Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1555103

Prognostic Analysis of Sepsis-induced Myocardial Injury Patients Using Propensity Score Matching and Doubly Robust Analysis with Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Model Development

Provisionally accepted
Pan Guo Pan Guo 1,2Li Xue Li Xue 3*Fang Tao Fang Tao 4*Kuan Yang Kuan Yang 3*YuXia Gao YuXia Gao 3*Chongzhe Pei Chongzhe Pei 3*
  • 1 Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
  • 2 Department of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital,, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China
  • 3 Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
  • 4 Medical Department, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI) is a severe and common complication of sepsis; However, its definition remains unclear. Prognostic analyses may vary depending on the definition applied. Early prediction of SIMI is crucial for timely intervention, ultimately improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of SIMI and develop validated predictive models using advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms for identifying SIMI in critically ill sepsis patients.Methods: Data were sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.0) database. Patients meeting Sepsis-3.0 criteria were included, and SIMI was defined as Troponin T (TNT) levels ≥0.1 ng/mL. Prognostic evaluation involved propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, doubly robust analysis, logistic regression, and Cox regression. Patients were divided into training and testing datasets in a 7:3 ratio. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for variable selection to simplify the model. Twelve hyperparameter-tuned ML models were developed and evaluated using visualized heatmaps. The bestperforming model was deployed as a web-based application.Results: Among 2,435 patients analyzed, 571 (23.45%) developed SIMI following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Boruta and LASSO identified 46 and 10 key variables, respectively, for prognostic and predictive modeling. Doubly robust analysis revealed significantly worse short-and intermediateterm outcomes for SIMI patients, including increased in-ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.85, p < 0.05), 28-day mortality (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.79, p < 0.05), and 180-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.44, p < 0.05). However, one-year mortality showed no significant difference (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.08, p = 0.169). The XGBoost model outperformed others, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted the top five predictive features: creatine kinase-myocardial band (CKMB), creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). A web-based application was subsequently developed for real-world use.SIMI significantly worsens patient prognosis, while the XGBoost model demonstrated excellent predictive performance. The development of a web-based application provides clinicians with a practical tool for timely intervention, potentially improving outcomes for septic patients.

    Keywords: Sepsis, Myocardial injury, prognosis, Propensity score matching, Doubly robust analysis, machine learning

    Received: 03 Jan 2025; Accepted: 06 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Xue, Tao, Yang, Gao and Pei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Li Xue, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
    Fang Tao, Medical Department, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao, China
    Kuan Yang, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
    YuXia Gao, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
    Chongzhe Pei, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.