Frederique Pasquali
Daniel Remondini
Emma Louise Snary
Tine Hald
Laurent Guillier- 1Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 3Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Addlestone, United Kingdom
- 4National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- 5Department of Risk Assessment, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Maisons-Alfort, France
Editorial on the Research Topic
Integrating Whole Genome Sequencing Into Source Attribution and Risk Assessment of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens
Source attribution and microbial risk assessment have proved to be crucial to identify and prioritize food safety interventions as to effectively control the burden of human illnesses (Cassini et al., 2016; Mughini-Gras et al., 2018a, 2019). By comparing human cases and pathogen occurrences in selected animal, food, and environmental sources, microbial subtyping approaches were successfully applied to pinpoint the most important sources of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes (Hald et al., 2004; Mullner et al., 2009a,b; Barco et al., 2013; Nielsen et al., 2017; Mughini-Gras et al., 2018b; Cody et al., 2019). Microbial risk assessment has been applied to assess known or potential adverse health effects resulting from human exposure to food-borne hazards. Through a scientific structured approach (FAO and WHO, 2021), microbial risk assessment helps to identify and quantify the risk represented by specific foods and the critical points in these foods' production chains for microbial control (Cassini et al., 2016; FAO and WHO, 2021). For both source attribution and risk assessment, one key challenge has been to define the hazard in question: is the whole foodborne pathogen species a hazard, or only some of its subtypes? In this regard the choice of the subtyping method becomes crucial. In recent years, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) has represented a major benefit for more targeted approaches, no longer focused on the species/genus level but at the level of subtypes (Franz et al., 2016; Fritsch et al., 2018; EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards, 2019). Besides WGS, metagenomics showed potentialities in source attribution. In particular, this approach was useful in attributing the source of environmental contamination by comparing the abundances of source-specific genetic markers (i.e., resistome) in different reservoirs (Gupta et al., 2019).
Therefore, this special issue focuses on traditional and novel source attribution approaches applied on molecular, WGS, and metagenomic data as well as on a fine-tuning genetic characterization of foodborne pathogens useful for hazard identification and characterization. In particular, one study compares the outputs of a modified Hald model, which was applied to different subtyping input data of S. enterica Typhimurium and its monophasic variant (Arnold et al.) whereas two studies proposed a novel network approach and a method based on the core-genome genetic distance to attribute human infections of S. enterica Typhimurium monophasic variant and S. enterica Derby using WGS as input data (Merlotti et al.; Sévellec et al.). Another study by Duarte et al. included the relative abundance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) associated genes (resistome) as metagenomic input data in an AMR source attribution study. Finally, two studies were focused on the molecular and genomic characterization of human isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from China and of Listeria monocytogenes isolates collected from ready-to-eat meat and processing environment from Poland (Zhang et al.; Kurpas et al.).
Arnold et al. performed a source attribution study including the genomes of S. enterica Typhimurium and its monophasic variant of 596 human sources and 327 animal sources from England and Wales between 2014 and 2016. Data from Seven Loci Multi Locus Sequence Typing (7-loci MLST), core-genome MLST (cg-MLST), and SNP calling were compared as input data. By applying a modified Hald model, 60% of human genomes were attributed to pork. Comparing different input data, results highlighted MLST as the method with the lowest fit and the lowest discriminatory power.
Merlotti et al. applied a network approach to 351 human and animal genomes of S. enterica Typhimurium and its monophasic variant collected from 2013 to 2014. Three datasets of whole-genome MLST (wgMLST), cgMLST, and SNPs were used as input data. Genomes were clustered based on their genetic similarities. Interestingly, a higher percentage of cluster coherence was reported for animal sources in comparison to country and year of isolation, suggesting animal sources as the major driver of cluster formation. The approach showed to be effective in attributing up to 97.2% of human genomes to animal sources represented in the dataset. Among these genomes, the majority (84%) was attributed to pigs/pork. No significant differences were highlighted by comparing the three different input datasets.
Core genome analysis was the approach applied by Sévellec et al. to attribute human sporadic cases of S. enterica Derby that occurred in France in 2014–2015 to non-human reservoirs. The authors analyzed 299 S. enterica Derby genomes corresponding to all S. enterica Derby sporadic human cases registered in the time frame, along with 141 non-human genomes. Within the non-human genomes, three main genomic lineages were detected in France: ST39-ST40 and ST682 associated to pork and ST71 associated to poultry. Within human genomes, 94% of S. enterica Derby clustered within the three genetic groups associated with pork, identifying this animal reservoir as the major contributor of S. enterica Derby to sporadic human cases in France.
Relative abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in shotgun metagenomic data was chosen in an antimicrobial resistance source attribution study by Duarte et al.. Starting from the assumption that fecal resistomes are source related, authors compared the resistomes of pooled fecal samples of pigs, broilers, turkeys, and veal calves with the resistomes of individual fecal samples of humans occupationally exposed to livestock production. Five supervised random forest models were applied on a total of 479 observations. Among the four livestock species, the results indicated that pigs have the resistome composition closest to the composition of the human resistome suggesting that occupational exposure to AMR determinants was higher among workers exposed to pigs than workers of broiler farms.
