
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1572726
This article is part of the Research Topic Drug Development for Respiratory Infectious Diseases and Related Complications in Other Systems View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat) are major pathogens implicated in bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Their involvement contributes to antibiotic resistance and poses significant immune challenges, underscoring the need for targeted vaccine strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines in COPD patients.Research design and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the safety and efficacy of NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines for COPD were systematically searched across four databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Medline) from inception to October 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects or fixed-effects models, with subgroup analyses to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity.Results: This analysis included eight RCTs involving 1,574 participants, primarily conducted in Europe (n=3) and Australia (n=2), with interventions administered orally or intramuscularly at varying frequencies (twice or three times).The Meta-analyses revealed that the NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccine did not affect the incidence of acute exacerbations of COPD (relative risk (RR): 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76 to 1.36), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.21), and hospitalization rate (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.09 to 2.77). Regarding safety, the NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccine did not significantly increase the risk of serious adverse events (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.19) or grade 3 serious events (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.53). However, it was associated with a higher risk of local and systemic reactions, including pain (RR: 5.33, 95% CI: 1.98 to 14.33), swelling (RR: 12.15, 95% CI: 4.67 to 31.67), redness (first dose: RR: 12.74, 95% CI: 3.48 to 46.59; second dose: RR: 11.55, 95% CI: 3.90 to 34.22), headaches (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.43), erythema (RR: 15.38, 95% CI: 5.64 to 41.92), and fever (after the second dose: RR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.24 to 4.38).Conclusions: Although the NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines were well-tolerated in COPD patients, they did not significantly reduce the risk of exacerbations or mortality. These findings suggest that further research is needed to validate these results and identify potential subgroups that may derive clinical benefit.
Keywords: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremia, Vaccine, Efficacy & safety, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 20 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shuai, Liu, Dong, Wu, Zhang, Feng, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jian Liu, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.