
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1574634
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Mechanical Ventilation: Understanding Physiology to Mitigate Complications View all 7 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Inverse ratio ventilation theoretically increases oxygenation in obese patients. However, it is unknown whether the use of inverse ratio ventilation prolongs the safe apnea time during induction of anesthesia. The primary objective of our study was to compare the safe apnea time in obese surgical patients receiving either inverse ratio ventilation or conventional ratio ventilation during induction of anesthesia.Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Forty obese patients who underwent elective operation under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomly allocated into CRV group, (n=20) and IRV group, (n=20).After the patients preoxygenated through a face mask for 3 minutes, anesthesia induction was performed. When the patients lost consciousness and spontaneous breathing, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was performed for 5min, and the inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio was set as 1:2 in CRV group and 2:1 in IRV group.Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at four time points before preoxygenation (T0), preoxygenation for 3 minutes (T1), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for 3 minutes (T2) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for 5 minutes (T3). Arterial blood was collected at T0, T1 and T3 for arterial blood gas analysis, and arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure were recorded. The patient's expiratory oxygen fraction at T1, T2 and T3 were recorded. Peak airway pressure, plateau pressure and mean airway pressure were record at T2 and T3. The safe apnea time was recorded in both groups.Results: Forty patients completed the study. Baseline parameters were comparable between groups. Safe apnea time was significantly longer (210.40±47.47 vs 153.80±41.54 seconds, mean difference [95% CI], 56.55 [28.00 to 85.10], P=0.0003) and the expired O2 fraction was higher (87.60±2.39 vs 91.60±1.79, mean difference [95% CI],4.00 [2.65 to 5.35], P <0.0001) at T3 in the IRV group compared to the CRV group.Conclusions: Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation of I:E ratio 2:1, compared to conventional ratio ventilation, provided a longer safe apnea time and higher expired O2 fraction in obese patients during anesthesia induction.
Keywords: Safe apnea time, preoxygenation, Inverse ratio ventilation, Functional Residual Capacity, Obesity, oxygen saturation, expiratory oxygen fraction
Received: 11 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Li, Xu, Wu, Ma, Yang, Ma and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hanxiang Ma, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
Xinli Ni, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.