Association of Helicobacter pylori related chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer risk: a literature review

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is considered to be closely related to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and characterized by the atrophy and/or intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the gastric mucosa in pathology. CAG is often regarded as the precancerous lesion of gastric cancer and H. pylori infection stimulates the development of atrophy and IM and the progression of gastric cancer through the persistent effect acting on the gastric mucosa, including releasing inflammatory factors such as Interleukin-8(IL-8). From the molecular biology perspective, growing evidence shows that H. pylori probably induce the expression of NF-κB, miR-204, miR-27a, hnRNPA2B1, and JARID1B, which play crucial roles in the progression of CAG into gastric cancer. In addition, H. pylori can increase Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and the co-infection will jointly increase gastric cancer risk. Furthermore, H. pylori induces cellular senescence and promotes atrophy progression and finally increases the gastric cancer risk. This review aims to explore the carcinogenic mechanisms of H. pylori related CAG in order to provide theoretical foundations for the pathogenesis mechanism and early detection and prevention of gastric cancer.

Introduction

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is a disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa, which typically presents a gradual atrophy of gastric glands and a reduction in gastric acid secretion (1–3). Based on clinical and etiological analysis, there are two major divisible types, that is, autoimmunity (usually appears in the corpus) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection related (usually appears in the antrum) CAG. Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) was defined as including gastric body atrophy, no H. pylori present infection, negative H. pylori antibody in serum, and one of the three situations (positive intrinsic factor antibody findings, positive parietal cell antibody findings, Pepsinogens I ≤70 ng/mL and ratio of Pepsinogens I/Pepsinogens II ≤3). Although AAG also runs a certain risk of developing gastric cancer, the probability of malignant transformation is relatively lower compared to H. pylori. Interestingly, a portion of AAG patients are simultaneously appearing to have H. pylori infection; and sometimes AAG patients are misdiagnosed as refractory to H pylori eradication therapy, probably because achlorhydria might allow urease-positive bacteria other than H pylori to colonize the stomach, causing positive 13C-urea breath test results (4). Therefore, CAG caused by H. pylori infection will be the focus of discussion in this review.

H. pylori has been recognized as a Class I carcinogen (5) and plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of CAG (6, 7). The prolonged state of reduced protective barriers and low pH not only affects the normal function of the stomach but also significantly increases gastric cancer risk (8, 9).

Most gastric cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to the lack of noticeable symptoms before then. Unfortunately, the median survival period for T3 or T4 stage gastric cancer without treatment is only 3–5 months, while those receiving palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a median survival of 6–14 months (10). The small difference between these two scenarios underscores the poor prognosis of advanced gastric cancer; however, the 5-year survival rate can reach more than 90% for the early-stage (11). This highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment for gastric cancer patients. In this review, we tried to summarize the association between H. pylori-related chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and gastric cancer risk, focusing on mechanisms including intestinal metaplasia(IM), epigenetics, co-infections, and cellular senescence. We tried to help clinical physicians to better understand H. pylori related pathogenesis in CAG and gastric cancer risk, from all aspects (8–11). It will probably help to provide new methods to treat CAG and gastric cancer. Maybe it can inspire clinical physicians to explore new ideas to block the CAG progression after understanding the comprehensive pathogenesis.

Intestinal metaplasia (IM)

IM is the state whereby the normal columnar epithelium of the stomach is substituted with intestinal epithelium and is considered as a precancerous lesion. IM is often diagnosed using magnifying endoscopy (ME) and endoscopic biopsies, which is important in diagnosis of CAG and gastric cancer and during follow-up. IM frequently arises in chronic gastritis, especially after H. pylori infection; while individuals with autoimmune-related CAG predominantly exhibit glandular atrophy without signs of IM (12). This implies that H. pylori may make gastric mucosa adopt intestinal characteristics after infection during the course of CAG.

