulate membrane fluidity than typical cold- or warm-adapted thermotypes. Finally, while all clades I, III and IV genomes possess the ocp operon, involved in the protection of PSII against photoinactivation through the dissipation of excess light energy (Kirilovsky, 2007) and which was recently shown in marine Synechococcus to play a key role at low temperature (Six et al., 2021), none of the three CRD1 genomes possess this operon.

Photosynthetic Activity and Pigment Content

PSII quantum yield (F_V/F_M), used as a proxy of photosynthetic activity, was measured for each strain over their whole temperature growth range. Most strains displayed a decrease in this parameter at both low and high boundary limits of their growth temperature range and this effect was particularly striking for BIOS-U3-1, reaching values down to 0.11 at 14°C and 0.32 at 28°C (Figure 2A). Besides MVIR-18-1 that exhibited a quite constant F_V/F_M over its whole temperature range, the decrease in F_V/F_M at high temperature was stronger for cold than warm thermotypes that are able to maintain a quite high F_V/F_M in the warmest growth conditions (Figure 2B). Finally, as for growth rate, CRD1 strains exhibited lower F_V/F_M at all temperatures than clade I to IV strains.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Variation with growth temperature of photosystem II quantum yield (F_V/F_M) for CRD1 vs. clade I, II, III, and IV strains. (A) CRD1-B strain BIOS-U3-1 vs. cold thermotypes. (B) CRD1-A strain MITS9220 and the CRD1-C strain BIOS-E4-1 vs. warm thermotypes. The insert indicates the strain names and their corresponding ESTU (sensu Farrant et al., 2016) between brackets.

The Exc_495:550nm fluorescence excitation ratio, used as a proxy for PUB:PEB ratio, was consistent with the pigment type of each strain (Humily et al., 2013; Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 4A). This ratio remained pretty constant over the whole temperature range for all strains except for the chromatic acclimator BL107 (pigment type 3dA), for which a sharp increase was observed at its maximal growth temperature (28°C) to reach a value (1.35) intermediate between that typically observed in green light (or white light; 0.6–0.7) and blue light (1.6–1.7). This suggests that the chromatic acclimation process could be affected by growth temperature, at least in this strain. The phycobilisome (PBS) rod lengths and the degree of coupling of PBS to PSII reaction center chlorophylls, as estimated from PE:PC and PE:TA ratios, respectively, showed fairly limited variations over the temperature range, indicating that the phycobiliprotein composition of PBS is quite stable over the growth temperature range of each strain (Supplementary Figures 4B,C). One notable exception was a rise in both ratios for strain A15-62 at its minimal growth temperature, likely attributable to the partial decoupling of individual phycobiliproteins and of the whole PBS from PSII, a phenomenon typically observed under stressful conditions (Six et al., 2007; Guyet et al., 2020). It is also worth noting that MITS9220 and to some extent BIOS-E4-1, exhibited a significantly higher PE:PC ratio than the five other strains, potentially indicating a different phycobiliprotein composition and/or length of PBS rods.

In terms of liposoluble pigments, the β-carotene/chlorophyll a (β-car/Chl a) ratio tended to increase with temperature in BIOS-E4-1 and MITS9220, as observed for the other warm thermotypes, whilst this ratio was more stable in the cold thermotypes BIOS-U3-1 and BL107, and seemed to slightly increase in the lower part of the thermal range for the clade I strain MVIR-18-1 (Figure 3). For all strains, these ratios result from a concomitant increase with temperature of Chl a and β-car content per cell (Supplementary Figure 5), indicating an enhancement of the surface of thylakoids per cell at higher temperatures that was particularly marked for BIOS-E4-1 and A15-62, whilst this variation was fairly limited in the other two CRD1 strains. As these two pigments are present in different proportions in PSI and II (Umena et al., 2011; Xu and Wang, 2017), the higher β-car/Chl a ratio measured in clades I and IV strains also suggests that they may have a higher PSII:PSI ratio than all other strains, including BIOS-U3-1, and that this ratio might be more strongly affected by temperature in warm than cold thermotypes.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Variation with growth temperature of cellular mass pigment ratios of CRD1 vs. clade I, II, III, and IV strains. (A,B) β-carotene (β-car) to chlorophyll a (Chla) ratio. (C,D) Zeaxanthin (Zea) to Chla ratio with (A,C) CRD1-B strain BIOS-U3-1 vs. cold thermotypes and (B,D) CRD1-A strain MITS9220 and the CRD1-C strain BIOS-E4-1 vs. warm thermotypes. Inserts indicate strain names and their corresponding ESTUs (sensu Farrant et al., 2016) between brackets.

