Adelaide Almeida- Department of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Editorial on the Research Topic
Insights in phage biology: 2021
Antibiotic resistance is an emerging problem that is forcing a growing search for alternative approaches to conventional antibiotics (O'Neill, 2016; Wainwright et al., 2017). Phage therapy emerged as an effective solution that can be used to deal with antibiotic resistance in human, animal, and environmental sectors. Bacteriophages are bacteria-specific viruses that exhibit antimicrobial activity against antibiotic-resistant bacteria without infecting the host cells. They are present in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, including plants, animals, and humans, and can be used as a health strategy to combat antibiotic resistance (Garvey, 2020).
The antibiotic resistance crisis motivates the scientific community to rethink the use of bacteriophages to control human infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, despite the early successes, the use of phage therapy in the clinic is sporadic in the Western world, it is only used as a compassionate treatment when antibiotics do not work (Schooley et al., 2017; Dedrick et al., 2019; Law et al., 2019). Contrary to Eastern Europe, in Western Europe and USA, no application currently holds approval that allows phage therapy free practice in the treatment of human infections.
Although phage therapy has been used as a compassionate treatment when antibiotics do not work, antibiotic resistance is not the only problem. There are many other infections that require urgent development, such as wounds, intracellular bacterial infections, infections caused by biofilm-forming bacteria, and bacterial chronic infections, for which antibiotics are not effective. For these indications, phages are ideal even when bacteria are antibiotic-sensitive.
Bacteriophages have also been used as promising candidates for controlling bacterial infection in other areas, such as in veterinary medicine, the food industry, agriculture, and aquaculture (Fernández et al., 2018; Schulz et al., 2022). In these cases, it is imperative to evaluate the impact of bacteriophages on the environment and also the effect of abiotic factors on phage viability; for instance temperature, pH, salinity, and radiation (Pereira et al., 2021, 2022).
Furthermore, overall, more in vivo studies are also required to translate the approach to the field when phage therapy is used in humans, animals, or the environment. In vitro studies are not plentiful to comprehend phage-bacteria interactions that go on in vivo, which hinders the translation of the treatment to the field (Park and Nakai, 2003; Silva et al., 2014, 2016).
Another important aspect to consider when bacteriophages are used is the presence of virulent genes in the phage genomes, such as antimicrobial resistance genes and genes codifying for toxins, potentially influencing host performance, namely its virulence. This phenomenon is more frequent in temperate phages (Silveira et al., 2020; de Nies et al., 2021), not used in phage therapy. However, some lytic phages can integrate their nucleic acid into the host genome, becoming prophages. Several studies have shown that the presence of prophages can affect host characteristics, in particular, antibiotic tolerance, biofilm formation ability, and toxicity (Fortier and Sekulovic, 2013; Touchon et al., 2017; Costa et al., 2018).
In this special issue, recent developments in some of these phage treatment topics are pointed out. It comprises four papers focused on the use of bacteriophages in humans. The first two involve the evaluation of the use of phages on the human microbiota (Buttimer et al.); in animals (Li et al.), including in vitro and in vivo studies. The second two papers are focused on the study of new phages, belonging to new clusters, which help to understand the virus-host interaction (Dong et al.) and the implication of the presence of genes codifying for virulent factors, namely toxins, in phage genomes (Ribeiro et al.).
As regards the use of phage therapy in humans (Buttimer et al.), the results of the study show that a cocktail of six phages targeting two bacteria is implicated in the development of the human gastrointestinal tract (IBD). Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, used as part of a defined community of a bacterial consortium with six members (SIHUMI-6), caused a 1.1–1.5 log reduction in the bacterial numbers when tested in a continuous fermenter, but not when tested in a murine colitis model. The phage addition in the fermenter cause variations in other SIHUMI-6 bacterial strains, increasing Lactobacillus plantarum and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. The results obtained using the mice model also suggest that the phage cocktail impacted the other SIHUMI-6 consortium, but did not affect the target bacteria. Overall, it can be concluded that the potential of phages to reduce host populations in vitro did not translate to an in vivo model, which has implications for translation to the field and the use of phages as a tool to engineer microbial populations (Buttimer et al.). In the study involving the use of phages on animals (Li et al.), 15 newly isolated phages targeting Salmonella, the most common pathogen in poultry, but also a significant foodborne pathogen, exhibited lytic capacities and infected a wide host range of serovars of S. enterica in vitro. Three of these phages were used in a cocktail and tested 24 h before and during for Salmonella and compared to S. Enteritidis in a chicken model. The treatment significantly reduced intestinal tract colonization and decreased inflammation in the duodenum. The results indicate that the three phages cocktail could be used against multidrug-resistant Salmonella in animal production, mitigating the transmission of infections by zoonotic Salmonella species. The in vitro results were confirmed in the in vivo studies, but, taking into account the results obtained in the study of Buttimer et al., more studies, such as histology scores of the human gastrointestinal tract of the chicken model, should be done in order to translate the treatment to the field.
In the study of Dong et al., a novel lytic Shewanella phage, with a linear double-strand genome, was isolated from the surface coastal waters. It was the first isolated Podovirus infecting Shewanella and the phylogenetic analysis suggests that this virus can represent a novel viral genus, Bocovirus. As in this study, most of the phages used to inactivate bacteria are isolated from the environment (Dong et al.), including adverse environments. Environmental selection pressures and the survival of the fittest generates a rich collection of competitive phage types in the environment. This study reports a new interaction system that can be used for studying phage–host interactions, providing new genome information for viral metagenomic analysis in the marine environment.
