data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1534828
This article is part of the Research Topic Optimizing Medication Management in Older Adults: Addressing Polypharmacy, Deprescribing and Represcribing Challenges View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
To examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed among older patients diagnosed with psychiatric diseases and to identify associated factors.This cross-sectional study was conducted among older patients who visited outpatient clinics in Saudi Arabia between June 1 st , 2019, and May 31 st , 2023. PIMs use was estimated using the updated 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria. Data were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables to compare patients with and without PIMs. In addition, the Pearson correlation test was performed between the total number of prescriptions and the number of PIMs.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore PIMs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Our study included 306 patients with psychiatric diseases, with 156 (50.98%) in the PIMs group and 150 (49.02%) in the non-PIMs group. There was a considerable positive correlation between the total number of prescriptions and the number of PIMs (r = 0.76; p < .0001). The adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of PIMs use in individuals with psychiatric diseases and comorbid neurological diseases compared to those without (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.48, 95% ). In contrast, the risk of PIMs use was not significantly greater for older individuals with psychiatric diseases and comorbid hypertension (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI [(0.79-3.54)]), diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI [(0.66-2.34)]), or pulmonary disease (AOR = 2.34, 95% CI [(0.69 -7.96)]).This study highlighted the elevated number of PIMs in older adults with psychiatric diseases in the outpatient setting, particularly those with comorbid neurological diseases. Therefore, clinical pharmacists may play a crucial role in improving the outcomes of patients diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses. Finally, future studies should examine additional strategies to reduce the use of PIMs in this population.
Keywords: Potentially inappropriate medication, Beers criteria, older, Aging, Psychiatric diseases, Mental health disease
Received: 26 Nov 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alsultan, Alhawas, Alhajri, Alamer, Alahmari, AlQarni and Alawad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mohammed M. Alsultan, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Damam, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.