Several mechanisms have been described to explain how H. pylori induces chronic inflammation in gastric mucosa, such as the well-known cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA), and the urease alpha subunit (UreA). Gastric mucosal cells take up outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) containing toxins through endocytosis or phagocytosis, and CagA and VacA play an important role in the process as pathogenic factors (13). Autophagy is treated as a self-defense machinery that fights against H. pylori infection to inhibit DNA-damage accumulation and the proliferation of precancerous gastric cells. However, CagA and VacA have been reported to disrupt the process of autophagy through down-regulation of human autophagy gene Beclin1(BECN1) (14). This suppression of autophagy further leads to mitochondrial damage, accumulated receptor protein SQSTM1/p62 autophagy substrate, increased release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and finally promoted inflammation and oxidative stress (15). In this way, CagA impairs intracellular signaling and induces Interleukin-8(IL-8) secretion of gastric epithelial cells in a phosphorylation-independent manner. The level of IL-8 markedly influences the degree of mucosal inflammation, which thus promote gastric mucosa inflammation (16). It has also been presented the mRNA expression level of Recombinant Enolase 1 (ENO1) in chronic gastritis and precancerous lesions in the H. pylori infection group were obviously higher than in the non-infection group. The same results of ENO1 expression difference were obtained with cancerous and adjacent tissues in gastric cancer. Thus, ENO1 can be considered as a response to H. pylori infection and CagA transfection, showing that H. pylori positive gastric mucosal is under stimulation after infection (17).

In terms of immunological perspective, CagA increases the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in gastric cancer-cell-derived exosomes by inhibiting p53 and miRNA-34a, which inhibits proliferation and anticancer effects induced by CD8⁺T cells (18). Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells generated by CD8⁺T cells develop aberrant T cell receptor beta chains during chronic infection, which results in the failure to maintain the TRM phenotype and eventually replaced by CD4⁺T cells to occupy the niche of CD8⁺T cells (19). In the meantime, the level of chemokine CCL3 and CX3CL1 in gastric mucosa infected with CagA⁻ H. pylori were much higher than those infected with CagA⁺ H. pylori, which more effectively promotes CX3CR1⁺CD4⁺ term cells recruitment in mouse gastric mucosa (20). This means that different H. pylori strains may induce several mechanisms to evade host immune defense, leading to persistent infection and development of chronic inflammation in gastric mucosa.

There is, in addition, one further point to make. In previous studies, it has been pointed out the virulence level of H. pylori depends on and is positively related to the types and quantities of virulence gene expression. Some scholars believe that there is no need to blindly take eradication treatment for those who are negative for CagA and VacA and have no clinical symptoms. Based on it, the application of gene editing technology (CRISPR-Cas12a) combined with recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) provides a new technical means for the detection and virulence gene typing of H. pylori in clinical practice.

In Correa's cascade model, the progression from IM to cancer unfolds in a stepwise manner (20) and H. pylori infection is considered as a primary factor in initiating inflammatory responses (21). Under the interaction of chronic inflammation, H. pylori infection and IM, gastric stem cells may incur genetic damage resulting in irreversible genetic alterations. Research indicates that changes at both the genetic and epigenetic levels can drive IM toward low-grade dysplasia and/or high-grade dysplasia. It is estimated that ~20% of cases with low-grade dysplasia may progress to high-grade dysplasia (22, 23). Notably, in some instances, IM can be partially reversed following the eradication of H. pylori infection (24). However, when the condition advances to high-grade dysplasia, the associated risk of developing gastric cancer escalates dramatically. Existing studies have shown that individuals diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia get a 40-fold increase in their likelihood of progressing to gastric cancer compared to those without this condition (25).

IM typically originates from the antrum and generally spreads along the lesser curvature toward the fundus and corpus of the stomach as the condition advances (as the gastric shape line) (26). IM typically does not cause any symptoms and is usually discovered by ME and biopsies. Images below show different stages from normal mucosa, atrophic mucosa, IM and cancer in antrum by endoscopy (seen as Figures 1–4). Throughout this intricate process, various genetic and epigenetic alterations gradually accumulate over time, creating a complex web of changes. As these modifications continue to build up, they eventually lead to irreversible changes within the cellular structure and function. This accumulation of changes ultimately sets the stage for the development of gastric cancer. It has also indicated that metaplastic glands form through glandular fission and may possess similar genetic traits to aberrantly proliferating glands (27). This finding further supports the idea that genetic changes accumulate progressively before events leading to abnormal proliferation take place (26). The extent of involvement by IM correlates positively with the increasing gastric cancer risk (28). H. pylori elimination before IM presents appears to be an effective way to reduce gastric cancer risk. H. pylori eradication in early stage before notable changes in the gastric mucosa can help prevent more serious complications, particularly the progression to gastric cancer (29). Even if established IM cannot be reversed, eradicating H. pylori can still slow down the progression according to Correa's cascade model (30) (seen as Figure 5).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Normal gastric mucosa in antrum.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Atrophic gastric mucosa in antrum.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Typical intestinal metaplasia, where ME reveals structures on the mucosal surface with bright blue crests; IM gradually presents in the foveolar and glandular epithelium of antrum.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Early gastric cancer in antrum.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Correa cascade process (genetic mutations gradually accumulate in the stomach's epithelial stem cells until they reach a point of no return, after which they progress toward gastric cancer. The effectiveness of eradicating H. pylori diminishes as the cascade progresses).

