Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 16 January 2023
Sec. Food Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Interaction Between Food Homologous Plants and Intestinal Microbiota View all 22 articles

Seaweed polysaccharide relieves hexavalent chromium-induced gut microbial homeostasis

Jinghao Mu,Jinghao Mu1,2Zhenhuan Guo
Zhenhuan Guo3*Xiujun WangXiujun Wang3Xuefei WangXuefei Wang3Yunxing FuYunxing Fu3Xianghui LiXianghui Li3Fuli ZhuFuli Zhu3Guangyuan HuGuangyuan Hu3Xia Ma
Xia Ma3*
  • 1Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Urology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Immunopharmacology of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicines, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Heavy metals released in the environment pose a huge threat to soil and water quality, food safety and public health. Additionally, humans and other mammals may also be directly exposed to heavy metals or exposed to heavy metals through the food chain, which seriously threatens the health of animals and humans. Chromium, especially hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)], as a common heavy metal, has been shown to cause serious environmental pollution as well as intestinal damage. Thus, increasing research is devoted to finding drugs to mitigate the negative health effects of hexavalent chromium exposure. Seaweed polysaccharides have been demonstrated to have many pharmacological effects, but whether it can alleviate gut microbial dysbiosis caused by hexavalent chromium exposure has not been well characterized. Here, we hypothesized that seaweed polysaccharides could alleviate hexavalent chromium exposure-induced poor health in mice. Mice in Cr and seaweed polysaccharide treatment group was compulsively receive K2Cr2O7. At the end of the experiment, all mice were euthanized, and colon contents were collected for DNA sequencing analysis. Results showed that seaweed polysaccharide administration can restore the gut microbial dysbiosis and the reduction of gut microbial diversity caused by hexavalent chromium exposure in mice. Hexavalent chromium exposure also caused significant changes in the gut microbial composition of mice, including an increase in some pathogenic bacteria and a decrease in beneficial bacteria. However, seaweed polysaccharides administration could ameliorate the composition of gut microbiota. In conclusion, this study showed that seaweed polysaccharides can restore the negative effects of hexavalent chromium exposure in mice, including gut microbial dysbiosis. Meanwhile, this research also lays the foundation for the application of seaweed polysaccharides.

Introduction

Industrial production releases a large amount of metal pollutants every year, such as lead, chromium, and copper, which are considered to be vital factors causing environmental contamination and animal metal poisoning (Wen et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019; Wang F. et al., 2022). Chromium is one of the most common heavy metals, which is widely used in leather, fuel and steel production (Mamais et al., 2016; Kapoor et al., 2022). Early surveys indicated that the global annual consumption of chromium is more than 200,000 tons and its demand is still increasing (Li A. et al., 2021). However, large amounts of chromium waste may be directly discarded and reach the environment through multiple ways, seriously threatening the surrounding water and soil health (Vaiopoulou and Gikas, 2020; Prasad et al., 2021). Importantly, the released chromium could accumulate in soil, water and plants then transfer to aquatic and terrestrial animals via food chain, posing a serious threat to human health and food safety (Nguyen et al., 2017; Lee C. P. et al., 2019). Previous studies indicated that long-term exposure to hexavalent chromium can cause parenchymal organ injury such as gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidney. Additionally, hexavalent chromium has also been shown to be associated with cancer, asthma and gut microbial dysbiosis (Yang Q. et al., 2020; Monteiro et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2019).

Gut microbiota is a complicated and dynamic microecosystem that consists of approximately 100 trillion microorganisms involving over 2,000 diverse species (Egerton et al., 2018; Feng et al., 2018; Morris, 2018). The gut microbiota exhibits a symbiotic relationship with the host, exerting positive effects on host metabolism, intestinal homeostasis and immune system maturation (Yu et al., 2020; Zhang L. et al., 2021). Moreover, the other well-understood contributions of the gut microbial community is its key roles in the intestinal barrier maintenance and immune system maturation, which contribute to protecting the host from invasion by infectious pathogens (Sun et al., 2022; Wang R. et al., 2022). As essential biochemical converters, gut microbiota can also convert food into nutrients and metabolites (Zhang L. et al., 2021; Zhang X. et al., 2021; Yang J. et al., 2022). However, many factors associated with hosts and environment such as aging, oxidative stress, antibiotics and heavy metal could affect intestinal homeostasis and even induce gut microbial dysbiosis (Xia et al., 2018; Kakade et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2022). Numerous studies provided supporting evidence that gut microbial dysbiosis could impair intestinal mucosal barrier and gut mucosal immune system, potentially causing severe gastrointestinal infection, diarrhea, and colonitis (Liu et al., 2019; Li Y. et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022). Additionally, gut microbial dysbiosis can also extend its negative effects beyond the gastrointestinal system and result in extraintestinal diseases such as autism, diabetes, obesity and NAFLD (Yang et al., 2021; Wan and Ma, 2022; Ye et al., 2022). Considering the systemic effects of gut microbial dysbiosis, it is also considered as a emerging participator in the pathophysiology of many diseases (Crusell et al., 2018).