Zhang et al. characterized genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of 236 Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli isolates collected from 2,945 individual stool samples of hospitalized patients with diarrhea in Beijing from 2017 to 2018. MLST results confirmed the high genetic diversity among isolates as well as CC21 as the most common clonal complex of C. jejuni in diarrhea patients in China. Clonal complex CC828 was the most frequently identified among C. coli isolates. Regarding antimicrobial resistance, rates higher than 88% were identified for the antimicrobials nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline.
Last but not least, Kurpas et al. genetically characterized 48 L. monocytogenes isolates of PCR-serogroup IIb and IVb collected from ready-to-eat food and food processing environments. Additionally, the authors compared them with public genomes collected from humans in Poland. Among food isolates, 65% belonged to CC1, CC2, and CC6 already described as hypervirulent strains in humans. The clonal complex CC5 was also identified; mostly collected from food processing environments and belonging to PCR-serogroup IIB. Genomes of this clonal complex showed mutations in the inlA gene and a deletion of 144 bp in the inlB gene suggesting them as hypovirulent.
Based on these studies, we conclude that the application of NGS data, in particular source attribution models, shows great potential. The results are improved by becoming more specific and to the point, which is considered very valuable for the decision support process. Integrations with phenotypic tests will continue to be essential for confirmation of NGS predicted outcomes.
Author Contributions
All authors were topic editors. FP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DR, ES, TH, and LG wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Barco, L., Barrucci, F., Olsen, J. E., and Ricci, A. (2013). Salmonella source attribution based on microbial subtyping. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 163, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.005
Cassini, A., Hathaway, S., Havelaar, A., Koopmans, M., Koutsoumanis, K., Messens, W., et al. (2016). Special issue: microbiological risk assessment. EFSA J. 14:s0507. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.s0507
Cody, A. J., Maiden, M. C., Strachan, N. J., and McCarthy, N. D. (2019). A systematic review of source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using multilocus sequence typing. Euro Surveill. 24:1800696. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.43.1800696
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards, Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., et al. (2019). Scientific opinion on the whole genome sequencing and metagenomics for outbreak investigation, source attribution and risk assessment of food-borne microorganisms. EFSA J. 17:5898. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5898
FAO and WHO (2021). Microbiological risk assessment - Guidance for food. Rome: Guidance. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No. 36.
Franz, E., Gras, L. M., and Dallman, T. (2016). Significance of whole genome sequencing for surveillance, source attribution and microbial risk assessment of foodborne pathogens. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 8, 74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.04.004
Fritsch, L., Guillier, L., and Augustin, J. C. (2018). Next generation quantitative microbiological risk assessment: refinement of the cold smoked salmon-related listeriosis risk model by integrating genomic data. Microb. Risk Anal. 10, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.06.003
Gupta, S., Arango-Argoty, G., Zhang, L., Pruden, A., and Vikesland, P. (2019). Identification of discriminatory antibiotic resistance genes among environmental resistomes using extremely randomized tree algorithm. Microbiome 7:123. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0735-1
Hald, T., Vose, D., Wegener, H. C., and Koupeev, T. (2004). A Bayesian approach to quantify the contribution of animal-food sources to human salmonellosis. Risk Anal. 24, 255–269. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00427.x
Mughini-Gras, L., Kooh, P., Augustin, J. C., David, J., Fravalo, P., Guillier, L., et al. (2018a). Source attribution of foodborne diseases: potentialities, hurdles, and future expectations. Front. Microbiol. 9:1983. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01983
Mughini-Gras, L., van Pelt, W., van der Voort, M., Heck, M., Friesema, I., and Franz, E. (2018b). Attribution of human infections with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) to livestock sources and identification of source-specific risk factors, the Netherlands (2010-2014). Zoonoses Public Health 65, e8–e22. doi: 10.1111/zph.12403
Mughini-Gras, L., Kooh, P., Fravalo, P., Augustin, J. C., Guillier, L., and David, J. (2019). Critical orientation in the jungle of currently available methods and types of data for source attribution of foodborne diseases. Front. Microbiol. 10:2578. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02578
Mullner, P., Jones, G., Noble, A. D., Spencer, S. E. F., Hathaway, S., and French, N. P. (2009b). Source attribution of food-borne zoonoses in New Zealand: a modified Hald model. Risk Anal. 7, 970–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01224.x
Mullner, P., Spencer, S. E. F., Wilson, D., Jones, G., Noble, A. D., Midwinter, A. C., et al. (2009a). Assigning the source of human campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Inf. Genet. Evol. 9, 1311–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.003
Nielsen, E. M., Björkman, J. T., Kiil, K., Grant, K., Dallman, T., Painset, A., et al. (2017). Closing gaps for performing a risk assessment on listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods: activity 3, the comparison of isolates from different compartments along the food chain, and from humans using whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis. EFSA Support. Public. 14:1151E. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-115
Keywords: source attribution, microbial risk assessment, whole genome sequencing, metagenomics, foodborne pathogens
Citation: Pasquali F, Remondini D, Snary EL, Hald T and Guillier L (2021) Editorial: Integrating Whole Genome Sequencing Into Source Attribution and Risk Assessment of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 12:795098. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.795098
Received: 14 October 2021; Accepted: 01 November 2021;
Published: 26 November 2021.
Edited by:
Giovanna Suzzi, University of Teramo, ItalyReviewed by:
Arun K. Bhunia, Purdue University, United StatesCopyright © 2021 Pasquali, Remondini, Snary, Hald and Guillier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frederique Pasquali, frederique.pasquali@unibo.it