As concerns the zeaxanthin/chlorophyll a (Zea/Chl a) ratio, although an increase in this ratio was measured at low temperature for all strains, the amplitude was globally larger for cold than for warm thermotypes, with BIOS-U3-1 behaving very similarly to the clade IV strain BL107 that exhibits the largest variation in this ratio (Figure 3). Changes in this ratio likely originate partially from the decrease in Chl a content in response to cold, a strategy typically used by cells to regulate light utilization under slow growth conditions (Inoue et al., 2001). However, several strains also displayed an increase in their Zea content per cell at low temperature, a response particularly striking in BIOS-U3-1 and A15-62, but that also seems to occur in M16.1 and in the two other CRD1 strains BIOS-E4-1 and MITS9220 (Supplementary Figure 5). Thus, although Zea has been hypothesized to be involved in the photoprotection of cold-adapted strains by dissipating excess light energy under low temperature conditions (Kana et al., 1988; Breton et al., 2020), this process seems to be present in both cold and warm-adapted CRD1 strains and in most warm thermotypes as well. In this context, it is also worth noting that the two clade II strains, A15-62 and M16.1, displayed fairly distinct temperature-induced variations in their Zea:Chl a ratios and individual pigment contents, possibly linked to their different isolation temperatures (see section “Discussion” below).

Photosystem II Repair Capacity

The ability of the different strains to repair PSII in response to light stress (375 μE m^–2 s^–1) was determined in cultures acclimated to 18, 22, and 25°C by measuring changes in F_V:F_M over time after adding the protein synthesis inhibitor lincomycin, or not (Supplementary Figure 6). While a decrease in F_V:F_M ratio during the 90 min light stress period was observed in both cultures supplemented with lincomycin and controls, this ratio only re-increased back up to initial F_V:F_M values, after shifting cultures back to standard light conditions (75 μE m^–2 s^–1), in the control group in most strains and temperature conditions. Thus, all studied strains were able to recover from this light stress, as long as the D1 repair cycle was not inactivated by inhibition of protein synthesis. Yet, a fast decrease in F_V:F_M was observed for all three CRD1 cultures supplemented with lincomycin, while the +/− lincomycin curves overlapped during the first 15–30 min of light stress in most other strains and conditions. This suggests that the initial decrease in F_V:F_M in clades I–IV strains was not due to D1 damage but rather to dissipation of light energy as heat through non-photochemical quenching (Campbell et al., 1998), whilst the damage and hence repair of D1 proteins only occurred later on.

The PSII repair rate (R_PSII), as calculated from the time course of F_V:F_M with and without lincomycin, increased with temperature in most strains, except for BIOS-U3-1 that displayed its highest rate at 22°C (Figure 4). Strikingly, all three CRD1 strains displayed significantly higher R_PSII than clade I-IV strains at all three tested temperatures, a difference ranging from 3- to nearly 40-fold at the lowest common temperature (18°C). Furthermore, CRD1 strains displayed fairly limited variation in R_PSII with temperature (ranging from 1.33 to 1.87-fold) compared to the other strains, the strongest increase in R_PSII being observed for the clade I strain MVIR-18-1 (21.5-fold) and the clade III strain WH8102 (5.5-fold). This indicates that CRD1 strains exhibit a constitutively high level of PSII repair compared to the other strains whatever the growth temperature and only trigger a moderate increase in R_PSII in response to temperature variations.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Variation with growth temperature of cumulative photosystem II repair rate (RPSII) of CRD1 vs. clade I, II, III, and IV strains. The insert indicates the strain names and their corresponding ESTU (sensu Farrant et al., 2016) between brackets.