Supplementation with antioxidants is regarded as a vital way to mitigate metal poisoning because metal contaminants can cause oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant capacity (He et al., 2020; Yang Y. et al., 2020; Paithankar et al., 2021). Currently, polysaccharides extracted from animals and plants have been shown to be promising antioxidants (Chen and Huang, 2018, 2019). Among many types of polysaccharides, seaweed polysaccharide has attracted mounting attention own to its several health benefits to the host (Tanna and Mishra, 2019; Bauer et al., 2021). Numerous studies indicated that seaweed polysaccharide has anti-inflammatory, antiviral, immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects (Lomartire and Goncalves, 2022). Moreover, recent research on seaweed polysaccharide also showed its vital roles in the gastrointestinal disease and improve antioxidant ability (Fu et al., 2021). Although increasing evidence showed the positive role of seaweed polysaccharide on the host health, it remains unclear whether seaweed polysaccharide can alleviate gut microbial imbalance caused by hexavalent chromium. Thus, we investigated the protective effect of seaweed polysaccharide on hexavalent chromium induced gut microbial imbalance.

Materials and methods

Animal experiments

Sixty 28-day-old Kunming mice with similar weight and background were used for this research. These selected mice were housed in a standard environment and health assessments were performed on all mice to ensure that the experiments ran smoothly. After acclimatization for 3 days, these mice were randomly divided into three groups namely control group (Con), Cr (VI)-induced group (Cr), seaweed polysaccharide treatment group (SP, 200 mg/kg). The dosage of seaweed polysaccharide and Cr (VI) refers to the previous research with slight improvements (Ben et al., 2016; Fu et al., 2021). The proportion of male and female in each groups was 1:1. The mice in the Con, Cr and SP groups were provided adequate feed and water. In addition, mice in Cr (VI) and SP treatment group was compulsively receive K2Cr2O7 (75 mg/kg). Moreover, the SP treatment group was compulsively gavaged with 0.2 ml of SP. On the day 29 of the experiment, we euthanized all the mice and collected colonic contents. The collected samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at-80°C until further investigation.

DNA extraction and illumine MiSeq sequencing

The acquired samples of each group were separately homogenized and then performed DNA extraction using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following suggested instructions of manufacturer. After ensuring the extracted DNA met the requirements for subsequent analysis, we amplified the V3/V4 variable regions using the primers (338F: ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA and 806R: GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) synthesized from conserved regions. The conditions and volumes of PCR reactions were determined as per previous studies (Zhang et al., 2020). Before building the libraries, some processing products including fragment recovery, quantitation and quality appraisal were performed to obtain qualified products. The constructed libraries were subsequently performed quality evaluation. The libraries with only one peak and concentration greater than 2 nM were considered qualified. The qualified libraries were subjected to paired-end sequenced (2 × 300 bp) on MiSeq sequencing machine following the standard protocols. The original data containing short sequences, chimera and mismatched primers preduced from amplicon sequencing were performed quality evaluation and filtration to acquire effective sequence. The effective sequences were clustered and OTUs partitioned based on 97% similarity. To further dissect the effects of thiram exposure on gut microbiota, we calculated five alpha diversity indices and generated PCoA plots that reflected beta diversity. The differential bacteria were identified through the Metastats analysis and LEfSe. p-values (means ± SD) <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Data collection and analysis

To investigate the protective effect of seaweed polysaccharide on Cr (VI)-induced mice, we explored changes in the gut microbiota of mice during polysaccharide supplementation. Results indicated that a total of 735,152 (Con = 256,535, Cr = 222,963, SP = 255,654) raw sequences were obtained from three groups (Table 1). Subsequently, we performed quality assessment on the raw data and obtained 502,400 (Con = 183,752, Cr = 138,389, SP = 180,259) valid sequences. Results of the rarefaction curves, which can reflect the sequencing depth, show that the species coverage and sequencing depth are qualified (Figures 1AC). The valid sequences of three groups were clustered into 358 OTUs (Con = 298, Cr = 182, SP = 269), ranging from 76 to 193 OTUs per sample (Figures 1D,E). Furthermore, the Con, Cr and SP groups have 69, 9, and 35 unique OTUs, respectively.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The raw sequence information generated from amplicon sequencing.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Feasibility assessment and OTU distribution. (A,B) Rarefaction curves. (C) Rank abundance curve. (D) Venn diagram. (E) OTUs distribution histogram.

Seaweed polysaccharide recovered the changes of gut microbial diversity induced by Cr (VI)

We further calculated changes in gut microbial diversity based on the abundance of OTUs in each sample. Results of Good’s coverage indicated that almost all bacterial phenotypes were found in this amplicon sequencing. The gut microbial diversity indices such as Chao1 (170.75 ± 15.79 vs. 87.00 ± 9.55, p = 0.00029), ACE (170.75 ± 15.79 vs. 87.00 ± 9.55, p = 0.00029), Shannon (4.64 ± 0.68 vs. 2.64 ± 0.64, p = 0.0055), and Simpson (0.88 ± 0.060 vs. 0.63 ± 0.15, p = 0.035) in the hexavalent chromium exposure group were significantly lower than those in the control group, indicating that hexavalent chromium markedly reduced the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota. However, seaweed polysaccharide administration reversed the hexavalent chromium-induced decrease in gut diversity indices (Figures 2AD). PCoA plots indicated that all the samples were clustered together, indicating no differences in the major components of the gut microbiota (Figures 2E,F).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Seaweed polysaccharide administration restored the changes in gut microbial diversity induced by hexavalent chromium exposure. (A) Chao1. (B) ACE. (C) Shannon. (D) Simpson. (E,F) PCoA plots based on the weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance.

