ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Pathology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1587417

Application of Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks to Identify Gastric Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Mice

Provisionally accepted
Yuke  RenYuke Ren1,2Shuangxing  LiShuangxing Li2Di  ZhangDi Zhang2Yongtian  ZhaoYongtian Zhao3Yanwei  YangYanwei Yang2Guitao  HuoGuitao Huo2Xiaobing  ZhouXiaobing Zhou2Xingchao  GengXingchao Geng2Zhi  LinZhi Lin2*Zhe  QuZhe Qu2*
  • 1Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, China
  • 2National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 3Indica Labs,Inc, Albuquerque, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In non-clinical safety evaluation of drugs, pathological result is one of the gold standards for determining toxic effects. However, pathological diagnosis might be challenging and affected by pathologist expertise. In carcinogenicity studies, druginduced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the mouse stomach represents a diagnostic challenge for toxicopathologists. This study aims to establish a detection model for mouse gastric squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC) using deep learning algorithms, to improve the accuracy and consistency of pathological diagnoses.: A total of 93 cases of drug-induced mouse GSCC and 56 cases of normal mouse stomach tissue from carcinogenicity studies were collected. After scanning into digital slides, semi-automated data annotation was performed. All images underwent preprocessing, including tissue extraction, artifact removal, and exclusion of normal epithelial regions. The images were then randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. Five different convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-FCN, LR-ASPP, DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and DenseNet were applied to identify GSCC and non-GSCC regions. Tumor prediction images (algorithm results shown as overlays) derived from the slide images were compared, and the performance of the constructed models was evaluated using Precision, Recall, and F1-score. Results: The Precision, Recall, and F1-scores of DenseNet, U-Net, and DeepLabv3+ algorithms were all above 90%. Specifically, the DenseNet model achieved an overall Precision of 0.9044, Recall of 0.9291, and F1-score of 0.9157 in the test set. Compared to the other algorithms, DenseNet exhibited the highest F1-score and Recall, demonstrating superior generalization ability. Conclusion: The DenseNet algorithm model developed in this study shown promising application potential for assisting in the diagnosis of mouse GSCC. As artificial intelligence (AI) technology continues to advance in non-clinical safety evaluation of drugs, CNN-based toxicological pathology detection models will become essential tools to assist pathologists in precise diagnosis and consistency evaluation.

Keywords: Non-clinical safety evaluation of drugs, Toxicological pathology, artificial intelligence, deep learning, Gastric squamous cell carcinoma

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ren, Li, Zhang, Zhao, Yang, Huo, Zhou, Geng, Lin and Qu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zhi Lin, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Zhe Qu, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.