Discussion

Temperature constitutes one the strongest driving factors that have shaped genetic diversification and niche partitioning in marine cyanobacteria (Scanlan et al., 2009; Flombaum et al., 2013; Biller et al., 2015) and phytoplankton at large (Sunagawa et al., 2015; Delmont et al., 2020). While temperature has caused one major diversification event in Prochlorococcus, resulting in the divergence of the cold-adapted HLI from the warm-adapted HLII clades (Johnson et al., 2006; Kettler et al., 2007), several independent temperature-related diversification events also occurred in the Synechococcus SC 5.1 radiation, leading to the emergence of clades I and IV (Dufresne et al., 2008; Zwirglmaier et al., 2008). Here, determination of the temperature optimum and boundary limits (i.e., the fundamental niche) of strains representative of the three CRD1 ESTUs identified in the field (Farrant et al., 2016) showed that different thermotypes can also be delineated within the CRD1 clade, which dominates the Synechococcus populations in low-Fe areas of the world Ocean. Comparison with representative strains of the cold-adapted Synechococcus ecotypes (clades I and IV) on the one hand, and warm-adapted ecotypes (clades II and III) on the other, made it possible to classify (i) the CRD1A strain MITS9220, isolated from the equatorial Pacific Ocean, as a warm thermotype, (ii) the CRD1B strain BIOS-U3-1, isolated from the Chilean upwelling, as a cold temperate thermotype, and finally (iii) the CRD1C strain BIOS-E4-1, isolated from the edge of the South Pacific gyre, a stable, warm, Fe-depleted oceanic region (Claustre et al., 2008), as a warm temperate stenotherm.

As expected from theory (Pearman et al., 2008), the realized environmental thermal niches of CRD1 ESTUs were narrower than their fundamental niches (or similar for MITS9220). In contrast, for ESTUs IA to IVA, the realized environmental niche was significantly more extended toward the low thermal limit than the fundamental niches of their representative strains, this expansion being particularly marked for ESTU IA (Figure 1). This could be due to passive transport of Synechococcus populations by currents into water masses colder than their temperature limits for growth. Alternatively, these ESTUs may exhibit a greater microdiversity than previously assessed (Farrant et al., 2016) and could be subdivided into distinct ESTUs occupying slightly different thermal niches from the current ones, although representative strains to test this hypothesis remain to be isolated. In agreement with the latter hypothesis, Paulsen et al. (2016) measured a positive growth rate of Synechococcus natural populations dominated by clade I in waters as cold as 2°C in the vicinity of the Svalbard island. Thus, CRD1 ESTUs appear to be strongly outcompeted by their ESTU IA to IVA counterparts at their lower temperature limits. Consistent with this, comparison of their gene content showed that CRD1 ESTUs, including the cold thermotype CRD1B, lack the main adaptation mechanisms reported so far for typical cold thermotypes. Indeed, all CRD1 strains examined in this study (i) exhibit warm-type substitutions in their α and β-phycocyanin subunits, influencing the thermotolerance of this phycobiliprotein (Pittera et al., 2017; Supplementary Figures 3A,B); (ii) possess a different set of desaturase genes, involved in regulation of membrane fluidity (Pittera et al., 2018), than typical warm and cold thermotypes (Supplementary Table 2) and (iii) lack the OCP system, involved in the protection of PSII against photoinactivation, which seemingly plays a key role at low temperature (Kirilovsky, 2007; Six et al., 2021). Still, we cannot exclude that CRD1 strains could use alternative strategies to cope with temperature variations and notably to deal with the generation of reactive oxygen species, known to be generated by a variety of factors including low and high temperature (Nishiyama et al., 2006; Latifi et al., 2009). For instance, all CRD1 strains possess the srxA gene encoding sulfiredoxin catalyzing the reduction of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin involved in H₂O₂ detoxification (Findlay et al., 2005; Guyet et al., 2020) as well as isiA that, besides its role in increasing the light-harvesting efficiency of PSI under conditions of Fe-limitation, was also shown to provide photoprotection to PSII by dissipating excess light energy under oxidative stress conditions (Yeremenko et al., 2004; Ihalainen et al., 2005; Supplementary Table 2).