Seaweed polysaccharide altered gut microbial composition in Cr (VI)-induced mice

The gut microbial composition and abundance in different taxonomical levels were evaluated and observed significant variations. In this amplicon sequencing, a total of 10 phyla and 91 genera were identified in 12 samples, ranging from 7 to 10 phyla and 37 and 69 genus per sample. Proteobacteria (13.49, 40.43%), Campylobacterota (23.70, 21.54%), Firmicutes (20.47, 13.58%) and Bacteroidota (23.43, 17.17%) were the most preponderant bacteria in Con and SP groups, whereas Proteobacteria (64.11%), Campylobacterota (8.41%), Firmicutes (19.43%), and Actinobacteriota (1.58%) were abundantly present in the Cr groups (Figure 3A). However, the abundances of Deferribacterota (3.18, 0.42, 1.57%), Verrucomicrobiota (2.94, 0.82, 0.22%), Patescibacteria (0.97, 0.021, 0.31%), and Cyanobacteria (0.033, 0.00, 0.00%) are lower in Con, Cr and SP groups. Escherichia_Shigella (10.71, 33.45%) and Helicobacter (23.70, 21.54%) were the most dominant genus in the Con and SP groups, whereas Escherichia_Shigella (57.75%) and Ligilactobacillus (14.24%) were abundantly present in the Cr group (Figure 3B). However, the proportions of Enterorhabdus (4.94, 1.41, 2.71%), Desulfovibrio (6.07, 0.89, 1.43%), unclassified_Enterobacteriaceae (0.43, 4.05, 3.52%), and Bacillus (2.63, 1.57, 2.06%) were lower in gut microbiota of Con, Cr, and SP groups. The specific bacterial species and abundance are also shown in the heatmap (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Seaweed polysaccharide administration restored gut microbial composition in hexavalent chromium-induced mice. (A,B) The preponderant bacteria at the phylum and genus levels. (C) Heat map of bacterial distribution.

At the phylum level, the abundances of Proteobacteria was observably more preponderant in Cr group than in the Con group, whereas the abundances of Bacteroidota, Patescibacteria, and Actinobacteriota were lower. At the genus level, the abundances of Escherichia_Shigella and Enterococcus in Cr group was observably predominant than Con group, whereas the unclassified_Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae_UCG_001, unclassified_Desulfovibrionaceae, Bilophila, Stenotrophomonas, Lachnoclostridium, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Rhodococcus, Microbacterium, Candidatus_Saccharimonas, Enterorhabdus, unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae, Sphingobacterium, unclassified_Anaerovoracaceae, Anaerotruncus, unclassified_Ruminococcaceae, and Acinetobacter were lower (Figure 4). However, seaweed polysaccharide administration could reverse these bacterial changes. A comparison of the Cr and SP showed a distinct decrease in the abundances of Bacteroides, Alloprevotella, unclassified_Desulfovibrionaceae, unclassified_Ruminococcaceae, Odoribacter, GCA_900066575, unclassified_Lachnospiraceae, Anaerotruncus, and Alistipes. LEfSe analysis further revealed bacteria that differed between groups (Figure 5).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Statistical analysis of differential bacteria. (A) Relative Abundance at genus level. (B) Relative Abundance at phylum level. All data was indicated as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with Con group, #p < 0.05 compared with Cr group.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Identification of differential bacteria by LEfSe and LDA scores. (A,C) Cladogram of phylogenetic distribution of differential bacteria. (B,D) LDA scores >2 were considered significantly different.

Correlation network analysis

Alistipes was positively related to unclassified_Muribaculaceae (0.79). Prevotellaceae_UCG_001 was positively related to Alloprevotella (0.83), unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae (0.77) and unclassified_Lachnospiraceae (0.66). Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was positively related to unclassified_Erysipelotrichaceae (0.72) and unclassified_Clostridia_UCG_014 (0.67) (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Correlation network analysis of gut microbiota. The green and red lines indicate the negative and positive correlation, respectively.

Discussion

The environmental contamination caused by heavy metal discharge and the negative impact on public health have attracted increasing attention (Drzezdzon et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2020). In addition, the accumulation of heavy metals in animals and plants also seriously affects animal production and human health (Quina et al., 2019; Bao et al., 2021). Studies have shown that chromium could be absorbed by the host in many ways such as the digestive system, epidermis and respiratory system (Zhang et al., 2020). Moreover, chromium ingested by the digestive tract can enter other organs such as liver, kidney, and intestine through blood circulation, which further threatens the health of the host (Cardenas-Gonzalez et al., 2016; Andleeb et al., 2020). Early investigations showed that long-term chromium exposure can cause a significant decrease in growth performance and perturb gut microbial homeostasis in broilers (Li Y. et al., 2021). In addition, chromium exposure has also been shown to cause significant gastrointestinal symptoms (Zhang et al., 2022). It is widely known that the intestine plays an important role in nutrient absorption and host health, which in turn depends on normal gut microbiota structure (Brussow, 2015; Coelho et al., 2019). Although gut microbiota inhabits the intestine, it can cause systemic effects. Therefore, the maintenance of gut microbial homeostasis is critical for host health (Greenhill, 2018; Ma et al., 2020). Chromium intake through the digestive tract inevitably affects the gut microbiota and causes kidney damage, but whether seaweed polysaccharides with various biological properties can restore the gut microbiota is still unknown. Therefore, we systematically explored the protective effects of seaweed polysaccharides on hexavalent chromium-induced gut microbiota in mice.

