AUTHOR=Sun Huishan , Pan Liping , Jia Hongyan , Zhang Zhiguo , Gao Mengqiu , Huang Mailing , Wang Jinghui , Sun Qi , Wei Rongrong , Du Boping , Xing Aiying , Zhang Zongde 

TITLE=Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Novel Plasma Biomarkers for Distinguishing Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Latent Infection

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Microbiology

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01267

DOI=10.3389/fmicb.2018.01267

ISSN=1664-302X

ABSTRACT=<p>The lack of effective differential diagnostic methods for active tuberculosis (TB) and latent infection (LTBI) is still an obstacle for TB control. Furthermore, the molecular mechanism behind the progression from LTBI to active TB has been not elucidated. Therefore, we performed label-free quantitative proteomics to identify plasma biomarkers for discriminating pulmonary TB (PTB) from LTBI. A total of 31 overlapping proteins with significant difference in expression level were identified in PTB patients (<italic>n</italic> = 15), compared with LTBI individuals (<italic>n</italic> = 15) and healthy controls (HCs, <italic>n</italic> = 15). Eight differentially expressed proteins were verified using western blot analysis, which was 100% consistent with the proteomics results. Statistically significant differences of six proteins were further validated in the PTB group compared with the LTBI and HC groups in the training set (<italic>n</italic> = 240), using ELISA. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was employed to determine the ideal protein combination for discriminating PTB from LTBI and HC. A diagnostic model consisting of alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (ACT), alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 (AGP1), and E-cadherin (CDH1) was established and presented a sensitivity of 81.2% (69/85) and a specificity of 95.2% (80/84) in discriminating PTB from LTBI, and a sensitivity of 81.2% (69/85) and a specificity of 90.1% (64/81) in discriminating PTB from HCs. Additional validation was performed by evaluating the diagnostic model in blind testing set (<italic>n</italic> = 113), which yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% (21/28) and specificity of 96.1% (25/26) in PTB vs. LTBI, 75.0% (21/28) and 92.3% (24/26) in PTB vs. HCs, and 75.0% (21/28) and 81.8% (27/33) in PTB vs. lung cancer (LC), respectively. This study obtained the plasma proteomic profiles of different <italic>M.TB</italic> infection statuses, which contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis involved in the transition from latent infection to TB activation and provide new potential diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing PTB and LTBI.</p>