ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Pulmonary Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1572779

Evaluating Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy as Key Performance Metrics in Pulmonary Lung Lesions

Provisionally accepted
Junsu  ChoeJunsu Choe1Hyunseung  NamHyunseung Nam1Hwan-ho  ChoHwan-ho Cho2Sun Hye  ShinSun Hye Shin1Byeong-Ho  JeongByeong-Ho Jeong1Sang-Won  UmSang-Won Um1Hojoong  KimHojoong Kim1Kyungjong  LeeKyungjong Lee1,3*
  • 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Electronics Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  • 3Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: A conservative definition of diagnostic yields for assessing the performance of guided bronchoscopy has been proposed, but it has yet to be validated in practice.Patients who underwent radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) between April 2020 and April 2023 were included in the study. Diagnostic results were classified as malignant or non-malignant based on the post-lung-biopsy pathology. Non-malignant results were further categorized into specific benign (SB), nonspecific benign (NSB), atypical cells, and non-diagnostic (ND). All non-malignant lesions were confirmed using alternative biopsy methods or chest computed tomography (CT) during a followup of over 1 year. Diagnostic yield and accuracy were calculated using pre-defined methods (Box below). Predictors of sampling success were identified in a logistic regression analysis.Results: Among the 736 patients evaluated in this study, R-EBUS-guided TBLB revealed malignancy in 431 (58.6%) patients. The remaining 305 (41.4%) patients with non-malignant lesions were classified as SB (8.3%), NSB (21.3%), atypia (4.6%), and ND (7.2%). Diagnostic yield vs. accuracy values based on conservative, intermediate, and liberal definitions were 67% vs. 67%, 88% vs. 77%, and 100% vs. 79%, respectively. Thus, for the conservative definition, diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic yield were identical. Significant predictive factors for successful lung biopsy according to the conservative diagnostic yield included lesion size (> 20 mm), CT-bronchus subclassification (Ia, Ib), and radial probe position within the lesion.Our study validated the use of the conservative definition of diagnostic yield as a reliable diagnostic endpoint for evaluating the performance of guided bronchoscopy.

Keywords: Diagnostic yields, Radial endobronchial ultrasound, Lung nodules, Navigation bronchoscopy, tissue diagnosis

Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Choe, Nam, Cho, Shin, Jeong, Um, Kim and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kyungjong Lee, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more