As the main channel for various substances to enter the body, the intestinal own health and the gut microbiota inhabiting the intestine are also more susceptible to external factors (Sadeq et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). Generally, the gut microbiota is in a dynamic balance under the action of various factors, but intestinal function does not change significantly (Michaudel and Sokol, 2020). In addition, the stability of the gut microbiota is also necessary to maintain the host health and the intestinal function (Li et al., 2016). However, environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, microplastics and pesticides can damage the intestine and various parenchymal organs, causing gut microbial imbalance and systemic effects (Lu et al., 2019; Qiao et al., 2019). Additionally, dysbiosis in the gut microbiota also affects the digestion and absorption of nutrients and growth performance (Chi et al., 2021). Previous study showed that long-term hexavalent chromium exposure leads to dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, accompanied by a significant reduction in microbial diversity (Li A. et al., 2022). Additionally, Yao et al. (2019) also found similar conclusions, demonstrating the negative impact of hexavalent chromium on gut microbes. In this study, we observed significant decrease in gut microbial diversity of mice during hexavalent chromium exposure. However, seaweed polysaccharide administration could restore the gut microbial dysbiosis caused by chromium exposure. Studies have shown that gut microbial dysbiosis and reduced diversity are considered important drivers of various diseases such as diarrhea, obesity and diabetes (Stephens et al., 2018; Lee P. et al., 2019). Moreover, decreased gut microbial diversity also affects intestinal barrier function and immune system maturation, which may reduce host immunity and increase permeability (Burcelin, 2016; Van Averbeke et al., 2022). In this case, the host is more sensitive to external pathogenic factors and more prone to other diseases. Increased intestinal permeability may also cause the passage of harmful intestinal metabolites or pathogenic bacteria across the intestinal barrier, leading to damage to other organs such as liver and kidney (Adolph and Tilg, 2018; Wahlstrom, 2019). More importantly, some opportunistic pathogens may also become pathogenic during this period (Nishida et al., 2018). Therefore, maintaining the balance of gut microbiota is also considered to be an important condition to ensure the health of the host. In addition, we also performed beta diversity analysis to explore the differences in the main components of the gut microbiota. Results showed that all the samples were clustered together, indicating that there were no differences in the main components of the gut microbiota.

As the most complex micro-ecosystem, the gut microbiota is composed of a large number of microorganisms, of which bacteria account for approximately 98% (Qin et al., 2022; Yakabe et al., 2022). Intestinal bacteria play key roles in intestinal function and homeostasis by interacting with the host or producing some beneficial metabolites (Haase et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022). Consistent with previous studies, we observed that hexavalent chromium exposure could cause significant changes in gut microbial composition, indicating the disruption of gut microbial homeostasis. Specifically, hexavalent chromium exposure led to a significant increase in gut pathogenic bacteria (Enterococcus and Escherichia_Shigella) and a significant decrease in beneficial bacteria (Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae_UCG_001, Alloprevotella, Bacteroides and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group). However, seaweed polysaccharide administration significantly improved the composition of the gut microbiota in mice. Studies have shown that Alistipes and Lachnospiraceae could produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; Wu et al., 2020). Many investigations indicate that SCFAs played vital roles in relieving intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, opportunistic infections as well as maintaining gut microbial homeostasis, intestinal permeability and intestinal epithelial cells morphology (Marino et al., 2017; Schwarz et al., 2017; Ikeda et al., 2022). Moreover, SCFAs has also been shown to regulate energy intake, regulate cell apoptosis and decrease cholesterol (Murugesan et al., 2018; Prasad and Bondy, 2018; Yang J. et al., 2022; Yang X. et al., 2022). Prevotellaceae in the intestine could digest pectin, hemicellulose and high carbohydrate foods, indicating its key roles in digestion and absorption (Li A. et al., 2022; Li C. et al., 2022). Alloprevotella could secrete acetate and succinate and these beneficial metabolites are critical for intestinal homeostasis and decreased cardiovascular disease risk (Yuan et al., 2021). Bacteroides could decompose polysaccharides, showing a key role in intestinal ecosystem (Schwalm et al., 2016; Schwalm and Groisman, 2017). Rikenellaceae could alleviate inflammation by activating T-regulatory cell differentiation (Cui et al., 2018). Numerous evidence demonstrate that Enterococcus could cause many diseases such as meningitis, sepsis, and cardioperiostitis (Su et al., 2016; Subramanya et al., 2019). Additionally, Enterococcus infection is difficult to cure because of inherent and acquired resistance (Chanderraj et al., 2020; Ekore et al., 2022). Escherichia_Shigella was considered as a vital factor for causing diarrhea (Li et al., 2018). Hexavalent chromium exposure may further adversely affect host health by disrupting gut microbial homeostasis. However, seaweed polysaccharide can maintain the gut microbial balance and this may be one of the modes of action of seaweed polysaccharides. Microorganisms inhabiting the intestine could interact in a synergistic, antagonistic or symbiotic relationship to form a stable intestinal environment (Li A. et al., 2022; Li C. et al., 2022). In this study, we observed significant correlations among some bacteria through correlation network analysis. For instance, Alistipes and Prevotellaceae_UCG_001 were associated with unclassified_Muribaculaceae and Alloprevotella, respectively. Therefore, these altered bacteria may further affect the function of other bacteria through the interaction between bacteria.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research explored the protective effect of seaweed polysaccharide administration on the gut microbiota of hexavalent chromium-exposed mice. Results showed that seaweed polysaccharide administration could alleviate hexavalent chromium exposure induced gut microbiota dysbiosis. Our study shows that seaweed polysaccharides can be used as an effective drug to mitigate the negative effects of hexavalent chromium exposure on host health. Meanwhile, maintaining the homeostasis of gut microbiota may be one of the ways that seaweed polysaccharides exert their pharmacological effects.

