Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 14 July 2022
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
This article is part of the Research Topic Impact of Novel Omic Technologies on Biological Control Against Plant Pathogens View all 11 articles

Xylella fastidiosa Infection Reshapes Microbial Composition and Network Associations in the Xylem of Almond Trees

  • 1Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (IAS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Córdoba, Spain
  • 2Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 3Laboratory for Phytopathology, Instituto Pedro Nunes, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 4Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Valencia, Spain
  • 5Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain

Xylella fastidiosa represents a major threat to important crops worldwide including almond, citrus, grapevine, and olives. Nowadays, there are no efficient control measures for X. fastidiosa, and the use of preventive measures and host resistance represent the most practical disease management strategies. Research on vessel-associated microorganisms is gaining special interest as an innate natural defense of plants to cope against infection by xylem-inhabiting pathogens. The objective of this research has been to characterize, by next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, the microbial communities residing in the xylem sap of almond trees affected by almond leaf scorch disease (ALSD) in a recent X. fastidiosa outbreak occurring in Alicante province, Spain. We also determined community composition changes and network associations occurring between xylem-inhabiting microbial communities and X. fastidiosa. For that, a total of 91 trees with or without ALSD symptoms were selected from a total of eight representative orchards located in five municipalities within the X. fastidiosa-demarcated area. X. fastidiosa infection in each tree was verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis, with 54% of the trees being tested X. fastidiosa-positive. Globally, Xylella (27.4%), Sphingomonas (13.9%), and Hymenobacter (12.7%) were the most abundant bacterial genera, whereas Diplodia (30.18%), a member of the family Didymellaceae (10.7%), and Aureobasidium (9.9%) were the most predominant fungal taxa. Furthermore, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances differentiated almond xylem bacterial communities mainly according to X. fastidiosa infection, in contrast to fungal community structure that was not closely related to the presence of the pathogen. Similar results were obtained when X. fastidiosa reads were removed from the bacterial data set although the effect was less pronounced. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed negative associations among four amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) assigned to X. fastidiosa with different bacterial ASVs belonging to 1174-901-12, Abditibacterium, Sphingomonas, Methylobacterium–Methylorubrum, Modestobacter, Xylophilus, and a non-identified member of the family Solirubrobacteraceae. Determination of the close-fitting associations between xylem-inhabiting microorganisms and X. fastidiosa may help to reveal specific microbial players associated with the suppression of ALSD under high X. fastidiosa inoculum pressure. These identified microorganisms would be good candidates to be tested in planta, to produce almond plants more resilient to X. fastidiosa infection when inoculated by endotherapy, contributing to suppress ALSD.

Introduction

Xylella fastidiosa has been identified as the major transboundary plant pest posing a serious threat to food security and the environment worldwide (Regulation EU, 2019; Regulation EU, 2020; Sanchez et al., 2019). Indeed, X. fastidiosa has been identified as the quarantine pathogen with the highest potential impact in the EU, in all economic, social, and environmental domains. Furthermore, it was ranked first in the priority list of quarantine pest/pathogens in the EU in a full spread scenario using a composite indicator (I2P2) developed by the Joint Research Center (Sanchez et al., 2019).

Xylella fastidiosa causes a relevant number of important diseases that induce severe yield losses in highly economic important crops, such as Pierce’s disease in grapevines (PD) (Hopkins and Purcell, 2002), citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC) (Coletta-Filho et al., 2020), olive quick decline syndrome (OQDS) (Saponari et al., 2017), and almond leaf scorch disease (ALSD) (Moralejo et al., 2020). X. fastidiosa infects not only crops of high economic importance, but also a wide host range of plants including species of cultural/patrimonial importance, ornamental, and landscape plants (EFSA, 2018, 2019b; Delbianco et al., 2022). The overall number of Xylella spp. host plants now reach 407 plant species, 185 genera, and 68 families if we consider those reports where the positive infection by the bacterium was determined by at least two different detection methods or with one method only if sequencing or pure culture isolation was used. These numbers rise to 655 plant species, 293 genera, and 88 families if we do not consider the method applied for its detection (Delbianco et al., 2022). This remarkable wide host range is related, in part, to its high efficient natural transmission between plants by diverse xylem sap-feeding insect species. Once inoculated into the plant, the bacterium survives within the xylem vessels of its host plants where its multiplication and biofilm formation result in a detriment of regular sap flow, and a progressive reduction of water and nutrient uptake, causing impairment of plant growth, and eventually, plant death (Chatterjee et al., 2008; Deyett and Rolshausen, 2019).

Xylella fastidiosa is taxonomically divided into three major subspecies (subsp. fastidiosa, subsp. multiplex, and subsp. pauca) (Schaad et al., 2004) although additional subspecies have been proposed (subsp. sandyi and subsp. morus) (Almeida and Nunney, 2015). Furthermore, each subspecies consists of multiple genetic lineages, grouped as sequence types (ST), each with different host ranges and virulence, although there is some host overlap and most of them infect several hosts (Sicard et al., 2018; Nunney et al., 2019; Landa et al., 2022).

In 2013, X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca was reported for the first time in Europe and was associated with a lethal disease outbreak affecting olive trees in Apulia, Italy (Saponari et al., 2013). After this detection and following mandatory EU annual surveys (Regulation EU, 2016; Regulation EU, 2020), several X. fastidiosa STs belonging to fastidiosa, pauca, multiplex, and sandyi subspecies have been intercepted and/or detected in Europe, where the bacterium has been detected in open fields and in the natural environment in France (2015, 2016, and 2020), Spain (2016), and Portugal (2018), and an outbreak in the Tuscany region of Italy (2018) (Denancé et al., 2017; EPPO Global Database; Landa et al., 2017; Regulation EU, 2019; Saponari et al., 2019; Olmo et al., 2021). Recent studies indicated that imports of plant material infected by X. fastidiosa from the American continent have probably been the origin of outbreaks of this bacterium in the Apulia region (Italy) and on the island of Majorca and in Alicante (Spain) (Jacques et al., 2016; Loconsole et al., 2016; Giampetruzzi et al., 2017; Landa et al., 2020; Moralejo et al., 2020).

In Spain, X. fastidiosa is causing severe yield losses in almond crops and the eradication of 1,000 trees. X. fastidiosa was first reported in 2016 in Majorca, in the Balearic Islands, infecting cherry (Prunus avium) and Polygala myrtifolia plants (Olmo et al., 2017). Early after, in 2017, more than 100 almond trees were diagnosed positive for the bacterium. Currently, more than 79% of almond trees in Majorca are estimated to be affected by ALSD (Moralejo et al., 2020). Four STs of X. fastidiosa infecting almond trees in the Balearic Islands have been detected: X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa ST1 and X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex ST7 on the island of Majorca, X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex ST81 on the islands of Majorca and Menorca, and X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca ST80 on the island of Ibiza (Delbianco et al., 2022). Simultaneously to the outbreak detected in Majorca, in the summer of 2017, the symptoms of ALSD were also observed for the first time in mainland Spain on 30-year-old almond trees in several orchards in the municipality El Castell de Guadalest of Alicante province, in the Eastern coast of the Iberian Peninsula (Marco-Noales et al., 2021). Currently, the X. fastidiosa demarcated area (DA) in the Valencian Community covers an extension of >136,200 ha (>135,000 in Alicante province and >1,200 in Valencia province). Within the DA, the infected zone (IZ) covers >2,700 ha, of which over 1,100 ha have been already eradicated. This outbreak represents one of the largest eradication campaigns for a plant disease ever carried out in Europe, with around 12,500 orchards and 90,000 trees already destroyed as of November 20211 (Vicente Dalmau, Plant Health Service of Valencian Community, personal communication). In this outbreak area, only X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex ST6 has been identified in infected almond trees (Marco-Noales et al., 2021).

Nowadays, there are no tools available to cure X. fastidiosa once a plant becomes infected in the field (EFSA, 2019a). Consequently, the use of preventive strategies focuses on the eradication of infected host plants, the control of the sap-feeding insect vectors, and restrictions on plant material movements (EFSA, 2019a; Serio et al., 2019; Morelli et al., 2021). Research on plant-associated microorganisms is gaining importance as a key component for the control of plant pathogens by exploiting and using single inoculants or microorganisms consortia that coexist in plant tissues to protect them against pathogen infection (Backman and Sikora, 2008). Plant-associated microorganisms are involved in several biotic and abiotic processes in the host, from the acquisition of nutrients to the increase of plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, without overlooking their role in plant defense against pathogens. In this context, the acquisition and maintenance of an efficient microbiota capable of adapting more rapidly to a changing environment may be undoubtedly a selective advantage (Doty, 2017; Rabiey et al., 2019).