It is worth noting that bile reflux, irregular diets and taking painkillers (like NSAIDs) can also lead to IM, besides H. pylori. In clinical, we not only focus on H. pylori related IM, but should take note of the other factors. A detailed history is necessary to the cause diagnosis.

Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA), firstly proposed in 2005, provided more intuitive information for clinical physicians to predict disease progression and formulate disease management measures, after linking the histopathology of chronic gastritis with the risk of cancer. Later, in 2010, Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) was suggested due to the consistency of IM diagnosed by pathologists was much higher than atrophy. OLGA and OLGIM were complementary to each other and predicted the cancer risk in high risk areas of gastric cancer. High OLGA/OLGIM staging (stages III/IV) is an independent risk factor for the development of gastric cancer. OLGA/OLGIM has been promoted and widely accepted in Europe, Japan and China. Regular endoscopic examination and H. pylori eradication are strongly recommended for stage III/IV of OLGA/OLGIM.

Epigenetic regulation

It is widely known that H. pylori infection is a significant cause of CAG and gastric cancer, while its direct role in triggering tumor-associated gene mutations may not be as prominent. Instead, recent research increasingly suggests that the development of gastric cancer is more closely linked to epigenetic abnormalities. These abnormalities can alter gene expression without changing the DNA sequence, leading to the activation or silencing of critical genes involved in cancer progression.

The general genetic background involved in gastric cancer is caused not by simple gene mutations, but by disruptions in DNA methylation patterns. This aberrant DNA methylation results in silencing cell cycle regulatory genes, the tumor suppressor gene p53 signaling pathway, and even the activation of some oncogenic signaling pathways, such as the WNT pathway, to promote the occurrence and development of gastric cancer (31). Christodoulidis has demonstrated that H. pylori infection might affect the DNA methylation patterns of the host cells through mediating its pathogenic factor, CagA protein. It was further identified that such abnormal methylation change induced by CagA might cause the silencing and inactivation of several key tumor suppressor genes. These methylations suppress the expression of normal genes, hence promoting the progression of gastric cancer (32).

Utilizing the GEO dataset GSE28700, Chen identified a total of 16 abnormally expressed microRNAs in gastric cancer tissues as compared with adjacent normal tissues. Downregulation of microRNA-204 expression showed the most obvious difference according to their result. This was further confirmed in another study of IgG (+) gastric cancer patients, in which microRNA-204 was also observed to be significantly lower in gastric cancer tissues. Overexpression of microRNA-204 may inhibit the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells and suppress potential lung metastatic. Moreover, H. pylori infection and/or its pathogenic factor CagA may induce downregulation of microRNA-204 expression in human gastric epithelial cell line GES-1. Further analysis showed that the expression of microRNA-204 has been downregulated from normal gastric mucosa to chronic gastritis and then to gastric cancer. It was also found that the infection with H. pylori epigenetically regulates the expression of microRNA-204, thus promoting the activation of NF-κB signaling by increasing the expression of BIRC2 in GC and gastric epithelial cells. NF-κB pathway is proved to be critical in both innate and adaptive immune response. Continuous activation of NF-κB often leads to pathologic tissue damages and diseases, which are related to the development of gastric cancer (33) (seen as Figure 6).

Figure 6

Figure 6. H. pylori increases gastric cancer risk through NF-κB pathway.

Besides, microRNA-204 can modulate gastric cancer development due to its regulatory effect on the NF-κB signaling pathway by influencing tumor microenvironment features including angiogenesis and immune responses. Other than BIRC2, microRNA-204 works as a tumor suppressor in regulating several target genes in a variety of cancers. It also downregulates the anti-apoptotic gene BCL-2 in gastric cancer cells, enhancing their sensitivity to chemotherapy agents like 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin, which are closely related to clinical prognosis (34). Downregulation of microRNA-204 increases the activities of target genes such as BDNF, Sox4 and EphB2, and promotes the migration and stem cell-like phenotype of glioma cells (35). In conclusion, microRNA-204 represents one of the main regulatory factors in the course of gastric cancer induced by H. pylori infection, and has provided new targets for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.

