SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Healthcare Professions Education

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577958

Building capacity for genomics in primary care: A scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs and enablers

Provisionally accepted
Kate  L.A. DunlopKate L.A. Dunlop1,2*Nehal  SinghNehal Singh1*Amelia  K SmitAmelia K Smit1,2April  L MorrowApril L Morrow3Julia  SteinburgJulia Steinburg2Anne  E CustAnne E Cust2,4Meredith  MakehamMeredith Makeham1Carissa  BonnerCarissa Bonner1Bronwyn  TerrillBronwyn Terrill5,6Lynn  Valerie MonrouxeLynn Valerie Monrouxe1David  WilkinsonDavid Wilkinson7Shailendra  SawleshwarkarShailendra Sawleshwarkar1Alan  S MaAlan S Ma1,8
  • 1The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia
  • 2The Daffodil Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Kings Cross, New South Wales, Australia
  • 3The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW, Australia
  • 4Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 5Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
  • 6University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
  • 7Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 8Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Improving clinical capacity for genomics in primary care promises to lead to better health, but genomics uptake in the sector is slow and patchy. This review aimed to identify the attitudes of primary care practitioners (PCP), and education needs and enablers in applying genomics to inform priorities in education and implementation.: Searches were conducted across Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL until November 2023. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework, and the Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework.Results: 52 studies were included and the most frequently mapped domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework were 'Knowledge' (65.4% of papers), 'Environmental context and resources' (40.4%), 'Skills' (38.5%), and 'Social/professional role and identity' (32.7%). Four key implications were identified: Knowledge as a major barrier and enabler; Education to build capacity; Uncertainty about role of PCPs; and Additional needs beyond education alone.Discussion: While PCPs are optimistic about genomics, long standing barriers to delivery in primary care remain. Multifaceted, and evidence-based education strategies, including interactive components to change behaviour, will help to address barriers. Clarifying the role of PCPs, referral pathways, and collaboration with tertiary genetics services will further build capacity for genomics delivery in primary care.

Keywords: Genomics, Genomics education, education strategies, Primary Care, general

Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dunlop, Singh, Smit, Morrow, Steinburg, Cust, Makeham, Bonner, Terrill, Monrouxe, Wilkinson, Sawleshwarkar and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kate L.A. Dunlop, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia
Nehal Singh, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more