Some studies have described the microbial community structure and composition within xylem vessels and its relationship to plant health and crop productivity (e.g., Deyett et al., 2017; Fausto et al., 2018; Deyett and Rolshausen, 2019; Anguita-Maeso et al., 2020, 2021a,b; Zicca et al., 2020; Haro et al., 2021). However, a very scarce number of studies have focused on the relationships between X. fastidiosa and xylem sap microbiota to assess the level of dysbiosis and the potential role of microbial endophytes in protecting host plants from disease development or stimulating plant immunity (Lacava et al., 2004; Azevedo et al., 2016; Deyett et al., 2019; Pacifico et al., 2019; Giampetruzzi et al., 2020; Vergine et al., 2020; Landa et al., 2022). For instance, Lacava et al. (2004) reported in vitro growth stimulation of X. fastidiosa by Methylobacterium extorquens and inhibition by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, two plant endophytes; whereas Deyett et al. (2017) found that the two endophytic bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens and Achromobacter xylosoxidans showed significant negative correlations in their abundance with X. fastidiosa.

For almond trees, microbiota studies have mainly focused on the epiphytic communities on the phyllosphere (flowers and leaves) using culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches (Fridman et al., 2012; Izhaki et al., 2013; Aleklett et al., 2014), on fungal pathogens associated with almond wood decay based on conventional culture-dependent techniques (Gramaje et al., 2012; Olmo et al., 2016) or Prunus replant disease (Khan et al., 2021). However, to our knowledge, no study has addressed the characterization of xylem sap microbial communities in almond trees despite the fact that the microbial profile serves as a basis to identify bacterial and fungal taxa with a potential antagonistic activity that could be used to fight vascular pathogens or as potential biocontrol agents to suppress ALSD.

This study was designed to characterize, for the first time, xylem-inhabiting bacterial and fungal communities from almond trees grown in the X. fastidiosa–DA of the Valencian Community (Spain) using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach. Next, we determined to what extent the infection of xylem vessels by X. fastidiosa affects the composition, diversity, and structure of the xylem microbiota. Finally, we determined the potential existence of tight interactions between specific xylem-inhabiting microorganisms and X. fastidiosa by network analysis. Our results could contribute to the development of sustainable and environmentally friendly biocontrol strategies to control ALSD by identifying key microbial players that might contribute to produce almond plants more resilient to infection by X. fastidiosa.

Materials and Methods

Study Area, Disease Assessment, and Sampling of Almond Trees

The study was conducted in July of 2018 in the DA of the Valencian Community in the province of Alicante (Spain) affected by X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex ST6. The incidence and severity of ALSD were assessed in a previous study in 20 almond orchards within the outbreak IZ (Camino et al., 2021). In each plot, ALSD severity (DS) was assessed by visual inspection of each tree for foliar symptoms using a rating scale of 0–4 according to the percentage of foliage with disease symptoms, where 0 corresponds to no visual symptoms (asymptomatic), and 1, 2, and 3 correspond to trees with visual ALSD symptoms between 1% and –25%, 25% and 50%, and 50% and 75% of the tree-crown, respectively, and 4 corresponds to a tree with mostly dead branches (≥75% of the crown canopy; with leaf collapse or leaf scorch) (Figure 1) (Camino et al., 2021).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Detection of Xylella fastidiosa by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from xylem samples obtained from asymptomatic (blue color) and almond leaf scorch disease (ALSD) symptomatic almond trees showing different ALSD severity values (from 0.5 to 3, orange color). No trees showing a disease severity of four were sampled.

From the 20 almond orchards evaluated by Camino et al. (2021), we selected for sampling and xylem analysis eight orchards within the municipalities of Benifato (two orchards), Benissa (two orchards), La Vall d’Alcala (one orchards), Polop (one orchard), and Xaló (two orchards) (Table 1). These plots were selected as the most representative of the 20 evaluated ones covering the geographic area evaluated and a wide range in terms of plot size and disease incidence and severity of ALSD symptoms determined by visual inspection (Camino et al., 2021). Table 1 shows the disease- and climate-related variables for the eight almond orchards analyzed in this study. Climate variables were selected based on annual temperature and precipitation values, as well as those that were found to be associated with the sensitivity of the bacterium to low winter temperature (Purcell, 1980) and the effects of water stress or warm conditions in the establishment of X. fastidiosa (EFSA, 2019b; Martinetti and Soubeyrand, 2019). Bioclimatic variables were obtained from the Chelsa Climatologies database that is based on the downscaled ERA-interim global circulation model with Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) and Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCM) bias correction, and a resolution of 30 arc s (approximately 1 km) (Karger et al., 2017). Bioclimatic variables were derived from monthly temperature and precipitation values and are intended to approximate climate dimensions meaningful to biological species.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Disease incidence and severity of almond leaf scorch disease (ALSD), and climatic characteristics of almond orchards sampled in this study within the demarcated area (DA) for Xylella fastidiosa in Alicante province.

A total of 94 trees were selected for microbiome analysis within the different evaluated plots, with 6–19 trees sampled per plot (Table 1). Trees included asymptomatic and symptomatic ALSD trees and were representative of the different disease severity scores present in the plot, from 0 (asymptomatic) to <3 (symptomatic), described above. We discarded those trees with a disease severity of 4 for sampling, as they had most of the canopies showing leaf scorch with dead branches (Figure 1). Sampling of the plant material was performed according to the standard protocol of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization for X. fastidiosa (EPPO, 2019). Briefly, samples for laboratory analysis were composed of almond branches/cuttings with attached mature leaves avoiding young growing shoots. Samples were kept refrigerated and shipped to the laboratory within a day. Sampling was supervised by the Plant Health Service of the Regional Ministry of Agriculture of the Valencian Community (Spain) and TRAGSATEC (Grupo TRAGSA) helped in the locations of the selected plots. Prior to sampling, an official permit was requested from the competent Phytosanitary Authority in the Valencian Community to move the plant material from the DA to the IAS-CSIC Laboratory in Córdoba, Spain. Trees could only be sampled once due to the eradication enforcement of the Regulation EU (2019) that is carried out in an IZ in Europe and that obliges to remove all trees tested positive for X. fastidiosa immediately after diagnosis.

DNA Extraction From Xylem Tissues and Real-Time PCR Analysis

It is known that, for deciduous plant species (e.g., Prunus spp.), a detectable concentration of the bacterium is commonly obtained on leaf petioles at the end of summer for symptomatic plants, but asymptomatic leaves collected early in the season during the vegetative period from the same trees can be negative. For this reason, we processed mature branches (i.e., woody cuttings) to maximize the chance of detecting X. fastidiosa. Xylem tissue was recovered by obtaining woody chip shavings as previously described by Anguita-Maeso et al. (2020). Shortly, three 6-cm-long pieces from mature almond branches were debarked and disinfested with a sterile paper moistened in ethanol to avoid microbial contamination of the xylem from bark and phloem. Once ethanol had evaporated, xylem chips were obtained by scraping the most external layer of the debarked woody pieces with a sterile scalpel. The xylem chips from the different pieces were mixed, and a 0.5-g sample was placed in a Bioreba bag containing 5 ml of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB; 2% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8, 20 mM EDTA, and 1.4 M NaCl); the bags were closed with a thermal sealer and the content was macerated with a hand homogenizer (BIOREBA, Reinach, Switzerland). Extracts were stored at –80°C until DNA extraction. All the processes described above were carried out under sterile conditions inside a flow hood chamber.

DNA was extracted from aliquots of xylem sap samples (0.5 ml) obtained from CTAB-macerated xylem chips following the EPPO procedure (2019). DNA was eluted in a final volume of 50 μl of ultrapure, filter-sterilized distilled water, DNA purity (absorbance 260/280 nm ratio) was determined using a NanoDrop®156 ND-1000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, United States), and yield concentration was quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays of Harper et al. (2010) and Francis et al. (2006) were used to determine the presence of X. fastidiosa in the trees with each DNA sample run in duplicate according to EPPO (2019). It should be noted that the analytical sensitivity of the real-time PCR test of Harper et al. (2010) is higher than that of the tests based on Francis et al. (2006). A sample was considered positive if the Cq ≤ 35 and an exponential amplification curve was obtained for both technical replicates. When a doubtful result was obtained, qPCR reactions were repeated. Appropriate negative and positive isolation controls and negative and positive amplification controls were included during DNA extraction and qPCR assays as described by EPPO (2019).

Bacterial and Fungal rRNA Gene Amplification

For bacteria, the primers 799F (5′-AACMGGATTAGAT ACCCKG-3′) and 1115R (5′-AGGGTTGCGCTCGTTG-3′) targeting V5–V6 of 16S rRNA were used for metabarcoding analysis as previously described (Anguita-Maeso et al., 2020, 2021a,b). Briefly, PCR products were purified using Agencourt Ampere XP (Beckman Coulter) and the barcodes and sequencing adaptors were attached using Fluidigm barcodes (Access Array Barcode Library for Illumina® Sequencers – 384, Single Direction). PCR products were quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Tecan Safire microplate reader (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland). Equimolecular amounts of each individual sample were combined in 10 mM of Tris, and the pooled library was sequenced by the Genomics Unit of the “Fundación Parque Científico de Madrid,” Madrid, Spain, using the Illumina MiSeq platform (V3; PE 2 bp × 300 bp).