Besides that, H. pylori infection not only induced activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, but also recruited NF-κB to the promoter region of the hnRNPA2B1 gene and caused its upregulation in gastric cancer cells. Subsequently, the overexpression of hnRNPA2B1 increased its interaction with PABPC1-eIF4F complex and led to following regulation of protein synthesis, promotion of mRNA levels and malignant progression in gastric cancer. It should be noted that the process is independent of m6A modification, although m6A plays an important role in mRNA metabolism; this is mediated by hnRNPA2B1, an m6A reader protein that delivers m6A-dependent mRNA stabilization in cancer (36). While hnRNPA2B1 can lower the glycolytic metabolism in gastric cancer cells, inhibit tumor growth and reduce liver metastasis, it also makes these cells more sensitive to the chemotherapy drug cisplatin (CDDP). This means that hnRNPA2B1 might play dule roles in the intricate web of gastric cancer regulation. Overall, H. pylori infection tends to push the progression of gastric cancer into a more aggressive phase by initiating NF-κB signaling pathway and promoting the expression of hnRNPA2B1. HnRNPA2B1 drives tumor malignancy and plays a crucial role in regulating the transcription, translation, and other processes of important oncogenes. In gastric cancer, the high expression of hnRNPA2B1 is closely related to poor prognosis in patients, mediating the process of malignant transformation such as gastric cancer migration and invasion. XI-101, as novel small molecule ligand of hnRNPA2B1, disruptes the binding of hnRNPA2B1 to the MDMX promoter and UTR and inhibits MDMX transcription, upregulates of p53, enhances expression of proapoptotic genes as downstream of p53, and ultimately induces apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. The Chemical targeting of hnRNPA2B1-MDMX-p53 axis has certain significance for the treatment of gastric cancer. These findings offer new perspectives on the molecular mechanisms behind the onset and progression of gastric cancer, opening up novel potential treatments (36).

Although H. pylori infection is a major contributor to gastric cancer, it also works by changing the epigenetic characteristics of host cells. This alteration can affect the expression of key oncogenes, which play a crucial role in cancer development. Knowing well this mechanism provides new insights to explore into the molecular processes behind gastric cancer. It also offers chances for developing targeted therapies that focus on epigenetic regulation.

Co-infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

EBV infection accounts for ~10% of total gastric cancer cases in the world, roughly 1.3 and 20.1% (37). Infection with H. pylori facilitates EBV infection by inducing the expression of auxiliary EBV receptor EphA2 and NMHC-IIA and their interaction in gastric epithelial cells. Cell surface localization of EphA2 is critical for EBV infection. The exposure of H. pylori not only increases the expression of EphA2, but also helps the formation of EphA2 and NMHC-IIA complex, which together enhance EBV infection. Apart from that, the capability of H. pylori infection to promote EBV infection is also attributed to its cag pathogenicity island instead of specific virulence factors such as CagA, VacA or FlaA. These findings suggest chronic H. pylori infection might lead to EBV-associated gastric cancer (38).

Co-infection with EBV and H. pylori was reported to increase gastric cancer risk by 3.3 times in patients (39). Co-infection with these two pathogens may have a synergistic effect on inducing inflammation of the gastric tissues and increase the development of gastric cancer. It is believed that gene product interactions are oncogenic, especially in the presence of antigens expressed from cytotoxin-related genes of H. polyri. On the other hand, Jin Hee Noh found that co-infection with EBV and H. polyri did not present a significant predictor concerning tumor biological outcome, suggesting that co-infection with EBV and H. polyri may be associated with an increased gastric cancer risk but probably not influence the clinical outcome and prognosis of patients (40).