Although phages have been indicated as achievable solutions for controlling bacterial diseases, lytic phages can become prophages, influencing host characteristics. In the study of Ribeiro et al., all complete genomes of Paenibacillus larvae (the agent of American Foulbrood, a bacterial disease that affects honeybee brood worldwide) available on the NCBI database, are evaluated in order to detect prophages. The 55 prophages identified in the genomes of the 11 P. larvae were examined for the existence of genes encoding relevant characteristics related to P. larvae, such as antimicrobial resistance, toxins, or bacteriocins activity. This is the first in-depth study of P. larvae prophages showing significant knowledge of their impact on the host virulence and fitness in the five ERIC genotypes of P. larvae, as new features were assigned to the viruses. Although more studies are necessary in order to confirm these results, using, for instance, a higher representation of P. larvae strains diversity, the results show the relevance of the role of prophages in the pathogeny of P. larvae, regarding its virulence and fitness.
Overall, these four papers gathered more knowledge of phage treatment, demonstrating that bacteriophages are promising tools for the control of pathogenic bacteria in different sectors, but there is still a need for new developments to translate this technology to the field, such as more ex vivo and in vivo studies.
It was a pleasure to edit a special scientific publication with the results of these important recent studies from different research groups to inspire researchers to respond to the current underutilization of phages.
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Funding
The author acknowledges the financial support to CESAM by FCT/MCTES (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+ LA/P/0094/2020) through national funds.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Costa, A. R., Monteiro, R., and Azeredo, J. (2018). Genomic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii prophages reveals remarkable diversity and suggests profound impact on bacterial virulence and fitness. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33800-5
de Nies, L., Lopes, S., Busi, S. B., Galata, V., Heintz-Buschart, A., Laczny, C. C., et al. (2021). PathoFact: a pipeline for the prediction of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes in metagenomic data. Microbiome 9, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00993-9
Dedrick, R. M., Guerrero-bustamante, C. A., Garlena, R. A., Daniel, A., Ford, K., Harris, K., et al. (2019). Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat. Med. 25, 730–733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z
Fernández, L., Gutiérrez, D., Rodríguez, A., and García, P. (2018). Application of bacteriophages in the agro-food sector: a long way toward approval. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8, 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00296
Fortier, L. C., and Sekulovic, O. (2013). Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 4, 354–365. doi: 10.4161/viru.24498
Garvey, M. (2020). Bacteriophages and the one health approach to combat multidrug resistance: is this the way? Antibiotics 9, 1–17. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9070414
Law, N., Logan, C., Yung, G., Furr, C. L. L., Lehman, S. M., Morales, S., et al. (2019). Successful adjunctive use of bacteriophage therapy for treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a cystic fibrosis patient. Infection 47, 665–668. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01319-0
O'Neill, J. (2016). Tackling Drug-Resistant Infection Globally: Final Report and Reccommendations. London: AMR Review.
Park, S. C., and Nakai, T. (2003). Bacteriophage control of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 53, 33–39. doi: 10.3354/dao053033
Pereira, C., Costa, P., Pinheiro, L., Balcão, V. M., and Almeida, A. (2021). Kiwifruit bacterial canker: an integrative view focused on biocontrol strategies. Planta 253, 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03549-1
Pereira, C., Duarte, J., Costa, P., Braz, M., and Almeida, A. (2022). Bacteriophages in the control of Aeromonas sp. in aquaculture systems: an integrative view. Antibiotics 11, 1–33. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020163
Schooley, R. T., Biswas, B., Gill, J. J., Hernandez-Morales, A., Lancaster, J., Lessor, L., et al. (2017). Development and use of personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic cocktails to treat a patient with a disseminated resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, 1–14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00954-17
Schulz, P., Pajdak-Czaus, J., and Siwicki, A. K. (2022). In vivo bacteriophages' application for the prevention and therapy of aquaculture animals—chosen aspects. Animals 12, 1–21. doi: 10.3390/ani12101233
Silva, Y. J., Costa, L., Pereira, C., Mateus, C., Cunha, Â., Calado, R., et al. (2014). Phage therapy as an approach to prevent Vibrio anguillarum infections in fish larvae production. PLoS ONE 9, 1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114197
Silva, Y. J., Moreirinha, C., Pereira, C., Rocha, R. J. M., Cunha, Â., Gomes, N. C. M., et al. (2016). Biological control of Aeromonas salmonicida infection in juvenile Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) with Phage AS-A. Aquaculture 450, 225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.07.025
Silveira, C. B., Coutinho, F. H., Cavalcanti, G. S., Benler, S., Doane, M. P., Dinsdale, E. A., et al. (2020). Genomic and ecological attributes of marine bacteriophages encoding bacterial virulence genes. BMC Genom. 21, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6523-2
Touchon, M., Moura de Sousa, J. A., and Rocha, E. P. (2017). Embracing the enemy: the diversification of microbial gene repertoires by phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 38, 66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.04.010
Keywords: bacteriophages, bacteria, resistance, antibiotic, virulence
Citation: Almeida A (2022) Editorial: Insights in phage biology: 2021. Front. Microbiol. 13:1052366. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1052366
Received: 23 September 2022; Accepted: 29 September 2022;
Published: 27 October 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Sangryeol Ryu, Seoul National University, South Korea
Copyright © 2022 Almeida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Adelaide Almeida, YWFsbWVpZGEmI3gwMDA0MDt1YS5wdA==