For fungal communities, the quantified DNA was sent to the Integrated Microbiome Resource (IMR) at Dalhousie University (Canada) to amplify the ITS2 region of the fungal ITS rRNA with the primers ITS86F (5′-GTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAA-3′) and ITS4R (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) using the Illumina MiSeq platform (V3; PE 2 bp × 300 bp).

In both the cases, the ZymoBIOMICS microbial standard (Zymo Research Corp., Irvine, CA, United States) and water (no template DNA) were used as internal positive and negative controls, respectively, for library construction and sequencing.

Bioinformatics and Statistical Analysis

Quality control and adapter trimming of the demultiplexed raw fastq files of bacterial and fungal sequences were performed with the TrimGalore v.0.6.6 tool2. The first 10 pb of all reads were trimmed and a truncation length of 240 and 200 pb was needed in the forward and reverse bacterial reads, respectively, to reach an adequate Phred quality score (Q > 30). In contrast, a truncation fixed length was not appropriate in fungal reads due to a variation in ITS biological length and additional quality steps were conducted using the Cutadapt v.3.4 tool (Martin, 2011) to overcome this limitation.

High-quality reads were then analyzed using the DADA2 method for the identification of the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) present in the samples (Callahan et al., 2016) and taxonomically classified using the Silva SSU v.138 and UNITE v.8.3 databases for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Singletons were discarded for taxonomy assignation and statistical analysis. Differences in bacterial and fungal communities were calculated using α-diversity indexes (Richness and Shannon) at the ASV level. The non-parametric Scheirer–Ray–Hare test (p < 0.05) was used to assess the effects of the X. fastidiosa infection status of the trees (presence of the pathogen as determined by qPCR), sampled plots, and their interaction on α-diversity indexes, using the package rcompanion v.2.4.1 (Mangiafico, 2020) in R. β-diversity was analyzed using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac and Bray–Curtis distance matrices and the Permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices (ADONIS function) within the vegan package in R (999 permutations) was performed to test the effects (p < 0.05) of X. fastidiosa tree infection, the sampled orchards, and their interaction. α- and β-diversity were conducted after resampling abundance values to the minimum number of reads found to achieve parity in the total number of counts between samples. Furthermore, a negative binomial model approach based on the DESeq2 package in R (Love et al., 2014) was used to find differences in microbiota composition at the genus level among the different treatments (p < 0.05). Finally, a 40% prevalence of ASV was fixed before performing a co-occurrence network inference analysis of microbial communities by combining an ensemble of the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, and the Bray–Curtis and Kullback–Leibler dissimilarity indices using CoNet v.1.1.1 (Faust and Raes, 2016) and MCODE (Bader and Hogue, 2003) in Cytoscape v.3.8.2 software to determine key network properties and highly interconnected regions to ascertain the existence of potential differences in microbial interactions occurring in the xylem of almond trees with or without X. fastidiosa infection. Statistical significance of co-occurrence and mutual exclusions was computed using edge-specific permutation and bootstrap score distributions with 1,000 iterations (Barberán et al., 2012; Faust et al., 2012). All data analyses were repeated by removing reads assigned to X. fastidiosa from the data set.

Results

Disease Assessment and qPCR

Of the 94 sampled trees, 52.7% were asymptomatic (DS = 0), 17.6% showed initial symptoms (0 < DS ≤ 1), 18.7% showed low severity symptoms (1 < DS ≤ 2), and 11.0% showed moderate symptoms (2 < DS ≤ 3) (Figure 1). X. fastidiosa infection was analyzed by the qPCR of Harper and Francis (EPPO, 2019) on all sampled trees, obtaining congruent results between the two protocols. The qPCR analysis indicated that 54% of the trees were infected by X. fastidiosa, and in the remaining 46%, X. fastidiosa could not be detected. After performing library amplification, good-quality reads were not obtained for three of the 94 trees analyzed, and these data were discarded for further analysis. The vast majority of trees showing visual ALSD symptoms were positive for X. fastidiosa by qPCR analysis (93.0%) with Cq values ranging from 23.2 to 35.7 for Francis qPCR, and from 20.4 to 31.0 for Harper qPCR, respectively. Of the asymptomatic trees, 18.8% were determined to be infected by X. fastidiosa by qPCR, with Cq values ranging from 25.2 to 34.9 for Francis qPCR, and from 21.3 to 33.2 for Harper qPCR.

For NGS analysis, a sample was considered as X. fastidiosa –positive if ≥5 reads were taxonomically assigned to the bacterium. X. fastidiosa reads identified by NGS ranged from 1,032 to 21,452, whereas the Cq values of same samples ranged from 23.2 to 36.6 for Francis qPCR and from 20.4 to 36.0 for Harper PCR. There was good agreement between the qPCR and NGS analysis, as indicated by the significant linear relationship between the Log(reads) and the Cq values of positive samples for both qPCR protocols assessed (Supplementary Figure 1). In addition, lower Cq values were found for the Harper qPCR protocol compared to the Francis qPCR protocol, when testing the same positive sample, as expected from the higher sensitivity of the former (Supplementary Figure 1).

Next-generation sequencing results supported the results obtained by qPCR and allowed the detection of X. fastidiosa in 93.0% of the symptomatic trees (Figure 1), with X. fastidiosa reads per sample between 49 and 21,452, representing between 0.3% and 97.7% of the total reads. A total of 18.8% (9/48) of the asymptomatic trees were found to be positive by NGS (Figure 1), with X. fastidiosa reads between 51 and 6,709, representing between 3.6 and 74.5% of the total reads. Although a similar proportion of asymptomatic trees were determined to be infected by the bacterium when using qPCR, some differences were found. Thus, in two samples from X. fastidiosa–infected asymptomatic trees (i.e., qPCR positive with Cq > 32) no reads of X. fastidiosa could be detected by NGS. Also, in two asymptomatic trees that were qPCR negative, X. fastidiosa reads could be detected, albeit in very low numbers (8 and 18 reads, respectively). Finally, a 7.0% (3/43) of the trees were found to be negative by both the methods, although those trees showed symptoms (DS < 1) similar to those of the initial ALSD (Figure 1). Negative results were obtained for those trees upon repeat qPCR analysis with and without sample dilution.

α- and β-Microbial Diversity Measures

Illumina MiSeq sequencing resulted in a total of 2,360,992 and 8,840,606 raw reads for bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. After removal of chimeras, unassigned, or mitochondrial reads, 928,850 and 6,840,847 good-quality reads were assigned to bacteria and fungi, respectively. No chloroplast reads were detected in our samples.

For bacterial communities, a total of 1,217 ASVs were identified among all treatments, with 776 ASVs being retained for α- and β-diversity analysis after rarefying all data to the minimum number of reads and singleton removal. A total of four ASVs were taxonomically assigned to X. fastidiosa. The Scheirer–Ray–Hare test indicated no significant differences (p > 0.05) for the Richness α-diversity index according to X. fastidiosa infection (H = 2.57, p = 0.108) whereas orchards were significant (H = 14.65, p = 0.040) with no significant interaction (H = 1.67, p = 0.892) between both the factors. Conversely, Shannon α-diversity index showed significant differences for X. fastidiosa infection (H = 5.34, p = 0.020), whereas orchards were not significant (H = 11.20, p = 0.130) with no significant interaction (H = 2.11, p = 0.833) (Figure 2A). On the contrary, when we removed X. fastidiosa ASVs reads from the data set, the Richness and Shannon α-diversity indices presented significant differences according to both orchards (H > 27.62, p < 0.001) and to the tree infection status (H < 5.25, p < 0.027) with no significant interaction (H < 1.99, p > 0.850) (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Boxplots of Richness (observed) and Shannon diversity indices for bacterial (A,B) and fungal communities (C) at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) taxonomic level in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa-qPCR negative and positive almond trees sampled in different orchards in Alicante province. X. fastidiosa ASVs were maintained (A) or removed (B) from the data set before analysis. The boxes represent the interquartile range, while the horizontal line within the box defines the median and whiskers represent the lowest and highest values of four values for each treatment combination.

For fungal communities, a total of 708 ASVs were identified for all treatments, with 356 ASVs retained for α- and β-diversity analysis. Both Richness and Shannon α-diversity indices showed significant differences according to the orchard (H > 55.16, p < 0.001) with no significant differences according to the tree infection status (H < 0.92, p > 0.342), nor its interaction (H < 0.96, p > 0.965) (Figure 2C).

Principal coordinate analysis of Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances differentiated almond xylem bacterial communities mainly according to X. fastidiosa infection, in contrast to fungal communities, where the presence of the bacterium had a minor effect on its distribution. Thus, there was a clear tendency to group bacterial communities according to the presence of X. fastidiosa on the trees along Axis 1, which explained 22.8 and 18.6% of the variation for Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac measures, respectively (Figure 3A). Interestingly, this trend was not observed when X. fastidiosa ASVs reads were removed from the datasheet indicating the crucial effect that X. fastidiosa has in displacing bacterial community composition (Figure 3B). These results were also observed when data from each orchard were considered separately (Supplementary Figures 2A,B). On the other hand, fungal communities did not show a clear distribution according to X. fastidiosa infection, neither when all data were analyzed together (Figure 3C) nor by sampled orchard (Supplementary Figure 2C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Principal coordinate plots of Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances of bacterial (A,B) and fungal communities (C) at the ASV taxonomic level in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa-qPCR negative and positive almond trees sampled in different orchards in Alicante province. X. fastidiosa ASVs were maintained (A) or removed (B) from the data set before analysis. Points are colored by X. fastidiosa detection and shaped by municipality.