Dharmendra indicated that co-infection created a favorable microenvironment which promoted high expression of pathogen-associated genes. The EBV latent genes, both ebna1 and ebna3c, had higher expressions in co-infection compared to the infection with EBV alone at 12 and 24 h. Simultaneously, H. pylori related genes, such as 16S rRNA, cagA and babA, were also found markedly upregulated in the course of co-infection. Gankyrin is known as a small oncoprotein and regulates different cellular signaling pathways during tumor progression. Interestingly, knockdown of Gankyrin was found to reduce drastically the cancer properties of gastric epithelial cells with an expression pattern similar to ebna3c. H. pylori induce gastric cancer progression in infected gastric epithelial cells, interfere with the cell cycle, gastric cancer markers, cell migration, DNA response, and anti-apoptotic genes. This new study may offer a perspective to understand the interaction of these two oncogenic factors and their mechanism for enhancing the oncogenic activity of gastric epithelial cells through Gankyrin (41).

Based on the above foundation, Charu Sonkar performed experiments using the AGS and found that H. pylori infection significantly up-regulate the expression of ITK. Meanwhile, co-infection with EBV and H. pylori up-regulated EPHB6 and tyrosine protein kinase Fyn expression obviously. It was also demonstrated that co-infection of EBV with H. pylori enhanced gastric cancer cell proliferation and changes in cell morphology and survival through expression regulation of certain kinases and apoptosis-related genes. These observations may offer a clue to understand the mechanism of early gastric cancer progression. It is worth mentioning that, the variability induced by different strains of H. pylori has showed variable effects on cell proliferation. Accordingly, H. pylori does not seem to promote cell growth consistently and presents as a time-dependent and strain-dependent relationship (42).

Cell senescence

Besides several well-known mechanisms, Cai has come up with a new pathway in which cellular senescence plays an important role in transforming CAG into gastric cancer due to the infection of H. pylori (43). The available literatures indicated that H. pylori can induce cellular senescence by activating p21 through its cytotoxin-associated gene A, which is known as CagA (44). Although cell senescence is generally considered as an absolute barrier to tumorigenesis, the aged cells would secrete many proteins and create a distinct “senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP).” The SASP includes proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that elicit inflammatory responses with beneficial and detrimental consequences. For instance, the SASP may lead to immune suppression and promote the growth and invasion of tumor cells (45–47). The secretory phenotype can, therefore, activate the many inflammatory signals and transduction events, thereby facilitating cell proliferation, growth recurrence, and metastasis of tumors (48). The presence of aging cells might provide a valuable biomarker for assessing gastric cancer risk in patients with H. pylori related CAG and serve as the basis for endoscopic monitoring. By detecting the presence of aging cells in different precancerous lesions, Cai pointed that the distribution of aging cells was mainly concentrated in the atrophic area of the gastric mucosa. Moreover, they concluded that cellular senescence is a mechanism of H. pylori related CAG, and H. pylori promoted gastric epithelial cell senescence through C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2(CXCR 2) signaling. It has been proved that blocking CXCR2 in mucosa infected with H. pylori in mice model can delay the development of precancerous gastric lesions. Therefore, they have summarized that treatment with CXCR2 inhibitors in the H. pylori infection at early stage could dramatically minimize neutrophil infiltration, cellular senescence, and mucosal atrophy, which can delay gastric cancer progression (43).

Recently, interventions targeting cellular senescence have gained more and more attention, especially after considering that H. pylori eradication has shown no apparent improvement in gastric atrophy in some cases. This may be because the bacteria can induce cellular senescence even in the absence of an active infection by upregulation of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta, which may induce through NFKB1 to activate CXCR2 signaling (49). Moreover, some of the virulence factors of H. pylori may be related to cellular senescence induction. According to the available literature, H. pylori strains with a functional type IV secretion system and CagA exhibit a higher virulence, inducing remarkable immune responses, which is regarded associated with the development of gastric cancer (44). It follows that CagA could induce gastric carcinogenesis by facilitating senescence of the gastric mucosa, but this is yet to be supported by hard evidence.

In a word, cell senescence plays a critical role in the process of canceration from H. pylori related CAG to precancerous lesions and then finally to gastric cancer (50). This phenomenon may have an important clinical implication, although further investigation and studies are still needed to make it clear.

H. pylori eradication

Eradicating H. pylori is crucial for gastrointestinal diseases like dyspepsia, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcers, G-MALT lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. CAG patients with Hp positivity should receive eradication treatment. Nowadays, the first-line H. pylori eradication is proton pump inhibitor and colloidal bismuth plus two antibiotics for 10–14 days at home and abroad. High bacterial load, high gastric acidity, H. pylori strain, smoking, low compliance, overweight, and increasing antibiotic resistance are regarded as treatment failure factors (51).