Data availability statement

The original sequence data was submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (NCBI, USA) with the accession no. PRJNA902534.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the study was conducted under the guidance and approval of the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Henan university of Animal Husbandry and Economy.

Author contributions

JM, ZG, and XM provided the idea. XiuW, XueW, YF, and XL contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. JM wrote the manuscript. XueW, YF, XL, FZ, GH, and XM revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by Key Discipline of Veterinary Medicine of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (XJXK202202).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Adolph, T. E., and Tilg, H. (2018). Gut microbiota as gatekeeper of anti-tumour responses in the liver. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 584–586. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0046-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andleeb, S., Ahmad, Z., Mahmood, T., Bao, S., Arif, S. A., and Jha, S. K. (2020). Evaluating toxicity impacts of environmental exposed chromium on small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctatus) hematological, biochemical and histopathological functioning. Chemosphere 259:127485. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bao, X., Asgari, A., Najafi, M. L., Mokammel, A., Ahmadi, M., Akbari, S., et al. (2021). Exposure to waterpipe smoke and blood heavy metal concentrations. Environ. Res. 200:111460. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauer, S., Jin, W., Zhang, F., and Linhardt, R. J. (2021). The application of seaweed polysaccharides and their derived products with potential for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Mar. Drugs 19:2021. doi: 10.3390/md19020089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ben, H. F., Troudi, A., Sefi, M., Boudawara, T., and Zeghal, N. (2016). The protective effect of propylthiouracil against hepatotoxicity induced by chromium in adult mice. Toxicol. Ind. Health 32, 235–245. doi: 10.1177/0748233713498446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brussow, H. (2015). Growth promotion and gut microbiota: insights from antibiotic use. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 2216–2227. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12786

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burcelin, R. (2016). Gut microbiota and immune crosstalk in metabolic disease. Mol. Metab. 5, 771–781. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cardenas-Gonzalez, M., Osorio-Yanez, C., Gaspar-Ramirez, O., Pavkovic, M., Ochoa-Martinez, A., Lopez-Ventura, D., et al. (2016). Environmental exposure to arsenic and chromium in children is associated with kidney injury molecule-1. Environ. Res. 150, 653–662. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chanderraj, R., Brown, C. A., Hinkle, K., Falkowski, N., Ranjan, P., Dickson, R. P., et al. (2020). Gut microbiota predict enterococcus expansion but not vancomycin-resistant enterococcus acquisition. mSphere 5, 665–669. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00537-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, F., and Huang, G. (2018). Preparation and immunological activity of polysaccharides and their derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 112, 211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, F., and Huang, G. (2019). Antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from different sources of ginseng. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 125, 906–908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chi, L., Tu, P., Ru, H., and Lu, K. (2021). Studies of xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis: from correlation to mechanisms. Gut Microbes 13:1921912. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1921912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coelho, O., Candido, F. G., and Alfenas, R. (2019). Dietary fat and gut microbiota: mechanisms involved in obesity control. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 59, 3045–3053. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1481821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crusell, M., Hansen, T. H., Nielsen, T., Allin, K. H., Ruhlemann, M. C., Damm, P., et al. (2018). Gestational diabetes is associated with change in the gut microbiota composition in third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum. Microbiome 6:89. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0472-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, H. X., Hu, Y. N., Li, J. W., and Yuan, K. (2018). Hypoglycemic mechanism of the Berberine organic acid salt under the synergistic effect of intestinal Flora and oxidative stress. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 8930374–8930313. doi: 10.1155/2018/8930374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drzezdzon, J., Jacewicz, D., and Chmurzynski, L. (2018). The impact of environmental contamination on the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species – consequences for plants and humans. Environ. Int. 119, 133–151. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., and Ross, R. P. (2018). The gut microbiota of marine fish. Front. Microbiol. 9:873. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ekore, D. O., Onanga, R., Nguema, P., Lozano, C., and Kumulungui, B. S. (2022). The antibiotics used in livestock and their impact on resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus hirae on farms in Gabon. Antibiotics 11:224. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Q., Chen, W. D., and Wang, Y. D. (2018). Gut microbiota: an integral moderator in health and disease. Front. Microbiol. 9:151. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, X., Zhan, Y., Li, N., Yu, D., Gao, W., Gu, Z., et al. (2021). Enzymatic preparation of low-molecular-weight Laminaria japonica polysaccharides and evaluation of its effect on modulating intestinal microbiota in high-fat-diet-fed mice. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:820892. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.820892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greenhill, C. (2018). Exercise affects gut microbiota and bone. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14:322. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0014-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haase, S., Wilck, N., Haghikia, A., Gold, R., Mueller, D. N., and Linker, R. A. (2020). The role of the gut microbiota and microbial metabolites in neuroinflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 50, 1863–1870. doi: 10.1002/eji.201847807

