Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1533753

This article is part of the Research Topic Pharmaco-Resistance in Epileptic Conditions View all 5 articles

Intubation in propofol-treated status epilepticus: a cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Maya Mikutra-Cencora Maya Mikutra-Cencora 1*Jeanne Teitelbaum Jeanne Teitelbaum 2
  • 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 2 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The management of status epilepticus (SE) often includes endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation to address respiratory depression, especially in patients treated with third-line anesthetic agents such as propofol. At our center we use sub-anesthetic propofol as a first line anti-epileptic for SE without intubation. We aimed to assess the performance of our treatment algorithm and to determine whether intubation in these patients improves outcomes. METHODS: All adult patients with SE treated with propofol at a tertiary neuro-intensive care unit from 2015-2022 were identified through medical records. Survival without new neurological deficits at discharge was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were the development of common complications. Descriptive statistics were used to assess general outcomes, and multi-variable logistic regressions were performed to compare outcomes between patients who were intubated while on propofol and those who were not, as well as to compare outcomes according to number of days kept intubated after cessation of propofol.RESULTS: We identified 162 SE patients treated with low-dose propofol, of which 44 (17%) were not intubated and 118 (83%) were. Our cohort's survival rate was 85%, and survival without new deficits was 42%. Intubation was not associated with improved survival without new neurological deficits (OR=1.34, p=0.655) or reduction in complications. Additionally, in patients intubated for management of SE, the number of days kept intubated following cessation of propofol was associated with a decrease in survival without new neurological deficits (OR=0.016, 95% CI 0.000-0.854, p=0.042).CONCLUSIONS: This study offers encouraging evidence that early sub-anesthetic propofol is a safe and efficient alternative to existing treatment approaches in selected patients. These patients do not require intubation: it fails to significantly improve outcomes, and prolonging intubation past cessation of propofol worsens outcomes. These data raise doubts as to the benefits of endotracheal intubation in SE and stress the need to limit the duration of this invasive measure.

    Keywords: Status Epilepticus, seizure, Endotracheal intubation, Propofol, cohort study

    Received: 24 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Mikutra-Cencora and Teitelbaum. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Maya Mikutra-Cencora, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Quebec, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more