
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Pulmonary Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1552566
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) therapy is an important treatment for autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP). Exogenous GM-CSF treatment can be administered either through subcutaneous injection or nebulized inhalation. However, data on the effectiveness and safety of these two approaches are lacking.We conducted a systematic literature review of different methods, including subcutaneous injection and nebulized inhalation of GM-CSF, for the treatment of aPAP patients. Patients were divided into a subcutaneous injection group (SIG) and a nebulized inhalation group (NIG) according to the route of administration. Treatment efficacy and safety, including adverse events, were statistically assessed. We analysed different GM-CSF treatment cycles with different time intervals. The analyses were performed using chi-square tests, unpaired t tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.Results: A total of 304 aPAP patients were treated with GM-CSF, including 66 (21.7%) in the SIG and 238 (78.3%) in the NIG. In total, we identified 220 (72.37%) patients whose treatment was effective and 84 (27.63%) patients whose treatment was ineffective. Efficacy was achieved in 54.55% (36/66) of the SIG patients and 77.31% (184/238) of the NIG patients (P<0.001). More metrics were changed than in the NIG than SIG, suggesting the superior effectiveness of nebulized inhalation. The nebulized inhalation of GM-CSF was more effective (P<0.001) and caused fewer adverse events than its subcutaneous injection. A significant difference in the NIG was noted across treatment durations, with an efficacy rate of 88% for those treated for over 24 weeks, compared with 48% in the SIG (P<0.001). Among the NIG patients, the optimal efficacy was found to be at a dosage of 300-400 µg/d, with diminishing efficacy at higher doses (P<0.036).Nebulized inhalation is a more effective and safer route of GM-CSF administration than subcutaneous injection is, with a potential optimal dosage of 300-400 µg/day, and the duration of GM-CSF treatment via nebulized inhalation with the greatest efficacy is >24 weeks.
Keywords: GM-CSF, APAP, Inhalation, Subcutaneous injection, treatment dosage and duration
Received: 28 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Feng, Yao, Li, Yang, Qin, Li and Qiu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ye Qiu, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.