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y., Zou, L., Luo, W., Yi, Z., Yang, P., Yu, S., et al. (2020). Heavy metal exposure, oxidative stress and semen quality: exploring associations and mediation effects in reproductive-aged men. Chemosphere 244:125498. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ikeda, T., Nishida, A., Yamano, M., and Kimura, I. (2022). Short-chain fatty acid receptors and gut microbiota as therapeutic targets in metabolic, immune, and neurological diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 239:108273. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kakade, A., Salama, E. S., Pengya, F., Liu, P., and Li, X. (2020). Long-term exposure of high concentration heavy metals induced toxicity, fatality, and gut microbial dysbiosis in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Environ. Pollut. 266:115293. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kapoor, R. T., Bani, M. M., Alam, P., Rinklebe, J., and Ahmad, P. (2022). Accumulation of chromium in plants and its repercussion in animals and humans. Environ. Pollut. 301:119044. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, C. P., Hsu, P. Y., and Su, C. C. (2019). Increased prevalence of Sjogren's syndrome in where soils contain high levels of chromium. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1121–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, P., Yacyshyn, B. R., and Yacyshyn, M. B. (2019). Gut microbiota and obesity: an opportunity to alter obesity through faecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Diabetes Obes. Metab. 21, 479–490. doi: 10.1111/dom.13561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Chen, N., Zhang, X., Shahzad, K., Qi, R., Zhang, Z., et al. (2022). Mixed silage with Chinese cabbage waste enhances antioxidant ability by increasing ascorbate and aldarate metabolism through rumen Prevotellaceae UCG-004 in Hu sheep. Front. Microbiol. 13:978940. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.978940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Ding, J., Shen, T., Han, Z., Zhang, J., Abadeen, Z. U., et al. (2021). Environmental hexavalent chromium exposure induces gut microbial dysbiosis in chickens. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 227:112871. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Hu, X., Yang, S., Zhou, J., Qi, L., Sun, X., et al. (2018). Comparison between the fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and diarrheic captive musk deer. Front. Microbiol. 9:300. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Wang, Y., Hao, J., Wang, L., Quan, L., Duan, K., et al. (2022). Long-term hexavalent chromium exposure disturbs the gut microbial homeostasis of chickens. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 237:113532. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, D., Wang, P., Wang, P., Hu, X., and Chen, F. (2016). The gut microbiota: a treasure for human health. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 1210–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Xia, S., Jiang, X., Feng, C., Gong, S., Ma, J., et al. (2021). Gut microbiota and diarrhea: an updated review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:625210. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.625210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C. S., Liang, X., Wei, X. H., Jin, Z., Chen, F. L., Tang, Q. F., et al. (2019). Gegen Qinlian decoction treats diarrhea in piglets by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids. Front. Microbiol. 10:825. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lomartire, S., and Goncalves, A. (2022). Novel technologies for seaweed polysaccharides extraction and their use in food with therapeutically applications-a review. Foods 11:2654. doi: 10.3390/foods11172654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, L., Luo, T., Zhao, Y., Cai, C., Fu, Z., and Jin, Y. (2019). Interaction between microplastics and microorganism as well as gut microbiota: a consideration on environmental animal and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 667, 94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Z., Gao, X., Yang, X., Lin, L., Wei, X., Wang, S., et al. (2022). Low-dose florfenicol and copper combined exposure during early life induced health risks by affecting gut microbiota and metabolome in SD rats. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 245:114120. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, T., Villot, C., Renaud, D., Skidmore, A., Chevaux, E., Steele, M., et al. (2020). Linking perturbations to temporal changes in diversity, stability, and compositions of neonatal calf gut microbiota: prediction of diarrhea. ISME J. 14, 2223–2235. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0678-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mamais, D., Noutsopoulos, C., Kavallari, I., Nyktari, E., Kaldis, A., Panousi, E., et al. (2016). Biological groundwater treatment for chromium removal at low hexavalent chromium concentrations. Chemosphere 152, 238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marino, E., Richards, J. L., Mcleod, K. H., Stanley, D., Yap, Y. A., Knight, J., et al. (2017). Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 18, 552–562. doi: 10.1038/ni.3713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Michaudel, C., and Sokol, H. (2020). The gut microbiota at the service of immunometabolism. Cell Metab. 32, 514–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monteiro, J., Cunha, L., Costa, M., Reis, H., Aguiar, A., Oliveira-Bahia, V., et al. (2018). Mutagenic and histopathological effects of hexavalent chromium in tadpoles of Lithobates catesbeianus (Shaw, 1802) (Anura, Ranidae). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 163, 400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morris, A. (2018). Gut microbiota: fibre restores healthy gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14:63. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.182