ADONIS analysis supported the results described above and indicated a significant main effect on X. fastidiosa infection in the weighted UniFrac model when the X. fastidiosa reads were maintained in the datasheet (R2 = 0.211, p < 0.001); and also when X. fastidiosa reads were removed from the data set (R2 = 0.022, p = 0.036). However, in both cases, the main effect on community composition was due to the orchard for both the Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac distance (R2 = 0.196, p < 0.001) and (R2 = 0.270, p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, fungal communities were mainly affected by the sampled orchard at both dissimilarity distances for Bray–Curtis (R2 < 0.358, p < 0.001) and for UniFrac (R2 < 0.400, p < 0.001), and to a lesser extent by X. fastidiosa infection (R2 = 0.014, p = 0.033) at the Bray–Curtis distance, with no significant effect for the weighted UniFrac distance (R2 = 0.009, p = 0.206) (Supplementary Table 1).

Composition of Xylem Tissue Bacterial and Fungal Communities

A total of 11 phyla, 22 classes, 125 orders, 256 families, and 584 genera of bacteria were taxonomically identified. Globally, the phyla Proteobacteria (68.89%), Bacteroidota (18.53%), and Actinobacteriota (10.83%) and the genus Xylella (27.39%), Sphingomonas (13.93%), and Hymenobacter (12.68%) were the most abundant taxa when analyzing all experimental treatments together (Figure 4A). As expected, Xylella was the genus with the highest relative abundance in X. fastidiosa-infected almond trees (58.23%), reaching maximum frequencies for infected trees sampled in orchard 405 (75.79%). In addition, Sphingomonas (with 35.20% in orchard 405 and 34.82% in orchard 20B) and Hymenobacter (with 36.13 and 31.31% in orchards 47 and 650, respectively) were the next two predominant genera in the xylem tissue from X. fastidiosa non-infected trees. Interestingly, a noticeable lower relative abundance of the main predominant genera was found in X. fastidiosa-positive almond trees compared to those with negative detection of the pathogen in each orchard (Figure 5A). In fact, when removing the genus Xylella from the data, slight differences in microbial relative abundance were found between X. fastidiosa qPCR-positive and negative trees (Figure 5B). On the contrary, a higher relative abundance of two members of the family Sphingobacteriaceae (ASV7 and ASV9) reached the highest frequencies in orchards 650 and 652 (3.52 and 3.34%, respectively) when compared to the other orchards. Similarly, the genus Tatumella presented a high relative abundance in X. fastidiosa non-infected trees in orchard 652 (23.86%), Friedmanniella in orchard 20B (17.33%), and Massilia in orchard 405 in non-infected trees (16.66%) (Figure 5B).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Global relative bacterial (A) and fungal (B) taxa abundance at the genus level present in the xylem of almond trees for all experimental combinations evaluated in the study.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Bar plots showing the relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the genus level in the xylem of almond trees sampled in different orchards in Alicante province before (A) or after (B) the removal of Xylella fastidiosa ASVs from the data set. X. fastidiosa (+) and X. fastidiosa (–) refer to X. fastidiosa-infected or non-infected almond trees, respectively.

Overall, three phyla, 66 classes, 123 orders, 266 families, and 408 genera were taxonomically identified as fungi. Globally, the phyla Ascomycota (98.38%), Basidiomycota (1.61%), and Mucoromycota (0.006%) and the genus Diplodia (30.18%), the families Didymellaceae (10.66%) and Aureobasidium (9.91%) were the most abundant taxa when exploring all experimental treatments together (Figure 4B). Diplodia and Neofusicoccum increased their relative abundance (37.95 and 8.52%, respectively) from non-infected X. fastidiosa trees, whereas the genus Collophora followed an opposite trend, with a reduction of 3.14% in its relative abundance. When analyzing the data according to orchard, the genus Diplodia presented a high relative abundance in X. fastidiosa–infected trees in orchard 75 (79.86%), Neofusicoccum (24.71%) in orchard 20B, Lasiodiplodia (18.02%) in non-infected trees in orchard 48, and Trichothecium (29.06%) in infected trees in orchard 650. However, there was no clear pattern of prevalent fungal genera among orchards or X. fastidiosa infection. Indeed, Diplodia presented the highest relative abundance in X. fastidiosa-positive trees in orchard 75 (79.86%), whereas the trend was the opposite in non-infected trees in orchard 47 (43.07%) (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Bar plots showing the relative abundance of fungal taxa at the genus level present in the xylem of almond trees sampled in different orchards in Alicante province. X. fastidiosa (+) and X. fastidiosa (–) refer to Xylella fastidiosa-infected or non-infected almond trees, respectively.

Differential Abundance of Bacterial and Fungal Taxa Associated With Xylella fastidiosa Infection

In line with these results, DESeq2 analysis was used to identify key genera that could be differentially associated with the presence or absence of X. fastidiosa in tree xylem vessels. Globally, a greater number of significant bacterial and fungal genera were found with higher frequencies in X. fastidiosa–infected trees (Figure 7 and Supplementary Figures 3,4). Thus, DESeq2 identified a bacterial enrichment (log2 fold change >0) of 50 bacterial members including ASVs from the Class Actinobacteria (two ASVs), family Acetobacteraceae (eight ASVs), and phylum Proteobacteria (two ASVs), and ASVs belonging to the genera Variovorax, Sediminivirga, Kineosporia, and Erwinia. On the contrary, Cupriavidus and the two unidentified genera from the families Sphingobacteriaceae (ASV59) and Acetobacteraceae (ASV41) (log2 fold change <0) showed a distinct behavior (Figure 7A). Regarding fungal communities, Neofusicoccum and Fitzroyomyces presented a major enrichment in the xylem when almond trees are infected with the pathogen (log2 fold change >0) whereas the genera Rosellinia and Chaetomium showed the opposite behavior. In addition, distinct ASVs from the family Didymellaceae showed significantly different enrichment according to the presence of X. fastidiosa in the xylem of almond trees (Figure 7B).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. DESeq2 analysis of differentially enriched bacterial (A) and fungal (B) genera present in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa-qPCR negative and positive almond trees sampled in different orchards in Alicante province. The color scale bar indicates log2 fold change. Only significant genera (p < 0.05) are shown.

When analyzing the data by each sampled orchard, DESeq2 identified Cedecea in orchard 405, and Hoyosella and Erwinia in orchard 650, as bacteria with the highest significant enrichment in the xylem of almond trees showing a qPCR X. fastidiosa–positive detection. In contrast, Erwiniaceae ASV61 in orchards 652 and 48, and Pantoea in orchard 20A were the ASVs with the greatest significant enrichment in the different municipalities in the xylem of almond trees with a negative qPCR detection for X. fastidiosa (Supplementary Figure 3). Focusing on fungal communities, Trichothecium in orchards 405 and 650, and Diaporthe in orchard 20A showed the greatest significant enrichment in the xylem of almond trees infected by X. fastidiosa, whereas Cytospora in orchard 650, ASV248 of the order Tubeufiales in orchard 48, and Neophaeomoniella in orchard 652 were enriched in non-infected trees (Supplementary Figure 4).

Co-occurrence Network Inference Analysis

Network analysis indicated aggregation or exclusion interactions between the four ASVs of X. fastidiosa identified with the different bacterial and fungal taxa detected in the xylem vessels of almond trees. The fungal phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota showed negative interactions within the network, whereas X. fastidiosa showed exclusion mainly with the phylum Ascomycota (Figure 8A) and a negative interaction mainly with Proteobacteria, and more specifically with Sphingomonas (Supplementary Figure 5A). Interestingly, the ASVs of Diplodia and Pringsheimia showed the greatest number of negative interactions (35 and 17, respectively) among all the microorganisms, whereas a member of the Family Acetobacteraceae and Sphingomonas showed the greatest number of positive associations (52 and 41, respectively) (data not shown).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Co-occurrence network inference plot based on the MCODE method showing highly interconnected regions of bacterial and fungal communities (A), or bacteria present in the xylem of almond trees before (B) or after (C) the removal of Xylella fastidiosa ASVs from the data set. Nodes in blue and black represent fungal and bacterial ASVs, respectively, and pink nodes correspond to X. fastidiosa ASVs. Copresence (green) and mutual exclusion (red) are shown as the edges between the nodes.

