
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1563003
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Benefits of Digital Health Technologies in Diabetes ManagementView all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Wearable devices that incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) have become effective instruments for managing diabetes through real-time monitoring, improved adherence, and increased person with diabetes engagement. Person with diabetes perceptions, adoption barriers, and preferences critically impact the effectiveness and widespread utilisation of these technologies. Aim: The aim of study was to investigate the perceptions of people with diabetes regarding wearable devices, emphasising their perceived advantages, challenges, and potential role in facilitating diabetes self-management. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 418 people with diabetes was conducted, with participants recruited via online platforms and people with diabetes groups. Data were gathered through a structured questionnaire that included Likert-scale items, multiple-choice questions, and open-ended responses. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse quantitative data, whereas qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis to discern key trends. Results: Participants demonstrated significant awareness of the primary functions of wearable devices, with 83.9% acknowledging their utility in monitoring glucose levels and physical activity. The primary advantages comprised increased adherence to medication regimens (81.9%) and heightened confidence in diabetes management (82.1%). Significant barriers were identified, including data privacy concerns (79.7%), cost issues (77.0%), and usability challenges (75.1%).Thematic analysis of open-ended responses indicated a demand for features including actionable feedback, integration with healthcare providers, and enhanced usability. Despite these challenges, 81.9% of participants indicated a willingness to adopt AI-integrated wearable devices if recommended by healthcare providers. Conclusion: The findings indicate that people with diabetes regard wearable devices as effective instruments for managing their condition, especially in terms of real-time monitoring and adherence support. Concerns regarding privacy, cost, and device usability must be addressed to enhance adoption rates. These insights can inform the development of patient-centered wearable devices and guide healthcare strategies for the effective integration of these technologies into diabetes care.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, wearable devices, diabetes self-management, Digital Health, patient perceptions, Health technology adoption, Cross-sectional study
Received: 18 Jan 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alzghaibi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haitham Alzghaibi, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.