![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Gastroenterology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509947
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a prevalent chronic liver condition, can cause severe complications like hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP -1RA) have shown unique therapeutic advantages and may become a preferred treatment for it. This meta-analysis aims to systematically examine GLP-1RA associated adverse events, providing a basis for guiding patient clinical management.We conducted a search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the therapeutic effects of GLP-1RA in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search period extended from the inception of each database until December 2023. Information pertaining to various adverse events was collected as outcome measures. Statistical analysis of the results and assessment of bias risk were conducted utilizing Review Manager (version 5.4.1) software.An analysis of 10 studies encompassing 960 participants revealed a significantly higher overall incidence of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group compared to the control group (OR: 2.40 [1.10, 5.26], P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis based on treatment duration demonstrated a higher rate of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group during follow-ups of less than 30 weeks (P = 0.0005, OR: 3.58 [1.75, 7.32]), but no statistical difference was observed between the two groups in follow-ups exceeding 30 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in adverse events leading to discontinuation (P = 0.29, OR: 1.47 [0.72, 2.98]). However, a notable difference was observed in gastrointestinal adverse events (P < 0.00001, OR: 4. 83 [3.36, 6.95]).GLP-1RA exhibits an overall higher incidence of adverse events in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, particularly in the gastrointestinal domain. Short-term use of GLP-1RA may be associated with a greater occurrence of adverse events, underscoring the importance of educating patients on preventive measures and establishing tolerance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in severe adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation, confirming the safety profile of GLP-1RA application.
Keywords: MASLD, GLP-1RA, Adverse event, gastrointestinal reactions, metaanalysis
Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Wu, Huang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaoyan Huang, Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China
Yi Zhang, Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.