Recent studies have revealed that vonoprazan-based triple therapy is to be a highly effective first-line regimen (52). It should be emphasized that carbon-13 urea breath test or gastroscopy supervision are still recommended for response evaluation after H. pylori eradication, while serology alone may not be valid for the assessment of the efficacy of eradication treatment (53).

Conclusion

Driven by H. pylori infection, IM progresses into gastric cancer under conditions of chronic inflammation, low pH, and other factors. Genetic mutations increase the risk of high-grade dysplasia and cancer, marking a critical step in Correa's cascade toward an irreversible pathway of gastric cancer development.

It is now widely accepted that H. pylori may promote gastric carcinogenesis through abnormal epigenetic changes in the host cells. Indeed, increasing evidence has supported the notion that gastric carcinogenesis has a closer relation with epigenetic rather than genetic alterations. H. pylori and its virulence factor as CagA up-regulate or suppress targeted gene expression, thereby improve gastric cancer risk. The discovery proposes new insights into the multifaceted molecular processes underlying gastric cancer development and also offers new epigenetic-based therapeutic strategies in gastric cancer.

H. pylori can increase opportunities for secondary EBV infection since the gastric epithelial cells begin to display extra EBV receptors like EphA2 and NMHC-IIA. This co-interaction implies us that H. pylori infection increases the odds of EBV positive gastric cancer and other EBV related cancers in host. Co-infection by H. pylori and EBV makes severe inflammation inside gastric tissues and finally improve gastric cancer risk. H. pylori and EBV, serving as pathogen-linked genes in cancerous conditions and gastric cancer, help to demonstrate the importance to know the impact of co-infection on gastric health.

In addition, cellular senescence is also newly discovered during the development of H. pylori related CAG into gastric cancer. H. pylori promotes gastric epithelial cell senescence through the activation of p21 and CXCR 2. Even with past infection of H. pylori, it still may trigger CXCR2 signaling to induce cellular senescence through upregulating the related cytokines like NFKB1. SASP originated from senescent cells promotes cell proliferation, tumor growth, recurrence and metastasis.

CAG significantly increases gastric cancer risk and should be taken seriously by clinicians. The progression from CAG to gastric cancer involves complex mechanisms, and future research still needed to explore deeper its mechanism, considering epidemiological variations among different ethnicities and regions. For high-risk individuals with CAG, early detection and regular follow-ups are valuable. Timely eradication should be initiated when H. pylori infection is confirmed; which not only reduces the incidence of gastric cancer, but also greatly enhances patient outcomes.

Author contributions

ZZ: Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SC: Writing – original draft. SL: Writing – original draft. YZ: Writing – original draft. LM: Writing – original draft. XZ: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Research Fund (8200100073/8210101308/8220102641/8230102561).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D. AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis: expert review. Gastroenterology. (2021) 161:1325–32.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Grantham T, Ramachandran R, Parvataneni S, Budh D, Gollapalli S, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer: Global Trends, Risk Factors And Premalignant Conditions. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. (2023) 13:100–6. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1252

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Botezatu A, Bodrug N. Chronic atrophic gastritis: an update on diagnosis. Med Pharm Rep. (2021) 94:7–14. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1887

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Massironi S, Zilli A, Elvevi A, Invernizzi P. The changing face of chronic autoimmune atrophic gastritis: an updated comprehensive perspective. Autoimmun Rev. (2019) 18:215–22. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.08.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. (1997) 69:1–631.

Google Scholar

6. Hooi JKY, Low MCH, To JCL, Mak HWF, Choi MM, Tam CCP, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. (2017) 153:420–9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lim NR, Chung WC. Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic atrophic gastritis and progression of gastric carcinogenesis. Korean J Gastroenterol. (2023) 82:171–9. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2023.097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Asaka M, Sugiyama T, Nobuta A, Kato M, Takeda H, Graham DY. Atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in Japan: results of a large multicenter study. Helicobacter. (2001) 6:294–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2001.00042.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2014) 23:700–13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hu HM, Tsai HJ, Ku HY, Lo SS, Shan YS, Chang HC, et al. Survival outcomes of management in metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:23142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02391-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K. The management of early gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. (2000) 9:17–22. doi: 10.1016/S0960-7404(00)00018-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kato M, Uedo N, Toth E, Shichijo S, Maekawa A, Kanesaka T, et al. Differences in image-enhanced endoscopic findings between Helicobacter pylori-associated and autoimmune gastritis. Endosc Int Open. (2021) 9:E22–30. doi: 10.1055/a-1287-9767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chew Y, Chung HY, Lin PY, Wu DC, Huang SK, Kao MC. Outer membrane vesicle production by Helicobacter pylori represents an approach for the delivery of virulence factors CagA, VacA and UreA into human gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:39412. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083942

