
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Ophthalmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1538359
This article is part of the Research Topic Ocular Surgery and Ocular Surface Disease: A Mutual Relationship View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: To evaluate changes in visual quality among myopic patients with varying tear film stability after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS II) Methods: This prospective study analyzed 141 patients who underwent SMILE surgery, selecting the right eye of each patient for analysis. Objective visual quality and tear film stability were assessed using the OQAS II preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Refractive error and uncorrected visual acuity were measured at the same time points. At the 1-week follow-up, all patients completed a visual quality questionnaire and underwent tear film break-up time (TBUT) measurement. These assessments were conducted to evaluate the correlation between subjective visual perception and objective visual quality, as well as to examine the relationship between the two methods of tear film evaluation.Results: No significant differences in UDVA or postoperative spherical and equivalent spherical values were observed between groups at any postoperative time point (p > 0.05). At 1 week and 1 month post-surgery, both groups exhibited elevated Objective Scatter Index (OSI) and Mean OSI values, while OV100%, OV20%, OV9%, MTF cut-off, and Strehl Ratio (SR) decreased compared to preoperative levels (all p < 0.05). By 3 months postsurgery, all objective visual quality parameters in the tear film stability group returned to preoperative levels (p > 0.05). In contrast, in the instability group, only SR remained unchanged, while other parameters significantly differed from baseline (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were found between OSI values and both foggy vision and glare at 1 week postoperatively in both groups. TF-OSI values positively correlated with blinking frequency and visual fluctuations. OV100% values at all preoperative and postoperative time points did not effectively predict subjective visual acuity.Tear film instability negatively impacts visual quality recovery and prolongs corneal healing time after SMILE surgery. However, it does not cause short-term refractive regression. OV100% shows limited predictive ability for visual acuity. A significant correlation exists between objective visual quality and subjective perception. The OQAS II system is a valuable tool for assessing tear film stability and objective visual quality in refractive surgery patients.
Keywords: SMLIE1, objective visual quality2, OQAS II3, dry eye4, tear film stability5. (Min.5-Max. 8)
Received: 02 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 廖, Li, Wei, Mao, Huang, Lu, Zhong, Lu, Huang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qi Chen, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.