Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Gastroenterology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1541461

This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Medical Imaging for Precision Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications in Digestive Diseases View all articles

Diagnostic Performance of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET vs. [ 18 F]FDG PET in Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Digestive System Cancers: A Head-to-Head Comparative Meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Huo Li Huo Li 1Zhognzhuan Li Zhognzhuan Li 1Jing Qin Jing Qin 2Shijiang Huang Shijiang Huang 1Shufen Qin Shufen Qin 1Zhixin Chen Zhixin Chen 1Rong Ouyang Rong Ouyang 1*
  • 1 The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
  • 2 Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [ 18 F]FDG PET for detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancer patients.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant articles up to June 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic performance of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [ 18 F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancer patients. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method and were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.Results: 15 articles, encompassing a total of 617 patients, were included in this study. The overall sensitivity of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET for diagnosing lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67-0.93), and the specificity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97). In comparison, the sensitivity of [ 18 F]FDG PET was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63), with a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64-0.94). These results suggest that [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET has a significantly higher sensitivity (P < 0.01) and similar specificity (P = 0.20) compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers.Our meta-analysis indicates that [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET has higher sensitivity and similar specificity compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET in diagnosing lymph node metastasis in 3 digestive system cancers. However, the high heterogeneity among the studies may impact the robustness of the current evidence. Therefore, future research should prioritize larger prospective studies with more diverse populations and specific cancer subtypes to draw more definitive conclusions.

    Keywords: Digestive system cancers, [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET, [ 18 F]FDG PET, lymph node metastasis, Meta-analysis

    Received: 07 Dec 2024; Accepted: 05 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Li, Li, Qin, Huang, Qin, Chen and Ouyang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rong Ouyang, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more