Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 15 July 2021
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease
This article is part of the Research Topic Immunity to Fungal Infections: Insights from the Innate Immune Recognition and Antifungal Effector Mechanisms View all 8 articles

Editorial: Immunity to Fungal Infections: Insights From the Innate Immune Recognition and Antifungal Effector Mechanisms

  • 1Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biomedical Institute, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Brazil
  • 3Campus Duque de Caxias, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Duque de Caxias, Brazil

Fungal infections represent a major health concern which, according estimations, account for nearly 1.6 million deaths annually (Brown et al., 2012). Epidemiological reports have demonstrated a growth in the incidence of invasive mycoses which are associated with conditions associated with immunossupression, such as diabetes, immunosupressive therapy for solid organ transplantation or autoimmune diseases, cancer and neutropenia (Bitar et al., 2014; Rayens et al., 2021). Risk factors for invasive mycosis represent medical advances, including the use of intravenous catheters, cancer chemotherapy and immunosupressive therapies which have created a growing population of vulnerable patients. Invasive mycoses are associated with unacceptable high lethality rates (Suleyman and Alangaden, 2016). Although antifungal drug resistance is not a major problem in most cases of invasive mycoses, it is an additional threat (Fairlamb et al., 2016). Recent outbreaks of infections caused by Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant fungus, as well as associations of fungal infections with influenza and COVID-19 cases, as observed for aspergillosis and mucormycosis, have created new challenges for the managements of patients in critical care units (Spivak and Hanson, 2018; Dewi et al., 2021; Gandra et al., 2021).

Integration of innate immune recognition and adaptive immunity is critical for the control of invasive mycoses. The relevance of the basic knowledge in the immunopathogenesis of mycoses can be observed by the growth in clinical immunomodulation studies (Williams et al., 2020). Thus, comprehension of the immunity to fungal pathogens offers new possibilities for the treatment of invasive mycoses. This topic discusses aspects of the innate immunity and leukocyte activation to fungal pathogens, the repertoire of B and T cell antigen receptors in experimental models of pneumocystosis, as well as a discussion about the control of the expression of fungal toxins involved in the modulation of host responses.

Here, Thompson et al. investigate the role of Dectin-2 and Mincle in recognizing different Candida species—notably C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata. They compare the cell wall composition of the different species, looking at cell wall thickness and phosphomannan content, and discuss the importance of Mincle and Dectin-2 recognition in systemic murine infection models varies with the Candida species, indicating the varied nature of fungal detection in the innate immune response.

Neutrophil DNA extracellular traps (NETs) are formed in response to fungal pathogens and show fungicidal/fungistatic activity (Urban and Nett, 2019). Eosinophils ETs (EETs) have been observed in human samples from bronchopulmonary aspergillosis cases and human eosinophils release ETs in response to A. fumigatus conidia (Muniz et al., 2018). In this topic, Silva et al. present a review discussing the mechanisms involved in the release of NETs and EETs, in response to fungal pathogens, as well as the role of ETs in the immunity and pathogenesis of fungal infections. In this issue, Barroso et al. describe the signaling pathways involved in the EET formation in response to A. fumigatus. A. fumigatus-induced EET release requires the activity of Src kinases, class IA phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3KIδ), Akt and p38 kinase. Intracellular calcium mobilization is also required for EET formation in response to A. fumigatus, while PAD4-mediated histone citrullination is dispensable. EET release does not require A. fumigatus viability, indicating that recognition of A. fumigatus molecular patterns is able to trigger EETosis, while fungal viability and expression of virulence factors are dispensable for the eosinophil activation culminating in the ET release.

Fungal infections are a particular problem in HIV-infected individuals. Indeed, one of the defining features of AIDS is respiratory Pneumocystis infection. Normally, these infections are prevented by robust B and T cell responses (Thomas and Limper, 2007). Although gross examination of the different subsets of T cells during these infections has been identified, only recently the tools have been developed to increase the resolution of the T cell immunophenotypes. In this issue, Yang et al. use a combination single cell TCR-Seq and single cell RNA-Seq to identify the subsets of T cells that respond to Pneumocystis infection. In doing so, they reveal the composition and characteristics of clonally expanding T cells, along with their TCR repertoire.

In a similar approach, Sun et al. integrated single-cell RNA and BCR sequencing of immune cells from mouse lungs to detail the dynamic nature of B cell responses during Pneumocystis infection, with ongoing increased plasma cells elevated ratio of (IgA+ IgG) to (IgD+ IgM) after infection. Despite the clonal expansion post-infection, BCR repertoire diversity decreased, with B cell transcriptional changes including a biased usage of V(D)J genes and higher frequency of somatic hypermutation in comparison to naïve B cells, offering valuable information and tools for the development of immunotherapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers.

