data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Microbiol. , 20 May 2021
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693341
This article is a correction to:
Tillage System and Crop Sequence Affect Soil Disease Suppressiveness and Carbon Status in Boreal Climate
A Corrigendum on
Tillage System and Crop Sequence Affect Soil Disease Suppressiveness and Carbon Status in Boreal Climate
by Palojärvi, A., Kellock, M., Parikka, P., Jauhiainen, L., and Alakukku, L. (2020). Front. Microbiol. 11:534786. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.534786
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 4 as published. Inadvertently, a misordered data table was used for calculating SOC (Soil Organic Carbon) pool results for Table 4. The numerical values were slightly erroneous and some of the letters referring to statistically significant differences in each comparison of SOC pools were incorrect. The corrected Table 4 is shown below.
TABLE 4. Test results of the fixed main effects in the generalized linear mixed models for soil carbon pools in soil.
Consequently, a correction has been made to Results, sub-section ‘Soil Organic Carbon and Microbial Biomass Carbon in the Soil Profile.' The corrected third paragraph is shown below.
The total amounts of SOC and Cmic on the topsoil layer were calculated based on both fixed 0–20 cm depth and on the equivalent soil mass method (equivalent mineral soil mass of 200 kg m−2, ≈15 cm depth; Wendt and Hauser, 2013; Singh et al., 2015) which takes soil bulk density into account (Table 4). Plowed treatment contained statistically significantly less SOC (6.37 kg C m−2) on 20 cm depth compared to the reduced tillage and no-till treatments (6.76 and 7.08 kg C m−2; p < 0.01, respectively). The difference turned to non-significant with the equivalent soil mass results between plow and reduced tillage (5.24, 5.29, and 5.54 kg C m−2 on plow, reduced tillage and no-till treatments, respectively). Crop rotation did not change SOC in tillage treatments (Table 4). Mean Cmic of the treatment combinations ranged from 65.3 and 77.0 g Cmic m−2 in the soil layer equivalent to 200 kg m−2 (Table 4), which is about 1.1–1.4% of the total soil C stock.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Singh, P., Heikkinen, J., Ketoja, E., Nuutinen, V., Palojärvi, A., Sheehy, J., et al. (2015). Tillage and crop residue management methods had minor effects on the stock and stabilization of topsoil carbon in a 30-year field experiment. Sci. Total Environ. 518–519, 337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.027
Keywords: fungistasis, no-till, non-inversion, Fusarium spp., microbial biomass, general disease suppression, crop rotation, labile carbon
Citation: Palojärvi A, Kellock M, Parikka P, Jauhiainen L and Alakukku L (2021) Corrigendum: Tillage System and Crop Sequence Affect Soil Disease Suppressiveness and Carbon Status in Boreal Climate. Front. Microbiol. 12:693341. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.693341
Received: 10 April 2021; Accepted: 29 April 2021;
Published: 20 May 2021.
Edited and reviewed by: Christopher Rensing, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China
Copyright © 2021 Palojärvi, Kellock, Parikka, Jauhiainen and Alakukku. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ansa Palojärvi, YW5zYS5wYWxvamFydmlAaGVsc2lua2kuZmk=
†Present address: Miriam Kellock, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.