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sakatani A, Hayashi Y, Saiki H, Kato M, Uema R, Inoue T, et al. A novel role for Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin-associated gene A in negative regulation of autophagy in human gastric cells. BMC Gastroenterol. (2023) 23:326. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02944-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang J, Wang W, Yan S, Li J, Wei H, Zhao W. CagA and VacA inhibit gastric mucosal epithelial cell autophagy and promote the progression of gastric precancerous lesions. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. (2022) 47:942–51. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210779

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Drnovsek J, Homan M, Zidar N, Smid LM. Pathogenesis and potential reversibility of intestinal metaplasia - a milestone in gastric carcinogenesis. Radiol Oncol. (2024) 58:186–95. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Yu F, He M, Li J, Wang H, Chen S, Zhang X, et al. Differential expression of α-enolase in clinical gastric tissues and cultured normal/cancer cells in response to Helicobacter pylori infection and cagA transfection. Medicina (Kaunas). (2022) 58:1453. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101453

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang J, Deng R, Chen S, Deng S, Hu Q, Xu B, et al. Helicobacter pylori CagA promotes immune evasion of gastric cancer by upregulating PD-L1 level in exosomes. iScience. (2023) 26:108414. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Koch MRA, Gong R, Friedrich V, Engelsberger V, Kretschmer L, Wanisch A, et al. CagA-specific gastric CD8(+) tissue-resident T cells control Helicobacter pylori during the early infection phase. Gastroenterology. (2023) 164:550–66. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.12.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Tannenbaum S, Archer M. A model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet. (1975) 2:58–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)90498-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Correa P. The biological model of gastric carcinogenesis. IARC Sci Publ. (2004) 157:301–10.

Google Scholar

22. Sun H, He T, Wu Y, Yuan H, Ning J, Zhang Z, et al. Cytotoxin-associated gene A-negative Helicobacter pylori promotes gastric mucosal CX3CR1(+) CD4(+) effector memory T cell recruitment in mice. Front Microbiol. (2022) 13:813774. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.813774

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rugge M, Farinati F, Baffa R, Sonego F, Di Mario F, Leandro G, et al. Gastric epithelial dysplasia in the natural history of gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Interdisciplinary Group on Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia. Gastroenterology. (1994) 107:1288–96. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90529-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hwang YJ, Kim N, Lee HS, Lee JB, Choi YJ, Yoon H, et al. Reversibility of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication - a prospective study for up to 10 years. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2018) 47:380–90. doi: 10.1111/apt.14424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. de Vries AC, van Grieken NC, Looman CW, Casparie MK, de Vries E, Meijer GA, et al. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology. (2008) 134:945–52. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tjandra D, Busuttil R A, Boussioutas A. Gastric intestinal metaplasia: challenges and the opportunity for precision prevention. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:53913. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153913

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gutierrez-Gonzalez L, Graham TA, Rodriguez-Justo M, Leedham SJ, Novelli MR, Gay LJ, et al. The clonal origins of dysplasia from intestinal metaplasia in the human stomach. Gastroenterology. (2011) 140:1251–60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Blair VR, McLeod M, Carneiro F, Coit DG, D'Addario JL, van Dieren JM, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:e386–97. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30219-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chen HN, Wang Z, Li X, Zhou ZG. Helicobacter pylori eradication cannot reduce the risk of gastric cancer in patients with intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia: evidence from a meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. (2016) 19:166–75. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0462-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mera RM, Bravo LE, Camargo MC, Bravo JC, Delgado AG, Romero-Gallo J, et al. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori infection as a determinant of progression of gastric precancerous lesions: 16-year follow-up of an eradication trial. Gut. (2018) 67:1239–46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311685

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Tsuyuki S, Takeshima H, Sekine S, Yamagata Y, Ando T, Yamashita S, et al. Comparable genetic alteration profiles between gastric cancers with current and past Helicobacter pylori infection. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:23443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02761-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Christodoulidis G, Koumarelas KE, Kouliou MN, Thodou E, Samara M. Gastric cancer in the Era of epigenetics. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:3381. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063381