The ability of cyanobacteria to grow over a large temperature range largely relies on their capacity to optimize the functioning of their photosynthetic apparatus, notably at low temperature that induces a general slowing down of cell metabolism (Murata et al., 2007; Pittera et al., 2014, 2017). For this reason, we also compared the photophysiology of CRD1 and clades I-IV strains at three growth temperatures common to all strains. These analyses showed that all three CRD1 strains exhibit a lower growth rate at most temperatures than clade I to IV strains (Figure 1), possibly explaining why they are easily outcompeted by other taxa when Fe is no longer limiting, as observed for instance around the Marquesas Islands (Caputi et al., 2019). Moreover, CRD1 strains also display a lower PSII maximum quantum yield (Figure 2), suggesting that PSII is partially photoinactivated, that is their D1 repair cycle does not fully compensate damage to this protein, even under optimal growth temperatures. Consistent with this, the very high turnover rate of the D1 protein measured in all CRD1 strains indicates that their PSII is much more sensitive to light stress than other strains and can only trigger a moderate increase in R_PSII in response to both light and temperature variations, possibly indicating that they are adapted to live deeper in the water column than clades I to IV. This sensitivity could be partially linked to the abovementioned absence of the OCP, potentially reducing their ability to dissipate excess light energy, although it must be noted that the clade II strain A15-62 also lacks the OCP system. Interestingly in this context, all cold thermotypes including the CRD1B strain BIOS-U3-1, possess more copies of the D1:2 isoform (3–6 copies, average: 3.9 ± 1.1) than warm thermotypes (2–3 copies, average: 2.2 ± 0.4), this isoform providing a lower quantum yield but higher PSII resistance to photoinhibition than D1:1 (Supplementary Table 2; Clarke et al., 1993a,b; Campbell et al., 1995; Garczarek et al., 2008). Moreover, A15-62 is one of the only Synechococcus strains to possess two complete copies of the D1:1 isoform, a duplication which could partly explain why, despite the absence of OCP, this atypical clade II strain is able to maintain a high PSII quantum yield over its whole growth temperature range with fairly low D1 repair rates. Interestingly, CRD1 strains also possess a paralog of psbN, which was found to be required for the assembly of the PSII reaction center in Nicotiana tabacum and would play an important role in the D1 repair cycle (Torabi et al., 2014).

Taken together, both comparative genomics and photophysiological analyses highlighted a number of specificities of CRD1 strains compared to their clade I-IV counterparts, rather than them possessing traits distinctive of cold or warm thermotypes. In this context, it is worth noting that although strains representative of ESTUs IVA and CRD1B exhibit a similar fundamental thermal niche in culture, the higher median temperature of CRD1B in the field indicates that it preferentially thrives in temperate waters (about 18°C, Figure 1), where energetically costly temperature adaptation mechanisms might not be essential. This suggests that for members of the CRD1 clade, adaptation to low-Fe conditions likely prevails over adaptation to temperature variations, and/or that adaptation mechanisms to temperature variations might be more complex and diversified than previously thought. Still, in terms of a realized environmental thermal niche, the occurrence of several CRD1 thermotypes likely explains why the CRD1 clade as a whole occupies most Fe-limited areas, a vast ecosystem constituting about 30% of the world Ocean (Moore et al., 2013; Bristow et al., 2017). A notable exception is the Southern Ocean, for which from the little available data shows that Synechococcus is scarce south of the polar front (Wilkins et al., 2013; Farrant et al., 2016), consistent with the fairly high low-temperature limit (14°C) of the CRD1B environmental realized niche (Figure 1), while low-Fe availability likely limits the growth of clades I and IV in this area. In contrast, CRD1 growth does not currently appear to be limited by warm temperatures since most oceanic waters display a temperature below 30°C (Supplementary Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 1). However, one cannot exclude that with global change, some areas of the world Ocean could become warmer than the highest limits determined here for representative strains of CRD1A and C, i.e., 31 and 30°C, respectively. In this context, it is worth mentioning that in the dataset used for this study, several coastal stations, sampled during the OSD campaign reached 31.5°C (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, although biogeochemistry global models predict that Synechococcus could be one of the winners of the phytoplankton community in a future world Ocean (Flombaum et al., 2013; Schmidt et al., 2020; Visintini et al., 2021), it might well not be able to survive in the warmest low-Fe areas, an ecological niche that is currently expanding (Polovina et al., 2008). Although a few studies have started to analyze the genomic bases of adaptation of Synechococcus cells to Fe-limitation in the field (Ahlgren et al., 2020; Garcia et al., 2020), further comparative genomic and physiological studies are still needed to decipher the specific capacity of CRD1 clade members to deal with Fe-limitation which should help predict the future distribution and dynamics of Synechococcus taxa in the world Ocean.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; PRJNA811120).

