Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1495789

Core values and principles of General Practice and family medicine: perspectives of German GP residents -a cross-sectional study

Provisionally accepted
Andreas Christian Dreher Andreas Christian Dreher 1Jonathan Ko Jonathan Ko 1*Christine Becker Christine Becker 1*Martina Bischoff Martina Bischoff 2*Christian Förster Christian Förster 3*Tanja Jähnig Tanja Jähnig 4*Sandra Stengel Sandra Stengel 1Attila Altiner Attila Altiner 1*Simon Schwill Simon Schwill 1*
  • 1 University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2 University Hospital of Freiburg, Insitute of General Practice, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • 3 Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 4 University Hospital Ulm, Institute of General Practice, Ulm, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The core values and principles of General Practice (GP) and Family Medicine (FM) have been described by various international scientific societies, including the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians (WONCA). These values and principles, such as continuity of care, a bio-psycho-social approach, and hermeneutic case understanding, are also integrated into FM training programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and perspectives of FM trainees regarding the core values and principles of FM.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, new participants of the postgraduate FM training program KWBW Verbundweiterbildung plus© were asked to complete a self-developed questionnaire on their educational experiences, attitudes towards, and knowledge of core values in GP/FM. Specifically, participants were asked to identify the core values and principles associated with GP/FM. Qualitative analysis was used to explore the answers. Additionally, participants were required to define a set of core values, which were then analyzed semi-quantitatively and rated as correct, semi-correct, wrong, or unknown.Results: From a total of n = 303 trainees, n = 250 completed the questionnaire. Most (n=194) were in their third year of training. A third of the participants reported having studied core values in the past. The participants identified several core values and principles associated with GP/FM. The practical relevance and confirmation in becoming a FM doctor were well evaluatedThe study identified deficits in the active and passive knowledge of GP/FM core values among GP residents. An educational compact intervention about GP/GM core principles and values proved successful in its realization and implementation. To become a reflective practitioner in FM, it is crucial for GP residents to engage in self-reflection on evidence-based medicine, attitudes, core values, and principles. Therefore, core values should be addressed at the beginning of FM training and constantly referred to within the longitudinal curriculum. Family physicians should be continuously empowered to explicitly reflect on and discuss core principles that shape their professional identity.

    Keywords: Core Values, Core principles, family medicine, FM training, Germany, Reflective practitioner

    Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 06 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Dreher, Ko, Becker, Bischoff, Förster, Jähnig, Stengel, Altiner and Schwill. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jonathan Ko, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Christine Becker, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Martina Bischoff, University Hospital of Freiburg, Insitute of General Practice, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Christian Förster, Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, 72076, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
    Tanja Jähnig, University Hospital Ulm, Institute of General Practice, Ulm, Germany
    Attila Altiner, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Simon Schwill, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.