ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Rheumatology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1549653

This article is part of the Research TopicImaging-Based Methods for Fracture Risk AssessmentView all 10 articles

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Low Bone Mineral Density in Male Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Provisionally accepted
Xiaotong  YangXiaotong Yang1Qin  ChengQin Cheng2Yifan  LiYifan Li1Hao  TangHao Tang1,3Xin  ChenXin Chen1Lijun  MaLijun Ma1Jing  GaoJing Gao1Wei  JiWei Ji4*
  • 1Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
  • 2Nanjing Jiangning District Chinese Medicine Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 3Liyang City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liyang, China
  • 4Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate clinical nomogram models for predicting site-specific low bone mineral density (BMD) risk in male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This study enrolled male AS patients treated at the Rheumatology Department of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2017 and September 2024. A total of 322 eligible patients were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Predictors of low BMD at lumbar spine (LS) and left hip (LH) were screened through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Nomograms and an online tool were developed and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Results: This study included 322 male AS patients randomly allocated to training (n=225) and validation (n=97) cohorts with balanced baseline characteristics (all P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified age at onset, BMI, serum uric acid , and hip involvement as common independent predictors for low BMD at both sites, while serum calcium (OR=12.19, 95%CI:1.44-103.25) was specific to LS. The developed nomograms, including web-based versions, demonstrated good discrimination (LS AUC:0.77 training/0.73 validation; LH AUC:0.82/0.85) and calibration. Decision curve analysis revealed significant net clinical benefit across probability thresholds (LS:0.17-0.86 training/0.20-0.82 validation; LH:0.15-0.92/0.27-0.91). The protective effect of BMI exhibited site-specific patterns: LS (low-TC: OR=0.86; high-TC: OR=0.77), LH (low-TC: OR=0.77; mid-TC: OR=0.74), with the most pronounced effect observed in the LS low-TG subgroup (OR=0.79). SUA demonstrated consistent protective effects (LS/LH: OR=0.95-0.99, all P<0.05), potentially independent of disease stage.Interaction analyses revealed that neither lipid levels nor disease stage significantly modified the effects of BMI and SUA (all interaction P>0.4).Conclusion: This study developed clinical prediction models with excellent discriminative ability and substantial clinical utility for male patients with AS. These models offer rheumatologists an efficient tool to rapidly assess individual risks of low BMD, facilitating early diagnostic decision-making and enabling personalized interventions tailored to anatomical site-specific osteoporosis risks.

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis, dynamic nomogram, early prevention, Low bone mineral density, Prediction model

Received: 21 Dec 2024; Accepted: 23 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Cheng, Li, Tang, Chen, Ma, Gao and Ji. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wei Ji, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.