Author Contributions

MF, HD, and LG designed the experiments. MF, LD, HD, MR, AG, FR-J, TS, LC, and GM collected the samples and performed the physiological measurements. MF and DM ran the flow cytometry analyses. FL isolated several CRD1 strains used in this study. HD, XX, DS, HL, and LG performed sequencing and bioinformatics analyses of metabarcodes. MH, EC, FP, and LG developed and refined the Cyanorak v2.1 database. MF, HD, FP, and LG made the figures. MF, LD, HD, FP, and LG interpreted results. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the French “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” Programs CINNAMON (ANR-17-CE02-0014-01) and EFFICACY (ANR-19-CE02-0019) as well as the European program Assemble Plus (H2020-INFRAIA-1-2016-2017; grant no. 730984).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Thierry Cariou for providing physico-chemical parameters from the SOMLIT-Astan station and Gwenn Tanguy (Biogenouest genomics core facility) and Monica Moniz for their sequencing of petB metabarcodes. We are also most grateful to Nathalie Simon for coordinating the phytoplankton time-series at the SOMLIT-Astan station, Christophe Six for technical hints on PAM fluorimetry and HPLC analyses as well as Priscillia Gourvil and Martin Gachenot from the Roscoff Culture Collection (http://roscoff-culture-collection.org/) and Florian Humily for isolating and/or maintaining the Synechococcus strains used in this study. We also thank the support and commitment of the Tara Oceans coordinators and consortium, Agnès b. and E. Bourgois, the Veolia Environment Foundation, Région Bretagne, Lorient Agglomeration, World Courier, Illumina, the EDF Foundation, FRB, the Prince Albert II de Monaco Foundation, the Tara schooner and its captains and crew.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.893413/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1. ^ https://roscoff-culture-collection.org/
2. ^ http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/cyanorak/

References

Ahlgren, N. A., and Rocap, G. (2012). Diversity and distribution of marine Synechococcus: multiple gene phylogenies for consensus classification and development of qPCR assays for sensitive measurement of clades in the ocean. Front. Microbiol. 3:213. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahlgren, N. A., Belisle, B. S., and Lee, M. D. (2020). Genomic mosaicism underlies the adaptation of marine Synechococcus ecotypes to distinct oceanic iron niches. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 1801–1815. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biller, S. J., Berube, P. M., Lindell, D., and Chisholm, S. W. (2015). Prochlorococcus: the structure and function of collective diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 13–27. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3378

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breton, S., Jouhet, J., Guyet, U., Gros, V., Pittera, J., Demory, D., et al. (2020). Unveiling membrane thermoregulation strategies in marine picocyanobacteria. New Phytol. 225, 2396–2410. doi: 10.1111/nph.16239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bristow, L. A., Mohr, W., Ahmerkamp, S., and Kuypers, M. M. M. (2017). Nutrients that limit growth in the ocean. Curr. Biol. 27, R431–R510. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell, D., Hurry, V., Clarke, A. K., Gustafsson, P., and Öquist, G. (1998). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and acclimation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 667–683. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.3.667-683.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell, D., Zhou, G., Gustafsson, P., Oquist, G., and Clarke, A. K. (1995). Electron transport regulates exchange of two forms of photosystem II D1 protein in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus. EMBO J. 14, 5457–5466. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.3.667-683.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caputi, L., Carradec, Q., Eveillard, D., Kirilovsky, A., Pelletier, E., Pierella Karlusich, J. J., et al. (2019). Community-level responses to iron availability in open ocean plankton ecosystems. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 391–419. doi: 10.1029/2018GB006022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarke, A. K., Hurry, V. M., Gustafsson, P., and Oquist, G. (1993a). Two functionally distinct forms of the photosystem II reaction-center protein D1 in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 11985–11989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarke, A. K., Soitamo, A., Gustafsson, P., and Oquist, G. (1993b). Rapid interchange between two distinct forms of cyanobacterial photosystem II reaction-center protein D1 in response to photoinhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9973–9977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9973

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Claustre, H., Sciandra, A., and Vaulot, D. (2008). Introduction to the special section bio-optical and biogeochemical conditions in the South East Pacific in late 2004: the BIOSOPE program. Biogeosciences 5, 679–691. doi: 10.5194/bg-5-679-2008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delmont, T. O., Gaia, M., Hinsinger, D. D., Fremont, P., Guerra, A. F., Eren, A. M., et al. (2020). Functional repertoire convergence of distantly related eukaryotic plankton lineages revealed by genome-resolved metagenomics. BioRxiv [Preprint] BioRxiv: 2020.10.15.341214-2020.10.15.341214, doi: 10.1101/2020.10.15.341214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doré, H., Farrant, G. K., Guyet, U., Haguait, J., Humily, F., Ratin, M., et al. (2020). Evolutionary mechanisms of long-term genome diversification associated with niche partitioning in marine picocyanobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 11:567431. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.567431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doré, H., Leconte, J., Breton, S., Demory, D., Hoebeke, M., Corre, E., et al. (2022). Global phylogeography of marine Synechococcus in coastal areas unveils strikingly different communities than in open ocean. BioRxiv [Preprint] doi: 10.1101/2022.03.07.483242

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dufresne, A., Ostrowski, M., Scanlan, D. J., Garczarek, L., Mazard, S., Palenik, B. P., et al. (2008). Unraveling the genomic mosaic of a ubiquitous genus of marine cyanobacteria. Genome Biol. 9:R90. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r90

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrant, G. K., Doré, H., Cornejo-Castillo, F. M., Partensky, F., Ratin, M., Ostrowski, M., et al. (2016). Delineating ecologically significant taxonomic units from global patterns of marine picocyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E3365–E3374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524865113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Findlay, V. J., Tapiero, H., and Townsend, D. M. (2005). Sulfiredoxin: a potential therapeutic agent? Biomed. Pharmacother. 59, 374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flombaum, P., Gallegos, J. L., Gordillo, R. A., Rincón, J., Zabala, L. L., Jiao, N., et al. (2013). Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 9824–9829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307701110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garcia, C. A., Hagstrom, G. I., Larkin, A. A., Ustick, L. J., Levin, S. A., Lomas, M. W., et al. (2020). Linking regional shifts in microbial genome adaptation with surface ocean biogeochemistry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375:20190254. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garczarek, L., Dufresne, A., Blot, N., Cockshutt, A. M., Peyrat, A., Campbell, D. A., et al. (2008). Function and evolution of the psbA gene family in marine Synechococcus: Synechococcus sp. WH7803 as a case study. ISME J. 2, 937–953. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.46

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garczarek, L., Guyet, U., Doré, H., Farrant, G. K., Hoebeke, M., Brillet-Guéguen, L., et al. (2021). Cyanorak v2.1: a scalable information system dedicated to the visualization and expert curation of marine and brackish picocyanobacteria genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D667–D676. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, A., Slack, G., Daniels, E. F., Selph, K. E., Palenik, B., and Landry, M. R. (2014). Fine spatial structure of genetically distinct picocyanobacterial populations across environmental gradients in the Costa Rica Dome. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 705–723. doi: 10.4319/lo.2014.59.3.0705

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guyet, U., Nguyen, N. A., Doré, H., Haguait, J., Pittera, J., Conan, M., et al. (2020). Synergic effects of temperature and irradiance on the physiology of the marine Synechococcus strain WH7803. Front. Microbiol. 11:1707. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Humily, F., Partensky, F., Six, C., Farrant, G. K., Ratin, M., Marie, D., et al. (2013). A gene island with two possible configurations is involved in chromatic acclimation in marine Synechococcus. PLoS One 8:e84459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ihalainen, J. A., D′Haene, S., Yeremenko, N., van Roon, H., Arteni, A. A., Boekema, E. J., et al. (2005). Aggregates of the chlorophyll-binding protein IsiA (CP43’) dissipate energy in cyanobacteria. Biochemistry 44, 10846–10853. doi: 10.1021/bi0510680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inoue, N., Taira, Y., Emi, T., Yamane, Y., Kashino, Y., Koike, H., et al. (2001). Acclimation to the growth temperature and the high-temperature effects on photosystem II and plasma membranes in a mesophilic cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 1140–1148. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, Z. I., Zinser, E. R., Coe, A., McNulty, N. P., Woodward, E. M. S., and Chisholm, S. W. (2006). Niche partitioning among Prochlorococcus ecotypes along ocean-scale environmental gradients. Science 311, 1737–1740. doi: 10.1126/science.1118052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kana, T. M., Glibert, P. M., Goericke, R., and Welschmeyer, N. A. (1988). Zeaxanthin and ß-carotene in Synechococcus WH7803 respond differently to irradiance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 1623–1626. doi: 10.4319/lo.1988.33.6part2.1623

