SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Gastroenterology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1532640

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Medical Imaging for Precision Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications in Digestive DiseasesView all 8 articles

Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends

Provisionally accepted
Negin  LetafatkarNegin Letafatkar1Ehsan  Amini-SalehiEhsan Amini-Salehi1*Maryam  HasanpourMaryam Hasanpour1Masoomeh  Namdar TaleshaniMasoomeh Namdar Taleshani1Mohammad  HashemiMohammad Hashemi2Hadi  AlotaibiHadi Alotaibi3Mohammad-Hossein  KeivanlouMohammad-Hossein Keivanlou1Pegah  RashidianPegah Rashidian1Soheil  HassanipourSoheil Hassanipour1
  • 1Gilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • 2University of Hormozgan, BandarAbbas, Hormozgān, Iran
  • 3Vision College, Ishbiliyah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the field of gastroenterology, particularly in endoscopic and colonoscopic procedures. These AI technologies aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy by facilitating the detection of gastrointestinal lesions, such as polyps and neoplasms.However, the rapid expansion of research in this area necessitates a comprehensive analysis to assess global trends and contributions. This study aims to conduct a thorough bibliometric and visualization analysis of global research focused on AI applications in endoscopy and colonoscopy.A systematic search was conducted in September 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection.The data were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R software, focusing on co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword trends.Research output on AI in endoscopy and colonoscopy has seen significant growth since 2016, peaking in 2023 with 345 publications. The top contributing country was China, with 399 publications, while the United States led in centrality with a score of 0.27, indicating its key position in research collaborations. Showa University contributed the highest number of institutional publications (64 papers). Mori Y emerged as the leading author, with 53 publications, reflecting his significant influence in the field. The leading journal was Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, contributing 72 publications and accumulating 6,496 citations. The most frequently occurring keywords were "diagnosis," "classification," and "cancer." The cluster analysis identified key research areas, with newer clusters emerging around "adenoma detection," "polyp segmentation," and "wireless capsule endoscopy." These clusters have shown an increasing trend over the past few years, reflecting the growing focus on using AI to optimize diagnostic procedures in real-time.The bibliometric analysis highlights the rapid expansion and diversification of AI research in endoscopy and colonoscopy. Key clusters, such as "adenoma detection" and "polyp segmentation," underscore the field's shift toward real-time diagnostic improvements. As AI technologies become more integrated into clinical practice, they are set to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in gastroenterology.

Keywords: Adenoma detection, artificial intelligence, bibliometric analysis, Cancer, Colonoscopy, diagnosis, Endoscopy

Received: 22 Nov 2024; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Letafatkar, Amini-Salehi, Hasanpour, Namdar Taleshani, Hashemi, Alotaibi, Keivanlou, Rashidian and Hassanipour. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ehsan Amini-Salehi, Gilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more