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murugesan, S., Nirmalkar, K., Hoyo-Vadillo, C., Garcia-Espitia, M., Ramirez-Sanchez, D., and Garcia-Mena, J. (2018). Gut microbiome production of short-chain fatty acids and obesity in children. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 37, 621–625. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3143-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, K. L., Nguyen, H. A., Richter, O., Pham, M. T., and Nguyen, V. P. (2017). Ecophysiological responses of young mangrove species Rhizophora apiculata (Blume) to different chromium contaminated environments. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nishida, A., Inoue, R., Inatomi, O., Bamba, S., Naito, Y., and Andoh, A. (2018). Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 11, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paithankar, J. G., Saini, S., Dwivedi, S., Sharma, A., and Chowdhuri, D. K. (2021). Heavy metal associated health hazards: An interplay of oxidative stress and signal transduction. Chemosphere 262:128350. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prasad, K. N., and Bondy, S. C. (2018). Dietary fibers and their fermented short-chain fatty acids in prevention of human diseases. Mech. Ageing Dev. 17:100170. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2018.10.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, N., Cabral-Pinto, M., Rezania, S., et al. (2021). Chromium contamination and effect on environmental health and its remediation: a sustainable approaches. J. Environ. Manag. 285:112174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiao, R., Deng, Y., Zhang, S., Wolosker, M. B., Zhu, Q., Ren, H., et al. (2019). Accumulation of different shapes of microplastics initiates intestinal injury and gut microbiota dysbiosis in the gut of zebrafish. Chemosphere 236:124334. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, D., Bai, Y., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Li, L., Wang, G., et al. (2022). Changes in gut microbiota by the lactobacillus casei anchoring the K88 Fimbrial protein prevented newborn piglets from clinical diarrhea. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:842007. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.842007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quina, A. S., Durao, A. F., Munoz-Munoz, F., Ventura, J., and Da, L. M. M. (2019). Population effects of heavy metal pollution in wild Algerian mice (Mus spretus). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 171, 414–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sadeq, S. A., Mills, R., and Beckerman, A. P. (2021). The microbiome mediates the interaction between predation and heavy metals. Sci. Total Environ. 775:145144. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwalm, N. R., and Groisman, E. A. (2017). Navigating the gut buffet: control of polysaccharide utilization in Bacteroides spp. Trends Microbiol. 25, 1005–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwalm, N. R., Townsend, G. N., and Groisman, E. A. (2016). Multiple signals govern utilization of a polysaccharide in the gut bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. MBio 7, 1–16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01342-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarz, A., Bruhs, A., and Schwarz, T. (2017). The short-chain fatty acid sodium butyrate functions as a regulator of the skin immune system. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, 855–864. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaw, P., Mondal, P., Bandyopadhyay, A., and Chattopadhyay, A. (2019). Environmentally relevant concentration of chromium activates Nrf 2 and alters transcription of related XME genes in liver of zebrafish. Chemosphere 214, 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stephens, R. W., Arhire, L., and Covasa, M. (2018). Gut microbiota: from microorganisms to metabolic organ influencing obesity. Obesity 26, 801–809. doi: 10.1002/oby.22179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, P. Y., Miller, S., Rutishauser, R. L., and Babik, J. (2016). Broad-range PCR for early diagnosis of nosocomial enterococcus gallinarum meningitis. Infect. Dis. Ther. 48, 640–642. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2016.1160422

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Subramanya, S. H., Amberpet, R., Chaudhary, D., Nayak, N., Padukone, S., Bairy, I., et al. (2019). Neonatal sepsis due to glycopeptide resistant Enterococcus faecium from colonized maternal gut-rare case evidence. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8:29. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0490-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Chen, J., Huang, Y., Zhu, S., Wang, S., Xu, Z., et al. (2022). Yishen Qingli Heluo granule ameliorates renal dysfunction in 5/6 Nephrectomized rats by targeting gut microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity. Front. Pharmacol. 13:858881. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.858881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanna, B., and Mishra, A. (2019). Nutraceutical potential of seaweed polysaccharides: structure, bioactivity, safety, and toxicity. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18, 817–831. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaiopoulou, E., and Gikas, P. (2020). Regulations for chromium emissions to the aquatic environment in Europe and elsewhere. Chemosphere 254:126876. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Averbeke, V., Berkell, M., Mysara, M., Rodriguez-Ruiz, J. P., Xavier, B. B., De Winter, F., et al. (2022). Host immunity influences the composition of murine gut microbiota. Front. Immunol. 13:828016. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.828016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahlstrom, A. (2019). Outside the liver box: the gut microbiota as pivotal modulator of liver diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. basis Dis. 1865, 912–919. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, J., and Ma, J. (2022). Efficacy of dietary supplements targeting gut microbiota in the prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus. Front. Microbiol. 13:927883. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.927883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, F., Huo, L., Li, Y., Wu, L., Zhang, Y., Shi, G., et al. (2022). A hybrid framework for delineating the migration route of soil heavy metal pollution by heavy metal similarity calculation and machine learning method. Sci. Total Environ. 858:160065. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, R., Yang, X., Liu, J., Zhong, F., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota regulates acute myeloid leukaemia via alteration of intestinal barrier function mediated by butyrate. Nat. Commun. 13:2522. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30240-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wen, X., Lu, J., Wu, J., Lin, Y., and Luo, Y. (2019). Influence of coastal groundwater salinization on the distribution and risks of heavy metals. Sci. Total Environ. 652, 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, M., Yang, S., Wang, S., Cao, Y., Zhao, R., Li, X., et al. (2020). Effect of Berberine on atherosclerosis and gut microbiota modulation and their correlation in high-fat diet-fed ApoE−/− mice. Front. Pharmacol. 11:223. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, J., Jin, C., Pan, Z., Sun, L., Fu, Z., and Jin, Y. (2018). Chronic exposure to low concentrations of lead induces metabolic disorder and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in mice. Sci. Total Environ. 631–632, 439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Jing, H., Wang, J., Zhang, S., Chang, Q., Li, Z., et al. (2022). Disordered gut microbiota correlates with altered fecal bile acid metabolism and post-cholecystectomy diarrhea. Front. Microbiol. 13:800604. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.800604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yakabe, K., Higashi, S., Akiyama, M., Mori, H., Murakami, T., Toyoda, A., et al. (2022). Dietary-protein sources modulate host susceptibility to Clostridioides difficile infection through the gut microbiota. Cell Rep. 40:111332. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Ai, P., He, X., Mo, C., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., et al. (2022). Parkinson's disease is associated with impaired gut-blood barrier for short-chain fatty acids. Mov. Disord. 37, 1634–1643. doi: 10.1002/mds.29063