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kashtan, N., Roggensack, S. E., Rodrigue, S., Thompson, J. W., Biller, S. J., Coe, A., et al. (2014). Single-cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild Prochlorococcus. Science 344, 416–420. doi: 10.1126/science.1248575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kent, A. G., Baer, S. E., Mouginot, C., Huang, J. S., Larkin, A. A., Lomas, M. W., et al. (2019). Parallel phylogeography of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. ISME J. 13, 430–441. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0287-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kettler, G. C., Martiny, A. C., Huang, K., Zucker, J., Coleman, M. L., Rodrigue, S., et al. (2007). Patterns and implications of gene gain and loss in the evolution of Prochlorococcus. PLoS Genet. 3:e231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirilovsky, D. (2007). Photoprotection in cyanobacteria: the orange carotenoid protein (OCP)-related non-photochemical-quenching mechanism. Photosynth. Res. 93:7. doi: 10.1007/s11120-007-9168-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larkin, A. A., and Martiny, A. C. (2017). Microdiversity shapes the traits, niche space, and biogeography of microbial taxa: the ecological function of microdiversity. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 9, 55–70. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larkin, A. A., Blinebry, S. K., Howes, C., Lin, Y., Loftus, S. E., Schmaus, C. A., et al. (2016). Niche partitioning and biogeography of high light adapted Prochlorococcus across taxonomic ranks in the North Pacific. ISME J. 10, 1555–1567. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Latifi, A., Ruiz, M., and Zhang, C. C. (2009). Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 258–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00134.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mackey, K. R. M., Paytan, A., Caldeira, K., Grossman, A. R., Moran, D., McIlvin, M., et al. (2013). Effect of temperature on photosynthesis and growth in marine Synechococcus spp. Plant Physiol. 163, 815–829. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.221937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marie, D., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D., and Brussaard, C. (1999). Enumeration of phytoplankton, bacteria, and viruses in marine samples. Curr. Protoc. Cytom 10, 11.11.1–11.11.15. doi: 10.1002/0471142956.cy1111s10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mella-Flores, D., Mazard, S., Humily, F., Partensky, F., Mahé, F., Bariat, L., et al. (2011). Is the distribution of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus ecotypes in the Mediterranean Sea affected by global warming? Biogeosciences 8, 2785–2804. doi: 10.5194/bg-8-2785-2011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mikami, K., and Murata, N. (2003). Membrane fluidity and the perception of environmental signals in cyanobacteria and plants. Prog. Lipid Res. 42, 527–543. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00036-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Arrigo, K. R., Berman-Frank, I., Bopp, L., Boyd, P. W., et al. (2013). Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nat. Geosci. 6, 701–710. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1765

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y., and Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2007). Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1767, 414–421. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nishiyama, Y., Allakhverdiev, S. I., and Murata, N. (2006). A new paradigm for the action of reactive oxygen species in the photoinhibition of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Bioenerg. 1757, 742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paulsen, M. L., Doré, H., Garczarek, L., Seuthe, L., Müller, O., Sandaa, R.-A., et al. (2016). Synechococcus in the atlantic gateway to the arctic ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 3:191. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., and Randin, C. F. (2008). Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pittera, J., Humily, F., Thorel, M., Grulois, D., Garczarek, L., and Six, C. (2014). Connecting thermal physiology and latitudinal niche partitioning in marine Synechococcus. ISME J. 8, 1221–1236. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pittera, J., Jouhet, J., Breton, S., Garczarek, L., Partensky, F., and Maréchal, É, et al. (2018). Thermoacclimation and genome adaptation of the membrane lipidome in marine Synechococcus. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 612–631. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pittera, J., Partensky, F., and Six, C. (2017). Adaptive thermostability of light-harvesting complexes in marine picocyanobacteria. ISME J. 11, 112–124. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Polovina, J. J., Howell, E. A., and Abecassis, M. (2008). Ocean’s least productive waters are expanding. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35:L03618. doi: 10.1029/2007GL031745