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Chen P, Guo H, Wu X, Li J, Duan X, Ba Q, et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-204 by Helicobacter pylori augments the NF-κB signaling pathway in gastric cancer development and progression. Carcinogenesis. (2020) 41:430–41. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz143

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sacconi A, Biagioni F, Canu V, Mori F, Di Benedetto A, Lorenzon L, et al. miR-204 targets Bcl-2 expression and enhances responsiveness of gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2012) 3:e423. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ying Z, Li Y, Wu J, Zhu X, Yang Y, Tian H, et al. Loss of miR-204 expression enhances glioma migration and stem cell-like phenotype. Cancer Res. (2013) 73:990–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2895

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Yu Y, Yang YL, Chen XY, Chen ZY, Zhu JS, Zhang J. Helicobacter pylori-enhanced hnRNPA2B1 coordinates with PABPC1 to promote non-m(6)A translation and gastric cancer progression. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2024) 11:e2309712. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309712

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Naseem M, Barzi A, Brezden-Masley C, Puccini A, Berger MD, Tokunaga R, et al. Outlooks on Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. (2018) 66:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Fekadu S, Kanehiro Y, Kartika AV, Hamada K, Sakurai N, Mizote T, et al. Gastric epithelial attachment of Helicobacter pylori induces EphA2 and NMHC-IIA receptors for Epstein-Barr virus. Cancer Sci. (2021) 112:4799–811. doi: 10.1111/cas.15121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Gareayaghi N, Akkus S, Saribas S, Demiryas S, Ozbey D, Kepil N, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and Helicobacter pylori co-infection in patients with gastric cancer and duodenale ulcer. New Microbiol. (2021) 44:217–26.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Noh JH, Shin JY, Lee JH, Park YS, Lee IS, Kim GH, et al. Clinical significance of Epstein-Barr virus and Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric carcinoma. Gut Liver. (2023) 17:69–77. doi: 10.5009/gnl210593

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kashyap D, Baral B, Jakhmola S, Singh AK, Jha HC. Helicobacter pylori and Epstein-Barr virus coinfection stimulates aggressiveness in gastric cancer through the regulation of gankyrin. mSphere. (2021) 6:e75121. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00751-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Sonkar C, Verma T, Chatterji D, Jain AK, Jha HC. Status of kinases in Epstein-Barr virus and Helicobacter pylori coinfection in gastric cancer cells. BMC Cancer. (2020) 20:925. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07377-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Cai Q, Shi P, Yuan Y, Peng J, Ou X, Zhou W, et al. Inflammation-associated senescence promotes Helicobacter pylori-induced atrophic gastritis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 11:857–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.10.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Saito Y, Murata-Kamiya N, Hirayama T, Ohba Y, Hatakeyama M. Conversion of Helicobacter pylori CagA from senescence inducer to oncogenic driver through polarity-dependent regulation of p21. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:2157–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Krtolica A, Parrinello S, Lockett S, Desprez PY, Campisi J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2001) 98:12072–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211053698

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Murakami M, Qian LW, Sato N, Nagai E, et al. Radiation to stromal fibroblasts increases invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells through tumor-stromal interactions. Cancer Res. (2004) 64:3215–22. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2464

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Bavik C, Coleman I, Dean JP, Knudsen B, Plymate S, Nelson PS. The gene expression program of prostate fibroblast senescence modulates neoplastic epithelial cell proliferation through paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Res. (2006) 66:794–802. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. He S, Sharpless NE. Senescence in health and disease. Cell. (2017) 169:1000–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mejías-Luque R. Senescence: A novel driver of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric atrophy. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 11:887–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.12.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Zheng SY, Zhu L, Wu LY, Liu HR, Ma XP, Li Q, et al. Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic atrophic gastritis and cellular senescence. Helicobacter. (2023) 28:e12944. doi: 10.1111/hel.12944

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Lahner E, Carabotti M, Annibale B. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic gastritis. World J Gastroenterol. (2018) 24:2373–373 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kanu JE, Soldera J. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori with potassium competitive acid blockers: s systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. (2024) 30:1213–23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Lahner E, Bordi C, Di Giulio E, Caruana P, D'Ambra G, Milione M, et al. Role of Helicobacter pylori serology in atrophic body gastritis after eradication treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2002) 16:507–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01213.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar