Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1529966

Impact of pre-pregnancy body mass index on preeclampsia

Provisionally accepted
Jing Mao Jing Mao *Hanxiang Sun Hanxiang Sun Qinxin Shen Qinxin Shen *Chang Zou Chang Zou Yuanyuan Yang Yuanyuan Yang *Qiaoling Du Qiaoling Du *
  • Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    How does pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) affect preeclampsia for Chinese population remains undetermined, especially lacking support from large-scale research.To figure out relation between pre-pregnancy BMI and (severe) preeclampsia among Chinese population, providing detailed description of the findings.The retrospective study enrolled a total of 75,773 pregnant women who were registered between 2016 and 2020. These participants were categorized into four groups based on their The retrospective research enrolled a total of 75,773 pregnant women registered from 2016 to 2020 and stratified these individuals into four groups, based on their levels of pre-pregnancy BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m² ), normal weight (BMI 18.5-<24 kg/m² ), overweight (BMI 24-<28 kg/m²), and obese (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m²). Relations between risks of preeclampsia or severe preeclampsia and pre-pregnancy BMI were further explored, with an evaluation of potential modification by maternal age.A lower risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in underweight population, with an OR of 0.604 (95%CI, 0.507-0.719). In contrast, women overweight or obese in prepregnancy period demonstrated significantly higher preeclampsia risk, with ORs of 2.211 (95%CI, 1.967-2.486) and 3.662 (95%CI, 3.026-4.431), respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the elevated preeclampsia risks persisted, showing ORs of 2.152(95%CI, 1.911-2.425)1.956 (95%CI, 1.736-2.204) for overweight population and 3.493(95%CI, 2.874-4.245)3.108 (95%CI, 2.559-3.774) for those obese, while risk for underweight women remained lower, with an OR of 0.609(95%CI, 0.511-0.727)0.638 (95%CI, 0.535-0.761). For severe preeclampsia, the risks were also higher in overweight and obese subjects following adjusting for confounders, demonstrating ORs of 1.652(95%CI, 1.364-2.001)1.378 (95%CI, 1.139-1.669) and 2.762(95%CI, 2.014-3.788)2. 335 (95%CI,, respectively. Underweight population exhibited lower severe preeclampsia risk as well, with an OR of 0.720(95%CI, 0.565-0.919)0.778 (95%CI, 0.609-0.993). In addition, these risks were not significantly associated with maternal age.No significant interaction between maternal age and preeclampsia or severe preeclampsia occurrence was observed.Regardless of adjustment for confounders, underweight women demonstrated lower preeclampsia risk, whereas overweight/obese population exhibited more occurrence of both preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia. These associations were not influenced by maternal age.

    Keywords: Body Mass Index, Underweight, Overweight, obese, Preeclampsia

    Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 20 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Mao, Sun, Shen, Zou, Yang and Du. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jing Mao, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China
    Qinxin Shen, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China
    Yuanyuan Yang, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China
    Qiaoling Du, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.