
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Rheumatology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561140
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: To evaluate cognitive improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after 6 months of treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, analyze associated factors, and determine the percentage of patients achieving cognitive improvement. Methods: This was a single-center prospective observational study conducted over 12 months on 70 RA patients initiating their first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) with a TNF inhibitor. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after 6 months using validated neuropsychological tests, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for global cognitive function, the digit span forward and backward tests for attention and working memory, and the Stroop-W, Stroop-C, and Stroop-CW tests for executive function and processing speed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale-II (QOL-RA II). Clinical variables, disease activity measured by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Associations with average CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores were analyzed throughout the follow-up period. Cognitive improvement was defined as a ≥20% increase in MoCA test scores. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with improvement. Results: A total of 70 patients (mean age, 56.2 years; 81.4% female) were included. After six months, patients showed significant cognitive improvement in a validated questionnaire, namely, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test 23.1 ± 3.6 to 24.1 ± 3.3; p = 0.001), particularly in the executive and memory domains. Significant improvements were also observed in the digit span forward test (p=0.003), digit span backward test (p=0.021), Stroop-W test (p=0.040), Stroop-C test (p=0.014), and Stroop-CW test (p=0.035). Improvements in the MoCA were associated with educational level (B=2.628; p<0.001), average CRP (B=-0.154; p=0.002), and average HAQ (B=-0.303; p=0.022). Similar associations were found for the other tests. Conclusion: TNF inhibitor therapy in RA patients is associated with significant cognitive improvement, particularly in executive function and memory.These findings highlight the potential cognitive benefits of effective RA treatment and underscore the importance of addressing modifiable risk factors to enhance patient quality of life.
Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, Anti-TNF therapy, Cognitive Function, Inflammation, disease activity
Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mena-Vázquez, Ortiz-Márquez, Ramirez-García, Gillis-Onieva, Cabezudo-García, García-Studer, Mucientes, Lisbona-Montañez, Borregón-Garrido, Limón, Manrique-Arija, Cano-García, Serrano-Castro and Fernández-Nebro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Natalia Mena-Vázquez, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.