Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1550418

White coat and masked effects depend on blood pressure level and time of blood pressure measurement

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2 Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Twenty-four hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers enhanced accuracy for evaluating true blood pressure and associated risks compared to office blood pressure (OBP). However, conflicting results have been reported in studies comparing the two settings, largely due to the statistical bias introduced by the mean difference calculation using the Bland and Altman method, especially if the inherent circadian variation of blood pressure is not considered. This study aimed to assess the difference between OBP and ABPM using a refined statistical approach while accounting for circadian variations at different blood pressure levels.Multilevel/ mixed-effects harmonic regression models were employed to estimate mean 24hours systolic and diastolic blood pressure profiles. The bias plot method, with ABPM as the reference, was used to calculate the OBP-daytime ABPM difference.Results 647 participants were included with a median of 63 measurements per individual, with most OBP measurements conducted between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. Analysis showed individual average systolic OBP-ABPM differences ranging from +10 to -30 mmHg and diastolic differences ranging from +20 to -60 mmHg. As ABPM values increase, the patients tend to exhibit a masked effect.Normotensive individuals on ABPM exhibited a white coat effect phenotype, with systolic OBP-ABPM differences ranging from +6 to +9 mmHg. Conversely, hypertensive patients displayed a modest white coat effect for those at the lower hypertension limit and a pronounced masked effect for those at higher hypertension levels. The reduced circadian blood pressure variation observed in hypertensive patients, characterized by a nadir shift to later in the day, contributed to this divergence.Differences between OBP and ABPM depend on mean ABPM blood pressure levels. OBP tends to overestimate in normotensive and underestimate in hypertensive patients. Differences in circadian variation between these groups contribute to the variance.

    Keywords: Bias, agreement, limits of agreement, Differential bias, Proportional bias, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Hypertension

    Received: 23 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Halfon, Taffe and Wuerzner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Matthieu Halfon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more