On the other hand, when analyzing only bacterial communities, a cluster of positive interactions was found among the four identified X. fastidiosa ASVs, and negative interactions were found between X. fastidiosa ASVs and a total of 22 ASVs corresponding to the genera Sphingomonas, 1174-901-12, a member of the family Solirubrobacteraceae, Abditibacterium, Methylobacterium–Methylorubrum, Modestobacter, and Xylophilus (Supplementary Figure 5A), with the four first genera being the most strongly and negatively connected (Figure 8B). Remarkably, only positive interactions between different ASVs were found in the network analysis after removing X. fastidiosa ASVs from the data set (Figure 8C and Supplementary Figure 5C). Overall, nine keystone species, the ASV members of the families Acetobacteraceae and Beijerinckiaceae, Sphingomonas, Acidiphilium, Friedmaniella, Hymenobacter, and Methylobacterium–Methylorubrum with positive interactions and Diplodia and Modestobacter with negative interactions, were predicted based on the network parameters of high closeness and degree, and low betweenness centrality (Supplementary Table 2).

Discussion

This study describes for the first time the endophytic bacterial and fungal communities colonizing the xylem vessels of almond trees using a metabarcoding approach, and describes the changes in the diversity and structural profile of those microbial communities associated with the infection of the tree by X. fastidiosa. The study has also revealed the existence of positive and negative associations between xylem-inhabiting microorganisms and the presence of this plant pathogenic bacterium. These results establish the bases to unravel the impacts of X. fastidiosa infection on the xylem microbial communities and to identify potential microorganisms that change in response to infection by X. fastidiosa or that are predominant in non-infected trees that grow in orchards with high inoculum pressure from the pathogen.

Several studies described the microbial communities inhabiting different ecological niches of almond trees, such as the phyllosphere (Izhaki et al., 2013), flowers (Aleklett et al., 2014), and their nectar (Fridman et al., 2012), or the soil associated to almond roots (Theofel et al., 2021). However, xylem vessels, as a plant niche with very specific characteristics, have been overlooked despite their decisive role in plant growth, as it provides an interconnected route for the circulation and transport of micronutrients and macronutrients (White, 2012) and is an optimal niche for the colonization of microbial endophytes (Malfanova et al., 2013).

As expected, using NGS analysis we identified four different ASVs belonging to X. fastidiosa that correspond to the subsp. multiplex associated to ALSD in the DA of the Valencian Community, in the province of Alicante (Spain) (Arias-Giraldo et al., 2020; Marco-Noales et al., 2021). Additionally, we found good agreement between X. fastidiosa reads obtained by NGS analysis and the Cq values obtained by the two qPCR protocols used to detect X. fastidiosa infection. The results also indicated that Harper qPCR showed greater sensitivity than Francis qPCR. Besides, we observed similar sensitivity of qPCR as compared with NGS analysis for detecting X. fastidiosa in asymptomatic trees. In a study comparing the nanopore amplicon sequencing methodology and the qPCR protocol of Francis et al. (2006) on the efficacy of X. fastidiosa detection, Faino et al. (2021) found a lower number of samples identified as X. fastidiosa-positive using nanopore sequencing, although the percentage of agreement between both approaches was lower than in our study (78.6%). However, they used the whole genome instead of 16S rRNA amplicons for sequencing and a different sequencing platform than those used in our study.

Our metabarcoding results suggest that X. fastidiosa infection reshapes almond xylem microbial composition by altering microbial structure and diversity. Thus, X. fastidiosa infection was correlated with a reduction in the relative abundance of two of the most predominant bacterial genera inhabiting almond xylem vessels (i.e., Sphingomonas and Hymenobacter). These bacterial genera have been described as endophytes in other plant species including elm trees (Mocali et al., 2003), maple trees (Wemheuer et al., 2019), rice (Wang et al., 2016), or potato (Tangapo et al., 2018), and more specifically as common xylem inhabitants of woody crops including olive (Anguita-Maeso et al., 2020, 2021a), grapevines (Bruez et al., 2020), and citrus (Ginnan et al., 2020). Additionally, Sphingomonas has been described as a bacterium with several functional plant beneficial traits including plant growth promotion and plant protection (Innerebner et al., 2011; Asaf et al., 2020), whereas Hymenobacter is a well-known psychrotrophic bacteria involved in plant growth development and bioremediation of heavy metal pollution in natural soils (Dimitrijević et al., 2018; Ubogu and Akponah, 2021).

On the other hand, X. fastidiosa infection was also correlated with changes in xylem-associated fungal communities. Thus, X. fastidiosa infection was correlated with a general increase of Diplodia and Neofusicoccum, although this trend was not consistent among the different sampled orchards, which suggest a lower influence of X. fastidiosa infection on fungal xylem-associated communities, or that other factors (agronomic practices, climatic conditions, age, or genotype of the tree, etc.) may also play a role. In our study, although we did not have precise information on the age and variety of the sampled trees, we speculated that those factors might have a minor role, since most of orchards sampled were of similar age, and “Marcona” was the most common almond variety grown in the area. Concerning climatic variables, there were small differences among the eight orchards in the study, with annual mean temperature and precipitation ranging from 13.9 to 17.1°C and from 487 to 686 mm, respectively. In the same context within the eight sampled orchards, slight differences in climatic suitability for X. fastidiosa establishment have been described (EFSA, 2019b; Table 1). Indeed, orchards 20A and 20B, located in Xaló municipality and orchard 75 located in the northeastern part of the municipality of Benissa are classified as highly suitable for the establishment of X. fastidiosa, while the remaining five orchards are classified as moderately suitable. Interestingly, the three plots with higher versus moderate suitability for X. fastidiosa establishment, present higher values for both mean annual temperature (17–17.1°C vs. 13.9–16.5°C) and the coldest month (9.0–9.4°C vs. 4.9–7.9°C), while they tend to have lower precipitation levels (Table 1). This indicated that the environmental conditions in those orchards differ and may affect not only the establishment and further development of X. fastidiosa, but also the entire xylem microbiome, and may explain, at least in part, the significant differences in α- and β-diversity measurements found among orchards for both fungal and bacterial communities, which deserves further study.

Diplodia and Neofusicoccum have been described as fungal endophytes belonging to the diverse Botryosphaeriaceae family (Slippers et al., 2013; Shetty et al., 2016) and have been found in wood samples of almond trees from Majorca that showed dieback symptoms (Gramaje et al., 2012), as well as in other woody plants, such as olive (Moral et al., 2010), grapevine (Gramaje and Armengol, 2011), mangrove (Osorio et al., 2017), and eucalyptus trees (Barradas et al., 2016). The procedure used for xylem microbiome extraction by macerating structural xylem tissues may explain, in part, why those fungi that are not common inhabitants of the xylem vessels were found. Additionally, although these genera include well-known pathogenic species, members of the genus Neofusicoccum are often symbiotically associated with different plant species and are involved in functions related to the response to environmental factors and internal signals that can modulate the production of secondary metabolites by the host (Salvatore et al., 2021). Interestingly, the two orchards sampled in Benissa, although showing an incidence (72 and 44%) and ALSD severity (1.51 and 0.78) similar to other sampled plots, included most of the trees with a higher severity score [i.e., (2 < DS ≤ 3)], which can be related to a more advanced stage or earlier infection by X. fastidiosa in those plots (Moralejo et al., 2020).

In parallel to the results described above, X. fastidiosa infection was correlated with a reduction in α-diversity measures estimated by Richness and Shannon indices, although this effect was more pronounced in the α-diversity of xylem-inhabiting bacteria compared to that of fungal populations. The decrease in the relative abundance of specific microbial taxa detected in our study in X. fastidiosa trees may be explained by: (i) the displacement of the natural xylem microbiota due to niche exclusion (X. fastidiosa colonizes and occludes xylem vessels forming microcolonies); (ii) the secretion by X. fastidiosa of specific molecules directly or in outer membrane vesicles with antimicrobial, signaling, and cell wall degrading activity (Feitosa-Junior et al., 2019; de Souza et al., 2020) can induce a direct modification of the xylem microbiome or induce changes if used as nutrient sources; and/or (iii) the triggering of a series of host physiological responses that result in a decrease in the abundance of specific components of the xylem microbiome. Thus, the interaction between X. fastidiosa and the plant xylem microbiome is bidirectional and there is still a need to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions (Landa et al., 2022). These hypotheses emphasize the need to expand our knowledge on the changes that may take place in xylem microbial communities after infection by vascular plant pathogens (Anguita-Maeso et al., 2021b).

The potential interactions occurring between X. fastidiosa and different members of the microbial community into the xylem have been considered by some authors (Deyett et al., 2017; Giampetruzzi et al., 2020; Vergine et al., 2020; Zicca et al., 2020). However, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to address interactions between X. fastidiosa and microbial composition into the xylem of almond trees via network analysis. Among the nine keystone species detected in the co-occurrence network analysis with significant interactions with X. fastidiosa, Sphingomonas showed the strongest negative interaction with the pathogen when bacterial and fungal communities were analyzed together. Although this study did not further evaluate the antagonistic activity of Sphingomonas against X. fastidiosa in vitro, we suggest that it might be worthwhile to assess the biocontrol potential in planta of Sphingonomas against X. fastidiosa covering the major subspecies and STs, because of its determinant position in the network community structure analysis. Although some authors have not found antagonistic activity of Sphingomonas against X. fastidiosa in vitro (Zicca et al., 2020), it might occur that its antagonistic effect is due to other biocontrol mechanisms rather than antibiosis. Thus, the role of Sphingomonas as a biological control agent has been widely studied in other pathosystems, which revealed that substrate competition plays a role in plant protection by Sphingomonas. In particular, differences in carbon source profiles have been identified between protecting and non-potecting strains (Innerebner et al., 2011; Wachowska et al., 2013).

