data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Nuclear Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1523862
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aim: Heterogeneous somatostatin receptor expression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) leads to significant intra-individual variability in tracer uptake on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This study aims to evaluate the lesion-based relationship between receptor-mediated tracer uptake and functional response to PRRT. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients with metastatic GEP-NET (12 pancreatic, 20 non-pancreatic), all treated with [177Lu]Lu-octreotate (4 cycles, mean 7.9 GBq per cycle). [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and three months after the final PRRT cycle. Tumor uptake was quantified using the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV). In each patient, 2–3 well-delineated tumor lesions were selected as target lesions. SUVmax, SUVmean (automated segmentation with a 50% SUVmax threshold), and corresponding tumor-to-liver ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L) were calculated. Functional tumor response was assessed based on the relative change in metabolic tumor volume (%ΔTVPET). The correlation between baseline SUV parameters and lesion-based functional response was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results: A total of 71 lesions were included in the analysis. The mean baseline SUVmax and SUVmean were 28.1 ± 15.9 and 13.6 ± 5.1, respectively. Three months after PRRT completion, the mean %ΔTVPET was 39.6 ± 52.1%. Baseline SUVmax and SUVmean demonstrated a poor correlation with lesion-based response (p = 0.706 and p = 0.071, respectively). In contrast, SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L were significantly correlated with lesion-based response (SUVmeanT/L: p = 0.011, r = 0.412; SUVmaxT/L: p = 0.004, r = 0.434). Among patient characteristics—including primary tumor origin, baseline tumor volume, and metastatic sites—only pancreatic origin was significantly associated with functional tumor volume reduction (ΔTVPET%: 56.8 ± 39.8 in pancreatic vs. 28.4 ± 50.1 in non-pancreatic NET; p = 0.020). Conclusions: Lesion-based molecular response to PRRT correlates with pretreatment somatostatin receptor PET uptake, specifically when expressed as tumor-to-liver SUV ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L).
Keywords: Neuroendocrine Tumors, Response prediction, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, [ 177 Lu]Lu-octreotate, [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT
Received: 06 Nov 2024; Accepted: 26 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Aouf, Speicher, Blickle, Bastian, Burgard, Rosar, Ezziddin and Sabet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tilman Speicher, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, 66424, Saarland, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.