
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Nephrology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1569031
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
AbstractBackgroundThe relationship between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and kidney function markers remains uncertain. MethodsWe used PFAS detection data from 5,947 adults in NHANES 2005-2012. We employed multivariable linear regression models to examine associations between PFAS and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine creatinine (UCR), urine albumin (UAL), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR). To capture non-linear trends, restricted cubic splines were applied. The WQS (weighted quantile sum) and Q-gcomp (quantile g computation) models were used for the mixture analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential interactions.ResultsPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (N-MEFOSAA), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) were negatively related to eGFR (β = -2.04, 95% CI = -2.85, -1.23,; β = -0.97, 95% CI = -1.78, -0.16; β = -1.50, 95% CI = -2.24, -0.76; β = -0.49, 95% CI = -1.25, 0.27; β = -0.68, 95% CI = -1.46, 0.10). PFOA and PFOS were positive associated with UCR (β = 10.61, 95% CI = -1.89, 23.11; β = 12.98, 95% CI = 0.56, 25.41). PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFUA were negatively related to UAL (β = -0.53, 95% CI = -0.73, -0.32; β = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.59, -0.18; β = -0.59, 95% CI = -0.78, -0.40; β = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.65, -0.19; β = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.22, 0.14). PFDA, PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA are significantly inversely associated with UACR (β = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.16, 0.14; β = -0.52, 95% CI = -0.69, -0.35; β = -0.50, 95% CI = -0.67, -0.33; β = -0.49, 95% CI = -0.64, -0.33; β = -0.27, 95% CI = -0.44, -0.10). Nonlinear relationships were found between PFAS and all kidney function indicators. Mixed PFAS exposure showed a negative association with eGFR, UAL and UACR, while showed a positive relationship with UCR. Interactions between PFASs and most subgroups were observed.ConclusionOur study revealed significant associations between PFAS exposure and various kidney function indicators. These findings provide an epidemiological perspective on how PFAS may lead to kidney dysfunction.
Keywords: Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals, Kidney function, EGFR, Mixed exposure, national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Cao, Yang, Ma, Zhang and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wenwen Xiao, Eastern Theater Command Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.