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Q., Han, B., Xue, J., Lv, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Hexavalent chromium induces mitochondrial dynamics disorder in rat liver by inhibiting AMPK/PGC-1alpha signaling pathway. Environ. Pollut. 265:114855. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114855

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, G., Wei, J., Liu, P., Zhang, Q., Tian, Y., Hou, G., et al. (2021). Role of the gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes and related diseases. Metabolism 117:154712. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154712

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Wei, H., Zhou, Y., Szeto, C. H., Li, C., Lin, Y., et al. (2022). High-fat diet promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Gastroenterology 162, 135.e2–149.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Zhang, H., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Response of male reproductive function to environmental heavy metal pollution in a free-living passerine bird, Passer montanus. Sci. Total Environ. 747:141402. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, Q., Yang, H., Wang, X., and Wang, H. (2019). Effects of hexavalent chromium on intestinal histology and microbiota in Bufo gargarizans tadpoles. Chemosphere 216, 313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, J., Wu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, W., and Su, Y. (2022). Role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetes mullites: advanced research-based review. Front. Microbiol. 13:1029890. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1029890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, X., Wu, Z., Song, Z., Zhang, H., Zhan, J., Yu, H., et al. (2020). Single-anastomosis duodenal Jejunal bypass improve glucose metabolism by regulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in Goto-Kakisaki rats. Front. Microbiol. 11:273. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y., Lu, L., Bo, N., Chaoyue, Y., and Haiyang, Y. (2021). Allicin ameliorates intestinal barrier damage via microbiota-regulated short-chain fatty acids-TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB Cascade response in acrylamide-induced rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 12837–12852. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, W., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, X., and Wang, J. (2020). Toxicological effects of microplastics and heavy metals on the Daphnia magna. Sci. Total Environ. 746:141254. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Cao, H., Song, N., Zhang, L., Cao, Y., and Tai, J. (2020). Long-term hexavalent chromium exposure facilitates colorectal cancer in mice associated with changes in gut microbiota composition. Food Chem. Toxicol. 138:111237. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Coker, O. O., Chu, E. S., Fu, K., Lau, H., Wang, Y. X., et al. (2021). Dietary cholesterol drives fatty liver-associated liver cancer by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Gut 70, 761–774. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319664

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Jing, J., Han, L., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Liu, Z., et al. (2021). Characterization of gut microbiota, metabolism and cytokines in benzene-induced hematopoietic damage. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 228:112956. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112956

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Long, C., Hu, G., Hong, S., Su, Z., Zhang, Q., et al. (2022). Two-week repair alleviates hexavalent chromium-induced hepatotoxicity, hepatic metabolic and gut microbial changes: a dynamic inhalation exposure model in male mice. Sci. Total Environ. 857:159429. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Joo, J. C., Lee, J. K., and Kim, J. Y. (2019). Mathematical estimation of heavy metal accumulations in Helianthus annuus L. with a sigmoid heavy metal uptake model. Chemosphere 220, 965–973. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, R., Wang, P., Cao, B., Wu, M., Li, X., Wang, H., et al. (2021). Intestinal response characteristic and potential microbial dysbiosis in digestive tract of Bufo gargarizans after exposure to cadmium and lead, alone or combined. Chemosphere 271:129511. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129511

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Wu, X., Li, Z., Zou, Z., Dou, S., Li, G., et al. (2022). Alterations in gut microbiota are correlated with serum metabolites in patients with insomnia disorder. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:722662. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.722662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chromium, seaweed polysaccharides, gut microbiota, bacteria, heavy metals

Citation: Mu J, Guo Z, Wang X, Wang X, Fu Y, Li X, Zhu F, Hu G and Ma X (2023) Seaweed polysaccharide relieves hexavalent chromium-induced gut microbial homeostasis. Front. Microbiol. 13:1100988. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1100988

Received: 17 November 2022; Accepted: 15 December 2022;
Published: 16 January 2023.

Edited by:

Kun Li, Nanjing Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Yun Peng Fan, Northwest A&F University, China
Dandan Han, China Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2023 Mu, Guo, Wang, Wang, Fu, Li, Zhu, Hu and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhenhuan Guo, ✉ guozhenhuan126@126.com; Xia Ma, ✉ maxia801010@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.