
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Dermatology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1556769
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of dupilumab treatment in moderate-tosevere atopic dermatitis (AD) patients with comorbid allergic rhinitis (AR).Methods: A total of 26 patients received subcutaneous dupilumab every 2 weeks and were followed up for 16 weeks. The efficacy assessment was evaluated based on clinical parameters every four weeks, including the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (P-NRS), Severity Index (EASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Scale (DLQI) for the severity of AD symptoms, and the total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) for the severity of AR symptoms. The serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophil levels were collected at baseline and 16 weeks after dupilumab treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) ware conducted to evaluate the safety profile of dupilumab.Results: Dupilumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement in AD symptoms after 16 weeks as demonstrated by reduced EASI, NRS, DLQI, and ADCT scores.In addition, dupilumab treatment had a significant improvement in AR symptoms based on reduced TNSS, VAS and MiniRQLQ scores. After 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment, the blood eosinophil count, eosinophil percentage, and total serum IgE levels were significantly decreased when compared with the baseline values (P < 0.01 both). During the treatment period, the incidence of TEAEs was 13.77% (n = 8). The most commonly reported TEAEs were injection-site reactions (n = 13, 60.25%), Conclusions: Dupilumab treatment resulted in clinically relevant improvements in symptoms of AD and AR and had an acceptable safety profile.
Keywords: atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, Dupilumab, Comorbidity, type 2 inflammation
Received: 07 Jan 2025; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tian, Li, Yuan and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tengfei Tian, Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, Shanghai Municipality, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.