This research is pioneering in providing new insights into the characterization of bacterial and fungal communities that colonize the xylem vessels of almond trees. These results can contribute to complement the current knowledge regarding the interaction between X. fastidiosa and xylem endophytes to determine the changes correlated with X. fastidiosa infection in the xylem-associated microbiome, describing the composition, diversity, and structure of the almond xylem microbial profile in X. fastidiosa –infected and non-infected trees. Also, this study provides for the first time the description of significant co-presence and mutual exclusion interactions between X. fastidiosa with bacterial and fungal microbial inhabitants of the xylem in almond trees. Some specific limitations can be raised in this study, mainly linked to the sampling of the microbiome in a single season. Thus, for other woody crops, a strong seasonality effect on the diversity and composition of the xylem microbiome has been found for grapes (Deyett and Rolshausen, 2019) and olive (Anguita et al., unpublished results). This fact was forced because infected trees were eradicated soon after they were confirmed as positive for X. fastidiosa as imposed by legislation (Regulation EU, 2016, 2020). Nevertheless, we consider our results relevant for future studies aimed at identifying xylem-inhabiting microorganisms potentially involved in host tolerance and/or plant defense against xylem-inhabiting pathogens, or may help select key microorganisms that can be tested in planta to determine their ability to suppress ALSD.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI database as Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number: PRJNA800096.

Author Contributions

AA-Y, CH, MA-M, and BL: conceived the research and wrote the manuscript. AF, MR-E, and JN-C: selected the field orchards, performed ALSD evaluation, and sampling. MA-M, JN-C, and BL: performed bioinformatics and statistical analyses. AA-Y, CH, CO-G, and MR-E: prepared materials and equipment and performed the qPCR and NGS experiments. JC, EM-N, AF, and JN-C: contributed to reviewing the manuscript and interpreting the results. JC and BL: provided funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by projects AGL2016-75606-R and PID2020-114917RB-I00 (Programa Estatal de I+D Orientado a los Retos de la Sociedad from Spanish Government, the Spanish State Research Agency and FEDER-EU), XF-ACTORS (X. fastidiosa Active Containment Through a Multidisciplinary Oriented Research Strategy; grant 727987) and EcoStack (Grant Agreement No. 773554) from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Research Program. AA-Y acknowledges the STM program granted by the COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Financial support of CYTED network Iber-Xyfas (Ref. 119RT0569) is acknowledged. MA-M is a recipient of a research fellowship BES-2017-082361 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and CH is a recipient of a Juan de la Cierva fellowship “Grant IJC2019-040423-I” from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer AV declared a shared affiliation with the author EM-N to the handling editor at the time of review.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the information provided by the Plant Health Service of the Regional Ministry of Agriculture of the region of Valencia (Spain) on the phytosanitary status of almond orchards in the affected area of Alicante and to TRAGSATEC (Grupo TRAGSA) for their support during the field sampling. M. Montes-Borrego, G. Leon and J.L. Trapero-Casas are also acknowledged for their support during the field sampling. We acknowledge support for the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.866085/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Linear regression between log [Xylella fastidiosa reads] obtained by next-generation sequencing (NGS) sequencing and Cq values from the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocols of Francis et al. (2006) and Harper et al. (2010) obtained from DNA extracted from xylem samples of X. fastidiosa-infected almond trees.

Supplementary Figure 2 | Principal coordinate plots of Bray–Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances of bacterial (A,B) and fungal communities (C) at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) taxonomic level in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa –qPCR negative and positive almond trees sampled in each orchard in Alicante province. X. fastidiosa ASVs were maintained (A) or removed (B) from the data set before analysis. Points are colored by X. fastidiosa detection.

Supplementary Figure 3 | DESeq2 analysis of differentially enriched bacterial genera present in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa–qPCR negative and positive almond trees in the different sampled orchards in Alicante province. The color scale bar indicates log2 fold change. Only significant genera (p < 0.05) are shown.

Supplementary Figure 4 | DESeq2 analysis of differentially enriched fungal genera present in the xylem of Xylella fastidiosa–qPCR negative and positive almond trees in the different sampled orchards in Alicante province. The color scale bar indicates log2 fold change. Only significant genera (p < 0.05) are shown.

Supplementary Figure 5 | Co-occurrence network inference plot of bacterial and fungal communities (A) present in the xylem of almond trees with the presence (B) or absence (C) of Xylella fastidiosa ASVs in the data set before analysis. Copresence (green) and mutual exclusion (red) are shown as the edges between the nodes.

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://agroambient.gva.es/es/web/agricultura/xylella-fastidiosa
  2. ^ http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/

References

Aleklett, K., Hart, M., and Shade, A. (2014). The microbial ecology of flowers: an emerging frontier in phyllosphere research. Botany 92, 253–266. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2013-0166

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almeida, R. P. P., and Nunney, L. (2015). How do plant diseases caused by Xylella fastidiosa Emerge? Plant Dis. 99, 1457–1467. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-15-0159-FE

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anguita-Maeso, M., Haro, C., Montes-Borrego, M., De La Fuente, L., Navas-Cortés, J. A., and Landa, B. B. (2021a). Metabolomic, ionomic and microbial characterization of olive xylem sap reveals differences according to plant age and genotype. Agronomy 11:1179. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11061179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anguita-Maeso, M., Olivares-García, C., Haro, C., Imperial, J., Navas-Cortés, J. A., and Landa, B. B. (2020). Culture-dependent and culture-independent characterization of the olive xylem microbiota: effect of sap extraction methods. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1708. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anguita-Maeso, M., Trapero-Casas, J. L., Olivares-García, C., Ruano-Rosa, D., Palomo-Ríos, E., Jiménez-Díaz, R. M., et al. (2021b). Verticillium dahliae inoculation and in vitro propagation modify the xylem microbiome and disease reaction to Verticillium wilt in a wild olive genotype. Front. Plant Sci. 12:250. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.632689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arias-Giraldo, L. F. F., Giampetruzzi, A., Metsis, M., Marco-Noales, E., Imperial, J., Velasco-Amo, M. P., et al. (2020). Complete circularized genome data of two Spanish strains of Xylella fastidiosa (IVIA5235 and IVIA5901) using two hybrid assembly approaches. Phytopathology 110, 969–972. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-20-0012-A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asaf, S., Numan, M., Khan, A. L., and Al-Harrasi, A. (2020). Sphingomonas: from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 40, 138–152. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1709793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Azevedo, J., Araújo, W. L., and Lacava, P. T. (2016). The diversity of citrus endophytic bacteria and their interactions with Xylella fastidiosa and host plants. Genet. Mol. Biol. 39, 476–491. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Backman, P. A., and Sikora, R. A. (2008). Endophytes: an emerging tool for biological control. Biol. Control 46, 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.03.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bader, G. D., and Hogue, C. W. V. (2003). An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 4:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., and Fierer, N. (2012). Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 6, 343–351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barradas, C., Phillips, A. J. L., Correia, A., Diogo, E., Bragança, H., and Alves, A. (2016). Diversity and potential impact of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with Eucalyptus globulus plantations in Portugal. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 146, 245–257. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0910-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bruez, E., Vallance, J., Gautier, A., Laval, V., Compant, S., Maurer, W., et al. (2020). Major changes in grapevine wood microbiota are associated with the onset of esca, a devastating trunk disease. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 5189–5206. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P. (2016). DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Camino, C., Calderón, R., Parnell, S., Dierkes, H., Chemin, Y., Román-Écija, M., et al. (2021). Detection of Xylella fastidiosa in almond orchards by synergic use of an epidemic spread model and remotely sensed plant traits. Remote Sens. Environ. 260:112420. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chatterjee, S., Almeida, R. P. P., and Lindow, S. (2008). Living in two worlds: the plant and insect lifestyles of Xylella fastidiosa. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 46, 243–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coletta-Filho, H., Castillo, A. I., Laranjeira, F. F., de Andrade, E. C., Silva, N. T., de Souza, A. A., et al. (2020). Citrus variegated chlorosis: an overview of 30 years of research and disease management. Trop. Plant Pathol. 45, 175–191. doi: 10.1007/s40858-020-00358-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delbianco, A., Gibin, D., Pasinato, L., and Morelli, M. (2022). European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Update of the Xylella spp. host plant database – systematic literature search up to 30 June 2021. EFSA J. 20:e07039. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Denancé, N., Legendre, B., Briand, M., Olivier, V., de Boisseson, C., Poliakoff, F., et al. (2017). Several subspecies and sequence types are associated with the emergence of Xylella fastidiosa in natural settings in France. Plant Pathol. 66, 1054–1064. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12695

