SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1566502
Pneumococcal Serotypes and Their Association with Death Risk in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical School, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
- 2Medical School, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae and its infections are a global public health concern. Invasive pneumococcal disease accounts for significant mortality in the aged and immunocompromised. Over 100 unique capsular serotypes have been identified, with 80-90% of invasive disease attributable to about 23 serotypes. Pneumococcal serotype influences invasiveness, virulence, carriage, and IPD outcome. Case fatality rates among different pneumococcal serotypes in IPD have been inconsistently reported, prompting the need for a comprehensive meta-analysis. We hypothesized that specific pneumococcal serotypes would be associated with higher case fatality rates and that non-vaccine serotypes may exhibit increased mortality risks over time. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of serotype-specific risk of death due to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in the last decade. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each serotype compared with serotype 14 in each study. Pooled risk ratios were computed using random effects size model analysis. We also conducted heterogeneity testing and meta-regression sub-analysis. Results: In total, 45 eligible studies were included, and 16 were selected for meta-analysis. The study distribution showed a global disparity, with Europe as the major data source. Serotype 31 had the highest case fatality rate (31.4%), indicating a concerning mortality risk associated with this serotype, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Overall, IPD patients with serotypes 3, 6A, 11A, 15A, 19F, and 31 were more likely to die. In contrast, serotypes 1, 5, 7F, and 8 IPD isolates recorded a reduced risk ratio compared to serotype 14. Subgroup analysis showed that vaccine serotypes were associated with a greater risk of death than non-vaccine serotypes, but there were no significant differences in risk estimates between population groups. Conclusion: The study confirms the stable role of pneumococcal serotype in determining the clinical outcomes of invasive pneumococcal disease. Our findings underscore the importance of serotype-specific surveillance in IPD and call for reconsideration of current pneumococcal vaccine formulations to address high-risk non-vaccine serotypes. Efforts to build research capacity, especially in low-resource regions such as Africa and South America, are highly recommended.
Keywords: IPD, S. pneumoniae, Mortality, Pneumococcal vaccine, serotype, Case fatality, relative-risk
Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Darkwah, Somda, Mahazu and Sampane-Donkor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Eric Sampane-Donkor, Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical School, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.