The modulation of inflammatory responses during fungal infections, particularly in the context of how each IL-1 family (IL-1, IL-18, and IL-36) member, despite of their clearly defined roles, could act together in determining the disease outcome is reviewed by Griffiths et al.. The authors address their mechanism of induction, the main cellular types responsible for their expression and processing and the immunological and other functional roles of each subfamily member. The authors tackle deeply how several endemically important fungal pathogens could differentially induce each of these IL-1 subfamily cytokines. Their therapeutic potential is further described as modulation of receptors or proteins regulating the IL-1 subfamily might enhance protective anti-fungal immunity or resolve excessive damaging immune responses.

Host and fungus interactions trigger responses in a two-way signaling that leads to fungal adaptation to the host environment, for example the hyphal growth in Candida species. Notably, these interactions can lead to the secretion of different mycotoxins, including ochratoxin, which can mediate different aspects of the pathology associated with infection. In this issue, Gao et al. review the role of G protein coupled receptors (GCPR) in fungi, and their role in regulating the synthesis of mycotoxins. Accordingly, the authors explore the current limited state of knowledge of fungal GPCR biology and how these circuits regulate fungal behavior and mycotoxin synthesis. The role of GPCR as potential targets in modulating the synthesis of secondary fungal metabolites and regulating fungal behavior is also discussed.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to manuscript revision and draft, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

RF was supported by Brazilian Agency Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, E-26/203.200/2017). AG was supported by FAPERJ (E-26/202.696/2018) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, grant 311470/2018-1). DM was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UKRI (BB/S016899/1) and Unilever.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Bitar, D., Lortholary, O., Le Strat, Y., Nicolau, J., Coignard, B., Tattevin, P., et al. (2014). Population-based analysis of invasive fungal infections, France, 2001–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1149–1155. doi: 10.3201/eid2007.140087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, G. D., Denning, D. W., Gow, N. A., Levitz, S. M., Netea, M. G., and White, T. C. (2012). Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 4:165rv113. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dewi, I. M., Janssen, N. A., Rosati, D., Bruno, M., Netea, M. G., Brüggemann, R. J., et al. (2021). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis associated with viral pneumonitis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 62, 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fairlamb, A. H., Gow, N. A., Matthews, K. R., and Waters, A. P. (2016). Drug resistance in eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat. Microbiol. 1:16092. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.92

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandra, S., Ram, S., and Levitz, S. M. (2021). The “Black Fungus” in India: the emerging syndemic of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021:2354. doi: 10.7326/M21-2354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muniz, V. S., Silva, J. C., Braga, Y.a.V., Melo, R. C. N., Ueki, S., Takeda, M., et al. (2018). Eosinophils release extracellular DNA traps in response to Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 141, 571–585.e577. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rayens, E., Norris, K. A., and Cordero, J. F. (2021). Mortality trends in risk conditions and invasive mycotic disease in the United States, 1999–2018. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021:ciab336. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spivak, E. S., and Hanson, K. E. (2018). Candida auris: an emerging fungal pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56:17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01588-17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suleyman, G., and Alangaden, G. J. (2016). Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 30, 1023–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.07.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, C. F., and Limper, A. H. (2007). Current insights into the biology and pathogenesis of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 298–308. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urban, C. F., and Nett, J. E. (2019). Neutrophil extracellular traps in fungal infection. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 89, 47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.03.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, T. J., Harvey, S., and Armstrong-James, D. (2020). Immunotherapeutic approaches for fungal infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 58, 130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.09.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mycoses, innate immunity, leukocytes, lymphocytes, cytokines

Citation: Moyes DL, Guimarães AJ and Figueiredo RT (2021) Editorial: Immunity to Fungal Infections: Insights From the Innate Immune Recognition and Antifungal Effector Mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 12:714013. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.714013

Received: 24 May 2021; Accepted: 23 June 2021;
Published: 15 July 2021.

Edited by:

Karl Kuchler, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

Reviewed by:

Oliver Kurzai, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany
Bruce Klein, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Copyright © 2021 Moyes, Guimarães and Figueiredo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: David L. Moyes, david.moyes@kcl.ac.uk; Allan J. Guimarães, allanguimaraes@id.uff.br; Rodrigo T. Figueiredo, figueiredo.rt@xerem.ufrj.br

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.