Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Regulatory Science
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1501921

Network analysis of adverse event patterns following immunisation with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Real-world data from the European pharmacovigilance database EudraVigilance

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 2 LAQV/REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objectives: To analyse real-world safety data of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines within the European Economic Area (EEA), using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR), and to evaluate the variability in safety profiles between different vaccine versions. Methods: We utilised EudraVigilance data from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, focusing on Moderna (Spikevax) and Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty) vaccines against COVID-19. We performed descriptive statistics, co-occurrence analysis, and correspondence analysis to identify patterns and clusters of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). Results: We retrieved 993,199 ICSR (Moderna: 394,484; Pfizer: 605,794), with most reports related to women patients (69%) and non-healthcare professionals (65%). A total of 10,804 distinct AEFI terms were described across the retrieved ICSR, with a cumulative occurrence frequency of 3,558,219 (Moderna: 1,555,638; Pfizer: 2,031,828). The most prominent serious clusters included headache, fatigue, pyrexia, myalgia, arthralgia, malaise, nausea, and chills, which frequently co-occurred with vaccination failure. Specific AEFI like fever, chills, malaise, arthralgia, injection site pain, inflammation, and warmth were more often linked to Moderna, while Pfizer was more commonly associated with vaccination failure, menstrual disorders (heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea), and hypoesthesia. In older adults, serious clusters included confusional states, cerebrovascular accidents, and myocardial infarctions, while myocarditis and pericarditis were noted in younger males. Although rare, serious systemic AEFI, like anaphylactic reactions, were identified but require further causality evaluation. Conclusions: The overall safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for mass vaccination is supported, but continuous pharmacovigilance remains essential. Identified clusters of AEFI, particularly serious and systemic ones, although rare and potentially influenced by other underlying causes, underscore the need for continuous monitoring and further epidemiological investigations to explore potential causal relationships.

    Keywords: COVID-19, mRNA vaccines, Pharmacovigilance, Adverse drug events, Postmarketing drug surveillance, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems

    Received: 25 Sep 2024; Accepted: 16 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ferreira Da Silva, Lobo, Pereira, Morato, Polónia and Ribeiro-Vaz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Renato Ferreira Da Silva, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.