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deyett, E., Pouzoulet, J., Yang, J. –I., Ashworth, V. E., Castro, C., Roper, M. C., et al. (2019). Assessment of Pierce’s disease susceptibility in Vitis vinifera cultivars with different pedigrees. Plant Pathol. 68, 1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deyett, E., and Rolshausen, P. E. (2019). Temporal dynamics of the Sap microbiome of grapevine under high Pierce’s disease pressure. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1246. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deyett, E., Roper, M. C., Ruegger, P., Yang, J.-I., Borneman, J., and Rolshausen, P. E. (2017). Microbial landscape of the grapevine endosphere in the context of Pierce’s disease. Phytobiomes J. 1, 138–149. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-08-17-0033-R

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Souza, J. B., Almeida-Souza, H. O., Zaini, P. A., Alves, M. N., de Souza, A. G., Pierry, P. M., et al. (2020). Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca strains Fb7 and 9a5c from citrus display differential behavior, secretome, and plant virulence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:6769. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dimitrijević, S., Pavlović, M., Maksimović, S., Ristić, M., Filipović, V., Antonović, D., et al. (2018). Plant growth-promoting bacteria elevate the nutritional and functional properties of black cumin and flaxseed fixed oil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 98, 1584–1590. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doty, S. L. (2017). “Functional importance of the plant microbiome: implications for agriculture, forestry and bioenergy,” in Functional Importance of the Plant Microbiome Implications for Agriculture, Forestry and Bioenergy, Vol. 178, ed. S. L. Doty (Cham: Springer), 1–111. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65897-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EFSA (2018). Updated pest categorisation of Xylella fastidiosa. EFSA J. 16:e05357. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EFSA (2019a). Effectiveness of in planta control measures for Xylella fastidiosa. EFSA J. 17:e05666. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5666

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EFSA (2019b). Update of the scientific opinion on the risks to plant health posed by Xylella fastidiosa in the EU territory. EFSA J. 17:5665. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5665

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EPPO (2019). PM 7/24 (4) Xylella fastidiosa. EPPO Bull. 49, 175–227.

Google Scholar

Regulation EU (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council of 26 October 2016 on Protective Measures Against pests of plants, Amending Regulations (EU) No 228/2013, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R2031. (accessed November 9, 2022).

Google Scholar

Regulation EU (2019). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1702 of 1 August 2019 Supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council by Establishing the List of Priority Pests. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R1702. (accessed November 9, 2022).

Google Scholar

Regulation EU (2020). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1201 of 14 August 2020 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Measures to Prevent the Introduction into and the Spread Within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.). Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32020R1201.

Google Scholar

Faino, L., Scala, V., Albanese, A., Modesti, V., Grottoli, A., Pucci, N., et al. (2021). Nanopore sequencing for the detection and identification of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies and sequence types from naturally infected plant material. Plant Pathol. 70, 1860–1870. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13416

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faust, K., and Raes, J. (2016). CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape. F1000Res. 5:1519. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9050.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faust, K., Sathirapongsasuti, J. F., Izard, J., Segata, N., Gevers, D., Raes, J., et al. (2012). Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8:e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fausto, C., Mininni, A. N., Sofo, A., Crecchio, C., Scagliola, M., Dichio, B., et al. (2018). Olive orchard microbiome: characterisation of bacterial communities in soil-plant compartments and their comparison between sustainable and conventional soil management systems. Plant Ecol. Divers. 11, 597–610. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2019.1596172

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feitosa-Junior, O. R., Stefanello, E., Zaini, P. A., Nascimento, R., Pierry, P. M., Dandekar, A. M., et al. (2019). Proteomic and metabolomic analyses of Xylella fastidiosa OMV-enriched fractions reveal association with virulence factors and signaling molecules of the DSF family. Phytopathology 109, 1344–1353. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-19-0083-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Francis, M., Lin, H., Rosa, J. C.-L., Doddapaneni, H., and Civerolo, E. L. (2006). Genome-based PCR primers for specific and sensitive detection and quantification of Xylella fastidiosa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 115, 203–213. doi: 10.1007/s10658-006-9009-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fridman, S., Izhaki, I., Gerchman, Y., and Halpern, M. (2012). Bacterial communities in floral nectar: bacterial communities in floral nectar. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 4, 97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00309.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giampetruzzi, A., Baptista, P., Morelli, M., Cameirão, C., Lino Neto, T., Costa, D., et al. (2020). Differences in the endophytic microbiome of olive cultivars infected by Xylella fastidiosa across seasons. Pathogens 9:723. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giampetruzzi, A., Saponari, M., Almeida, R. P. P., Salwa, E., Donato, B., Giuliana, L., et al. (2017). Complete genome sequence of the olive-infecting strain Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca De Donno. Genome Announc. 5:e00569–17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00569-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ginnan, N. A., Dang, T., Bodaghi, S., Ruegger, P. M., McCollum, G., England, G., et al. (2020). Disease-induced microbial shifts in citrus indicate microbiome-derived responses to huanglongbing across the disease severity spectrum. Phytobiomes J. 4, 375–387. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-04-20-0027-R

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gramaje, D., Agustí-Brisach, C., Pérez-Sierra, A., Moralejo, E., Olmo, D., Mostert, L., et al. (2012). Fungal trunk pathogens associated with wood decay of almond trees on Mallorca (Spain). Persoonia 28, 1–13. doi: 10.3767/003158512X626155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gramaje, D., and Armengol, J. (2011). Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: potential inoculum sources, detection, identification, and management strategies. Plant Dis. 95, 1040–1055. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haro, C., Anguita-Maeso, M., Metsis, M., Navas-Cortés, J. A., and Landa, B. B. (2021). Evaluation of established methods for DNA extraction and primer pairs targeting 16S rRNA gene for bacterial microbiota profiling of olive xylem sap. Front. Plant Sci. 12:296. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.640829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harper, S. J., Ward, L. I., and Clover, G. R. G. (2010). Development of LAMP and real-time PCR methods for the rapid detection of Xylella fastidiosa for quarantine and field applications. Phytopathology 100, 1282–1288. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-10-0168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. L., and Purcell, A. H. (2002). Xylella fastidiosa: cause of Pierce’s disease of grapevine and other emergent diseases. Plant Dis. 86, 1056–1066. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.10.1056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Innerebner, G., Knief, C., and Julia, A. V. (2011). Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3202–3210. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00133-11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Izhaki, I., Fridman, S., Gerchman, Y., and Halpern, M. (2013). Variability of bacterial community composition on leaves between and within plant species. Curr. Microbiol. 66, 227–235. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0261-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacques, M.-A., Denancé, N., Legendre, B., Morel, E., Briand, M., Mississipi, S., et al. (2016). New coffee plant-infecting Xylella fastidiosa variants derived via homologous recombination. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1556–1568. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03299-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R. W., et al. (2017). Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4:170122. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, A. R., Wicaksono, W. A., Ott, N. J., Poret-Peterson, A. T., and Browne, G. T. (2021). Characterization of soils conducive and non-conducive to Prunus replant disease. PLoS One 16:e0260394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lacava, P. T., Araújo, W. L., Marcon, J., Maccheroni, W., and Azevedo, J. L. (2004). Interaction between endophytic bacteria from citrus plants and the phytopathogenic bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, causal agent of citrus-variegated chlorosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 39, 55–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01543.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Landa, B. B., Castillo, A. I., Giampetruzzi, A., Kahn, A., Román-Écija, M., Velasco-Amo, M. P., et al. (2020). Emergence of a plant pathogen in associated with multiple intercontinental introductions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 86:e01521–19, doi: 10.1128/AEM.01521-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Landa, B. B., Saponari, M., Feitosa-Junior, O. R., Giampetruzzi, A., Vieira, F. J. D., Mor, E., et al. (2022). Xylella fastidiosa’s relationships: the bacterium, the host plants and the plant microbiome. New Phytol 234, 1598–1605. doi: 10.1111/nph.18089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Landa, B., Marco Noales, E., and López, M. M. (2017). Enfermedades Causadas por la Bacteria “Xylella fastidiosa. Almería: Cajamar Caja Rural.

Google Scholar

Loconsole, G., Saponari, M., Boscia, D., D’Attoma, G., Morelli, M., Martelli, G. P., et al. (2016). Intercepted isolates of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe reveal novel genetic diversity. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 146, 85–94. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0894-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Love, M. I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malfanova, N., Lugtenberg, B. J. J., and Berg, G. (2013). “Bacterial endophytes: who and where, and what are they doing there?,” in Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, Vol. 2, (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 391–403. doi: 10.1002/9781118297674.ch36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mangiafico, S. (2020). rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. R Package Version 2.3.25, 132. Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion

Google Scholar

Marco-Noales, E., Barbé, S., Monterde, A., Navarro, I., Ferrer, A., Dalmau, V., et al. (2021). Evidence that Xylella fastidiosa is the causal agent of almond leaf scorch disease in Alicante, mainland Spain (Iberian Peninsula). Plant Dis. 105, 3349–3352. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0625-SC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinetti, D., and Soubeyrand, S. (2019). Identifying lookouts for epidemio-surveillance: application to the emergence of Xylella fastidiosa in France. Phytopathology 109, 265–276. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0237-FI

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mocali, S., Bertelli, E., Di Cello, F., Mengoni, A., Sfalanga, A., Viliani, F., et al. (2003). Fluctuation of bacteria isolated from elm tissues during different seasons and from different plant organs. Res. Microbiol. 154, 105–114. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00031-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moral, J., Muñoz-Díez, C., González, N., Trapero, A., and Michailides, T. J. (2010). Characterization and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species collected from olive and other hosts in Spain and California. Phytopathology 100, 1340–1351. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-09-0343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moralejo, E., Gomila, M., Montesinos, M., Borràs, D., Pascual, A., Nieto, A., et al. (2020). Phylogenetic inference enables reconstruction of a long-overlooked outbreak of almond leaf scorch disease (Xylella fastidiosa) in Europe. Commun. Biol. 3:560. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01284-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morelli, M., García-Madero, J. M., Jos, Á, Saldarelli, P., Dongiovanni, C., Kovacova, M., et al. (2021). Xylella fastidiosa in olive: a review of control attempts and current management. Microorganisms 9:1771. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nunney, L., Azad, H., and Stouthamer, R. (2019). An experimental test of the host-plant range of nonrecombinant strains of North American Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex. Phytopathology 109, 294–300. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0252-FI

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olmo, D., Armengol, J., León, M., and Gramaje, D. (2016). Characterization and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species isolated from almond trees on the island of Mallorca (Spain). Plant Dis. 100, 2483–2491. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0676-RE

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olmo, D., Nieto, A., Adrover, F., Urbano, A., Beidas, O., Juan, A., et al. (2017). First Detection of Xylella fastidiosa infecting cherry (Prunus avium) and Polygala myrtifolia Plants, in Mallorca island. Spain. Plant Dis. 101:1820. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0590-PDN

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olmo, D., Nieto, A., Borràs, D., Montesinos, M., Adrover, F., Pascual, A., et al. (2021). Landscape epidemiology of Xylella fastidiosa in the Balearic islands. Agronomy 11:473. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11030473

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osorio, J. A., Crous, C. J., de Beer, Z. W., Wingfield, M. J., and Roux, J. (2017). Endophytic Botryosphaeriaceae, including five new species, associated with mangrove trees in South Africa. Fungal Biol. 121, 361–393. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pacifico, D., Squartini, A., Crucitti, D., Barizza, E., Lo Schiavo, F., Muresu, R., et al. (2019). The role of the endophytic microbiome in the grapevine response to environmental triggers. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1256. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Purcell, A. H. (1980). Environmental therapy for Pierce’s disease of grapevines. Plant Dis. 64, 388–390. doi: 10.1094/PD-64-388

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rabiey, M., Hailey, L. E., Roy, S. R., Grenz, K., Al-Zadjali, M. A. S., Barrett, G. A., et al. (2019). Endophytes vs tree pathogens and pests: can they be used as biological control agents to improve tree health? Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 155, 711–729. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01814-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salvatore, M. M., Alves, A., and Andolfi, A. (2021). Secondary metabolites produced by Neofusicoccum species associated with plants: a review. Agriculture 11:149. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11020149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanchez, B., Barreiro, J., Soto, I., and Rodriguez, E. (2019). The Impact Indicator for Priority Pests (I2P2): a Tool for Ranking Pests According to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. Maastricht: Europen Union. doi: 10.2760/585182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saponari, M., Boscia, D., Altamura, G., Loconsole, G., Zicca, S., D’Attoma, G., et al. (2017). Isolation and pathogenicity of Xylella fastidiosa associated to the olive quick decline syndrome in southern Italy. Sci. Rep. 7:17723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17957-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saponari, M., Boscia, D., Nigro, F., and Martelli, G. P. (2013). Identification of DNA sequences related to Xylella fastidiosa in oleander, almond and olive trees exhibiting leaf scorch symptoms in Apulia (Southern Italy). J. Plant Pathol 95668.

Google Scholar

Saponari, M., D’Attoma, G., Abou Kubaa, R., Loconsole, G., Altamura, G., Zicca, S., et al. (2019). A new variant of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex detected in different host plants in the recently emerged outbreak in the region of Tuscany, Italy. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 154, 1195–1200. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01736-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaad, N. W., Postnikova, E., Lacy, G., Fatmi, M., and Chang, C.-J. (2004). Xylella fastidiosa subspecies: X. fastidiosa subsp piercei, subsp. nov., X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex subsp. nov., and X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca subsp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27:763. doi: 10.1078/0723202042369848

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serio, F. D., Bodino, N., Cavalieri, V., Demichelis, S., Carolo, M. D., Dongiovanni, C., et al. (2019). Collection of data and information on biology and control of vectors of Xylella fastidiosa. EFSA Support. Publ 16:1628E. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1628

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shetty, K. G., Rivadeneira, D. V., Jayachandran, K., and Walker, D. M. (2016). Isolation and molecular characterization of the fungal endophytic microbiome from conventionally and organically grown avocado trees in South Florida. Mycol. Prog. 15, 977–986. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1219-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sicard, A., Zeilinger, A. R., Vanhove, M., Schartel, T. E., Beal, D. J., Daugherty, M. P., et al. (2018). Xylella fastidiosa: insights into an emerging plant pathogen. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 56, 181–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045849

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Slippers, B., Boissin, E., Phillips, A. J. L., Groenewald, J. Z., Lombard, L., Wingfield, M. J., et al. (2013). Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriales: a systematic and evolutionary framework. Stud. Mycol. 76, 31–49. doi: 10.3114/sim0020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tangapo, A. M., Astuti, D. I., and Aditiawati, P. (2018). Dynamics and diversity of cultivable rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria during the growth stages of cilembu sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. var. cilembu). Agric. Nat. Resour 52, 309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.anres.2018.10.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Theofel, C. G., Williams, T. R., Gutierrez, E., Davidson, G. R., Jay-Russell, M., and Harris, L. J. (2021). Microorganisms move a short distance into an almond orchard from an adjacent upwind poultry operation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86:e00573–20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00573-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ubogu, M., and Akponah, E. (2021). “Plant–microbe interactions in attenuation of toxic waste in ecosystem BT –,” in Rhizobiont in Bioremediation of Hazardous Waste, eds V. Kumar, R. Prasad, and M. Kumar (Singapore: Springer), 131–150. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0602-1_7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vergine, M., Meyer, J. B., Cardinale, M., Sabella, E., Hartmann, M., Cherubini, P., et al. (2020). The Xylella fastidiosa-resistant olive cultivar “Leccino” has stable endophytic microbiota during the olive quick decline syndrome (OQDS). Pathogens 9:35. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9010035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wachowska, U., Irzykowski, W., Jêdryczka, M., Stasiulewicz-Paluch, A. D., and Głowacka, K. (2013). Biological control of winter wheat pathogens with the use of antagonistic Sphingomonas bacteria under greenhouse conditions. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 23, 1110–1122. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2013.812185

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Zhai, Y., Cao, L., Tan, H., and Zhang, R. (2016). Endophytic bacterial and fungal microbiota in sprouts, roots and stems of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Microbiol. Res 188–189, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wemheuer, F., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R., and Vidal, S. (2019). Deciphering bacterial and fungal endophyte communities in leaves of two maple trees with green islands. Sci. Rep. 9:14183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50540-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, P. J. (2012). “Chapter 3 – Long-distance transport in the xylem and phloem,” in Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, eds H. Marschner and P. Marschner (San Diego: Academic Press), 49–70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00003-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zicca, S., De Bellis, P., Masiello, M., Saponari, M., Saldarelli, P., Boscia, D., et al. (2020). Antagonistic activity of olive endophytic bacteria and of Bacillus spp. strains against Xylella fastidiosa. Microbiol. Res. 236:126467. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: almond leaf scorch (ALS), xylem, microbiome, network associations, Xylella fastidiosa, quarantine pathogens

Citation: Anguita-Maeso M, Ares-Yebra A, Haro C, Román-Écija M, Olivares-García C, Costa J, Marco-Noales E, Ferrer A, Navas-Cortés JA and Landa BB (2022) Xylella fastidiosa Infection Reshapes Microbial Composition and Network Associations in the Xylem of Almond Trees. Front. Microbiol. 13:866085. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.866085

Received: 30 January 2022; Accepted: 26 May 2022;
Published: 14 July 2022.

Edited by:

Inmaculada Larena, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria (INIA), Spain

Reviewed by:

Shahram Naeimi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Iran
Antonio Vicent, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Spain
Ljubica Tasic, State University of Campinas, Brazil

Copyright © 2022 Anguita-Maeso, Ares-Yebra, Haro, Román-Écija, Olivares-García, Costa, Marco-Noales, Ferrer, Navas-Cortés and Landa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Manuel Anguita-Maeso, bWFuZ3VpdGFAaWFzLmNzaWMuZXM=; Blanca B. Landa, YmxhbmNhLmxhbmRhQGNzaWMuZXM=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.