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rippka, R., Coursin, T., Hess, W., Lichtle, C., Scanlan, D. J., Palinska, K. A., et al. (2000). Prochlorococcus marinus Chisholm et al. 1992 subsp. pastoris subsp. nov. strain PCC 9511, the first axenic chlorophyll a2/b2-containing cyanobacterium (Oxyphotobacteria). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50, 1833–1847. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-5-1833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saito, M. A., Rocap, G., and Moffett, J. W. (2005). Production of cobalt binding ligands in a Synechococcus feature at the Costa Rica upwelling dome. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 279–290. doi: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.1.0279

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scanlan, D. J., Ostrowski, M., Mazard, S., Dufresne, A., Garczarek, L., Hess, W. R., et al. (2009). Ecological genomics of marine picocyanobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 249–299. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00035-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., et al. (2009). Introducing Mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, K., Birchill, A. J., Atkinson, A., Brewin, R. J. W., Clark, J. R., Hickman, A. E., et al. (2020). Increasing picocyanobacteria success in shelf waters contributes to long-term food web degradation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5574–5587. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Six, C., Joubin, L., Partensky, F., Holtzendorff, J., and Garczarek, L. (2007). UV-induced phycobilisome dismantling in the marine picocyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH8102. Photosynth. Res. 92, 75–86. doi: 10.1007/s11120-007-9170-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Six, C., Ratin, M., Marie, D., and Corre, E. (2021). Marine Synechococcus picocyanobacteria: light utilization across latitudes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118:e2111300118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111300118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Six, C., Thomas, J., Brahamsha, B., Lemoine, Y., and Partensky, F. (2004). Photophysiology of the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH8102, a new model organism. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 35, 17–29. doi: 10.3354/ame035017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Six, C., Thomas, J.-C., Thion, L., Lemoine, Y., Zal, F., and Partensky, F. (2005). Two novel phycoerythrin-associated linker proteins in the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102. J. Bacteriol. 187, 1685–1694. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.5.1685-1694.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sohm, J. A., Ahlgren, N. A., Thomson, Z. J., Williams, C., Moffett, J. W., Saito, M. A., et al. (2016). Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron. ISME J. 10, 333–345. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sunagawa, S., Coelho, L. P., Chaffron, S., Kultima, J. R., Labadie, K., Salazar, G., et al. (2015). Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359–1261359. doi: 10.1126/science.1261359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Torabi, S., Umate, P., Manavski, N., Plöchinger, M., Kleinknecht, L., Bogireddi, H., et al. (2014). PsbN is required for assembly of the photosystem II reaction center in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Cell 26, 1183–1199. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.120444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Umena, Y., Kawakami, K., Shen, J.-R., and Kamiya, N. (2011). Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473, 55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature09913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Visintini, N., Martiny, A. C., and Flombaum, P. (2021). Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus, and picoeukaryotic phytoplankton abundances in the global ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 6, 207–215. doi: 10.1002/lol2.10188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilkins, D., Lauro, F. M., Williams, T. J., Demaere, M. Z., Brown, M. V., Hoffman, J. M., et al. (2013). Biogeographic partitioning of Southern Ocean microorganisms revealed by metagenomics. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1318–1333. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, X., Cheung, S., Endo, H., Suzuki, K., and Liu, H. (2019). Latitudinal and vertical variation of Synechococcus assemblage composition along 170°W transect from the South Pacific to the Arctic Ocean. Microb. Ecol. 77, 333–342. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1308-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, X., Partensky, F., Garczarek, L., Suzuki, K., Guo, C., Cheung, S. Y., et al. (2017). Phylogeography and pigment type diversity of Synechococcus cyanobacteria in surface waters of the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 142–58. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, W., and Wang, Y. (2017). “Function and structure of cyanobacterial photosystem I,” in Photosynthesis: Structures, Mechanisms, and Applications, eds H. J. M. Hou, M. M. Najafpour, G. F. Moore, and S. I. Allakhverdiev (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 111–168. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48873-8_7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeremenko, N., Kouřil, R., Ihalainen, J. A., D’Haene, S., van Oosterwijk, N., Andrizhiyevskaya, E. G., et al. (2004). Supramolecular organization and dual function of the IsiA chlorophyll-binding protein in cyanobacteria. Biochemistry 43, 10308–10313. doi: 10.1021/bi048772l

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zwirglmaier, K., Jardillier, L., Ostrowski, M., Mazard, S., Garczarek, L., Vaulot, D., et al. (2008). Global phylogeography of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus reveals a distinct partitioning of lineages among oceanic biomes. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 147–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01440.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar