AUTHOR=Luo Liang , Xu Yue , Chang Yumei , Sun Bo , Zhang Limin , Zhao Zhigang , Liang Liqun 

TITLE=Microbiota Comparison of Amur ide (Leuciscus waleckii) Intestine and Waters at Alkaline Water and Freshwater as the Living Environment

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Microbiology

VOLUME=13

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.881132

DOI=10.3389/fmicb.2022.881132

ISSN=1664-302X

ABSTRACT=<p>The intestinal microbiota of marine animals was influenced by the water and environment in which they live. The Amur ide (<italic>Leuciscus waleckii</italic>) adapts to extremely high alkalinity and is an ideal material for aquacultural studies of alkaline adaptation. In this study, we screened intestinal indicator flora and functional redundancy of intestinal colonies in alkaline-water species (AW) and freshwater species (FW) of Amur ide (<italic>L. waleckii</italic>) in these different aquatic environments. The available vs. community composition correlations were then predicted by contrasting each other with the flora contained in environmental water samples. Here, five microbial species and six genera were identified owing to the classifiable sequence. The intestinal microbiota that existed in AW and FW had approximately 1/3 of the operational taxonomic units in the respective living water environments, meaning gut microbes in the aqueous habitats will have an influential association with gut microbes in AW and FW. Compared to the bacterial composition of the FW intestine and that present in freshwater, <italic>Moraxella osloensis, Psychrobacter maritimus</italic>, and <italic>Psychrobacter faecalis</italic> were significantly enriched in the intestine of AW and alkaline water samples. In the FW intestine and freshwater samples, however, <italic>Cryptomonas curvata</italic> and <italic>Polynucleobacter asymbioticus</italic> were highly improved, which can be summarized as <italic>Enterobacter sp</italic>., the predominant population in the AW gut, while <italic>Aeromonas</italic> and <italic>Ralstonia</italic> being primarily present in FW intestines. Photosynthetic bacteria were most significant in both water samples. The results indicated that the intestinal microbiota composition, abundance, and diversity of AW and FW were quite different. In contrast, the microbial composition of the additional alkaline water and freshwater environments showed slight differences. This study expects to enhance our understanding of the alkalinity tolerance of <italic>L. waleckii</italic>, which will be provided for the breeding of fish living in alkaline water, and push the development of alkaline water resources with increased efficiency.</p>